Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
Moderator: Metal Sludge
-
- Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
- Posts: 17500
- Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:39 am
- Location: North Dakota
Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
Of course a lot of us grew up in the MTV era where the videos with the cars in women made you think that a lot of these bands were living Lifestyles of the Rich and famous. A fair percentage of them were on the verge of financial collapse and working side jobs. Who did you grow up thinking Had it all but they truly did not from a financial sense?
Everyone Is Someone Else's Bitch
- GreatWhiteSnake
- Playing a Package Tour in Arenas
- Posts: 11248
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 4:22 pm
- Location: Hell, CA Population 4
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
I was never under the illusion that many of them were massively rich but it is sad how far down the river some of them sold themselves and are now destitute...
GWS video of the week Seven Seconds of Shred https://youtu.be/6DAqH3eKqEM?si=N2I9eU92_ovsb69d updated 3/9/24
https://soundcloud.com/crunch-104998557
https://soundcloud.com/crunch-104998557
- Bono Nettencourt
- MSX Tour Support Act
- Posts: 4340
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2022 12:32 pm
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
After Slide It In and before WS '87 David Coverdale was in debt $3 million to Geffen Records and was doing anonymous New York Seltzer jingles for extra cash.
Kiss went broke in the 80s because they kept spending like it was still the 70s.
Kiss went broke in the 80s because they kept spending like it was still the 70s.
ijwthstd wrote: obviously you take this way too seriously and were deeply affected by what transpired in the early 1990's and hopefully you are discussing these issues with a therapist in addition to other fans on music message boards.
- Turner Coates
- Playing First Stage at SludgeFest
- Posts: 42926
- Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:09 am
- Location: Is Everything
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
A guy can't have too many pairs of zebra striped loafers and flower print pants.Bono Nettencourt wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2024 5:47 pm Kiss went broke in the 80s because they kept spending like it was still the 70s.
"I'm just here for the irony and the dancing."
-
- Headlining Clubs
- Posts: 2240
- Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:06 pm
- Location: West Hollywood, California
- Contact:
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
It's funny I know a pretty highly actually very highly regarded musician especially by other musicians but they don't move very many albums so they resort to commercial jingles which if national pay very well.Bono Nettencourt wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2024 5:47 pm After Slide It In and before WS '87 David Coverdale was in debt $3 million to Geffen Records and was doing anonymous New York Seltzer jingles for extra cash.
Kiss went broke in the 80s because they kept spending like it was still the 70s.
The Inappropriate Earl Podcast is on Itunes or Soundcloud
https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/ina ... 96362?mt=2
https://soundcloud.com/inappropriate-earl
http://www.twitter.com/earlskakel
New comedy album out on Itunes under Earl Skakel
https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/ina ... 96362?mt=2
https://soundcloud.com/inappropriate-earl
http://www.twitter.com/earlskakel
New comedy album out on Itunes under Earl Skakel
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
Any time you see news on Blabbermouth about a musician offering instrument lessons via Skype you know he's in trouble.
-
- Headlining Clubs
- Posts: 2826
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 1:58 pm
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
KISS the company was living record advance to record advance (thus releasing an album every year), but Gene and Paul themselves were well off financially.Bono Nettencourt wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2024 5:47 pm After Slide It In and before WS '87 David Coverdale was in debt $3 million to Geffen Records and was doing anonymous New York Seltzer jingles for extra cash.
Kiss went broke in the 80s because they kept spending like it was still the 70s.
Even when their oil field tax write-off's from the 70's were deemed illegal by the government, both Gene and Paul were still able to write a million dollar check to pay off the IRS (it did cause Peter and Ace to file for bankruptcy though).
-
- Playing Shitty Clubs in a Van
- Posts: 1232
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2019 9:20 am
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
There have been plenty of artists since the beginning of rock who were huge, but ended up broke or deep in debt. Some were just plain financially illiterate. (I don't pretend to know how to operate with millions of dollars, but I know that not paying taxes will come back to bite you in the ass and guess that if you're netting $1 million per month, but spending twice that amount, you're not going to be able to maintain that indefinitely.) Some were too out of it to keep track of it all. Some were blatantly ripped off my managers, agents or supposed financial advisors.
