Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

The one that started it all. Spreading gossip and insults since 1998.

Moderator: Metal Sludge

Post Reply

Do you want legacy acts to put out new material?

Yes. Even mediocre stuff is pretty good.
27
68%
No.
13
33%
 
Total votes: 40
Rocker4Real
Playing Shitty Clubs in a Van
Posts: 1067
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2023 5:15 am

Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by Rocker4Real »

Would you prefer legacy acts not put out any new material? Is that better than putting out a mediocre album every few years? Maybe they like having a couple new songs to play in the set. Maybe the fans would prefer to have that 10 minutes devoted to stuff they came to hear.
User avatar
Chip Z'Hoy
Playing First Stage at SludgeFest
Posts: 30076
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 12:29 pm
Location: Between here and there

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by Chip Z'Hoy »

Mediocre for sure. I'm not crazy about a lot of the new GN'R stuff but I'll take "The General" over silence, 14 years or otherwise.
LAglamrocker wrote: Sun Feb 18, 2024 3:56 pmClub was packed with Metal Edge fans 18-30..no stupid Rush Roll The Bones dipsh*ts
User avatar
DonJuanDeMarco
Debut Album Goes Gold
Posts: 3954
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 8:50 pm

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by DonJuanDeMarco »

I'm on the fence about this one.

For many of our 80's rock guys, I truly feel later albums were "mediocre" because of limited budgets and no real producer. It just doesn't exist like it used to. It's gotten better in recent years but there are some late 90's and early 2000''s records that sound worse than demos.

When I saw Whitesnake on the Flesh & Blood tour....even though I didn't like the album very much, I like what David Coverdale said. He said "We need the old songs for the memories but we need the new songs to live". So, I say, let them play a few new ones but no more than 25% of the set.

Outside of Sludge bands....I always look at Bruce compared to Billy. Bruce never stopped putting out records. There are some good and great songs on almost all of his records. His setlist changes every tour. Billy on the other hand sticks to the greatest hits and a few album tracks. Both have been successful touring artists. But it's not fair to compare them to Roxy Blue or something! So I don't know why I bothered bringing it up! :)
"You want Don Juan DeMarco, the world's greatest lover, to talk to you? What do you know of great love?"
User avatar
Spongie
Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
Posts: 1304
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2021 1:41 pm

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by Spongie »

Varies by band. Some still got it, some don’t.

If a band can create one single song per new record that’s actually good, and will fit nicely in a live set alongside legacy songs… then I’d say they’re doing it right.

Problem is, most can’t even write one single new song that anyone wants to hear. (Looking at you Def Leppard)
User avatar
SterileEyes1
Doing 20 Questions with Metal Sludge
Posts: 5056
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 2:53 pm

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by SterileEyes1 »

This is case by case for me.

If GN’R are gonna put out…not their best material and play it live, but they’re playing 3 hour sets including what everyone came to hear, fine, fair enough. They’re clearly not doing it for money or for their health.

If RHCP are gonna put out…not their best material and play it live, but they’re barely playing an hour and a half and skipping probably at least half their big hits every night, I think that’s, as Josh Homme recently described it, “cunty”.
My Video Covers: https://www.youtube.com/@therealjeffstein/

"Diary Of A Madman"
"Aja"
"I’m Bad, I’m Nationwide”
“Sludge Factory”
"Locomotive"

My Original Music: https://jeffstein.bandcamp.com
CrankerBait
Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
Posts: 1388
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2019 9:20 am

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by CrankerBait »

SterileEyes1 wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2024 12:07 pm This is case by case for me.

If GN’R are gonna put out…not their best material and play it live, but they’re playing 3 hour sets including what everyone came to hear, fine, fair enough. They’re clearly not doing it for money or for their health.

