Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

The one that started it all. Spreading gossip and insults since 1998.

Moderator: Metal Sludge

joey78
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2231
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 2:21 am
Location: Mumbai, India

Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by joey78 »

They always seemed like a blend of Aerosmith and Guns n Roses.

Consistent records with catchy songs .

Josh Todd is right up there with Steven Tyler as a front man .Keith Nelson is a great songwriter

They should have been way bigger
User avatar
pieceofme
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 22469
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 12:49 pm
Location: Downtown Vancouver

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by pieceofme »

You must have been listening to a different buckcherry than i was. At most a few good songs.
Image
GrayAntiMatter wrote:EVH


Zappa is pure cult status shit. He is to music what Bruce fucking Campbell is to acting....
User avatar
VinnieVincentsVag
Headlining a Theater Tour
Posts: 6355
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by VinnieVincentsVag »

Josh Todd can’t sing
User avatar
HottKarl777
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 3:38 pm

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by HottKarl777 »

VinnieVincentsVag wrote: Fri Apr 11, 2025 5:45 am Josh Todd can’t sing

Plus he looks like he cooks meth. And it's not even good meth.
Tommy2Tone84
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 23002
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 6:04 am

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by Tommy2Tone84 »

Why weren’t they bigger? Cause bands like Foo Fighters, Nickelback, Creed, Limp Bizkit, Seether, Kid Rock, Slipknot and Good Charlotte were what was happening at the time.


Piece of Me and VV’s Vag are also right. Although I would say a singer’s voice is subjective territory. I liked a couple of songs and I appreciated they were trying to do a 70s and 80s mix of old school rock. I probably shortchanged them at the time, I had a tough time understanding the hype online about them. As derivative as they were, I liked Airborne better when they came out a few years later. I’m not a huge fan I thought they did the retro trip better than Buckcherry. Buckcherry also seemed to change members often. Like Vag said, I was never a big fan of Todd’s voice. Same with The Darkness. I thought the band were great but could never get past Justin’s singing style. I know that’s subjective. But to this day, I’m still not a big fan.


The problem with this scene is, everyone ran for the exits in 1992 and 1993. The back biting, squabbling and petty infighting became public in the wake of the scene change. Everyone acted like they were so humiliated to be a part of or attached to the scene. Then, magically everyone became “bros” again over the last twenty years. While I appreciate a lot of the musicians and hangers on (I’m looking at you Riki Rachtman) have grown up to a degree and gotten over themselves, it’s way too late. It was too late by the time Buckcherry came along.
LitaStrauss
Opening Act in Local Bars
Posts: 323
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2023 4:58 pm

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by LitaStrauss »

I saw Buckcherry open for Motley Crue and Josh Todd said pussy so many times in his stage banter that even Steel Panther would go, "that's a bit much."

"Who likes pussy? I like pussy. Everybody getting some pussy tonight? Who likes cocaine? Who likes pussy and cocaine? I like pussy and cocaine."

It felt like something out of South Park. It was like "we get it dude, you're sex, drugs and rock n roll. Good for you."
LAglamrocker
Playing First Stage at SludgeFest
Posts: 27736
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 9:49 am
Location: Candyassland

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by LAglamrocker »

Band C-
Image C-
Sound C-
They got what they deserved C-
Jani Lane and Bret Michaels should form a band called "Nelson II"
Tommy2Tone84
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 23002
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 6:04 am

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by Tommy2Tone84 »

LitaStrauss wrote: Fri Apr 11, 2025 6:34 am I saw Buckcherry open for Motley Crue and Josh Todd said pussy so many times in his stage banter that even Steel Panther would go, "that's a bit much."

"Who likes pussy? I like pussy. Everybody getting some pussy tonight? Who likes cocaine? Who likes pussy and cocaine? I like pussy and cocaine."

It felt like something out of South Park. It was like "we get it dude, you're sex, drugs and rock n roll. Good for you."

