Metal Sludge Gossip Board

Posted: **Thu Mar 22, 2018 4:26 pm**

Chip Z'Hoy wrote:
Gazpacho wrote:

Let me get this straight....

You can be annoying as fuck, but I can’t?

Haven’t you been banned before?

What was the story behind that Opie?
Yep. You're off your meds.

I was banned because I work at McDonalds. I should actually thank your morbidly obese ass. The overtime I get making your truckloads of Big Macs got me a new pair of kicks.

Remember last time we did this and you melted?

It’s happening again.

Meds, check.
Fat, check.
Janitor, check.
trump, check.

So predictable, yet so lame.

Posted: **Thu Mar 22, 2018 4:27 pm**

Chip Z'Hoy wrote:IT'S SO HARD BEING WHITE TRASH NOWADAYS!

Wouldn’t know, but they say admitting it is the first step.

Good for you!

Posted: **Thu Mar 22, 2018 4:32 pm**

Gazpacho wrote:Remember last time we did this and you melted?

Yeah, I melted so hard you went suicide-by-mod and explained to everyone you were sorry for being an asshole and that you went off your meds.

Definitely a tough time for me, thanks for keeping me in check.

Gazpacho wrote:
Chip Z'Hoy wrote:IT'S SO HARD BEING WHITE TRASH NOWADAYS!
Wouldn’t know, but they say admitting it is the first step.

Good for you!

You wouldn't know? You dress like Kenny Powers.

Okay, enough threadjacking. Take it to Hatas if you want to have the Mental Breakdown Funtime Hour.

Posted: **Thu Mar 22, 2018 4:33 pm**

Love you

Posted: **Thu Mar 22, 2018 4:34 pm**

Gazpacho wrote:

Love you

Seriously. Take your fucking meds. It's obvious when you start to lose it.

Posted: **Thu Mar 22, 2018 4:36 pm**

Gazpacho wrote:You can be annoying as fuck, but I can’t?

Don't sell yourself short, Asstaco. You're a tremendous annoyance.

Posted: **Thu Mar 22, 2018 4:37 pm**

Chip Z'Hoy wrote:Okay, enough threadjacking. Take it to Hatas if you want to have the Mental Breakdown Funtime Hour.

THIS!
Seriously, if you have no opinion on the subject of the thread, stay the fuck out of it!

Posted: **Thu Mar 22, 2018 4:57 pm**

I'm watching the Mcdougal interview on CNN. Wow!

Posted: **Thu Mar 22, 2018 5:23 pm**

Beyotch_Knowles wrote:I'm watching the Mcdougal interview on CNN. Wow!

Oh, she's lying because she hates America and stuff.
BUILD THE WALL!

Posted: **Thu Mar 22, 2018 5:40 pm**

Beyotch_Knowles wrote:I'm watching the Mcdougal interview on CNN. Wow!

Posted: **Thu Mar 22, 2018 5:43 pm**

Well, God already forgave Trump for Stormy Daniels, according to Kirk Cameron, so God will forgive this, too.

Posted: **Thu Mar 22, 2018 5:59 pm**

Here is the interview:

Playboy model speaks out on time with Trump
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCB91N ... bnw/videos

Posted: **Thu Mar 22, 2018 6:54 pm**

SeminiferousButtNoid wrote:
eddie lee roth wrote:
SeminiferousButtNoid wrote:
The Russia truthing media and Democratic Party notwithstanding, zero evidence this is true. Zero evidence any database was hacked. Zero evidence the Russian government was responsible. Zero evidence the Russian government hacked election machines or power grids, or the DNC or anything else.
I’m not so sure about that. I don’t think all of our intelligence agencies would lie for the media or the Democratic Party. And didn’t France report similar problems with their election between Emmanuel Macron and Marine Le Pen although with different results.

1) "All of our intelligence agencies" haven't claimed Russia hacked the various incidents. The All 17 Intelligence Agencies Believe Russia Interfered is a debunked myth that is still peddled by some in the media and members of Congress. Four agencies made this claim.

2) The claims of intelligence agencies are not evidence. They have presented no evidence. And the statement "I don't think they would lie about it" is ludicrous. You don't think the CIA, FBI, and NSA would lie? Deception has been their standard operating procedure since each agency began.

Yeah I could have been more on point with the intelligence agencies. I didn’t mean to include the agencies at People magazine and whatnot.

And you’ll get no argument out of me about our government doing some shifty shit. I remember being shocked studying up trying to advance in the military at some of the weapons we had and this was over 25 years ago. And in no way am I trying show off my ego with some secret knowledge shit please don’t confuse me with Rev.

But when it comes to what little bit of info we’ve gotten from Mueller’s investigation and Putin’s history I’m going to believe more in what our country and it’s allies have to say. I may be naive or just some stubborn old proud vet I can’t help that that’s just me.

