Re: Bobby Blotzer = piece of shit
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2016 2:21 pm
Which one is the skank?Luminiferous wrote:The Ratt FB skank is backstage..
https://forums.metalsludge.tv/forums/
https://forums.metalsludge.tv/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=329408
Which one is the skank?Luminiferous wrote:The Ratt FB skank is backstage..
epic post Kristy!Kristy_Deville wrote:Before the FB Ratt Skank went North Korea on the comments...
It would appear she may have borrowed Mitch's dentures.Luminiferous wrote: The Ratt FB skank is backstage..
Hey, wasn't that chick on the right in Billy Jack?Luminiferous wrote:The Ratt FB skank is backstage..
The original guys aren't "bitting at the bit" to play for their fans.Psychobolia.com wrote:Damn, that pic is just epic... (FU_BLOTZ.jpg!!!) To Blotzer's credit, at least his version comes back out for "on cores"!
I hope this drama lasts through the new year at least, it's going to be sad when it ends and all we have left is "How does blablabla rank for you?"
Hungwell wrote:epic post Kristy!Kristy_Deville wrote:Before the FB Ratt Skank went North Korea on the comments...
Kristy_Deville wrote:Before the FB Ratt Skank went North Korea on the comments...
Endless Yodel wrote:Stephen Pearcy posted Kristy's work on his Facebook page! It's great to see that the real RATT is watching what Blobby is doing and saying on social media--and for a Sludger to get some exposure.
I also wanted to get this thread back to the front page. Carry on.
*flick* wrote:Which one is the skank?Luminiferous wrote:The Ratt FB skank is backstage..
What about Crosby's heir? Doesn't this mean that they have a say / skin in the game as well, orplasticbastard wrote: {SNIP}
The judge furthermore decided that the corporation WBS, Inc., of which Blotzer and DeMartini were thought to be the sole shareholders, and which Blotzer had claimed owns the RATT name and brand, did not have ownership interest in the RATT marks and that the name and brand was still owned by the members who were part of the original RATT partnership agreement: Pearcy, Croucier, DeMartini and Blotzer.
IIRC b, they booted him (towards the end methinks).TheDeadBastard wrote:What about Crosby's heir? Doesn't this mean that they have a say / skin in the game as well, orplasticbastard wrote: {SNIP}
The judge furthermore decided that the corporation WBS, Inc., of which Blotzer and DeMartini were thought to be the sole shareholders, and which Blotzer had claimed owns the RATT name and brand, did not have ownership interest in the RATT marks and that the name and brand was still owned by the members who were part of the original RATT partnership agreement: Pearcy, Croucier, DeMartini and Blotzer.
a) was Crosby never part of the original RATT partnership, or
b) was Crosby legally booted at some point?
This is correct.Psychobolia.com wrote:IIRC b, they booted him (towards the end methinks).TheDeadBastard wrote:What about Crosby's heir? Doesn't this mean that they have a say / skin in the game as well, orplasticbastard wrote: {SNIP}
The judge furthermore decided that the corporation WBS, Inc., of which Blotzer and DeMartini were thought to be the sole shareholders, and which Blotzer had claimed owns the RATT name and brand, did not have ownership interest in the RATT marks and that the name and brand was still owned by the members who were part of the original RATT partnership agreement: Pearcy, Croucier, DeMartini and Blotzer.
a) was Crosby never part of the original RATT partnership, or
b) was Crosby legally booted at some point?
You are DUMB!DemonFilth2001 wrote:The ex-members of RATT are fucked. Wow. Sherman is gonna fucking shut them down for good.
Someone needs to tell his brother that Blotz is a disgrace to musicians from the Pittsburgh area. Thank god we have Donnie Iris and Reb Beach to make the town look good, but dreamy Burt Miracles to make it great. Sorry I didn't mean Burt, had my bandana wrapped around my head a little too tight.CGaijin wrote:From Juan Croucier's Facebook:
Waaaaahhhh!