McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

The one that started it all. Spreading gossip and insults since 1998.

Moderator: Metal Sludge

BernieTaupson
Debut Album Goes Gold
Posts: 3847
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2023 2:09 am
Location: Vegas

McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by BernieTaupson »

He’s in his 80s. Pick something you can actually sing! This is self-delusion at Paul Stanley levels. There is no reason on earth he had to pick that song to perform. He’s Paul fucking McCartney. He’s got a hundred well known songs that he could have picked from.

https://youtu.be/iu4aedISw6g?si=lsSklDpgz-UH9ADm
Adam Bomb wrote: Sat Oct 12, 2024 4:49 pm You’re a tord
DangerZone
MSX Tour Support Act
Posts: 4609
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2017 10:39 am

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by DangerZone »

BernieTaupson wrote: Mon Feb 17, 2025 7:22 pm He’s in his 80s. Pick something you can actually sing! This is self-delusion at Paul Stanley levels. There is no reason on earth he had to pick that song to perform. He’s Paul fucking McCartney. He’s got a hundred well known songs that he could have picked from.

https://youtu.be/iu4aedISw6g?si=lsSklDpgz-UH9ADm
I heard the first “sleep pretty darling..” and clicked it off.
Don’t want to hear the golden slumbers part.

You’re right, that’s one of the worst ones to pick.
Why not go for ‘oh darling,’ too
User avatar
Mister Freeze
Platinum Artist
Posts: 10631
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 6:11 pm

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by Mister Freeze »

I suspect the song choice was a nod to Chris Farley.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHPQFPdj8ko

Paul's been the real deal without tapes or any other smoke-and-mirrors bullshit into his '80s. I think we can give him a pass when time finally catches up to him.

Paul Stanley levels? Not even close. Fuck off. Show some respect.
skunklovestiger wrote: A comment like this needs a really useless piece of shit. Well maybe you are used to get fucked by your mother in the basement. It would be better if somebody just kills you useless asshole. Just killl yourself shithead.
BernieTaupson
Debut Album Goes Gold
Posts: 3847
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2023 2:09 am
Location: Vegas

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by BernieTaupson »

Mister Freeze wrote: Mon Feb 17, 2025 8:48 pm
Paul Stanley levels? Not even close. Fuck off. Show some respect.
Why? No one is a bigger McCartney nutswinger than me. But this shit is just embarrassing. Paul Mc thinking he can belt out Golden Slumbers in 2025 is no different to Paul Stan wailing and screeching an unnecessary intro to Cold Gin in 2020.

Wheeen yaaawwurr down in the dumps, carrry that weight!!!

These people don’t have anyone higher up in the chain of command telling them they suck and to make more intelligent choices, this is the problem.
Adam Bomb wrote: Sat Oct 12, 2024 4:49 pm You’re a tord
LAglamrocker
Playing First Stage at SludgeFest
Posts: 27319
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 9:49 am
Location: Candyassland

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by LAglamrocker »

Why didn’t Skidrow show up with the 23rd singer- missed opportunity
Jani Lane and Bret Michaels should form a band called "Nelson II"
User avatar
Jason Jennifer Leigh
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 3099
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:18 pm

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by Jason Jennifer Leigh »

Not bad firvhis age ata ll.

Still the king.
Mr.Happyface
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 3055
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 2:03 pm
Location: Jack's Bistro

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by Mr.Happyface »

BernieTaupson wrote: Mon Feb 17, 2025 7:22 pm He’s in his 80s. Pick something you can actually sing! This is self-delusion at Paul Stanley levels. There is no reason on earth he had to pick that song to perform. He’s Paul fucking McCartney. He’s got a hundred well known songs that he could have picked from.

https://youtu.be/iu4aedISw6g?si=lsSklDpgz-UH9ADm
I'm guessing he did that song because of the skit he did with Chris Farley on SNL back in the day where they mention that song. "Remember ..when you were in The Beatles..." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHPQFPdj8ko
MurrayFiend wrote:DJ Ashba is the worst thing to happen to GN'R's live show since Axl's tiny shorts.
aznsquirt
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2296
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:16 pm

