Bad Rock Career Decisions

The one that started it all. Spreading gossip and insults since 1998.

Moderator: Metal Sludge

User avatar
HueyRamone
Playing First Stage at SludgeFest
Posts: 33984
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 9:07 pm

Re: Bad Rock Career Decisions

Post by HueyRamone »

Bono Nettencourt wrote: Sat May 24, 2025 7:57 pm
dmbrocker wrote: Sat May 24, 2025 4:00 pm
Olivia Sophia wrote: Fri May 23, 2025 10:21 pm

Sammy Hagar
Considering the first three Van Hagar albums all went multi-platinum in the US, I'd hardly call that a bad career decision, even if they were somewhat of a drop off from Roth-era VH album sales. Rothtards gonna Rothtard, though.
They kept selling albums and concert tickets on pure name-brand recognition, but creatively they weren't anywhere near the same level. 5150 was good. The other 3 records weren't.
I hate every Van Hagar song i've ever heard with a white hot passion, but theres no denying it was a full on success. Even Balance was multiplatinum, and released when every other 80s band band was dropped or trying to cope (unsuccessfully) with grunge. Quality music? No. Good career decision? Yes.
LAglamrocker wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2024 8:07 pm You can tell Sleek had nothing to do with this…thats why it’s so entertaining
Tommy2Tone84
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 22991
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 6:04 am

Re: Bad Rock Career Decisions

Post by Tommy2Tone84 »

dmbrocker wrote: Sat May 24, 2025 4:00 pm
Olivia Sophia wrote: Fri May 23, 2025 10:21 pm
Dave Muffstaine wrote: Sat May 17, 2025 11:15 am Two words: John & Corabi. /thread
Sammy Hagar
Considering the first three Van Hagar albums all went multi-platinum in the US, I'd hardly call that a bad career decision, even if they were somewhat of a drop off from Roth-era VH album sales. Rothtards gonna Rothtard, though.

Van Hagar were sharp and outsold Roth 5-to-1. Yep, Rothtards gonna tard hard, fer sure.
User avatar
pieceofme
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 22466
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 12:49 pm
Location: Downtown Vancouver

Re: Bad Rock Career Decisions

Post by pieceofme »

Tommy2Tone84 wrote: Wed May 28, 2025 7:41 pm
dmbrocker wrote: Sat May 24, 2025 4:00 pm
Olivia Sophia wrote: Fri May 23, 2025 10:21 pm

Sammy Hagar
Considering the first three Van Hagar albums all went multi-platinum in the US, I'd hardly call that a bad career decision, even if they were somewhat of a drop off from Roth-era VH album sales. Rothtards gonna Rothtard, though.

Van Hagar were sharp and outsold Roth 5-to-1. Yep, Rothtards gonna tard hard, fer sure.
This is not true.

But I also don't think Van Halen going with Hagar was a bad decision considering how successful they were as well.
Image
GrayAntiMatter wrote:EVH


Zappa is pure cult status shit. He is to music what Bruce fucking Campbell is to acting....
User avatar
Bono Nettencourt
Headlining a Theater Tour
Posts: 6090
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2022 12:32 pm

Re: Bad Rock Career Decisions

Post by Bono Nettencourt »

HueyRamone wrote: Wed May 28, 2025 3:23 pm
Bono Nettencourt wrote: Sat May 24, 2025 7:57 pm
dmbrocker wrote: Sat May 24, 2025 4:00 pm

Considering the first three Van Hagar albums all went multi-platinum in the US, I'd hardly call that a bad career decision, even if they were somewhat of a drop off from Roth-era VH album sales. Rothtards gonna Rothtard, though.
They kept selling albums and concert tickets on pure name-brand recognition, but creatively they weren't anywhere near the same level. 5150 was good. The other 3 records weren't.
I hate every Van Hagar song i've ever heard with a white hot passion, but theres no denying it was a full on success. Even Balance was multiplatinum, and released when every other 80s band band was dropped or trying to cope (unsuccessfully) with grunge. Quality music? No. Good career decision? Yes.
After 5150 they got by on pure momentum and marketing. The fact that Velvet Revolver actually mocked "Runaround" at the RnRHoF was all you needed to say. A holding action that was commercially successful due to Eddie's keyboard fetish being en vogue at the time, but as far as their history and legacy, the Van Hagar era is barely a footnote. Speaking of footnotes, they were opening for Bon Jovi in Europe on the "multiplatinum" Balance tour, and playing sheds in the USA. They were already falling apart.
veritas wrote: Wed May 21, 2025 3:37 pm Wow, late to this thread, but Sleek is pulling a Moggio here.