In fairness, I saw Motley Crue years ago and way past their prime. It was mostly the same thing between Nikki and Tommy. Vince didn’t really say much and came off really normal. We left the show early and I seriously began to question why I was ever a fan of those clowns. Those two made Sebastian Bach sound like a college professor.
Last edited by Tommy2Tone84 on Fri Apr 11, 2025 7:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
Tommy2Tone84
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 23002
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 6:04 am

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by Tommy2Tone84 »

LAglamrocker wrote: Fri Apr 11, 2025 6:39 am Band C-
Image C-
Sound C-
They got what they deserved C-
That’s a fair grade point average. They made the original Nelson band look like Deep Purple. That’s the thing with this place and the scene. If BC had come out in 1990 fans would’ve been mocking them mercilessly and relentlessly in 1999. Which was an argument made at the time. But because they were “new” back then fans were acting as if they were the second coming. I think it’s great they’ve lasted for so long. But I never got it. I thought there were other bands that were better. The scene had nothing left in the tank. The industry killed it and many of the musicians involved in the scene willing helped the suits. Listening to people like Tracii Guns, Nikki Sixx, Tommy Lee, Don Dokken, George Lynch, Joe Elliott, CC Deville and even Gene Simmons was like watching someone stab themselves or jump off a building in desperate attempts to gain the approval of people who didn’t matter.


To the OP, Keith isn’t in the band anymore and hasn’t been for a long time.
User avatar
Kajsa
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2727
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 7:59 am
Location: I dont know

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by Kajsa »

Didnt have any good songs.
User avatar
Black Stuff
Playing Second Stage at SludgeFest
Posts: 5966
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2020 1:24 pm
Location: Blotz's Treehouse

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by Black Stuff »

pieceofme wrote: Fri Apr 11, 2025 5:45 am You must have been listening to a different buckcherry than i was. At most a few good songs.
this
The power of Sludge compels you.
User avatar
Nate S Axel
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2393
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 2:17 am
Location: DTLV

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by Nate S Axel »

Probably because Josh Todd did a lot of drugs and was skinny and anorexic looking -- not very big.

If they had been lazy slobs and didn't tour so much, they could sit around, get older, and get bigger and fatter like the tubs of lard in Bowling For Soup.

The lead singer is fatter now than the fat-ass guitarist used to be, and the fat-ass guitarist had to retire because he had two toes amputated.

That's why Buckcherry wasn't bigger.
"If you find yourself in a fat bitch pussy just remember it's because you're broke." (Kanye West)
User avatar
dmbrocker
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 18944
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:49 pm
Location: Rockin’ with Amber, Bradie, Laurine, Dokken, Ratt, Motley, Aerosmith, Rush, Poison…

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by dmbrocker »

"Lit Up", "Crazy Bitch", and "Sorry" were pretty big when they came out, weren't they? That's about the right amount of success for them, I think.
Image
LAglamrocker wrote: Trixter is awesome but everyone has seen After The Rain video correct? That’s one of first things I’m going thank God for
joey78
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2231
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 2:21 am
Location: Mumbai, India

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by joey78 »

Josh Todd and Keith Nelson got sober before they formed Buckcherry

Keith and Xavier quit due to musical differences

They had the potential to be the next guns n roses

Their post comeback records from 2005 until 2017 are pretty solid.

I wonder how Velvet Revolver would have turned out if Slash persisted with Josh and Keith . They probably would have lasted longer as a band . But on the flip side there would be no Buckcherry comeback or Slash/Myles
User avatar
pieceofme
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 22469
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 12:49 pm
Location: Downtown Vancouver

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by pieceofme »

joey78 wrote: Fri Apr 11, 2025 9:48 am Josh Todd and Keith Nelson got sober before they formed Buckcherry

Keith and Xavier quit due to musical differences

They had the potential to be the next guns n roses

Their post comeback records from 2005 until 2017 are pretty solid.

I wonder how Velvet Revolver would have turned out if Slash persisted with Josh and Keith . They probably would have lasted longer as a band . But on the flip side there would be no Buckcherry comeback or Slash/Myles
:lol:

Now you're just trolling!