Then, you have the artists who were huge for a while, but maybe didn't get any songwriting royalties, or as a band "member", instead of getting a percentage of record sales (not that those count for much anymore), merchandise and touring, got paid a salary or as a session guy in the studio. Beats the hell out of working at Walmart, but doesn't necessarily translate into three homes, a yacht and a fleet of luxury vehicles.
Then, you have the artists who were huge for a while, but maybe didn't get any songwriting royalties, or as a band "member", instead of getting a percentage of record sales (not that those count for much anymore), merchandise and touring, got paid a salary or as a session guy in the studio. Beats the hell out of working at Walmart, but doesn't necessarily translate into three homes, a yacht and a fleet of luxury vehicles.
- mrspeedgene
- Headlining Clubs
- Posts: 2732
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 9:35 am
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
KISS in the early 70's. They made it seem they were huge but they were running on fumes before ALIVE! broke. Aucoin's credit card maxed out. Paul's "hole in Bill's shoe story" puts it in perspective.
They laughed at their gods
And fought them in vain
So he turned his
back on them
And left them in pain
And fought them in vain
So he turned his
back on them
And left them in pain
-
- Headlining Clubs
- Posts: 2826
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 1:58 pm
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
Even when they were really huge in 76-78, a lot of it was still smoke and mirrors.mrspeedgene wrote: ↑Wed Jan 17, 2024 4:29 am KISS in the early 70's. They made it seem they were huge but they were running on fumes before ALIVE! broke. Aucoin's credit card maxed out. Paul's "hole in Bill's shoe story" puts it in perspective.
Especially a lot of the record sales and 'hit' singles were fake, created by shipping a lot and accepting returns and by payola for the so-called hits.
-
- Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
- Posts: 22227
- Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 6:04 am
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
All of that was because as smart as they were, Neil and Bill were dumb as rocks and lacked common sense. While he’s not my favorite producer, Eddie Kramer produced their demo that them signed. Instead of hiring Eddie to produce the first album, Neil cut corners and went on the cheap by hiring his glorified A&R guys to produce their first two records. Which resembled almost nothing of their live show. Had Eddie produced it, the tracking order would have most likely mirrored their live set lists and SHE more than likely would have ended up on the albummrspeedgene wrote: ↑Wed Jan 17, 2024 4:29 am KISS in the early 70's. They made it seem they were huge but they were running on fumes before ALIVE! broke. Aucoin's credit card maxed out. Paul's "hole in Bill's shoe story" puts it in perspective.
Bogart also blew a six figure advance he got from Warners. Instead of puttting that money into his artists, he bought a fleet of Mercedes for himself and suits at Casablanca. He was a moron. That is why they lost their distribution deal with Warners. I can’t even blame cocaine since most of the suits at Warners were probably just as high as Neil was at the time and they managed run a tight ship. Eddie would’ve brought his clout and credibility to that debut album and produced a superior product than what we got. Which wasn’t the band’s fault. It was their two handlers faults.
Bill Aucoin was no Peter Grant or Brian Epstein. Bill should’ve set KISS up with their own record label like Peter did for Zeppelin with Swan Song and negotiated a distribution and promotion deal with a major label like Atlantic or WB.
Kissin Time was a cheap ploy and should’ve been DOA. The fact that Bill made the band go along with that is incredulous
Last edited by Tommy2Tone84 on Wed Jan 17, 2024 7:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
- Posts: 22227
- Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 6:04 am
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
El Vampiro Blanco wrote: ↑Wed Jan 17, 2024 5:25 amEven when they were really huge in 76-78, a lot of it was still smoke and mirrors.mrspeedgene wrote: ↑Wed Jan 17, 2024 4:29 am KISS in the early 70's. They made it seem they were huge but they were running on fumes before ALIVE! broke. Aucoin's credit card maxed out. Paul's "hole in Bill's shoe story" puts it in perspective.
Especially a lot of the record sales and 'hit' singles were fake, created by shipping a lot and accepting returns and by payola for the so-called hits.
That is how the industry worked at the time
What hit singles? They only had two, Beth in 1976 and IWMFLY in 1979. They didn’t have any other hit singles
This was fifteen years before Sound Scan. The labels based sales off units shipped not sold. The labels figured Zeppelin’s and Aerosmith’s “sales” the same way they did KISS’s.
