Dump Shithole

[radiobed]

Cite one then. It should be easy.

I already did:

Oh and btw, I showed the statistics on the 9th circuit a few pages back, I was fairly clear.

http://www.bankrate.com/rates/interest- ... -rate.aspx

[Bianca]

Joe, you know you're lying about the lender/borrower snafu, it wasn't the first time you seemed confused on that. Regardless, I have a more important challenge for you. You seem to believe you know what you're talking about and what's right for the country, why waste your time on only people that agree with you. Why not share your wisdom with all the "dummies" that vote%d in Orange Hitler?!?

I challenge you to spend all your political posting time at say Breitbart. The site is now bigger than PornHub. Help all those disillusioned Trumptards find their way!! Keep us updated on where you're posting. Let's see how you do in unfriendly waters. I predict those silly Trumptards will have you quickly back here with your tail between your legs.

Stay at Bratfart forums then, and stop posting here.

[radiobed]

And what is with you Trumpies constantly trying to make yourselves look like the victims or underdogs? You're given equal opportunity to defend yourself here and you're failing. You look like an idiot. So what do you do? Pretend like the cards are stacked against you and everything is unfair.

Chip, I'm not sure where I claimed I was the victim or underdog. I'm happy to argue with Joe and then you/Danzig/exit/etc in his defense. I don't expect any of you to claim I'm "winning" and I could careless.

I just challenged Joe to do what I happily do when I have time here. He's making such amazing points!! Time to use it to convert stupid Trumptards. Seriously, you wouldn't enjoy following him there??

[Danzig in the Dark]

Cite one then. It should be easy.

I already did:

http://www.bankrate.com/rates/interest- ... -rate.aspx

Explain exactly how that contradicts his position.

[Chip Z'Hoy]

Chip, I'm not sure where I claimed I was the victim or underdog. I'm happy to argue with Joe and then you/Danzig/exit/etc in his defense. I don't expect any of you to claim I'm "winning" and I could careless.

I just challenged Joe to do what I happily do when I have time here. He's making such amazing points!! Time to use it to convert stupid Trumptards. Seriously, you wouldn't enjoy following him there??

I'm not defending DRJ--he doesn't need my help. I'm commenting on your stupidity.

Also, there are plenty of Trumptards here. None of them are capable of defending themselves when challenged. You are among them. Too bad, so sad. I guess you don't have strength in numbers after all?

[DEATH ROW JOE]

Joe, you know you're lying about the lender/borrower snafu, it wasn't the first time you seemed confused on that.

LMFAO, you're desperate and an obvious liar. It's clear from the context that the Treasury is borrowing and attracting lenders. Good luck finding anything to support your lie that I'm confused on how the Fed works. Perhaps you are thinking of Paul Ryan who said the following in a widely ridiculed Ezra Klein interview from 2010:

"I think literally that if we raised the federal funds rate by a point, it would help push money into the economy, as right now, the safest play is to stay with the federal money and federal paper."
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-k ... o_for.html

I challenge you to spend all your political posting time at say Breitbart.

You fucking dunce. I post to right wing sites frequently.

[radiobed]

Cite one then. It should be easy.

I already did:

http://www.bankrate.com/rates/interest- ... -rate.aspx

Explain exactly how that contradicts his position.

Read the fucking thread if you're interested. Joe has already acknowledged and claimed he meant lenders.

[radiobed]

I'm not defending DRJ--he doesn't need my help. I'm commenting on your stupidity.

Also, there are plenty of Trumptards here. None of them are capable of defending themselves when challenged. You are among them. Too bad, so sad. I guess you don't have strength in numbers after all?

In your alternative reality, Joe is "pwning" me, Trump is braindead and you're a fucking genius!!

[Danzig in the Dark]

I already did:

http://www.bankrate.com/rates/interest- ... -rate.aspx

Explain exactly how that contradicts his position.

Read the fucking thread if you're interested. Joe has already acknowledged and claimed he meant lenders.

I did. You explained nothing. This is what you do all the time: you dodge.

I'm not defending DRJ--he doesn't need my help. I'm commenting on your stupidity.

Also, there are plenty of Trumptards here. None of them are capable of defending themselves when challenged. You are among them. Too bad, so sad. I guess you don't have strength in numbers after all?

In your alternative reality, Joe is "pwning" me, Trump is braindead and you're a fucking genius!!

In reality, DRJ is 'pwning' you, Trump is brain dead and and nobody has to be a genius for either.

[Chip Z'Hoy]

In your alternative reality, Joe is "pwning" me, Trump is braindead and you're a fucking genius!!

Certainly not a genius. You think it takes a genius to pwn you?

But you got two things right. Congrats! First time for everything.

[DEATH ROW JOE]

I already did:

http://www.bankrate.com/rates/interest- ... -rate.aspx

Explain exactly how that contradicts his position.

Read the fucking thread if you're interested. Joe has already acknowledged and claimed he meant lenders.

Dumb ass, I addressed that by showing that the Fed's Dec rate hike did not lead to higher Treasury rates. Treasury rates rose the day after the Nov 8 election and were unchanged after the Fed's December rate hike. Treasury rates rose because Trump won. Again, post is right here.

