YourMomma wrote:The same can be said for any President. The fact remains that it took Obama just one year to earn the poor job approval numbers Bush had after six to seven times that amount of time.
YourMomma wrote:The same can be said for any President. The fact remains that it took Obama just one year to earn the poor job approval numbers Bush had after six to seven times that amount of time.
I'm not the biggest obama fan in the world, but I like him a hell of a lot more than bush for a couple simple reasons.
1. He's got a brain
2. He's actually doing something rather than spend most of his time on a ranch or a golf course, and though He hasn't done half the shit he promised during his campaign He's still got a couple years to get more done.
Fuck, even the Fox news poll has him at 46%. Do you even check anything before you type?
Not sure what your question is but the news is only getting worse. Obamas disapproval rating is now at 50% with Gallup/USA Today for the first time. And for good reason.
Wow, you really showed me! Obama's disapproval rating of 50% is almost exactly the same as Bush's almost 75% disapproval rating in 2007, which you compared it to! Fuck, what's 25% between friends?
Seriously, how fucking stupid can you be? It took me less than a minute to research this.
So, either one of two things is true: either you posted something you thought was true but didn't bother to verify, or you think 50% and 75% are about the same. Which one is it?
Until you can point to polls that had Bush in the mid 40's for approval rating after just just one year in office my point stands and you continue to fail.
Ha ha, awesome! No, your point doesn't stand at all. I can drag up the quote of you want, but you said that Obama's disapproval rating had fallen to where Bush's was after "six or seven years in office." Not one, not two, but six or seven.
My point was that you just pull numbers out of your ass and rarely bother to research them. My point stands.
It isn't hard to admit you were wrong. We all know it. At this point it is a fait accompli.
YourMomma wrote:
Except for the fact that the American people disagree. What took Bush 6-7 years to accomplish Obama has done in just one regarding peoples confidence in his job performance.
YourMomma wrote:No mention of his disapproval numbers being the same as Dubyas. Fail.
Ha ha, awesome! I only mentioned disapproval numbers OVER AND OVER in this very thread, showing they weren't what you thought they were. You tried to backtrack and change it from "six or seven years" to "in his first year" when you saw the numbers didn't match up.
It's OK. We all sometimes make assumptions that turn out to be untrue. It just seems like with you it happens way more than sometimes.
tin00can wrote:
You said Obama's disapproval rating is the same as Bush's was after six or seven years in office.
YourMomma wrote:
What took Bush 6-7 years to accomplish Obama has done in just one regarding peoples confidence in his job performance.
YourMomma wrote:Obama just one year to earn the poor job approval numbers Bush had after six to seven times that amount of time.
Neither of the them mention a comparison of disapproval numbers between Obama and Bush like you claimed. You might just want to stop while you're ahead. But then again, you're not.
So, people don't express their feelings of "poor job approval" by saying they "disapprove" of the job he is doing? Really? How else would they express it, and how would you measure it?
Jesus christ on a pogo stick, man. You're one of the few people on this board who can use a post clearly showing how wrong you are to try to prove how right you think you are. Is English your third language?
tin00can wrote:
You said Obama's disapproval rating is the same as Bush's was after six or seven years in office.
YourMomma wrote:
What took Bush 6-7 years to accomplish Obama has done in just one regarding peoples confidence in his job performance.
YourMomma wrote:Obama just one year to earn the poor job approval numbers Bush had after six to seven times that amount of time.
Neither of the them mention a comparison of disapproval numbers between Obama and Bush like you claimed. You might just want to stop while you're ahead. But then again, you're not.
Just wanted to show this again, it's really beautiful. It's like a Dali painting fucked a Renoir.
tin00can wrote:
You said Obama's disapproval rating is the same as Bush's was after six or seven years in office.
YourMomma wrote:
What took Bush 6-7 years to accomplish Obama has done in just one regarding peoples confidence in his job performance.
Obama just one year to earn the poor job approval numbers Bush had after six to seven times that amount of time.
Neither of the them mention a comparison of disapproval numbers between Obama and Bush like you claimed. You might just want to stop while you're ahead. But then again, you're not.
Just wanted to show this again, it's really beautiful. It's like a Dali painting fucked a Renoir.
tin00can wrote:
You said Obama's disapproval rating is the same as Bush's was after six or seven years in office.
He's like the little engine that could. Chug-a-lug-a-chug-a-lug-a. More fail!
Chug-a-lug-a-chug-a-lug-a. More fail!
So "poor job approval" isn't the same as "disapproval"? Perhaps you can provide some "poor job approval" polls to back up your point. Do that, and I'll gladly admit I was wrong and you were right.
I'll be over here waiting. Come on, prove me wrong! I know you can do it!
Bush at 32% at the start of 2008, right smack dab in the middle of your time period. That makes it even worse for you, a 17% difference as opposed to a 12% difference.
So yeah, no matter what you look at, approval or disapproval, you were wrong. By at least 12% and as much as 17%.
So "poor job approval" isn't the same as "disapproval"?
Right. With polls "approve" is different than "disapprove". If you don't even know that much about polling there is nothing that I can do for you.
I guess you missed the part where I showed you were even more wrong with "approval" than you were with "disapproval". There is nothing else I can do for you. Now I know you may want to go off on a tangent about the differences between "approve" and "approval", and "disapprove" and "disapproval" - that's all you could possibly have left - but let me save you the time and assure you that they are different forms of the same word.
tin00can wrote: Now I know you may want to go off on a tangent about the differences between "approve" and "approval", and "disapprove" and "disapproval".
Why do you keep posting quotes that prove you're wrong? Are you one of those nutty catholics who likes to flog themselves?
I posted job disapproval ratings, I posted job approval ratings - that covers the spectrum. Both of them proved you wrong by at least 12%. Tell me where I'm wrong, I really want to know. Really.
or a 
. Either way, it will be a textbook study in passive-aggressive behavior.
