Page 1 of 2

The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 10:34 am
by Whatever Happened To…
Image

Paul needs a brolly roadie.

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 10:58 am
by RaceFan3
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Not sure what's funnier here: the wig, the expression, or the slim-fit jeans (seriously, why do guys where those?) with...built-in knee pads?

EDIT: Are they some kind of painter's jeans? Looks like some paint splashes on them. If so, that actually would explain the built-in knee pads. Maybe 'ol Stan was doing some work around the house.

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 11:27 am
by Turner Coates
Image

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 11:29 am
by Hair I Go Again
Guess he’s not a Folgers man after all…

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 11:34 am
by DangerZone
Hair I Go Again wrote: Fri Mar 14, 2025 11:29 am Guess he’s not a Folgers man after all…
nice!

he looks like Henry winkler

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 12:03 pm
by Hatchets Molly
Holy Shit, there is all kinds of hilarity going on in a still photo. The hair, expression, jeans for teens, running shoes with pink laces, the intolerance to wind or rain or a smell or whatever.

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 12:07 pm
by NeonKnite
Legends never die, they just turn into old women.

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 12:08 pm
by Hatchets Molly
DangerZone wrote: Fri Mar 14, 2025 11:34 am
Hair I Go Again wrote: Fri Mar 14, 2025 11:29 am Guess he’s not a Folgers man after all…
nice!

he looks like Henry winkler
They both look like Jewish women. Whenever a Winkler commercial comes on TV, I say, "Who's that lady?" It's hard to believe that used to be Arthur Fonzarelli, who was much cooler before he became the central character. But people have been saying "Who's that lady?" about Paul for 50-60 years.

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 1:28 pm
by sirthx2
I don't trust the photo. The hair looks photoshopped. No detail from hair to head. ehh, maybe the whole thing is just soft-focus. Carry on.

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 1:31 pm
by Wiseacre
That's a good-looking wig, I'll give him that.

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 1:58 pm
by Hatchets Molly
Wiseacre wrote: Fri Mar 14, 2025 1:31 pm That's a good-looking wig, I'll give him that.
His head looks larger than Tommy’s in that pic.

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 2:02 pm
by Wiseacre
Hatchets Molly wrote: Fri Mar 14, 2025 1:58 pm
Wiseacre wrote: Fri Mar 14, 2025 1:31 pm That's a good-looking wig, I'll give him that.
His head looks larger than Tommy’s in that pic.
I think because he's ducking down and has no neck, plus the wind blowing his "hair" makes it look bigger.

BTW, he is also performing street magic with a levitating left foot. OR we can see that that leg really is shorter than the other leg, thus the "foot thing".

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 2:53 pm
by SeniorGrande
Image

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 3:12 pm
by Hatchets Molly
Wiseacre wrote: Fri Mar 14, 2025 2:02 pm
Hatchets Molly wrote: Fri Mar 14, 2025 1:58 pm
Wiseacre wrote: Fri Mar 14, 2025 1:31 pm That's a good-looking wig, I'll give him that.
His head looks larger than Tommy’s in that pic.
I think because he's ducking down and has no neck, plus the wind blowing his "hair" makes it look bigger.

BTW, he is also performing street magic with a levitating left foot. OR we can see that that leg really is shorter than the other leg, thus the "foot thing".
Pee-pull…a street hustler came up to me one day at Starbucks when I was being a Karen to the barista. Now he looked me up and he looked me down and said - hey man, why your head so big and leg so short. I looked at him like I shit my pants and said, “The wind is cool. My jeans are for teens.”

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 4:42 pm
by Danzig in the Dark
RaceFan3 wrote: Fri Mar 14, 2025 10:58 am :lol: :lol: :lol:

Not sure what's funnier here: the wig, the expression, or the slim-fit jeans (seriously, why do guys where those?) with...built-in knee pads?

EDIT: Are they some kind of painter's jeans? Looks like some paint splashes on them. If so, that actually would explain the built-in knee pads. Maybe 'ol Stan was doing some work around the house.
You're asking why Paul might need knee pads?