If RHCP are gonna put out…not their best material and play it live, but they’re barely playing an hour and a half and skipping probably at least half their big hits every night, I think that’s, as Josh Homme recently described it, “cunty”.
I think that's on the money.
aznsquirt
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2147
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:16 pm

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by aznsquirt »

DonJuanDeMarco wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2024 11:05 am When I saw Whitesnake on the Flesh & Blood tour....even though I didn't like the album very much, I like what David Coverdale said. He said "We need the old songs for the memories but we need the new songs to live". So, I say, let them play a few new ones but no more than 25% of the set.
Is this really true, though? It sounds like he's claiming they make their money from new albums, and the old songs are just something they're forced to play on tour.

Maybe Whitesnake is a unique situation, but my impression is that these days the majority of these bands make their money touring and selling merch based on nostalgia, not on new album sales or hype.
DangerZone
MSX Tour Support Act
Posts: 4420
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2017 10:39 am

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by DangerZone »

I had a copy of LA Guns’ ‘the devil you know’ but never listened to it until a few days ago.

It was so boring. It “sounded good” but lacking something
User avatar
Kid-Wicked
Opening for Helix
Posts: 8242
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 11:57 pm
Location: Vancouver....wish you were here
Contact:

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by Kid-Wicked »

priest still keeps putting out good stuff.
maiden hasn't put out a decent album since brave new world.
saxon has never really had a stinker.
bon jovi hasn't done anything good since have a nice day.
it's really a mixed bag. i say keep making music if that's your passion not your paycheque.
User avatar
Zinny
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2606
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 1:01 pm
Location: Living next door to Alice Cooper

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by Zinny »

Kid-Wicked wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2024 9:46 pm priest still keeps putting out good stuff.
maiden hasn't put out a decent album since brave new world.
saxon has never really had a stinker.
bon jovi hasn't done anything good since have a nice day.
it's really a mixed bag. i say keep making music if that's your passion not your paycheque.
Agreed in all points!
Looking forward to the new Judas Priest album.
But too many acts just seem to put their names & faces on the cover and let others do the heavy lifting.
Ozzy, Ace, Mick Mars, Motley, who are even in Ac/Dc & Guns nowdays? No thanks.
User avatar
Love_Industry
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 18170
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 1:49 pm
Location: Zasransk, Belarus

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by Love_Industry »

Zinny wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2024 9:54 pm
Kid-Wicked wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2024 9:46 pm priest still keeps putting out good stuff.
maiden hasn't put out a decent album since brave new world.
saxon has never really had a stinker.
bon jovi hasn't done anything good since have a nice day.
it's really a mixed bag. i say keep making music if that's your passion not your paycheque.
Agreed in all points!
Looking forward to the new Judas Priest album.
But too many acts just seem to put their names & faces on the cover and let others do the heavy lifting.
Ozzy, Ace, Mick Mars, Motley, who are even in Ac/Dc & Guns nowdays? No thanks.
Oh the irony. I agree with your general statement, but Priest now has 3 replaceable dorks, and only 2 guys from their classic line-up, a bass player nobody noticed back then (and who doesn't write songs) and a singer who has changed his look and act beyond recognition and it could as well be someone else onstage. But, Firepower was great, their best since Turbo, and at least in the studio Halford still can do it.
User avatar
TooOldToCare
Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
Posts: 1931
Joined: Tue May 24, 2022 1:16 pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by TooOldToCare »

I'm split. If it's a band I've seen a lot, I'm bored if they only play their recognizable songs. I'm good with the old material if it's a band I didn't see back then. Night Ranger was one of those I didn't see until 5 years or so ago. I had a great time. I've never seen Extreme and liked their latest album. I'd be cool with a couple of songs from Rise.
User avatar
GaulPilbert
Opening for Slaughter
Posts: 491
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 3:56 pm
Location: East of the West

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by GaulPilbert »

One or two strong new songs to freshen up the live set (and maybe release them on streaming services, etc. as singles) would be great. No one really wants to hear a whole album full of generic re-treads, although maybe recording and coming up with something new regardless of the freshness or quality keeps the band from being bored.
User avatar
mrspeedgene
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2755
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 9:35 am

