Schilling would be next on my list. His postseason dominance gets him there for me. I use that same criteria with Jack Morris.killeverything wrote:That's a good question. I was never a Morris fan but I understand the debate. I believe Curt Schilling warrants consideration. His records are just below the minimum ( remember how awful the Astros and Philly were ), except if you factor in his post-season success it tilts in his favor.Gritt wrote:Next hall of question that I'll throw out for debate: best non-steroid pitcher not in the hall that should be? My vote is Jack Morris.
That's kind of what would be the argument for Andy Pettite if he didn't use PEDs. Andy immediately admitted and apologized. That also might work in his favor.
Using the low win total because they played for awful teams. Bret Saberhagen makes a strong case for induction also.
The Mussina, Cone, ( possibly Morris ) and Tiant just miss the cut. Tiant was better than a few of some HOF pitchers. Something about him doesn't scream HOF'er. I dunno.
JC Ramirez acquired by Seattle.
Supposedly the Nats are close to getting Kimbrel from SD and TX leads for Hammels. Houston is going all out to land Cole too.
***Apparently the Dodgers let teams know Puig is available in the right deal.
I don't really care about win totals (although I know real voters do) because you can be dominant on a shit team and have a losing record.
When I think all time greats I don't think of Cone and Mussina or even Pettite. They were very good but if I had to win a game and I had to choose between them or guys like Schilling and Morris, they aren't getting the ball.
Saberhagen is a real interesting one because we will just never know how great he could have been due to his injuries.