Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

The one that started it all. Spreading gossip and insults since 1998.

Moderator: Metal Sludge

Tommy2Tone84
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 22186
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 6:04 am

Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by Tommy2Tone84 »

Yes, I’ve seen Rock Like A Rocker on YouTube and it’s so bad that it’s funny. I have audio of them from a gig in PA from 1984 mainly playing covers. While they aren’t Rush and Bert certainly doesn’t attempt to sing in a higher register on the Motley and Judas Priest songs they do, it’s not all that bad. I’ve heard worse.


I’m half way through the Nothing But A Good Time book and while some will be honest or critical and admit how awful Motley Crue were live. Most make an excuse for them with how “dangerous” they were instead of the clown show that they really were. With Poison it’s “Yeah they sucked but the girls loved them.” The book talks about how Vicky Hamilton dumped them off on Howard Kaufman from GuitarsRUs for a couple measly thousand dollars.

So for those of you who were there, after they hired CC were they really that bad? Many, many major league bands were not very good live: Led Zeppelin, Aerosmith, KISS, Van Halen (for how accomplished 3/4 of that band were they were not awesome as a live act), Ozzy, Motley Crue, Ratt, Dokken, Guns N Roses, Skid Row, Nirvana, Soundgarden, AIC (sorry guys…I saw them and they were uneven and boring AF) so why does Poison get shit on so much for not being King Crimson? Racer X were literally one of the best live bands to come out of Hollywood and I’m one of maybe five people who have ever heard of them or ever gave a shit about them.

I wanted to hate Poison. I did hate Poison at first. I remember when Talk Dirty To Me first got airplay and I convulsed between cringing and laughing but they I heard CC’s Chuck Berry meets Ace Frehley meets Rick Nielsen inspired solo and I wasn’t laughing anymore.

I remember seeing I Want Action for the first time on MTV and I remember being sort of disturbed by it’s Rocky Horror schtick but I also remember seeing all the cool guitars CC played in the video and hearing his solo and going “Fuck! That guy is awesome!”

Maybe I’m just a sucker for guitar collecting hoarders? They also impressed me in the Decline movie. They were candid and honest but very funny at the same time. Bands like Odin and London made Poison look like Cheap Trick and Van Halen.

Penelope tries to come off all Switzerland in the book but she did the glam scene dirty by including some of those bands and especially those posing hipster scensters who really weren’t in a band. I would’ve rather have seen Vixen, Tuff and Jetboy play than Odin and London. Lizzy Borden, to his credit, came off looking and sounding professional even though he was cheesy
MetalSludgeCEO
Playing First Stage at SludgeFest
Posts: 27075
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 8:44 pm
Location: http://www.TuffCds.com
Contact:

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by MetalSludgeCEO »

Tommy2Tone84 wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 11:28 am Yes, I’ve seen Rock Like A Rocker on YouTube and it’s so bad that it’s funny. I have audio of them from a gig in PA from 1984 mainly playing covers. While they aren’t Rush and Bert certainly doesn’t attempt to sing in a higher register on the Motley and Judas Priest songs they do, it’s not all that bad. I’ve heard worse.


I’m half way through the Nothing But A Good Time book and while some will be honest or critical and admit how awful Motley Crue were live. Most make an excuse for them with how “dangerous” they were instead of the clown show that they really were. With Poison it’s “Yeah they sucked but the girls loved them.” The book talks about how Vicky Hamilton dumped them off on Howard Kaufman from GuitarsRUs for a couple measly thousand dollars.

So for those of you who were there, after they hired CC were they really that bad? Many, many major league bands were not very good live: Led Zeppelin, Aerosmith, KISS, Van Halen (for how accomplished 3/4 of that band were they were not awesome as a live act), Ozzy, Motley Crue, Ratt, Dokken, Guns N Roses, Skid Row, Nirvana, Soundgarden, AIC (sorry guys…I saw them and they were uneven and boring AF) so why does Poison get shit on so much for not being King Crimson? Racer X were literally one of the best live bands to come out of Hollywood and I’m one of maybe five people who have ever heard of them or ever gave a shit about them.

