Nice to see you replied with a bunch of nothing.EddieVanHeineken wrote:yeahbuddy wrote:Pretty much.roxxxtar wrote:Ronda is a cash cow for Dana. As long as she stays like that, she's not going to lose.
Funny how with each fight they sell that particular fighter as her "toughest to date" & sell it really well. Unfortunately ALL of these other fighters are good not great at one thing while Rousey is very good/great at 3 or 4 things.
How else are they supposed to "sell" the fight? " The odds are 12 to 1 and this chick hasn't fought a top 10 opponent...please give us your money!"
They did the same thing with George St. Pierre, Mike Tyson, Lennox Lewis, Mahammad Ali etc. It's all part of the fight game.
The fact of the matter is, is that this chick beat two of Ronda's friend's and said some implied shit about Ronda's father. Bam! That sells a fight. Remember when no one gave a fuck about the McMann fight because McMann did absolutely zero to sell the fight. We can all pretend that we want MMA to be a sport where title shots are earned and such but people don't spend money on the PPV's for those fights.
Ronda is right, why should she have to budge an inch for somebody that was busted cheating? Cyborg has been saying for the 2 years she has been with Invicta that she would drop to 35 there. It's been two years and she hasn't made a single attempt. It's on her to make the fight, not the biggest star in MMA.
Answer the question- why do they sell it as her toughest to date when everybody knows it isn't? She fights nothing but average mma fighters that are good at what they do, not great. You seriously think Meisha Tate has improved so much that another Rousey fight will be challenging for her?