https://forums.metalsludge.tv/forums/
https://forums.metalsludge.tv/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=336454
Translation:Chip Z'Hoy wrote:Trump: "This is just an excuse the Democrats are making for losing. But also they knew about it ahead of time and should've done something. Make America Great Again!"
The funny/sad reality is that they don't give a fuck about being consistent or making sense. They will trash the Sanders because the FBI is investing them while holding a sign that says "stop the witch hunt." The argument they are making about Obama does not even make sense. Russia was trying to hurt Clinton and bringing attention to it would have helped Clinton. There is no question about it. But Trump & Co. argue that Obama was not more aggressive because he wanted to help Clinton. Hopefully the Senate tax cut/Medicaid cut won't have the votes this week and Trump will have another defeat to blame on Obama.Luminiferous wrote:I'm interested in how Drumpftards handle the news that has been announced the last few days and how it will spin...
Now that Obama's name has been thrown into the Russia mix as knowing and not really doing anything about it above a few menial sanctions and who supposedly gave the info to the incoming Drumpf administration who did nothing with it (for obvious reasons) do they now admit or believe that Russia fucked with the 2016 presidential election since Obama allegedly knew about it or is this still just a "witch hunt?"
It has been revealed that Bernie Sanders' wife and Bernie have hired attorney's to handle an ongoing FBI investigation into a loan she received, do they believe the FBI is now trustworthy and competent now that they are investigating Sanders?
Or if they're found they didn't violate any laws are the FBI protecting the Dems?
Now they're saying that the ban will be reinstated in 72 hours.That-guy wrote:The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the travel ban case in October. Until then, it's still blocked.
Republicans probably know that like the healthcare bill, this is going to continually be swatted down, but they have to appear like they're continually trying. It's for show for their base.That-guy wrote:Now they're saying that the ban will be reinstated in 72 hours.That-guy wrote:The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the travel ban case in October. Until then, it's still blocked.
Benedict Orange seems to want this logic to go both ways. Either there was interference or there wasn't, Donald. Can you imagine him trying to untangle his own conflicting statements in a hearing?DEATH ROW JOE wrote:The funny/sad reality is that they don't give a fuck about being consistent or making sense. They will trash the Sanders because the FBI is investing them while holding a sign that says "stop the witch hunt." The argument they are making about Obama does not even make sense. Russia was trying to hurt Clinton and bringing attention to it would have helped Clinton. There is no question about it. But Trump & Co. argue that Obama was not more aggressive because he wanted to help Clinton. Hopefully the Senate tax cut/Medicaid cut won't have the votes this week and Trump will have another defeat to blame on Obama.Luminiferous wrote:I'm interested in how Drumpftards handle the news that has been announced the last few days and how it will spin...
Now that Obama's name has been thrown into the Russia mix as knowing and not really doing anything about it above a few menial sanctions and who supposedly gave the info to the incoming Drumpf administration who did nothing with it (for obvious reasons) do they now admit or believe that Russia fucked with the 2016 presidential election since Obama allegedly knew about it or is this still just a "witch hunt?"
It has been revealed that Bernie Sanders' wife and Bernie have hired attorney's to handle an ongoing FBI investigation into a loan she received, do they believe the FBI is now trustworthy and competent now that they are investigating Sanders?
Or if they're found they didn't violate any laws are the FBI protecting the Dems?
Well, the Comey thing for sure. Trump told Lester Holt he fired Comey for the Russia situation. Oops, that's gonna leave a mark, Donald.Mojo wrote:To be fair, I don't think there's any evidence of obstruction on Trump's part. I mean, WaPo reports that he knew about it, but the FBI hasn't made that public yet. At this point it's still unconfirmed reporting, and it's still innocent until proven guilty. Until then, we wait.