[Danzig in the Dark]

He brags about his job in the 'finance sector' and his appreciation and respect for facts, numbers and statistics but never actually posts any. I would think when he calls DRJ out for providing 'bogus' statistics, he would understand he is obligated to provide the 'real' statistics or be mercilessly mocked and ridiculed for his stupidity.

[SebastianLeeDanzig]

How do you like being blatantly lied to by the president? Think it's cool? No big deal his justifications of policy are evidently made-up?

The truth is, none of you even really believe half this garbage Joe posts daily. People like Joe & Turner are just political pawns for democratic talking points. It's no different than republican pawns that attacked every little thing they could on Obama.

Huh? I wasn't referencing anything DRJ said anywhere. There's endless examples of Trump lying, but for argument's sake let's just keep it down to the last non-existent Islamist terrorist attacks, while failing to acknowledge real white supremacist terror. That's not attacking "every little thing", that's not media propaganda, that's evident, factual lies to deceive the public. How can you support this person based on purely ideological optimism about the future economy (not backed by any explicit statistics)?

[exitflagger]

There are no stats or figures that can paint Trump as anything but a fucking miserable dolt. It's only going to get worse and more surreal in his brazen groping for power.

[DEATH ROW JOE]

Opening Line from the 2021 Inaugural Address:
My fellow Americans, our long national nightmare is over.

[Luminiferous]

I just challenged Joe to do what I happily do when I have time here. He's making such amazing points!! Time to use it to convert stupid Trumptards.

Could really care less about your little spat with DRJ, but why should he waste his time? It's obvious from your posts you will never believe anything negative towards the numbers towards Drumpf, much like the idiots on Brietbart...

The idiots over there are claiming there WAS a Muslim terrorist attack in Sweden on Friday, that the entire media ignored, the DHS and CIA said nothing about it to cover it up and Drumpf blew the lid off the whole cover up thanks to Faux News!!
They don't need pictures or proof (like they demanded from the Sandy Hook massacre/Obama gun grab/false flag) they just need Drumpf to tell them what to believe..

To help cement the whack jobs who are swallowing every bit of orange Kool-Aid, Drumpf had a supporter come onstage at his rally this weekend, supposedly spur of the moment, except that the guy blew his cover with his own Twitter post he was meeting Drumpf before (as well as the Secret Service allows NO ONE near the president on a stage unless they have been extremely vetted) who tells the world he salutes a cardboard cut out of Drumpf and prays to it every day....
Trumptarditus has no cure...

[Mojo]

To help cement the whack jobs who are swallowing every bit of orange Kool-Aid, Drumpf had a supporter come onstage at his rally this weekend, supposedly spur of the moment, except that the guy blew his cover with his own Twitter post he was meeting Drumpf before (as well as the Secret Service allows NO ONE near the president on a stage unless they have been extremely vetted) who tells the world he salutes a cardboard cut out of Drumpf and prays to it every day....
Trumptarditus has no cure...

That whole thing was so pathetic. You could tell it was staged the second it started. He'll be walking through crowds, staging the healing of leprosy, next.

[Chip Z'Hoy]

Trumpies:

Real massacres are fake.

Fake massacres are real.

[DEATH ROW JOE]

[Turner Coates]

[DEATH ROW JOE]

[grishnak boss]

They steal our jobs!!!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/won ... 734fcda9e8

[exitflagger]

There are a few things about his speech mannerisms that make me want to go postal but the one that's getting on my nerves most is his empty-headed repetition of the term "extreme vetting" and the way he pronounces "vetting" as "vudding". "Extreme vudding" is such a fucking dog whistle. Not discrimination based on religion but just... you know... "vudding".

Also, the air pudding thought content when he is ostensibly saying something of substance. He says shit like "We will be doing very, very good things and we will bring you up to date on those things when they happen. We're also doing very, very important things to work against the very, very bad things." He sounds exactly like a 7 year old kid pretending to be a politician, that's no exaggeration.

Take worthless adverbs and superlatives out of his vocabulary and the motherfucker would be rendered mute.

[Luminiferous]

Trumpies:

Real massacres are fake.

Fake massacres are real.

How sad is it that it has come to that here in America?

Sandy Hook was a hoax to take guns away since the authorities didn't parade out photos of the bullet riddled bodies of children, but Bowling Green and Sweden attacks are real because Drumpf and one of his bimbos said so...

[vlad]

There are a few things about his speech mannerisms that make me want to go postal but the one that's getting on my nerves most is his empty-headed repetition of the term "extreme vetting" and the way he pronounces "vetting" as "vudding". "Extreme vudding" is such a fucking dog whistle. Not discrimination based on religion but just... you know... "vudding".

Also, the air pudding thought content when he is ostensibly saying something of substance. He says shit like "We will be doing very, very good things and we will bring you up to date on those things when they happen. We're also doing very, very important things to work against the very, very bad things." He sounds exactly like a 7 year old kid pretending to be a politician, that's no exaggeration.