It's absolutely idiotic to contend Zep weren't A-listers in the 1970s.
Tommy2Tone84
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 22991
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 6:04 am

Re: Bad Rock Career Decisions

Post by Tommy2Tone84 »

pieceofme wrote: Wed May 28, 2025 8:04 pm
Tommy2Tone84 wrote: Wed May 28, 2025 7:41 pm
dmbrocker wrote: Sat May 24, 2025 4:00 pm

Considering the first three Van Hagar albums all went multi-platinum in the US, I'd hardly call that a bad career decision, even if they were somewhat of a drop off from Roth-era VH album sales. Rothtards gonna Rothtard, though.

Van Hagar were sharp and outsold Roth 5-to-1. Yep, Rothtards gonna tard hard, fer sure.
This is not true.

But I also don't think Van Halen going with Hagar was a bad decision considering how successful they were as well.
5150 went six times platinum. OU812 went 4xs platinum. F*CK and Balance sold 3xs platinum each. EEAS and Skysucker only sold a million each. ALAE only went gold. The one after didn’t achieve.

Van Halen with Gary Cherone went gold in 1998. DLR Band didn’t achieve

Van Hagar and the VH sisters for the win.
User avatar
Love_Industry
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 18627
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 1:49 pm
Location: Zasransk, Belarus

Re: Bad Rock Career Decisions

Post by Love_Industry »

Stephen Clifford leaving Icon right after the recording of Night of the Crime. He became a born again Christian and did quite well in music management and financial advisory, but if he stayed and Icon could tour the album in 85/86, they would be Leppard or Bon Jovi :)

The 2nd worst Icon related career decision was for replacement singer Jerry Harrison to get drunk and insult their label from the stage knowing well there were some A&R guys in attendance checking out the new line-up. They got dropped right after that show which may have been his first as they had one or two other singers in the months after Clifford left.
Chip Z'Hoy wrote: ↑
LI is a gentleman and scholar but that “Parasite” take is wild!
User avatar
pieceofme
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 22466
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 12:49 pm
Location: Downtown Vancouver

Re: Bad Rock Career Decisions

Post by pieceofme »

Tommy2Tone84 wrote: Wed May 28, 2025 11:32 pm
pieceofme wrote: Wed May 28, 2025 8:04 pm
Tommy2Tone84 wrote: Wed May 28, 2025 7:41 pm


Van Hagar were sharp and outsold Roth 5-to-1. Yep, Rothtards gonna tard hard, fer sure.
This is not true.

But I also don't think Van Halen going with Hagar was a bad decision considering how successful they were as well.
5150 went six times platinum. OU812 went 4xs platinum. F*CK and Balance sold 3xs platinum each. EEAS and Skysucker only sold a million each. ALAE only went gold. The one after didn’t achieve.

Van Halen with Gary Cherone went gold in 1998. DLR Band didn’t achieve

Van Hagar and the VH sisters for the win.
Oh you mean solo Roth. I thought you were talking about Van Halen albums with Roth.
Image
GrayAntiMatter wrote:EVH


Zappa is pure cult status shit. He is to music what Bruce fucking Campbell is to acting....
User avatar
FreddyFender
Debut Album Goes Gold
Posts: 3991
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2018 12:36 am

Re: Bad Rock Career Decisions

Post by FreddyFender »

If we're gonna talk Van Halen, the glaringly terrible career decision is Ed not cutting an instrumental album in the mid eighties.

There was never a bigger demand that was not met in the history of rock and roll.

