Metal Sludge Gossip Board

Brian Hoyer is visiting the Jets.

Machado wrote:Does this list of former NFL QB's have a common denominator?

Johnny Manziel

Indeed they do. All busts in the NFL. All failed to live up to expectations but also were never NFL material. Just good college QB's who felt the NFL owed them a living.

I don't know about the backgrounds of the others, but Manziel I don't think really gives a fuck about making a living in the NFL.

WTF wrote:

Machado wrote:Does this list of former NFL QB's have a common denominator?

Johnny Manziel

Indeed they do. All busts in the NFL. All failed to live up to expectations but also were never NFL material. Just good college QB's who felt the NFL owed them a living.

I don't know about the backgrounds of the others, but Manziel I don't think really gives a fuck about making a living in the NFL.

The kid is a socialite. He wants to mug for the TMZ cameras and make sure someone knows how many Hollywood clubs he visits per week.
Then I read he orders "red bull and vodka"
Talk about being unoriginal and not knowing how to drink like an adult. That NFL career is in the rear view!!!

Well, I guess Philly is all in on a QB this year.

WhiteHouseSubsAC wrote:Well, I guess Philly is all in on a QB this year.

"The Eagles gave up the No. 8 overall pick, third- and fourth-round picks in 2016, a first-round pick next year and a second-round pick in 2018. They also receive a fourth-round pick next year."

-------------------------

They're adding depth at the position like it's the D-Line. They're giving up everything for QB's in what seems to be a horrible QB draft. I'm not sold on Goff or Wentz but they're definitely not worth anything close to the price they're paying and that's just the drafting price.
Then Philly don't have "A" guy, saying they're fine with either....I hope that's a ploy, normally you give up all those pic's for a player you want bad. Not just being COOL with whatever one is left when they pick.

Josh Norman signs with Skins...

http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york-giants ... ice-a-year


Fuck,

One, how in the hell do the Skins have any cap room? Thought they would be in trouble? Guess not.. Of all the fuckin teams this dude could sign with..


Man, fuck,, this blows... Dude is good. Course, Dallas couldn't make a play at him, FUCK YOU JERRY JONES.

He's a damn good CB, but not worth what the 'Skins just shelled out.

That said, I would've loved to hold on to him for one more year under the franchise tag, just for another playoff push.

I don't care what the Skins paid for him... I hope they get in salary cap hell..

I am pissed that Dallas and Romo have to face him twice a fuckin season now.

I'm sure ESPN and their ilk won't hype up Norman vs OBJ twice a year at all

every single website is promoting the draft by having their very own mock drafts. seems like this trend
has been going on for months and months. so much so that i thought the draft was beginning last week.
S.O.B.
still a few more days until the draft beings. hurry up and get this over with already. UNREAL build up
these days with social media, the internet and so called draft experts.

Brady now suspended again. What a crock.

I'm not surprised, really.
I still think he didn't do anything near worthy of such a punishment.
But what are you gonna do?

Pierce Foreskin wrote:I'm not surprised, really.
I still think he didn't do anything near worthy of such a punishment.
But what are you gonna do?

IMO, destroying his cell phone should have resulted in a suspension. that act put him in the category of, "failed to cooperate". which means he
was guilty, the evidence on the phone would have been shocking to his fans, etc..

Machado wrote:

Pierce Foreskin wrote:I'm not surprised, really.
I still think he didn't do anything near worthy of such a punishment.
But what are you gonna do?

IMO, destroying his cell phone should have resulted in a suspension. that act put him in the category of, "failed to cooperate". which means he was guilty, the evidence on the phone would have been shocking to his fans, etc..

You know this how - about "the evidence on his phone would have been shocking""?

cantstopthemusic wrote:

Machado wrote:

Pierce Foreskin wrote:I'm not surprised, really.
I still think he didn't do anything near worthy of such a punishment.
But what are you gonna do?

IMO, destroying his cell phone should have resulted in a suspension. that act put him in the category of, "failed to cooperate". which means he was guilty, the evidence on the phone would have been shocking to his fans, etc..

You know this how - about "the evidence on his phone would have been shocking""?

the proof is in the pudding. brady willingly destroyed his phone.
ask yourself why he would do that besides the obvious-brady had information on that phone that was damaging to either himself or the Pats organization.
get rid of phone, destroy the phone, etc...nobody finds out exactly what Brady did in this case.

Machado wrote:

cantstopthemusic wrote:

Machado wrote:
IMO, destroying his cell phone should have resulted in a suspension. that act put him in the category of, "failed to cooperate". which means he was guilty, the evidence on the phone would have been shocking to his fans, etc..

You know this how - about "the evidence on his phone would have been shocking""?

the proof is in the pudding. brady willingly destroyed his phone.
ask yourself why he would do that besides the obvious-brady had information on that phone that was damaging to either himself or the Pats organization.
get rid of phone, destroy the phone, etc...nobody finds out exactly what Brady did in this case.

You didn't explain anything that would be "shocking."

You're assuming and talking out your ass.

cantstopthemusic wrote:
You didn't explain anything that would be "shocking."