-
- Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
- Posts: 1910
- Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:03 am
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
I used to think if you were famous you were set the rest of your life. Even when they'd complain they were struggling financially I'd assume they were rich-people broke not broke broke. Now I see bands selling memorabilia and doing tours when they clearly don't want to because they need the money. They may never have to get a job as a waiter but that still must suck, especially since they've had a taste of the high life.
- Hellsinkey
- Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
- Posts: 18101
- Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 12:15 pm
- Location: Finland
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
When Scott Weiland died, his ex-wife said that he was a million in debt, which was surprising.
-
- Headlining Clubs
- Posts: 2826
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 1:58 pm
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
I think Casablanca already considered it a hit single if it broke the top 100 or something.Tommy2Tone84 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 17, 2024 7:33 amEl Vampiro Blanco wrote: ↑Wed Jan 17, 2024 5:25 amEven when they were really huge in 76-78, a lot of it was still smoke and mirrors.mrspeedgene wrote: ↑Wed Jan 17, 2024 4:29 am KISS in the early 70's. They made it seem they were huge but they were running on fumes before ALIVE! broke. Aucoin's credit card maxed out. Paul's "hole in Bill's shoe story" puts it in perspective.
Especially a lot of the record sales and 'hit' singles were fake, created by shipping a lot and accepting returns and by payola for the so-called hits.
That is how the industry worked at the time
What hit singles? They only had two, Beth in 1976 and IWMFLY in 1979. They didn’t have any other hit singles
This was fifteen years before Sound Scan. The labels based sales off units shipped not sold. The labels figured Zeppelin’s and Aerosmith’s “sales” the same way they did KISS’s.
It's all in that book about Casablanca, which is an interesting read, especially since it seemed Kiss wasn't that important to them at all, they were much more concerned with Donna Summer, Village People and George Clinton it seemed.
-
- Playing Shitty Clubs in a Van
- Posts: 1232
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2019 9:20 am
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
Assuming she was telling the truth about that, it is sad; however, I don't find it all that surprising. Most likely, he wasn't much of a financial manager to start with. Two ex-wives and many years of drug addiction probably didn't help things. He wasn't exactly selling a lot of albums, selling lots of tickets or traveling like a top tier rock star at the time of his death.Hellsinkey wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2024 12:00 am When Scott Weiland died, his ex-wife said that he was a million in debt, which was surprising.
- Bono Nettencourt
- MSX Tour Support Act
- Posts: 4340
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2022 12:32 pm
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
Yeah they were primarily a disco label. Kiss were an anomaly.El Vampiro Blanco wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2024 1:15 amI think Casablanca already considered it a hit single if it broke the top 100 or something.Tommy2Tone84 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 17, 2024 7:33 amEl Vampiro Blanco wrote: ↑Wed Jan 17, 2024 5:25 am
Even when they were really huge in 76-78, a lot of it was still smoke and mirrors.
Especially a lot of the record sales and 'hit' singles were fake, created by shipping a lot and accepting returns and by payola for the so-called hits.
That is how the industry worked at the time
What hit singles? They only had two, Beth in 1976 and IWMFLY in 1979. They didn’t have any other hit singles
This was fifteen years before Sound Scan. The labels based sales off units shipped not sold. The labels figured Zeppelin’s and Aerosmith’s “sales” the same way they did KISS’s.
It's all in that book about Casablanca, which is an interesting read, especially since it seemed Kiss wasn't that important to them at all, they were much more concerned with Donna Summer, Village People and George Clinton it seemed.
ijwthstd wrote: obviously you take this way too seriously and were deeply affected by what transpired in the early 1990's and hopefully you are discussing these issues with a therapist in addition to other fans on music message boards.
-
- Cockblocked by Poison
- Posts: 9295
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 9:23 pm
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
KISS didn't go broke, they figured out how to carry on.Bono Nettencourt wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2024 5:47 pm After Slide It In and before WS '87 David Coverdale was in debt $3 million to Geffen Records and was doing anonymous New York Seltzer jingles for extra cash.
Kiss went broke in the 80s because they kept spending like it was still the 70s.
KISS Co. was having financial problems, not Paul and Gene.
If you meant Peter and Ace, then you would be correct. Ace declared bankruptcy in 1995. Peter was down to his last $100,000 at that time.
To date, Ace owes the IRS somewhere in the 6 digits. He lost his reunion era house many years ago.