Posted: **Thu Mar 22, 2018 10:35 pm**

Posted: **Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:03 am**

We now have one of the biggest warmongers in our nation's history as NSA, and also one of the biggest Russia hawks. So all the fearmongering and bellicose rhetoric from liberals and nevertrumpers about this administration being "soft" on Russia got their wish. Be careful what you wish for.

Posted: **Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:42 am**

It's all fun and games until the shooting starts.

Posted: **Fri Mar 23, 2018 1:19 pm**

BREAKING NEWS

Posted: **Fri Mar 23, 2018 1:49 pm**

Posted: **Fri Mar 23, 2018 1:51 pm**

Posted: **Fri Mar 23, 2018 1:51 pm**

eddie lee roth wrote:BREAKING NEWS

This is the America BLOTUS wants to MAGA. "Reality" shows, porn actresses, being a regular on Howard Stern, and "wrestling" in the fucking WWE.

Posted: **Fri Mar 23, 2018 1:55 pm**

Uh oh. Eddie went full Kathy Griffin on us.

Never go full Kathy Griffin, Eddie.

Posted: **Fri Mar 23, 2018 2:10 pm**

I’m sandy blonde I couldn’t do that.

Posted: **Fri Mar 23, 2018 6:49 pm**

Why Stormy Daniels is so dangerous
She matches the president in many ways, and trumps him in some
https://www.economist.com/news/united-s ... epresident

THE humourist P. J. O’Rourke once made these distinctions. “There is parody, when you make fun of people who are smarter than you; satire, when you make fun of people who are richer than you; and burlesque, when you make fun of both while taking your clothes off.” Stormy Daniels’s “Make America Horny Again” tour, which the porn star recently took to strip clubs in Texas and Florida, arguably constitutes a rare triple-whammy. And if power can be substituted for smarts, which Stephanie Clifford, as Ms Daniels is properly known, appears to have in abundance, the case is indisputable. Not since a Mikhail Gorbachev impersonator enticed a fawning Donald Trump onto 5th Avenue has anyone made such a monkey of the president.

Much has been made of a moment in West Palm Beach last month when Mr Trump’s motorcade, en route between Mar-a-Lago and a golf club, roared past a strip joint advertising Ms Clifford’s tour in neon lights. But irony did not die that night, as some have suggested. It is thriving at Ms Clifford’s shows, which sound a lot like a Trump rally. Both feature stirring, slightly eccentric, entrance music; “Li’l Red Riding Hood” for Ms Clifford, who appears wearing a red cape; “Nessun Dorma” for Mr Trump, who wears a red tie. Both performers are over-the-top assertive and racing against time. (Fear of death is an under-considered explanation for Mr Trump’s belligerent insecurity, and the 39-year-old Ms Clifford is now the oldest stripper in the club.) Both offer their fans a sugar rush of instant gratification. Mr Trump invites his to shout, “Lock her up!” Ms Clifford pours molten wax on herself.

Mr Trump’s titillating, debasing speeches are the apogee of what a conservative columnist once described as the “pornificaton of politics”. Ms Clifford, in her shows, but even more in her offstage comportment since news broke in January of a scandal linking her to the president, is in a sense the inverse. Immune to his bullying, she has emerged as a powerful emblem of Mr Trump’s vulnerabilities. Benjamin Wittes, editor of the influential Lawfare blog, hails her as “the icon of our time”.

There are three big reasons for Ms Clifford’s effectiveness as a Trump-mocker. The first is that the star of “Big Busted Goddesses of Las Vegas” appears, through no plan of hers, to have put the president in serious jeopardy. That is not because of her alleged months-long affair with him, which took place long ago and reveals nothing new about Mr Trump. Rather, in the usual way of political sex scandals, it is because of the blundering way he, or his retainers, tried to cover it up. Two weeks before Mr Trump’s election his lawyer, Michael Cohen, paid Ms Clifford $130,000 in return for an agreement not to speak of the alleged affair, which the president denies. When this was revealed, Mr Cohen claimed, almost incredibly, that he had taken the step on his own initiative, using his money. Ms Clifford then sued to be released from the non-disclosure agreement, claiming Mr Cohen had broken its terms by talking about it and the president had done so by failing to sign it. She has recorded an interview with CBS’s show “60 Minutes”, which is expected to air on March 25th.

This appears to have put Mr Trump in a bind. He can let Mr Cohen try to enforce the agreement with Ms Clifford, which might look like an admission of guilt and would risk her aggressive lawyer, Michael Avenatti, airing further revelations in court. Or he can let the matter lie. But that would signal to any other woman bound by a non-disclosure agreement with the president—and Mr Avenatti claims to know of two—that it can be safely ignored.