I wanted to hate Poison. I did hate Poison at first. I remember when Talk Dirty To Me first got airplay and I convulsed between cringing and laughing but they I heard CC’s Chuck Berry meets Ace Frehley meets Rick Nielsen inspired solo and I wasn’t laughing anymore.

I remember seeing I Want Action for the first time on MTV and I remember being sort of disturbed by it’s Rocky Horror schtick but I also remember seeing all the cool guitars CC played in the video and hearing his solo and going “Fuck! That guy is awesome!”

Maybe I’m just a sucker for guitar collecting hoarders? They also impressed me in the Decline movie. They were candid and honest but very funny at the same time. Bands like Odin and London made Poison look like Cheap Trick and Van Halen.

Penelope tries to come off all Switzerland in the book but she did the glam scene dirty by including some of those bands and especially those posing hipster scensters who really weren’t in a band. I would’ve rather have seen Vixen, Tuff and Jetboy play than Odin and London. Lizzy Borden, to his credit, came off looking and sounding professional even though he was cheesy
Fun Fact: Racer X guitarist Paul Gilbert wore a TUFF t-shirt during a show at Trobadour... likely in 1988 ish.

Photos exist somewhere, and very likely in a Live Review in a Rock City News!

Thank you drive thru.

$tEvil
factchecker
Picking a Band Name
Posts: 130
Joined: Sat May 16, 2020 12:59 am

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by factchecker »

Can't really add to that wiki tier overview of Poison.

Well at least record producer Bruce Fairbairn (Bon Jovi) felt Poison were big enough to produce their follow up album Open Up And Say Ah! Naff album imo with a lot of filler and duds but killer singles with Rose, Angel, Nothin' and Mama Don't Dance.
User avatar
Mojo
Playing First Stage at SludgeFest
Posts: 26540
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 3:17 pm
Location: Oceanside, CA
Contact:

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by Mojo »

Fun band with fun songs, and I'd say CC is actually underrated. His vibrato absolutely sounds like someone on coke, but his solos are often melodic, tasteful, and have a surprising amount of flash in them. I can see why insecure dudes might hate on them, but I think they're fun.
Rooster wrote: I hunt with a handgun.
pieceofme wrote: Yeah, Mojo is a lot of peoples favourite!
keyofgee wrote: I am a free thinker
Image Image
LSD69
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2370
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Location: Hollywood North

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by LSD69 »

Mojo wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 12:01 pm Fun band with fun songs
:!:
That-guy
Cockblocked by Poison
Posts: 9941
Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 7:20 pm

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by That-guy »

Tommy2Tone84 wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 11:28 am “Fuck! That guy is awesome!”
Thanks.
User avatar
Nate S Axel
Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
Posts: 1695
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 2:17 am
Location: DTLV

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by Nate S Axel »

Mojo wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 12:01 pm Fun band with fun songs, and I'd say CC is actually underrated. His vibrato absolutely sounds like someone on coke, but his solos are often melodic, tasteful, and have a surprising amount of flash in them. I can see why insecure dudes might hate on them, but I think they're fun.
100%. What's the point of going to a show? Hopefully to have fun. Never had a bad time at a Poison show, especially with 1, 2, 3 other bands.
https://www.last.fm/user/SundownDevil
LAglamrocker wrote: Wed Sep 20, 2023 10:45 am I can’t believe people actually don’t live in So Cal/ San Diego/Vegas circle ..waste of life
Tommy2Tone84
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 22186
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 6:04 am

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by Tommy2Tone84 »

Mojo wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 12:01 pm Fun band with fun songs, and I'd say CC is actually underrated. His vibrato absolutely sounds like someone on coke, but his solos are often melodic, tasteful, and have a surprising amount of flash in them. I can see why insecure dudes might hate on them, but I think they're fun.
Well stated. I couldn’t have said it any better. They were fun, energetic and had great songs. They were kind of a shit show live, CC specifically. But he was a total rock star!!! They weren’t any worse than Motley or Guns N Roses. Guns were cooler but that Ritz show is embarrassing.