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by aznsquirt »

Good excuse to remind everyone how amazing Brad Delp was:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OiC7LaU8Cg
User avatar
Wiseacre
Platinum Artist
Posts: 10188
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 8:46 am
Location: STL
Contact:

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by Wiseacre »

aznsquirt wrote: Tue Feb 18, 2025 12:01 am Good excuse to remind everyone how amazing Brad Delp was:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OiC7LaU8Cg
He was SUCH a great singer. What a gift he had. Sad to think he’s gone mainly because he felt so embarrassed after getting busted peeping on his fiancé’s sister.

Image
User avatar
Hatchets Molly
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2197
Joined: Tue May 24, 2022 1:16 pm
Location: Cowtown, OH

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by Hatchets Molly »

My first thought was Ooof. Second thought was PM is self-aware. Yes, he could have chosen a song his voice can handle, but he chose that one. He probably knows how he sounds but gives no facks. On the other hand, Paul Stanley is delusional.
User avatar
Turner Coates
Playing First Stage at SludgeFest
Posts: 43390
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:09 am
Location: Is Everything

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by Turner Coates »

Paul chose the song because of the message, which is the same reason Ringo always does this:

Image
Image
If it's dangerous, illegal, sickening, strange, or obscene
You can get it from the man if your money is green
User avatar
keyofgee
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 3032
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 5:55 am
Location: Kenfucky
Contact:

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by keyofgee »

its Paul McCartney, a freakin Beatle,. we are lucky to still have hm around at 82 years old and still performing. Is he 20? nope, but he is out there without a net. not tracks or autotune. we win because he wins. A living Legend.
User avatar
Turner Coates
Playing First Stage at SludgeFest
Posts: 43390
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:09 am
Location: Is Everything

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by Turner Coates »

keyofgee wrote: Tue Feb 18, 2025 10:13 am its Paul McCartney, a freakin Beatle,. we are lucky to still have hm around at 82 years old and still performing. Is he 20? nope, but he is out there without a net. not tracks or autotune. we win because he wins. A living Legend.

Agreed. He doesn't need to prove anything. He already did.
Image
If it's dangerous, illegal, sickening, strange, or obscene
You can get it from the man if your money is green
BernieTaupson
Debut Album Goes Gold
Posts: 3847
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2023 2:09 am
Location: Vegas

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by BernieTaupson »

Well, he proved he can’t sing anymore, that’s for sure.
Adam Bomb wrote: Sat Oct 12, 2024 4:49 pm You’re a tord
User avatar
Wiseacre
Platinum Artist
Posts: 10188
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 8:46 am
Location: STL
Contact:

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by Wiseacre »

BernieTaupson wrote: Tue Feb 18, 2025 11:33 am Well, he proved he can’t sing anymore, that’s for sure.
It’s funny how the original question is answered over and over by the apologists in this thread. “but, but, but…he’s MACA!” Yes, he is and that’s the point of the thread. Why suck when you don’t have to?

Probably the same people who shit all over Ace for playing and singing like shit in his ‘70s.
User avatar
Hatchets Molly
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2197
Joined: Tue May 24, 2022 1:16 pm
Location: Cowtown, OH

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by Hatchets Molly »

Wiseacre wrote: Tue Feb 18, 2025 11:49 am
BernieTaupson wrote: Tue Feb 18, 2025 11:33 am Well, he proved he can’t sing anymore, that’s for sure.
It’s funny how the original question is answered over and over by the apologists in this thread. “but, but, but…he’s MACA!” Yes, he is and that’s the point of the thread. Why suck when you don’t have to?

Probably the same people who shit all over Ace for playing and singing like shit in his ‘70s.
He should have covered The Elder in its entirety.
DangerZone
MSX Tour Support Act
Posts: 4609
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2017 10:39 am

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by DangerZone »

people in this post saying it’s Jesus incarnate are no different than kisstards making excuses for Paul lip syncing.