- Ziggy Sawdust
- Doing Package Tours in Theaters
- Posts: 5418
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 3:00 am
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
A lot of bands seem to be begging for change these days with cheap signed editions etc
Hell'sHungryChild wrote:
I have no desire to pay $150 to see an ant sized Ac/Dc and drink $12 beer cups.
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
There are probably more people than we know who are legit huge but way in debt and living paycheck to paycheck even if the paychecks are in the millionsCrankerBait wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2024 3:45 amAssuming she was telling the truth about that, it is sad; however, I don't find it all that surprising. Most likely, he wasn't much of a financial manager to start with. Two ex-wives and many years of drug addiction probably didn't help things. He wasn't exactly selling a lot of albums, selling lots of tickets or traveling like a top tier rock star at the time of his death.Hellsinkey wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2024 12:00 am When Scott Weiland died, his ex-wife said that he was a million in debt, which was surprising.
"I went and saw Chickenfoot twice. I've suffered for being Sammy's friend" - Bob Forrest
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
There are probably more people than we know who are legit huge but way in debt and living paycheck to paycheck even if the paychecks are in the millionsCrankerBait wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2024 3:45 amAssuming she was telling the truth about that, it is sad; however, I don't find it all that surprising. Most likely, he wasn't much of a financial manager to start with. Two ex-wives and many years of drug addiction probably didn't help things. He wasn't exactly selling a lot of albums, selling lots of tickets or traveling like a top tier rock star at the time of his death.Hellsinkey wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2024 12:00 am When Scott Weiland died, his ex-wife said that he was a million in debt, which was surprising.
"I went and saw Chickenfoot twice. I've suffered for being Sammy's friend" - Bob Forrest
- DonJuanDeMarco
- Headlining Clubs
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 8:50 pm
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
HIGHWAY 9
I remember walking into the Virgin Megastore in Times Square and they were performing to a pretty large crowd. They had a good Goo Goo Dolls meets Matchbox 20 meets Eagles sound. I just figured they were a new popular band. I bought the record and loved it.
Then a few months later I saw they were performing at Arlene's Grocery a very small bar/club downtown. I don't think they got any bigger than that unfortunately and never put out another record either!
Here's on of my favorites off of the album to get you started....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6KWBh4we6o
I remember walking into the Virgin Megastore in Times Square and they were performing to a pretty large crowd. They had a good Goo Goo Dolls meets Matchbox 20 meets Eagles sound. I just figured they were a new popular band. I bought the record and loved it.
Then a few months later I saw they were performing at Arlene's Grocery a very small bar/club downtown. I don't think they got any bigger than that unfortunately and never put out another record either!
Here's on of my favorites off of the album to get you started....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6KWBh4we6o
"You want Don Juan DeMarco, the world's greatest lover, to talk to you? What do you know of great love?"
-
- Lugging equipment around in parent's car
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2021 9:56 am
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
Just read an interview with his son. According to him (take it for what it’s worth), Scott’s estate is STILL in debt despite all of the hit singles he helped write. His son is working a regular 9-5 while trying to get his music career off the ground.Hellsinkey wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2024 12:00 am When Scott Weiland died, his ex-wife said that he was a million in debt, which was surprising.
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
Oh man. When I was a young, I thought that anybody who had a record out or a video on MTV was rich and just living the goddamned life.
First band I ever met and hung out with was Metallica. It was such an eye opener...they were basically poor as shit at the time (RTL tour). I traded a fucked up guitar to James at an in-store for tickets and passes, and he was like: "Wait. YOU ARE GOING TO GIVE ME this guitar for tickets to OUR show??????" and immediately called somebody over to seal the deal. Damned thing wasn't worth $50.
Got to hang out after, and it was just...not glamorous, lol. I always thought backstage would be a huge party, but it was just basically dudes drinking beer long enough that they could stop sweating and get on the bus.
Then of course I later went through the whole thing with Poison where the first year was just pretty much poverty living, even after the first video was on MTV and through the first leg of that Ratt tour. I meannn, aside from DeVille who lived with his parents, nobody in the band even owned a car until after Talk Dirty to Me hit.
First band I ever met and hung out with was Metallica. It was such an eye opener...they were basically poor as shit at the time (RTL tour). I traded a fucked up guitar to James at an in-store for tickets and passes, and he was like: "Wait. YOU ARE GOING TO GIVE ME this guitar for tickets to OUR show??????" and immediately called somebody over to seal the deal. Damned thing wasn't worth $50.