What was ironic about Poison is a couple of those guys were just as f*cked up and destructive as the Motley and GNR guys were. But because of their image and more commercial sound, people wrote them off as lite weight. CC and Bobby were completely f*cked up. Bert, later wrapped his sports car around a telephone pole. Rikki came off looking like the only level headed guy in the band.
User avatar
keyofgee
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2792
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 5:55 am
Location: Kenfucky
Contact:

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by keyofgee »

I saw Poison on their first U.S. tour and for what it's worth, glam and all, they were starving and kicked butt. They played their butts off and won the crowd over. Their music is cotton candy, all sugar and not filling but it worked for them and their bank and spank accounts.
User avatar
Bono Nettencourt
MSX Tour Support Act
Posts: 4181
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2022 12:32 pm

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by Bono Nettencourt »

factchecker wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 11:54 am Can't really add to that wiki tier overview of Poison.

Well at least record producer Bruce Fairbairn (Bon Jovi) felt Poison were big enough to produce their follow up album Open Up And Say Ah! Naff album imo with a lot of filler and duds but killer singles with Rose, Angel, Nothin' and Mama Don't Dance.
Werman did Open Up. Fairbairn did Flesh & Blood, which was the one after.

This place needs a new factchecker.
ijwthstd wrote: obviously you take this way too seriously and were deeply affected by what transpired in the early 1990's and hopefully you are discussing these issues with a therapist in addition to other fans on music message boards.
User avatar
VinnieVincentsVag
Playing Second Stage at SludgeFest
Posts: 5858
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by VinnieVincentsVag »

Mojo wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 12:01 pm Fun band with fun songs, and I'd say CC is actually underrated. His vibrato absolutely sounds like someone on coke, but his solos are often melodic, tasteful, and have a surprising amount of flash in them. I can see why insecure dudes might hate on them, but I think they're fun.
I hated his lack of vibrato on most solos.
User avatar
ElectrickMagick
Playing Shitty Clubs in a Van
Posts: 1107
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Moving through Kashmir
Contact:

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by ElectrickMagick »

Bono Nettencourt wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 3:04 pm
factchecker wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 11:54 am Can't really add to that wiki tier overview of Poison.

Well at least record producer Bruce Fairbairn (Bon Jovi) felt Poison were big enough to produce their follow up album Open Up And Say Ah! Naff album imo with a lot of filler and duds but killer singles with Rose, Angel, Nothin' and Mama Don't Dance.
Werman did Open Up. Fairbairn did Flesh & Blood, which was the one after.

This place needs a new factchecker.
That's just an alternative fact, man.

Poison was high energy and lots of fun, that was always good enough for me. And I have always loved CC's solos, maybe they aren't technically brilliant but they always fit the mood of the song.
whoami
Playing Frat Parties
Posts: 265
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 4:56 pm

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by whoami »

Mojo wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 12:01 pm Fun band with fun songs, and I'd say CC is actually underrated. His vibrato absolutely sounds like someone on coke, but his solos are often melodic, tasteful, and have a surprising amount of flash in them. I can see why insecure dudes might hate on them, but I think they're fun.
This 100%
User avatar
VinnieVincentsVag
Playing Second Stage at SludgeFest
Posts: 5858
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by VinnieVincentsVag »

That album cover was a pretty big turnoff for me.
Wasn’t a fan of Brett’s voice.
Very low on the musical IQ spectrum

But hey, they’re rich and famous and I’m typing this.
User avatar
dmbrocker
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 17666
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:49 pm
Location: Rockin’ with Amber, Bradie, Laurine, Dokken, Ratt, Motley, Aerosmith, Rush, Poison…

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by dmbrocker »

