Page 1 of 1

I Might Have to Foe Palemoon

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2015 12:53 am
by Chip Z'Hoy
I can't take it anymore. I've never foed anyone but I honestly can't read his posts anymore. They are like black holes.

Re: I Might Have to Foe Palemoon

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2015 4:51 am
by LouDoo
They're pretty bad.

Hollywood and Rev are getting up there, too. It's like Neon never left.

Re: I Might Have to Foe Palemoon

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2015 5:09 am
by EvilRockPosh
I used to laugh at tym but now his posts just make me sad :cry:

Re: I Might Have to Foe Palemoon

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 4:43 pm
by Woosh
palemoon? more like moonmoon.

Re: I Might Have to Foe Palemoon

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 5:58 pm
by Gritt
LouDoo wrote:They're pretty bad.

Hollywood and Rev are getting up there, too. It's like Neon never left.
Watching them argue in the PC vs Mac thread is mesmerizing. Kinda like watching horses fucking.

Re: I Might Have to Foe Palemoon

Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:18 am
by SanityClause
I think Dym has me foe'd same as Sleazyrocker.

Re: I Might Have to Foe Palemoon

Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2015 1:50 pm
by SeminiferousButtNoid
I don't foe anyone unless they are spamming gay porn, shit pics, racist pics, etc. But by implication, that means palemong's posts are more acceptable that those. I must contemplate this more.

Re: I Might Have to Foe Palemoon

Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2015 4:29 pm
by MurrayFiend
I foe, but only in the event of supreme uselessness. parasite74 and RATTRules are both on my list.

Re: I Might Have to Foe Palemoon

Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2015 5:12 pm
by Gritt
MurrayFiend wrote:I foe, but only in the event of supreme uselessness. parasite74 and RATTRules are both on my list.
You mean scab kiss sucks isn't profound enough for you?

Re: I Might Have to Foe Palemoon

Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2015 2:01 am
by Chip Z'Hoy
I can't take him anymore. At least Matardo has entertainment value. I have been opposed to foeing like fuck until now but I think the atheism thread might be the last straw.

Image

Re: I Might Have to Foe Palemoon

Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2015 3:31 am
by caroline
MurrayFiend wrote:I foe, but only in the event of supreme uselessness. parasite74 and RATTRules are both on my list.
I concur.

Re: I Might Have to Foe Palemoon

Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2015 5:20 am
by MurrayFiend
Chip Z'Hoy wrote:I can't take him anymore. At least Matardo has entertainment value. I have been opposed to foeing like fuck until now but I think the atheism thread might be the last straw.

Image
But What if your wrong?

Re: I Might Have to Foe Palemoon

Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2015 8:57 am
by Machado
Chip Z'Hoy wrote:I can't take it anymore. I've never foed anyone but I honestly can't read his posts anymore. They are like black holes.
Do it already. Why create a new thread? Are you looking for validation from the masses? Like anybody gives 2 shits what you do around here.

Get over yourself!

Re: I Might Have to Foe Palemoon

Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2015 6:29 pm
by Chip Z'Hoy
Machado wrote:Like anybody gives 2 shits what you do around here.
2 shits? I wish! That's a lot of liquid gold.

Re: I Might Have to Foe Palemoon

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 11:41 am
by WhiteHouseSubsAC
:lol:

Matardo owned again!

Re: I Might Have to Foe Palemoon

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 1:35 pm
by Machado
WhiteHouseSubsAC wrote::lol:

Matardo owned again!
This coming from someone who believes "crossing swords" with Chip and NittGritt should be known as a secret handshake.

GOON!!!

Re: I Might Have to Foe Palemoon

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 3:46 pm
by Gritt
Machado wrote:
WhiteHouseSubsAC wrote::lol:

Matardo owned again!
This coming from someone who believes "crossing swords" with Chip and NittGritt should be known as a secret handshake.

GOON!!!
Oh Matardo. See, here is a free lesson in flaming. A good flame uses something a person has said or has revealed about themselves. For example: you leave shit floating in your toilet for hours and call it liquid gold. That leads to jokes about liquid gold. On the other hand, you come up with attempts at flames that have no real ties to the person you are attempting to flame. I have never seen Chip's penis. I have never seen Subsy's penis. They haven't seen mine. We also have not had our collective penises in the same room, let alone zip code. Therefore, your lame attempts at flaming come across as desperate and pathetic, much like your love life.

Re: I Might Have to Foe Palemoon

Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2015 8:28 pm
by LouDoo
Chip Z'Hoy wrote:
Machado wrote:Like anybody gives 2 shits what you do around here.
2 shits? I wish! That's a lot of liquid gold.
Lmao.

The liquid gold jokes will never get old.

Re: I Might Have to Foe Palemoon

Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 6:51 am
by WhiteHouseSubsAC
ORO LIQUIDO!

Re: I Might Have to Foe Palemoon

Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 10:36 am
by eddie lee roth
LouDoo wrote:
Chip Z'Hoy wrote:
Machado wrote:Like anybody gives 2 shits what you do around here.
2 shits? I wish! That's a lot of liquid gold.
Lmao.

The liquid gold jokes will never get old.
Any truth to the rumors he's taking Velveeta to court?

Re: I Might Have to Foe Palemoon

Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 10:57 am
by Landshark2000
Chip Z'Hoy wrote: I can't take it anymore. I've never foed anyone but I honestly can't read his posts anymore. They are like black holes.
Much like the one between his ears ...

Re: I Might Have to Foe Palemoon

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 3:51 pm
by Gazpacho
SeminiferousButtNoid wrote:I don't foe anyone unless they are spamming gay porn, shit pics, racist pics, etc. But by implication, that means palemong's posts are more acceptable that those. I must contemplate this more.
So posting a pic of a guy sucking shit off a bootlips dick will get you to foe me?

Google, here I cum.

Re: I Might Have to Foe Palemoon

Posted: Sat May 02, 2015 1:52 am
by David_Lee_Halen
Chip Z'Hoy wrote:I can't take it anymore. I've never foed anyone but I honestly can't read his posts anymore. They are like black holes.
I concur. In some sort of way though, I do appreciate dym in the same sort of way as when you burn an annoying insect with a magnifying glass.