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by mrspeedgene »

I vote keep putting out material even if it is just 1 or 2 songs. I have a SPOTIFY comp that I made for myself called "NEW" and I take the new songs I like from my favorite bands and add them as they come out. That list is pretty damn good and fun to listen to.
They laughed at their gods
And fought them in vain
So he turned his
back on them
And left them in pain
User avatar
Tenacious_Dio
MSX Tour Support Act
Posts: 4835
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 5:51 am

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by Tenacious_Dio »

Rocker4Real wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2024 10:35 am Would you prefer legacy acts not put out any new material? Is that better than putting out a mediocre album every few years? Maybe they like having a couple new songs to play in the set. Maybe the fans would prefer to have that 10 minutes devoted to stuff they came to hear.
The way this is phrased, it's a 2-part question.

1. Do you want legacy acts to release new music?
2, Do you want to hear them play it in concert?

I can understand someone saying "no" to the 2nd part, but I don't get not wanting bands to release albums of new music. You get to sample it for free, and you don't have to buy it, if you don't want to.

Why would anyone prefer being offered nothing?
Rocker4Real
Playing Shitty Clubs in a Van
Posts: 1067
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2023 5:15 am

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by Rocker4Real »

Tenacious_Dio wrote: Tue Mar 05, 2024 6:45 am
Rocker4Real wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2024 10:35 am Would you prefer legacy acts not put out any new material? Is that better than putting out a mediocre album every few years? Maybe they like having a couple new songs to play in the set. Maybe the fans would prefer to have that 10 minutes devoted to stuff they came to hear.
The way this is phrased, it's a 2-part question.

1. Do you want legacy acts to release new music?
2, Do you want to hear them play it in concert?

I can understand someone saying "no" to the 2nd part, but I don't get not wanting bands to release albums of new music. You get to sample it for free, and you don't have to buy it, if you don't want to.

Why would anyone prefer being offered nothing?
It's more of a question to gauge what the fans of this style of music would want. Some fans might think it tarnishes the legacy of their favorite bands when the music released is not up to par with their past.
User avatar
Tenacious_Dio
MSX Tour Support Act
Posts: 4835
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 5:51 am

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by Tenacious_Dio »

Rocker4Real wrote: Tue Mar 05, 2024 7:14 am Some fans might think it tarnishes the legacy of their favorite bands when the music released is not up to par with their past.
Some people take this stuff way too seriously.
VincentVanWinger
Showcasing for A&R Reps
Posts: 619
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 8:36 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by VincentVanWinger »

I've never understood how people can be a fan of any band and not want new music.

Pour Some Sugar On Me was un unknown song at one point.
New shit just needs a chance.
I always want new music.
If I've seen Def Leppard for example 19 times....wouldn't you want some different songs to be played? Why trudge out the same old 40 year old shit tour after tour. I'm not talking about the 7 or 8 staples that have to be played. I'm talking the other 5 or 6 slots in a set list. Why if you love a band wouldn't you want something fresh?

I will always be down for new music even if it sucks. I like when musicians create and aren't just mailing in the final 25 years of their career.

Now yes some bands are pretty washed when it comes to writing new songs. But I still would prefer something rather than yeah we are just gonna tour 4 months every year with the same 15 song set no changes just roll and go.

Do photographers and painters just stop and say yeah I've done enough. I'll just live off that image or painting from 45 years ago it's all good. You should never stop creating your art even if it doesn't make you millions anymore.

The last Skid Row album had 2 good songs. But they were really good songs. This is the way.
DangerZone
MSX Tour Support Act
Posts: 4420
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2017 10:39 am

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by DangerZone »

most of these bands are in name only.