Mojo wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 12:01 pm Fun band with fun songs, and I'd say CC is actually underrated. His vibrato absolutely sounds like someone on coke, but his solos are often melodic, tasteful, and have a surprising amount of flash in them. I can see why insecure dudes might hate on them, but I think they're fun.
Mojo nails it. I love Poison, cheesy party glam and all.
Image
Image
LAglamrocker wrote: Trixter is awesome but everyone has seen After The Rain video correct? That’s one of first things I’m going thank God for
User avatar
Fat_Elvis
Cockblocked by Poison
Posts: 8370
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:24 am
Location: In The Poolhouse

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by Fat_Elvis »

There's no Metal Sludge without Poison.
Tommy2Tone84
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 22186
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 6:04 am

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by Tommy2Tone84 »

VinnieVincentsVag wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 6:03 pm That album cover was a pretty big turnoff for me.
Wasn’t a fan of Brett’s voice.
Very low on the musical IQ spectrum

But hey, they’re rich and famous and I’m typing this.
He didn’t have much of a range but I didn’t mind Bert’s voice.

I’ll take Poison over Genesis
User avatar
Love_Industry
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 17452
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 1:49 pm
Location: Zasransk, Belarus

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by Love_Industry »

Nate S Axel wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 12:28 pm Never had a bad time at a Poison show
Must have been out of luck then. Saw them at their peak, Monsters of Rock 1990 in Stockholm with Whitesnake headlining and they weren't very good. Seemed like they didn't even want to be there and it was one of the first shows of the tour.

They also played the wrong songs IMO - Ride the Wind, Let it Play, Poor Boy Blues...
User avatar
Whatever Happened To…
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2702
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 3:36 pm

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by Whatever Happened To… »

I fucking love that first album, the cover, title, everything about it.
whiteowl yesterday
Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
Posts: 1695
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:14 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by whiteowl yesterday »

i have their 1st 3 albums on cd and love 'em.
saw them in concert in the early 2000's they were great.
"artist formerly known as midnighttoker"
User avatar
Bono Nettencourt
MSX Tour Support Act
Posts: 4181
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2022 12:32 pm

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by Bono Nettencourt »

Fat_Elvis wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 8:50 pm There's no Tuff without Poison.
FTFY
ijwthstd wrote: obviously you take this way too seriously and were deeply affected by what transpired in the early 1990's and hopefully you are discussing these issues with a therapist in addition to other fans on music message boards.
DrumminAway
Jamming in Parent's Basement
Posts: 87
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2023 1:42 pm

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by DrumminAway »

Tommy2Tone84 wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 9:13 pm
VinnieVincentsVag wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 6:03 pm That album cover was a pretty big turnoff for me.
Wasn’t a fan of Brett’s voice.
Very low on the musical IQ spectrum

But hey, they’re rich and famous and I’m typing this.
He didn’t have much of a range but I didn’t mind Bert’s voice.

I’ll take Poison over Genesis
Feels like we’re living in a land of confusion.
Tommy2Tone84
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 22186
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 6:04 am

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by Tommy2Tone84 »

DrumminAway wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 8:08 am
Tommy2Tone84 wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 9:13 pm
VinnieVincentsVag wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 6:03 pm That album cover was a pretty big turnoff for me.
Wasn’t a fan of Brett’s voice.
Very low on the musical IQ spectrum

But hey, they’re rich and famous and I’m typing this.
He didn’t have much of a range but I didn’t mind Bert’s voice.

I’ll take Poison over Genesis
Feels like we’re living in a land of confusion.
Great song! I was thinking more of the original Genesis with Peter. Great musicianship but boring and odd.
User avatar
Mister Freeze
Platinum Artist
Posts: 10204
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 6:11 pm

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by Mister Freeze »

Why sing about getting laid for an audience packed with chicks when you can sing about spirits and demons for an arena full of dudes in denim jackets?