Could have cut the thing in a week at 5150 and just printed money.
User avatar
Bono Nettencourt
Headlining a Theater Tour
Posts: 6090
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2022 12:32 pm

Re: Bad Rock Career Decisions

Post by Bono Nettencourt »

It's true. He could've beat Satriani to the punch. But I think TPTB at WB wanted VH to go on. Them getting 5150 on the racks 4 months before EEAS was everything. Dave really miscalculated with the movie. He put out a great record and did a great tour, but if you're not 1st, you're last.
veritas wrote: Wed May 21, 2025 3:37 pm Wow, late to this thread, but Sleek is pulling a Moggio here.

It's absolutely idiotic to contend Zep weren't A-listers in the 1970s.
Tommy2Tone84
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 22991
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 6:04 am

Re: Bad Rock Career Decisions

Post by Tommy2Tone84 »

FreddyFender wrote: Thu May 29, 2025 3:53 pm If we're gonna talk Van Halen, the glaringly terrible career decision is Ed not cutting an instrumental album in the mid eighties.

There was never a bigger demand that was not met in the history of rock and roll.

Could have cut the thing in a week at 5150 and just printed money.
Ed and VH were printing money with the release of 5150, OU812 and FUCK. Ed was as much into keyboards at the time as he was guitar.

Where Ed fucked up was not writing and recording that solo album with different singers on each track. Although given how much coke Ed was doing, we probably would’ve gotten an album with Hall & Oates and Patti Smyth on it. Ed didn’t have the personality to pull that kind of project off.
User avatar
Love_Industry
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 18627
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 1:49 pm
Location: Zasransk, Belarus

Re: Bad Rock Career Decisions

Post by Love_Industry »

Brian Robertson getting the gig in Motörhead then refusing to play the band's classics and going on stage in shiny shorts and ballet shoes.

Lemmy fired his ass and had a career in music for 30 more years. Robbo... guested on some Swedish bands abum. Lotus.

I can just imagine the pissed off Motörheadbangers after a show where they didn't play Bomber, Overkill, Ace or even Motorhead the song.

Tommy Thayer would never do this!
Chip Z'Hoy wrote: ↑
LI is a gentleman and scholar but that “Parasite” take is wild!
Ryan81
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 3321
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 2:44 am

Re: Bad Rock Career Decisions

Post by Ryan81 »

Love_Industry wrote: Fri May 23, 2025 1:57 pm
"Here today, gone later today" - DLR about grunge rockers replacing hair bands in the 90s.
Roth was saying that we'll before the Grunge thing happened. At the end of Decline of Western Civilization 2 Brett Michaels even quotes Roth (and gives him credit) for the saying and that movie came out in '87.

Also, as far as the Floyd/Waters split I don't think Roger was trying to take the Pink Floyd name. I believe he was trying to retire the name because he felt the had nothing more to offer. Or in his words "Pink Floyd was a spent force creatively."

Edward not asking to be paid/credited for Beat It was unwise.

Cecil Deville dying his hair fire engine red at the MTV awards was a bad idea as it made the case for him being a lunatic much easier to prove. I don't get when he even did it because at sound check he was still blonde. I'm sure the band shit when they first saw him with that hair right before going on national TV. In a way CC was the first in the rock world to dye his hair a crazy color. It became popular right after he did it pretty much. Notice a few months later Mr. Cobain had his hair a nearly identical color in the Come As You Are video. So it's not a stretch to call CC Deville the God Father of Grunge.

Lars making a stink about Napster didn't do Metallica any favors. It could be said that Metallica had a solid decade of bad decisions between '96-'06.
User avatar
greengoblinrulz
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 3610
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 4:56 pm
Location: Midwest

Re: Bad Rock Career Decisions

Post by greengoblinrulz »

Obviously club level but Dizzy Dean leaving Britny Fox in middle of tour while their single was being played on MTV didnt turn out well.
If grunge would've killed them off instead, so be it but they could've had a nice little run here in the last 20 years.
Still have songs played daily on Hair Nation, which is more than some of the bands still active.
Post Reply