Got to hang out after, and it was just...not glamorous, lol. I always thought backstage would be a huge party, but it was just basically dudes drinking beer long enough that they could stop sweating and get on the bus.
Then of course I later went through the whole thing with Poison where the first year was just pretty much poverty living, even after the first video was on MTV and through the first leg of that Ratt tour. I meannn, aside from DeVille who lived with his parents, nobody in the band even owned a car until after Talk Dirty to Me hit.
- diablomozart
- Headlining Clubs
- Posts: 2780
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 7:11 am
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
yeah i met metallica on the justice tour and james said they were still "in debt to elektra" at the time...pretty crazy...d.m.Sleek wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 12:41 pm Oh man. When I was a young, I thought that anybody who had a record out or a video on MTV was rich and just living the goddamned life.
First band I ever met and hung out with was Metallica. It was such an eye opener...they were basically poor as shit at the time (RTL tour). I traded a fucked up guitar to James at an in-store for tickets and passes, and he was like: "Wait. YOU ARE GOING TO GIVE ME this guitar for tickets to OUR show??????" and immediately called somebody over to seal the deal. Damned thing wasn't worth $50.
Got to hang out after, and it was just...not glamorous, lol. I always thought backstage would be a huge party, but it was just basically dudes drinking beer long enough that they could stop sweating and get on the bus.
Then of course I later went through the whole thing with Poison where the first year was just pretty much poverty living, even after the first video was on MTV and through the first leg of that Ratt tour. I meannn, aside from DeVille who lived with his parents, nobody in the band even owned a car until after Talk Dirty to Me hit.
-
- Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
- Posts: 22227
- Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 6:04 am
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
Vince Neil Eats wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 12:16 pmJust read an interview with his son. According to him (take it for what it’s worth), Scott’s estate is STILL in debt despite all of the hit singles he helped write. His son is working a regular 9-5 while trying to get his music career off the ground.Hellsinkey wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2024 12:00 am When Scott Weiland died, his ex-wife said that he was a million in debt, which was surprising.
I was shocked to find our that Scott wasn’t much of a writer in the band. The bros wrote the majority of the songs.
That’s very sad. But Scott was an addict and as was mentioned not a good or very responsible financial planner. When you have kids you need to grow up and stop being a f*ck up. Same goes for Jani Lane. That’s one of the only times I’ll compare the two
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
Ramones. Despite their legendary status as godfathers of punk rock it was a surprise to find out they were barely surviving financially all those years touring small clubs in a van.
According to his brother, after End of The Century, which was their most succesful album, Joey Ramone only had $5,000 saved in his bank account.
They started to get some better money in the 90’s from music and merchandise licensing. Johnny and Joey were frugal and both invested, but the hired guns like Richie and later CJ were only making like $300-$400 a week.
According to his brother, after End of The Century, which was their most succesful album, Joey Ramone only had $5,000 saved in his bank account.
They started to get some better money in the 90’s from music and merchandise licensing. Johnny and Joey were frugal and both invested, but the hired guns like Richie and later CJ were only making like $300-$400 a week.
- Bono Nettencourt
- MSX Tour Support Act
- Posts: 4340
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2022 12:32 pm
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
Yeah Richie quit because he wanted some of the T-shirt money.
ijwthstd wrote: obviously you take this way too seriously and were deeply affected by what transpired in the early 1990's and hopefully you are discussing these issues with a therapist in addition to other fans on music message boards.
-
- Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
- Posts: 1689
- Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 7:16 pm
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
Which he should have gotten.Bono Nettencourt wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 2:50 pm Yeah Richie quit because he wanted some of the T-shirt money.
Christ - he was writing songs for the band (ie “Somebody Put Something In My Drink”), so he should have been made a full member, but Johnny was, by all accounts, a dick.
Re: Bands you thought were huge, but actually broke?
I'd have to imagine many of the richest rock stars get a lot of their money through good investments in real estate or some other non-musical ventures.
I often wonder how well off a guy like George Lynch is. Like was he ever a millionaire at any point? Same with the guys in Judas Priest.
I often wonder how well off a guy like George Lynch is. Like was he ever a millionaire at any point? Same with the guys in Judas Priest.