That would in turn risk highlighting Mr Trump’s broader problem with women, including the 18 who have accused him of molesting them. Indeed, the striking degree to which Ms Clifford’s case contains echoes of Mr Trump’s wider legal troubles is another reason she is proving such a thorn in his flank. A hint that she might have certain mementoes of Mr Trump is also illustrative of this. It recalls speculation that Mr Trump’s history of sexual indiscretion could leave him open to Russian blackmail, as was alleged by Christopher Steele, a former British spy. So too, the way Mr Trump seems to have used Mr Cohen as a blunt instrument, while keeping him at arm’s length for plausible deniability, is a familiar pattern. This was evident last year in the president’s cackhanded attempt to sack Robert Mueller, the special counsel investigating him, through two stages of intermediary.

Yet the main reason Ms Clifford is running rings around the commander-in-chief reflects what a nightmarish matchup for him she is personally. The president’s recipe for political success is to appear more down-to-earth than his effete critics in the media, and so robustly transactional that his political rivals appear hypocritical by comparison. Yet Ms Clifford is no smarmy British comic or slippery senator. She is a self-made Republican-voting woman from Louisiana who has sex for a living. In a pre-agreement interview, she suggested she had indulged Mr Trump not because she was attracted to him (“Would you be?”), but because he had promised to make her a TV star. She out-Trumps Trump.

A storm in a DD-cup

Besides blunting the president’s strengths, she also shows up his biggest weakness. He is at once thin-skinned and unembarrassable, a combination that explains most of his Twitter rages and boasting. After years of dealing with misogynist insults, by contrast, she appears so cheerfully thick-skinned as almost to be operating on a higher plane. This is also apparent on Twitter, where Ms Clifford dispatches the slurs Mr Trump’s fans hurl at her with wry wit (“You know you’re supposed to read that Bible and not smoke it, right?”) and no tolerance for poor English. “Commas are our friend. Don’t forget them,” she advised one critic.

The effect is devastating, a rapier to the president’s bludgeon. Ms Clifford has not merely ridiculed and perhaps imperilled Mr Trump more effectively than anyone else. She has done so, most crushingly of all, while coming across as perfectly pleasant.

Posted: **Fri Mar 23, 2018 8:00 pm**

And now, a word from the first family of the United States Of America:

Posted: **Fri Mar 23, 2018 10:13 pm**

One of the potential dealbreakers on hiring John Bolton as national security advisor was that Trump apparently doesn't like his mustache.

His. Mustache.

Jesus fucking Christ.

Posted: **Fri Mar 23, 2018 10:45 pm**

exitflagger wrote:One of the potential dealbreakers on hiring John Bolton as national security advisor was that Trump apparently doesn't like his mustache.

His. Mustache.

Jesus fucking Christ.

But Donnie Dump loved Hitler's moustache.

Posted: **Sat Mar 24, 2018 5:13 am**

March For Our Lives today . . .

Posted: **Sat Mar 24, 2018 6:23 am**

TravisBicklesMohawk wrote:March For Our Lives today . . .

Which is nothing but a giant circle jerk that will do absolutely nothing but litter the streets of DC with trash and fuck up traffic for a day. This shit may have worked in the 1700's, when the people actually scared the government. Now? Utter waste of time and money.
Also, like last week' walk outs, it's completely sanctioned by schools and local governments. It's pandering. It's like when you tell your kid their shitty drawing is really good. Makes the kid feel good, but you're still bullshitting them.

I want to get behind the idea of protesting, but the more old and "get off my lawn" I get, the less I see anything but futility.

Posted: **Sat Mar 24, 2018 7:07 am**

Mojo wrote:
TravisBicklesMohawk wrote:March For Our Lives today . . .
Which is nothing but a giant circle jerk that will do absolutely nothing but litter the streets of DC with trash and fuck up traffic for a day. This shit may have worked in the 1700's, when the people actually scared the government. Now? Utter waste of time and money.
Also, like last week' walk outs, it's completely sanctioned by schools and local governments. It's pandering. It's like when you tell your kid their shitty drawing is really good. Makes the kid feel good, but you're still bullshitting them.

I want to get behind the idea of protesting, but the more old and "get off my lawn" I get, the less I see anything but futility.

Old man yells at clouds.

I don't know. POTUS hightailed it out of DC, as did quite a few Congresscritters. The anti-war marches going back 50 years did had an impact. As did the civil rights marches. The anti-Iraq War protests didn't have the impact, though they were fairly large. But that was a time when the country was still under the 9/11 haze.

I like this bunch. I wish them well. I do love that they remind the politicians that they, the kids, will be voting. Stressing the voting. If this engages kids in voting then it's a win for that if nothing else.

Posted: **Sat Mar 24, 2018 7:39 am**

After the past week's bullshit, I'm wondering how long until he wags the dog?

Metal Sludge Gossip Board

Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole

Re: Dump Shithole