You're assuming and talking out your ass.

you want me to walk you through the crime he is guilty of? no thanks. i won't do that.
just do the math. add up a pieces. common sense says Brady is guilty, so he destroyed
the phone. why destroy your phone? does he have a habit of destroying phones? i think not.
he might as well tossed the murder weapon into the lake

Machado wrote:

cantstopthemusic wrote:
You didn't explain anything that would be "shocking."

You're assuming and talking out your ass.

you want me to walk you through the crime he is guilty of? no thanks. i won't do that.
just do the math. add up a pieces. common sense says Brady is guilty, so he destroyed
the phone. why destroy your phone? does he have a habit of destroying phones? i think not.
he might as well tossed the murder weapon into the lake

Yes, I do.

He was never charged with (or accused of committing) a "crime."

You go ahead and explain this "crime" along with the statute number.

Take your time.

cantstopthemusic wrote:

Machado wrote:

cantstopthemusic wrote:
You didn't explain anything that would be "shocking."

You're assuming and talking out your ass.

you want me to walk you through the crime he is guilty of? no thanks. i won't do that.
just do the math. add up a pieces. common sense says Brady is guilty, so he destroyed
the phone. why destroy your phone? does he have a habit of destroying phones? i think not.
he might as well tossed the murder weapon into the lake

Yes, I do.

He was never charged with (or accused of committing) a "crime."

You go ahead and explain this "crime" along with the statute number.

Take your time.

Bob Kraft over here

Brady failed to cooperate. Brady destroyed his phone. Of course he was not accused of a crime. Ever heard of a backroom deal?
Everybody here saves face. The golden boy retains his image and is only guilty of destroying his phone. Which is not very
environmentally friendly

Should he have sold it on ebay or CL instead?

The term "crime" was misused by you.

You can't spin it into something it never was.

Ideal gas law + no concrete evidence = bullshit suspension

cantstopthemusic wrote:

Machado wrote:

Pierce Foreskin wrote:I'm not surprised, really.
I still think he didn't do anything near worthy of such a punishment.
But what are you gonna do?

IMO, destroying his cell phone should have resulted in a suspension. that act put him in the category of, "failed to cooperate". which means he was guilty, the evidence on the phone would have been shocking to his fans, etc..

You know this how - about "the evidence on his phone would have been shocking""?

Only thing that would've been shocking is if there weren't any nude photos of his wife on there.

Pierce Foreskin wrote:

cantstopthemusic wrote:

Machado wrote:
IMO, destroying his cell phone should have resulted in a suspension. that act put him in the category of, "failed to cooperate". which means he was guilty, the evidence on the phone would have been shocking to his fans, etc..

You know this how - about "the evidence on his phone would have been shocking""?

Only thing that would've been shocking is if there weren't any nude photos of his wife on there.

tbh, i think the wifey is overrated. but that's just me.

I would never give my employer my private phone in the case of a workplace investigation. Only if the police came to me with a warrant (ie as part of an actual criminal investigation, not a breach of workplace discipline) would I do anything short of telling them to fuck off.

Machado wrote:

cantstopthemusic wrote:
You didn't explain anything that would be "shocking."

You're assuming and talking out your ass.

you want me to walk you through the crime he is guilty of? no thanks. i won't do that.
just do the math. add up a pieces. common sense says Brady is guilty, so he destroyed
the phone. why destroy your phone? does he have a habit of destroying phones? i think not.
he might as well tossed the murder weapon into the lake

1) Tom Brady has never been accused of a criminal act, he's been accused of breaking an NFL rule.
2) There could be any number of other personal or business things on the phone that had nothing to do with deflating footballs but which he dism't want strangers or the NFL seeing.

NFL Draft 2016 begins today

Biggest winners/losers to be declared 5 seconds after the pick. Not years later because
the experts are always correct, LOL!!!

Can't wait to see how the Browns fuck it up again this year!

Welp, Dallas already fucked up.. Fucking idiots..

I'm just waiting to see where Derrick Henry ends up.

cantstopthemusic wrote:

Machado wrote:

cantstopthemusic wrote:
You didn't explain anything that would be "shocking."

You're assuming and talking out your ass.

you want me to walk you through the crime he is guilty of? no thanks. i won't do that.
just do the math. add up a pieces. common sense says Brady is guilty, so he destroyed
the phone. why destroy your phone? does he have a habit of destroying phones? i think not.
he might as well tossed the murder weapon into the lake

Yes, I do.

He was never charged with (or accused of committing) a "crime."

You go ahead and explain this "crime" along with the statute number.

Take your time.

First off, they looked at every phone on the staff he would have sent a text too.

Secondly, he bought a new phone and got rid of the old after he was questioned.

Third, if some crook like Goodell wanted my phone I'd tell him to fuck off. Him or anyone, without a court order you're not seeing the shit on my phone. Nude animal pictures and personal conversations, it don't prove guilt. My phone is my personal shit I'm not giving it to anyone, it has nothing to do with guilt. More like protection of my privacy act.

Fuck Goodell, Like machado would just hand his phone over. This shit is so trivial it's an ego quest for Goodell since the judge pulled the suspension. The Pat's got fucked enough.


If he's on Brady about his phone, how come Goodell destroyed and didn't release the PSI data taken last year? Because it proved Goodell was wrong.