Okay, Trump's "clear victory" stinks even more now than when he first introduced this retarded travel ban. The urgency of 90 days is long over and guess what - nothing fucking happened! That already proves his reasoning was nothing but crap. That time span was supposed to give his great administration the chance to "figure out what the hell is going on". Shocker, they can't figure out jack shit and never will and never intended to.That-guy wrote:Now they're saying that the ban will be reinstated in 72 hours.That-guy wrote:The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the travel ban case in October. Until then, it's still blocked.
grishnak boss wrote:
This shit bugs me. Trump is a world class cunt, but having a novelty product on the wall isn't exactly a reason to write a fucking article. There are plenty of reasons to bash Trump without having to resort to this petty shit.Machado wrote:The media is now reporting that POTUS has hung "fake" Time Magazines with him on the cover
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... a1351aafdf
The singing bass or a Jacklope mounted on the wall are novelty products, but I've seen the Time cover fake. Anyone who didn't know it was fake would assume he was on that cover. It is petty shit, but then Trump is the guy who said he had been on the cover of Time more than anyone else (not true by any means). So I think it's sadly funny.Mojo wrote:This shit bugs me. Trump is a world class cunt, but having a novelty product on the wall isn't exactly a reason to write a fucking article. There are plenty of reasons to bash Trump without having to resort to this petty shit.Machado wrote:The media is now reporting that POTUS has hung "fake" Time Magazines with him on the cover
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... a1351aafdf
eff Trump & his long list of lies. that's true, he said that he has been on the cover more than anyone else. now why say that when you knowvlad wrote:The singing bass or a Jacklope mounted on the wall are novelty products, but I've seen the Time cover fake. Anyone who didn't know it was fake would assume he was on that cover. It is petty shit, but then Trump is the guy who said he had been on the cover of Time more than anyone else (not true by any means). So I think it's sadly funny.Mojo wrote:This shit bugs me. Trump is a world class cunt, but having a novelty product on the wall isn't exactly a reason to write a fucking article. There are plenty of reasons to bash Trump without having to resort to this petty shit.Machado wrote:The media is now reporting that POTUS has hung "fake" Time Magazines with him on the cover
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... a1351aafdf
Turner Coates wrote:
It may be petty, but I think it really says something about how his mind works (or doesn't). He screams daily about fake news and then literally hangs fake news on the wall. Seems like the actions of a crazy bastard to me.Mojo wrote:This shit bugs me. Trump is a world class cunt, but having a novelty product on the wall isn't exactly a reason to write a fucking article. There are plenty of reasons to bash Trump without having to resort to this petty shit.Machado wrote:The media is now reporting that POTUS has hung "fake" Time Magazines with him on the cover
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... a1351aafdf
I get that you could totally read that into it, and I'm sure you're right. But sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, and sometimes a novelty picture on the wall is just a novelty picture on the wall. Like I said, there are hundreds of things to bust Trump's balls on. Writing an entire article on a novelty picture is petty as fuck. Journalists really DO need to hold themselves to a higher standard.That-guy wrote:It may be petty, but I think it really says something about how his mind works (or doesn't). He screams daily about fake news and then literally hangs fake news on the wall. Seems like the actions of a crazy bastard to me.Mojo wrote:This shit bugs me. Trump is a world class cunt, but having a novelty product on the wall isn't exactly a reason to write a fucking article. There are plenty of reasons to bash Trump without having to resort to this petty shit.Machado wrote:The media is now reporting that POTUS has hung "fake" Time Magazines with him on the cover
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... a1351aafdf
but since so many things have been written about the man and not a lot of people are noticing, the media is now focusing on the "fake cover pages" TrumpMojo wrote:I get that you could totally read that into it, and I'm sure you're right. But sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, and sometimes a novelty picture on the wall is just a novelty picture on the wall. Like I said, there are hundreds of things to bust Trump's balls on. Writing an entire article on a novelty picture is petty as fuck. Journalists really DO need to hold themselves to a higher standard.That-guy wrote:It may be petty, but I think it really says something about how his mind works (or doesn't). He screams daily about fake news and then literally hangs fake news on the wall. Seems like the actions of a crazy bastard to me.Mojo wrote: This shit bugs me. Trump is a world class cunt, but having a novelty product on the wall isn't exactly a reason to write a fucking article. There are plenty of reasons to bash Trump without having to resort to this petty shit.