Ratt without Robbin isn’t really Ratt, same with guns without Izzy
(And Adler, in my opinion)

So it’s always a bit apples to oranges.
For Paul Stanley to say no one wants a new Kiss record is accurate - nobody wants a Tommy record.
But if they did a real one with ace & Peter back it would at least be interesting
WCiezak
Lugging equipment around in parent's car
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 3:58 pm

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by WCiezak »

A lot of times new material isn't mediocre. Sometimes we get a great song or two like Stand from Dee or October Song from Skid Row. It's very rare though. Optimist by Anathema to me was an instant classic and the best thing they ever did. A big part of the problem is how modern records sound. Compromising fidelity for loudness has been going on around 30 years. I've gone back and downloaded needledrops people made of 90s albums like Voodoo by King Diamond. The vinyl version of that album was far better. And if it's not the loudness, they don't do enough to offset digital sterility. Or they're using plugins that introduce all sorts of bad distortion, aliasing, and other undesirable artifacts. There are some very well-made plugins, but a lot of these guys are using ancient stuff that malfunctions at a lot of settings. A lot of modern albums would be more enjoyable if they got the production and mastering correct. Great songs can't be great if they're unpleasant or boring to listen to. On the flip side, you can take a mediocre song and make it a lot more fun than it should be by giving it a great sound.
User avatar
FreddyFender
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 3653
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2018 12:36 am

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by FreddyFender »

I'm all for new material if that artist is actually putting the work in to do something worth listening to. Whitesnake, WASP, Ratt, Lynch Mob and Dio all put out damn good albums later in their careers.

However 99% of bands just release low budget, phoned in bullshit to have something new to charge superfan weirdos an extra $25 to sign. All that garbage that comes out on Frontiers comes to mind.
Metal Sludge
The End All Be All
Posts: 4779
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2005 3:35 pm

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by Metal Sludge »

It's a hard thing to answer because so many bands have so many great songs that people want to hear.
Especially older bands.
I saw Elton John in 2001 or 2002, I think? The Songs From The West Coast tour.
He played a song or two from that album mid show. The he said, "thank you for listening politely, to the new songs, I know that's not what you came here to hear, so let's get on with it".
That's how you do it! Nobody wants to hear the new album.
Wednesday 13 Fan
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2060
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2021 10:32 am

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by Wednesday 13 Fan »

DonJuanDeMarco wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2024 11:05 am I'm on the fence about this one.

For many of our 80's rock guys, I truly feel later albums were "mediocre" because of limited budgets and no real producer. It just doesn't exist like it used to. It's gotten better in recent years but there are some late 90's and early 2000''s records that sound worse than demos.

When I saw Whitesnake on the Flesh & Blood tour....even though I didn't like the album very much, I like what David Coverdale said. He said "We need the old songs for the memories but we need the new songs to live". So, I say, let them play a few new ones but no more than 25% of the set.

Outside of Sludge bands....I always look at Bruce compared to Billy. Bruce never stopped putting out records. There are some good and great songs on almost all of his records. His setlist changes every tour. Billy on the other hand sticks to the greatest hits and a few album tracks. Both have been successful touring artists. But it's not fair to compare them to Roxy Blue or something! So I don't know why I bothered bringing it up! :)
I really doubt Whitesnake is selling that many albums. I appreciate new stuff from bands though.
User avatar
DonJuanDeMarco
Debut Album Goes Gold
Posts: 3954
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 8:50 pm

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by DonJuanDeMarco »

aznsquirt wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2024 3:59 pm
DonJuanDeMarco wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2024 11:05 am When I saw Whitesnake on the Flesh & Blood tour....even though I didn't like the album very much, I like what David Coverdale said. He said "We need the old songs for the memories but we need the new songs to live". So, I say, let them play a few new ones but no more than 25% of the set.
Is this really true, though? It sounds like he's claiming they make their money from new albums, and the old songs are just something they're forced to play on tour.