Take worthless adverbs and superlatives out of his vocabulary and the motherfucker would be rendered mute.

Some wag on the internet pointed out that Koko the gorilla has a larger vocabulary than him. Over a 1000 words in sign language.

[exitflagger]

Trump is now taking a brave and controversial stand against "bigotry and anti-Semitism". Everybody stand up and applaud!

I bet right now he's crowing about how that takes care of those pesky comparisons to Hitler.

[radiobed]

Could really care less about your little spat with DRJ, but why should he waste his time? It's obvious from your posts you will never believe anything negative towards the numbers towards Drumpf, much like the idiots on Breitbart[/b]

I've actually stated here I have concerns about Trump growing government. I also have concerns about whether he'll be able to institute some of the economic policies a lot of us are optimistic about.

To be clear, the vast majority of news I read and follow is from non-partisan economic analysts. Boring, technical news. I explained my background but apparently that was me bragging so I'll leave it there.

Cable news and even local news in general is just an apparatus of each party today. Watch Fox News or read Breitbart and you'll generally hear one side, watch CNN or read NY Times and you'll hear the other side. Discrediting one and accepting the other is not giving you the truth but rather what you want to hear.

You called Breitbart idiots. Danzig/Chip/Joe/etc. call me an idiot and claim they constantly "pwn" me. A lot of you call Trump a dunce. Romney was also a racist dunce. Fox News is just lies.

You all are unwilling to acknowledge and discuss both sides. Instead you pretend everyone ideologically opposed to you is somehow just stupid, braindead, racist, (enter your favorite) phobia. Is this actually true??

Well Breitbart is a major player and just passed PornHub and ESPN in rankings. FoxNews is clobbering CNN. Trump is president. We have a republican majority in senate, house and governorship. The stock market is optimistic based on the policies these "idiots" want to implement.

At what point do you start to reconsider some of your preconceived notions or things you hear on a democratic propoganda arm??? In reality, you don't seem to be winning. On here, Joe/Chip/Danzig and others can claim otherwise but they don't seem to be living in reality.

[radiobed]

Huh? I wasn't referencing anything DRJ said anywhere. There's endless examples of Trump lying, but for argument's sake let's just keep it down to the last non-existent Islamist terrorist attacks, while failing to acknowledge real white supremacist terror. That's not attacking "every little thing", that's not media propaganda, that's evident, factual lies to deceive the public.

Look, I didn't follow the Sweden comment very closely. To me it's just a distraction from what's important and really just a way for those opposed to trump to pile on. Did he misspeak and try to cover up, probably. Does it really matter, not really.

Every president has made mistakes, there's literally thousands of articles picking on Obama and his mistakes like this from sites opposed to him:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism ... and-trump/

But hey, I know, Breitbart...must be all lies, even though they are actual quotes. Yet some phony anonymously leaked conversation by Robert Reich is legit!!

Just know most of you are actually progressive, the mainstream media is not. They will choose a Hillary over a Bernie if it ever really comes down to it. You saw it a little bit this past year in a race that never got too close.

[SebastianLeeDanzig]

Look, I didn't follow the Sweden comment very closely. To me it's just a distraction from what's important and really just a way for those opposed to trump to pile on. Did he misspeak and try to cover up, probably. Does it really matter, not really.

Every president has made mistakes, there's literally thousands of articles picking on Obama and his mistakes like this from sites opposed to him:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism ... and-trump/

But hey, I know, Breitbart...must be all lies, even though they are actual quotes. Yet some phony anonymously leaked conversation by Robert Reich is legit!!

Just know most of you are actually progressive, the mainstream media is not. They will choose a Hillary over a Bernie if it ever really comes down to it. You saw it a little bit this past year in a race that never got too close.

You're arguing a straw man again. Nobody's talking about the mainstream media. I'm talking facts. Trump was lying and there's evidence. He's actively deceiving the public to justify actions against Muslims, in this instance by distorting reality in Europe. It's not picking on Trump for misspeaking, and claiming so disqualifies you from any serious discussion about this government. That's not opinion by the "fake news" either, as the right is now trying to discredit any journalistic or scientific dissent.

Which is another thing that can be objectively evaluated, by the way. And applying factual standards, the NY Times is not on the level of Breitbart and it's not simply a matter of ideology. Claiming so is ideology itself. There is such a thing as communication sciences, you know.

Still the most baffling thing to me is your statement about this being distraction from what's important. How can human rights issues and a free press being undermined by verifiable misinformation not be considered important, compared to, well, anything? Do you really fail to see the big picture here? This isn't about Sweden getting their feelings hurt.

[exitflagger]

At what point do you start to reconsider some of your preconceived notions or things you hear on a democratic propoganda arm???

The "democratic propaganda arm" I go by is Trump's own words, mostly spat out in 140 extremely idiotic characters or less. Tell me exactly who on the evil democrat side of things is forcing President Fuckface to do that?

In reality, you don't seem to be winning.

I can't imagine there could be a more humiliating designation on this board than yours: Moggio-lite. Congrats on that one.

SAD!