Image
skunklovestiger wrote: A comment like this needs a really useless piece of shit. Well maybe you are used to get fucked by your mother in the basement. It would be better if somebody just kills you useless asshole. Just killl yourself shithead.
steviedoes
Recording Debut Album
Posts: 780
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 2:58 pm

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by steviedoes »

To me, Poison has always been my KISS. What I mean by that - Poison is the band that got me into rock music as a teenager. Poison is the band that made me want to play guitar, make my own music and be in a band. That is what KISS is to so many musicians, especially in the "hair band" genre. And no matter how cheesy KISS became, it was always acceptable to be a fan and have them be why you make music. But that has never seemed to be the case with Poison. I don't, and have never cared though. Poison is my KISS. I've become a bigger fan of Cheap Trick than Poison, and my music tastes have expanded since 1991, but no matter how cheesy Poison could be, no matter how many cringe things Bret does, Poison is still my rock and roll foundation. And always will be.

I'm listening to Swallow This Live right now. There are a million bad reviews of it out there and many haters. I don't care at all. It's peak Poison to me. If you're a Poison fan, it has everything you love about them. If you're a hater, it's got all the things you hate. That being said - I certainly could do without the Rikki Rockett drum solo. :lol: I do love C.C.'s solo though. 8)
New Fuzzruckus single "I Never Liked You The Way You Thought I Did" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkS904a ... t1cw%3D%3D
User avatar
DonJuanDeMarco
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 3571
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 8:50 pm

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by DonJuanDeMarco »

steviedoes wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 9:06 am To me, Poison has always been my KISS. What I mean by that - Poison is the band that got me into rock music as a teenager. Poison is the band that made me want to play guitar, make my own music and be in a band. That is what KISS is to so many musicians, especially in the "hair band" genre. And no matter how cheesy KISS became, it was always acceptable to be a fan and have them be why you make music. But that has never seemed to be the case with Poison. I don't, and have never cared though. Poison is my KISS. I've become a bigger fan of Cheap Trick than Poison, and my music tastes have expanded since 1991, but no matter how cheesy Poison could be, no matter how many cringe things Bret does, Poison is still my rock and roll foundation. And always will be.
100% exactly how I feel! Right on, man!!!

I love almost every band from the 80's scene but there is a special love for Poison that is just stronger than the others. Those first 3 albums are rock & roll gold to me. They are simple, sincere, honest, catchy, fun. Everything you look for in a pop/rock song.

The glam rock image of the first album cover is not what I picture though. The definitive Poison image is probably the Nothin' But a Goodtime video.

None of this actually answers the OP though! Were they that bad BEFORE they got signed? Maybe.... they got a very small record deal. But they took what they had and made the most of it. Ain't that what it's all about?
"You want Don Juan DeMarco, the world's greatest lover, to talk to you? What do you know of great love?"
TravisBicklesMohawk
Headlining a Theater Tour
Posts: 6171
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:17 pm

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by TravisBicklesMohawk »

No, they are not bad.

Poison is very good at what they do. Some of us may not like it, but they do have an audience.

So that's that . . . 8)
The Tao of Pooh
Image Image
User avatar
Fat_Elvis
Cockblocked by Poison
Posts: 8370
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:24 am
Location: In The Poolhouse

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by Fat_Elvis »

Bono Nettencourt wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 8:02 am
Fat_Elvis wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 8:50 pm There's no Tuff without Poison.
FTFY
Which is why there'd be no Metal Sludge.
User avatar
Bono Nettencourt
MSX Tour Support Act
Posts: 4181
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2022 12:32 pm

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by Bono Nettencourt »

Fat_Elvis wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 10:04 am
Bono Nettencourt wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 8:02 am
Fat_Elvis wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 8:50 pm There's no Tuff without Poison.
FTFY
Which is why there'd be no Metal Sludge.
Touche.
ijwthstd wrote: obviously you take this way too seriously and were deeply affected by what transpired in the early 1990's and hopefully you are discussing these issues with a therapist in addition to other fans on music message boards.
User avatar
Indy_Rob
Headlining a Theater Tour
Posts: 6640
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:52 am
Location: Indianapolis, IN

Re: Poison: Were They Really That Bad?

Post by Indy_Rob »

That-guy wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 12:18 pm
Tommy2Tone84 wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 11:28 am “Fuck! That guy is awesome!”
Thanks.
:lol:
Post Reply