Yes, he’s Paul McCartney. He could have keyed this song down and came up with a different arrangement.

Sounding bad is sounding bad, doesn’t matter who you are
User avatar
Anthrax442
Cockblocked by Poison
Posts: 7581
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 5:12 am
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by Anthrax442 »

At least he's not Ozzy...
Image
MurrayFiend wrote:Shit, deathcurse, you sure know how to make an exit.
BernieTaupson
Debut Album Goes Gold
Posts: 3847
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2023 2:09 am
Location: Vegas

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by BernieTaupson »

A guy with a degenerative disease who was too ill to perform at his RNRHOF induction six months ago, and this Sabbath thing is in July …
Adam Bomb wrote: Sat Oct 12, 2024 4:49 pm You’re a tord
skinni
Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
Posts: 1555
Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2013 6:56 am

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by skinni »

His performance here did not live up to his legendary reputation.

Perhaps retirement is in order.
BernieTaupson
Debut Album Goes Gold
Posts: 3847
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2023 2:09 am
Location: Vegas

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by BernieTaupson »

No, just play a song you can sing.
Adam Bomb wrote: Sat Oct 12, 2024 4:49 pm You’re a tord
User avatar
kytepunches
Doing Package Tours in Theaters
Posts: 5189
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 10:49 am
Location: America’s snowy Hat

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by kytepunches »

I thought Paul Simon was way worse . McCartney was passable.. Cher and Bonnie Raitt were the gold standard of how to sing in your golden years.
BernieTaupson
Debut Album Goes Gold
Posts: 3847
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2023 2:09 am
Location: Vegas

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by BernieTaupson »

Paul Simon has a serious medical issue, he’s rapidly going deaf.
Adam Bomb wrote: Sat Oct 12, 2024 4:49 pm You’re a tord
risingfarce
Cockblocked by Poison
Posts: 9393
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 9:23 pm

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by risingfarce »

Hatchets Molly wrote: Tue Feb 18, 2025 4:13 am My first thought was Ooof. Second thought was PM is self-aware. Yes, he could have chosen a song his voice can handle, but he chose that one. He probably knows how he sounds but gives no facks. On the other hand, Paul Stanley is delusional.
Paul isn't delusional. He used the Paul Stanley Vocal Smoothing Pedal (TM) on the last KISS tour.
BernieTaupson
Debut Album Goes Gold
Posts: 3847
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2023 2:09 am
Location: Vegas

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by BernieTaupson »

Yeah and still screamed like he was 35 with the intros etc and said he was never sounding better and going out on top. Delusional.
Adam Bomb wrote: Sat Oct 12, 2024 4:49 pm You’re a tord
risingfarce
Cockblocked by Poison
Posts: 9393
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 9:23 pm

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by risingfarce »

BernieTaupson wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:11 am Yeah and still screamed like he was 35 with the intros etc and said he was never sounding better and going out on top. Delusional.
Paul vocally didn't go out on top, but KISS did. That was their longest tour (250 shows; no previous tour broke the 200 mark) and it was their highest grossing tour.

The band was tight. Gene, Eric, and Tommy sang well. Good stage production (not my favorite; that would be "Monster"). Most pyro I've seen at any show. Packed TD Garden in Boston. Crowd was into the show as was the band. I also saw them two years later at the amphitheater in Mansfield. Smaller production due to the smaller amphitheater stage. Good show, but not as good as the show in Boston.
User avatar
Wiseacre
Platinum Artist
Posts: 10188
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 8:46 am
Location: STL
Contact:

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by Wiseacre »

risingfarce wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:19 am
BernieTaupson wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:11 am Yeah and still screamed like he was 35 with the intros etc and said he was never sounding better and going out on top. Delusional.
Paul vocally didn't go out on top, but KISS did. That was their longest tour (250 shows; no previous tour broke the 200 mark) and it was their highest grossing tour.