Maybe Whitesnake is a unique situation, but my impression is that these days the majority of these bands make their money touring and selling merch based on nostalgia, not on new album sales or hype.
I’m pretty sure he meant artistically, not financially.
"You want Don Juan DeMarco, the world's greatest lover, to talk to you? What do you know of great love?"
User avatar
Psychobolia.com
Playing a Package Tour in Arenas
Posts: 13180
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 4:17 am
Location: Paris, France, land of sleaze and cheese, wine and whine
Contact:

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by Psychobolia.com »

I also went with YES...

There's always a few nuggets to be found on recent releases. I really dig the latest Priest song that was released (the other ones not as much). Looking forward to the upcoming Testament album, the last 4 albums had a bunch of really good songs.

Nothing wrong with letting bands do what they've always done, nobody's forcing you to buy their albums for crissakes!
User avatar
GoodJudge
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2107
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 11:49 am
Location: UK

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by GoodJudge »

VincentVanWinger wrote: Tue Mar 05, 2024 10:27 am I've never understood how people can be a fan of any band and not want new music.

If I've seen Def Leppard for example 19 times....wouldn't you want some different songs to be played? Why trudge out the same old 40 year old shit tour after tour. I'm not talking about the 7 or 8 staples that have to be played. I'm talking the other 5 or 6 slots in a set list. Why if you love a band wouldn't you want something fresh?
Agreed on your 1st point but if you've seen Leppard 19 times you are NOT the sort of person they design their set lists for.

BTW Voivod's last 2 proper albums have been some.of the best work of their career. The 'let's re-record some old stuff' cd was pretty damn good too. So the fire is still there for some oldsters.
aznsquirt
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2147
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:16 pm

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by aznsquirt »

DonJuanDeMarco wrote: Tue Mar 05, 2024 11:37 pm
aznsquirt wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2024 3:59 pm
DonJuanDeMarco wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2024 11:05 am When I saw Whitesnake on the Flesh & Blood tour....even though I didn't like the album very much, I like what David Coverdale said. He said "We need the old songs for the memories but we need the new songs to live". So, I say, let them play a few new ones but no more than 25% of the set.
Is this really true, though? It sounds like he's claiming they make their money from new albums, and the old songs are just something they're forced to play on tour.

Maybe Whitesnake is a unique situation, but my impression is that these days the majority of these bands make their money touring and selling merch based on nostalgia, not on new album sales or hype.
I’m pretty sure he meant artistically, not financially.
Makes sense.
User avatar
Zinny
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2606
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 1:01 pm
Location: Living next door to Alice Cooper

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by Zinny »

Love_Industry wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2024 11:16 pm
Zinny wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2024 9:54 pm
Kid-Wicked wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2024 9:46 pm priest still keeps putting out good stuff.
maiden hasn't put out a decent album since brave new world.
saxon has never really had a stinker.
bon jovi hasn't done anything good since have a nice day.
it's really a mixed bag. i say keep making music if that's your passion not your paycheque.
Agreed in all points!
Looking forward to the new Judas Priest album.
But too many acts just seem to put their names & faces on the cover and let others do the heavy lifting.
Ozzy, Ace, Mick Mars, Motley, who are even in Ac/Dc & Guns nowdays? No thanks.
Oh the irony. I agree with your general statement, but Priest now has 3 replaceable dorks, and only 2 guys from their classic line-up, a bass player nobody noticed back then (and who doesn't write songs) and a singer who has changed his look and act beyond recognition and it could as well be someone else onstage. But, Firepower was great, their best since Turbo, and at least in the studio Halford still can do it.
You are not wrong… But from what I’ve heard from the new ”Judas Priest” album sounds great, but then again, is it Judas Priest?
Dyslexicheart
Debut Album Goes Gold
Posts: 4090
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 8:31 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: Legacy acts. No new material vs. Mediocre material (Poll)

Post by Dyslexicheart »

Yes - if you don't like it don't buy it. Why would we deny someone the right to make music if they're musicians?
Post Reply