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 4:54 pm
by Wiseacre
:lol:

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 7:03 pm
by JamesHetfieldsAcneScars
Otb

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 7:08 pm
by JamesHetfieldsAcneScars
Nnb

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2025 1:43 am
by Whatever Happened To…
sirthx2 wrote: Fri Mar 14, 2025 1:28 pm I don't trust the photo. The hair looks photoshopped. No detail from hair to head. ehh, maybe the whole thing is just soft-focus. Carry on.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/a ... uting.html

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2025 2:28 am
by DevastatinDave
Hatchets Molly wrote: Fri Mar 14, 2025 12:03 pm Holy Shit, there is all kinds of hilarity going on in a still photo. The hair, expression, jeans for teens, running shoes with pink laces, the intolerance to wind or rain or a smell or whatever.
You forgot the Dr. Evil jacket.

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2025 4:08 am
by Black Stuff
Paula when he sees a nude woman.

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2025 5:07 am
by kwf
Fake picture of fake hair

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2025 5:23 am
by Hatchets Molly
DevastatinDave wrote: Sat Mar 15, 2025 2:28 am
Hatchets Molly wrote: Fri Mar 14, 2025 12:03 pm Holy Shit, there is all kinds of hilarity going on in a still photo. The hair, expression, jeans for teens, running shoes with pink laces, the intolerance to wind or rain or a smell or whatever.
You forgot the Dr. Evil jacket.
I did, yes. I knew there was something familiar about it but couldn't pin it down. :D :D

Image

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2025 7:01 am
by Whatever Happened To…
kwf wrote: Sat Mar 15, 2025 5:07 am Fake picture of fake hair
Nope: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/a ... uting.html

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2025 7:20 am
by kwf
Whatever Happened To… wrote: Sat Mar 15, 2025 7:01 am
kwf wrote: Sat Mar 15, 2025 5:07 am Fake picture of fake hair
Nope: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/a ... uting.html
LOL, that's proof

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2025 7:27 am
by Whatever Happened To…
kwf wrote: Sat Mar 15, 2025 7:20 am
Whatever Happened To… wrote: Sat Mar 15, 2025 7:01 am
kwf wrote: Sat Mar 15, 2025 5:07 am Fake picture of fake hair
Nope: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/a ... uting.html
LOL, that's proof
Are you suggesting that the Daily Mail faked a photo of Paul Stanley’s hair?

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2025 8:00 am
by kwf
Whatever Happened To… wrote: Sat Mar 15, 2025 7:27 am
kwf wrote: Sat Mar 15, 2025 7:20 am
LOL, that's proof
Are you suggesting that the Daily Mail faked a photo of Paul Stanley’s hair?
Look real close

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2025 9:11 am
by wildside1969
Whatever Happened To… wrote: Sat Mar 15, 2025 7:27 amAre you suggesting that the Daily Mail faked a photo of Paul Stanley’s hair?
Judge for yourself. Look at his hands in the pic. On the left hand his middle finger and the one next are missing parts and deformed. His thumb looks like its 3, 4 inches long and right out of a science fiction movie. The fingers on his right hand are also deformed.

Image
Image

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2025 9:14 am
by Hatchets Molly
wildside1969 wrote: Sat Mar 15, 2025 9:11 am
Whatever Happened To… wrote: Sat Mar 15, 2025 7:27 amAre you suggesting that the Daily Mail faked a photo of Paul Stanley’s hair?
Judge for yourself. Look at his hand in the pic. His middle finger and the one next are missing parts and deformed. His thumb looks like its 3, 4 inches long and right out of a science fiction movie. The fingers on his right hand are also deformed.

Image

Image
How did he hold a pick? Are the missing parts with his missing ear? So many questions.

Re: The Starbucks Child gets his wig wet

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2025 10:45 am
by DonJuanDeMarco
wildside1969 wrote: Sat Mar 15, 2025 9:11 am
Whatever Happened To… wrote: Sat Mar 15, 2025 7:27 amAre you suggesting that the Daily Mail faked a photo of Paul Stanley’s hair?
Judge for yourself. Look at his hands in the pic. On the left hand his middle finger and the one next are missing parts and deformed. His thumb looks like its 3, 4 inches long and right out of a science fiction movie. The fingers on his right hand are also deformed.

Image
Image
That is weird! What the hell is going on with his fingers? The hair is beautiful. As for the face he's making. That must be one bad cup of coffee!