The band was tight. Gene, Eric, and Tommy sang well. Good stage production (not my favorite; that would be "Monster"). Most pyro I've seen at any show. Packed TD Garden in Boston. Crowd was into the show as was the band. I also saw them two years later at the amphitheater in Mansfield. Smaller production due to the smaller amphitheater stage. Good show, but not as good as the show in Boston.
My God. I’m a lifelong fan since the ‘70s and have devoted innumerable hours in recent years to remixing and cleaning up old KISS shit and even I can admit the last tour was a slow-motion, karaoke-clean embarrassment of what was once “KISS”. Out on TOP????? :lol: That COULD have happened in ‘96-‘97, but what they ended up as was HORRIBLE. They literally stayed around long enough to prove their earliest critics 100% correct by going out all style and zero substance. Bombs and smoke, old guys looking terrible and bored with canned vocals that still sucked. It couldn’t have possibly been any worse. And I’ll say exactly the same thing about my boyhood hero Ace. No idea what the fuck he is even thinking at this point.

EOTR was pure shit. I saw it twice. Once for free and once towards the very end just in case they had any final surprises. Of course they didn’t and neither show was worth the price of gasoline to get there.

I know you are a confirmed troll, but this is beyond dumb.
risingfarce
Cockblocked by Poison
Posts: 9393
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 9:23 pm

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by risingfarce »

Wiseacre wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:29 am
risingfarce wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:19 am
BernieTaupson wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:11 am Yeah and still screamed like he was 35 with the intros etc and said he was never sounding better and going out on top. Delusional.
Paul vocally didn't go out on top, but KISS did. That was their longest tour (250 shows; no previous tour broke the 200 mark) and it was their highest grossing tour.

The band was tight. Gene, Eric, and Tommy sang well. Good stage production (not my favorite; that would be "Monster"). Most pyro I've seen at any show. Packed TD Garden in Boston. Crowd was into the show as was the band. I also saw them two years later at the amphitheater in Mansfield. Smaller production due to the smaller amphitheater stage. Good show, but not as good as the show in Boston.
My God. I’m a lifelong fan since the ‘70s and have devoted innumerable hours in recent years to remixing and cleaning up old KISS shit and even I can admit the last tour was a slow-motion, karaoke-clean embarrassment of what was once “KISS”. Out on TOP????? :lol: That COULD have happened in ‘96-‘97, but what they ended up as was HORRIBLE. They literally stayed around long enough to prove their earliest critics 100% correct by going out all style and zero substance. Bombs and smoke, old guys looking terrible and bored with canned vocals that still sucked. It couldn’t have possibly been any worse. And I’ll say exactly the same thing about my boyhood hero Ace. No idea what the fuck he is even thinking at this point.

EOTR was pure shit. I saw it twice. Once for free and once towards the very end just in case they had any final surprises. Of course they didn’t and neither show was worth the price of gasoline to get there.

I know you are a confirmed troll, but this is beyond dumb.
KISS sucked circa '96/'97 due to two shitty alcoholic/drug addicts who shouldn't have been on a KISS stage ever again.

I'll take Paul on tape with a good band over Paul singing well with a shitty drummer and lead guitarist.

You drink blue and green Kool-Aid. I don't.

You "remix and clean up old KISS shit". LOL. I have better things to do with my time.

EOTR was "pure shit", but you still went. That's being a sheep. Gene and Paul thank you for your support.
DangerZone
MSX Tour Support Act
Posts: 4609
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2017 10:39 am

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by DangerZone »

risingfarce wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:42 am
Wiseacre wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:29 am
risingfarce wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:19 am

Paul vocally didn't go out on top, but KISS did. That was their longest tour (250 shows; no previous tour broke the 200 mark) and it was their highest grossing tour.

The band was tight. Gene, Eric, and Tommy sang well. Good stage production (not my favorite; that would be "Monster"). Most pyro I've seen at any show. Packed TD Garden in Boston. Crowd was into the show as was the band. I also saw them two years later at the amphitheater in Mansfield. Smaller production due to the smaller amphitheater stage. Good show, but not as good as the show in Boston.
My God. I’m a lifelong fan since the ‘70s and have devoted innumerable hours in recent years to remixing and cleaning up old KISS shit and even I can admit the last tour was a slow-motion, karaoke-clean embarrassment of what was once “KISS”. Out on TOP????? :lol: That COULD have happened in ‘96-‘97, but what they ended up as was HORRIBLE. They literally stayed around long enough to prove their earliest critics 100% correct by going out all style and zero substance. Bombs and smoke, old guys looking terrible and bored with canned vocals that still sucked. It couldn’t have possibly been any worse. And I’ll say exactly the same thing about my boyhood hero Ace. No idea what the fuck he is even thinking at this point.

EOTR was pure shit. I saw it twice. Once for free and once towards the very end just in case they had any final surprises. Of course they didn’t and neither show was worth the price of gasoline to get there.

I know you are a confirmed troll, but this is beyond dumb.
KISS sucked circa '96/'97 due to two shitty alcoholic/drug addicts who shouldn't have been on a KISS stage ever again.

I'll take Paul on tape with a good band over Paul singing well with a shitty drummer and lead guitarist.

You drink blue and green Kool-Aid. I don't.

You "remix and clean up old KISS shit". LOL. I have better things to do with my time.

EOTR was "pure shit", but you still went. That's being a sheep. Gene and Paul thank you for your support.
purple & red jizz is much more potent
User avatar
Wiseacre
Platinum Artist
Posts: 10188
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 8:46 am
Location: STL
Contact:

Re: McCartney on SNL. Why do these guys do this to themselves?

Post by Wiseacre »

risingfarce wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:42 am
Wiseacre wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:29 am
risingfarce wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:19 am

Paul vocally didn't go out on top, but KISS did. That was their longest tour (250 shows; no previous tour broke the 200 mark) and it was their highest grossing tour.

The band was tight. Gene, Eric, and Tommy sang well. Good stage production (not my favorite; that would be "Monster"). Most pyro I've seen at any show. Packed TD Garden in Boston. Crowd was into the show as was the band. I also saw them two years later at the amphitheater in Mansfield. Smaller production due to the smaller amphitheater stage. Good show, but not as good as the show in Boston.
My God. I’m a lifelong fan since the ‘70s and have devoted innumerable hours in recent years to remixing and cleaning up old KISS shit and even I can admit the last tour was a slow-motion, karaoke-clean embarrassment of what was once “KISS”. Out on TOP????? :lol: That COULD have happened in ‘96-‘97, but what they ended up as was HORRIBLE. They literally stayed around long enough to prove their earliest critics 100% correct by going out all style and zero substance. Bombs and smoke, old guys looking terrible and bored with canned vocals that still sucked. It couldn’t have possibly been any worse. And I’ll say exactly the same thing about my boyhood hero Ace. No idea what the fuck he is even thinking at this point.

EOTR was pure shit. I saw it twice. Once for free and once towards the very end just in case they had any final surprises. Of course they didn’t and neither show was worth the price of gasoline to get there.

I know you are a confirmed troll, but this is beyond dumb.
KISS sucked circa '96/'97 due to two shitty alcoholic/drug addicts who shouldn't have been on a KISS stage ever again.

I'll take Paul on tape with a good band over Paul singing well with a shitty drummer and lead guitarist.

You drink blue and green Kool-Aid. I don't.

You "remix and clean up old KISS shit". LOL. I have better things to do with my time.

EOTR was "pure shit", but you still went. That's being a sheep. Gene and Paul thank you for your support.
Textbook KISSTARDERY. :lol:

Reunion was magic for actual fans as literally everyone knows. Fuck Karaoke Fake KI$$. Without Ace and Peter (or Krazy Vinnie) there isn’t an ounce of actual rock n roll in that band. Without them it is literally Juan Epstein and Arnold Horshack in clown makeup with loud guitars. Zero swag, zero cool. Fact.

“I have better things to do with my time.”

I seriously doubt that. I’m not a n00b here.
Post Reply