Aren't you the same guy who loves the Blaze Maiden albums as well?
Image
GrayAntiMatter wrote:EVH


Zappa is pure cult status shit. He is to music what Bruce fucking Campbell is to acting....
DangerZone
MSX Tour Support Act
Posts: 4744
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2017 10:39 am

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by DangerZone »

is this a parody post?
Their big hit was a blatant “shock me” rewrite.

Crazy bitch is just embarrassing.
But Phil lewis lowered that bar even further
TREVERLAST
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2029
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 7:54 am

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by TREVERLAST »

I remember loving the first CD. I was excited to see ROCK coming back! I didn't like the 2nd CD as much. So I guess I lost interest then. 'Crazy Bitch' got a lot of attention but I didn't buy that CD. I did get to see them open for Crue in 08, KISS in 09 & a couple of club shows since. They always deliver live.
aznsquirt
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2444
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:16 pm

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by aznsquirt »

joey78 wrote: Fri Apr 11, 2025 5:39 am They always seemed like a blend of Aerosmith and Guns n Roses.
The same reason that a band that was a "blend of Black Sabbath and Deep Purple" weren't megastars in the 80s and a band that was a "blend of Nirvana and Pearl Jam" weren't megastars in the 2000s, etc.

I would argue that, given the market, they probably achieved as much success as a band like that could've reasonably expect to have had without them pivoting their sound/image.
User avatar
HueyRamone
Playing First Stage at SludgeFest
Posts: 33992
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 9:07 pm

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by HueyRamone »

joey78 wrote: Fri Apr 11, 2025 5:39 am They always seemed like a blend of Aerosmith and Guns n Roses.
They were in no way that. A blend of Nugent and Johnny Crash, maybe.
joey78 wrote: Fri Apr 11, 2025 5:39 am
Consistent records with catchy songs .
Horrible songs like Crazy Bitch and I Love the Cocaine might have been catchy? But were not good.
joey78 wrote: Fri Apr 11, 2025 5:39 am
Josh Todd is right up there with Steven Tyler as a front man .
lol
joey78 wrote: Fri Apr 11, 2025 5:39 am
They should have been way bigger
They should have been less big.
LAglamrocker wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2024 8:07 pm You can tell Sleek had nothing to do with this…thats why it’s so entertaining
ParaDime77
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 18073
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:39 am
Location: North Dakota

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by ParaDime77 »

Bigger?

Everyone and their brother knows who Buckcherry is. In the grand scope of music, there are very few bands that play stadiums.
Everyone Is Someone Else's Bitch
User avatar
Slippery Pete
Recording Debut Album
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:06 pm
Location: Where is anybody, really?

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by Slippery Pete »

I remember having the thought with friends in the late 90s that they might bring back sleazy GnR style rock after their debut and we anxiously awaited the follow up. While we liked the second album, the public absolutely did not and the rise up was over.

Even when Crazy Bitch hit a few years later, it never felt like they'd start to climb again.

Still a solid hard rock band and as I mentioned in the other thread, I've liked a decent few songs over the years.
"The worst tempered people I have ever met were those who knew that they were wrong." -- David Letterman
User avatar
Michael Hotts Ghost
Playing Shitty Clubs in a Van
Posts: 899
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2018 3:59 pm

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by Michael Hotts Ghost »

They got pretty big with Crazy Bitch. I remember every girl saying: "that's my song" and me thinking "no kidding". 8)
aznsquirt
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2444
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:16 pm

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by aznsquirt »

Michael Hotts Ghost wrote: Fri Apr 11, 2025 5:07 pm They got pretty big with Crazy Bitch. I remember every girl saying: "that's my song" and me thinking "no kidding". 8)
Crazy Bitch and Before He Cheats. What a bar combo.

Man.
User avatar
rockker
Doing Package Tours in Theaters
Posts: 5118
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:31 pm
Location: Middle of the Great White North

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by rockker »

They sure are fucking road dogs. I’ve seen them multiple times with out trying to (opening for Kiss, Motley, Skid Row, etc).
Kiss fans are like old men at the strip club. We know we're getting bilked but give 'em our money anyway. - Danko Jones
Ozzy Stradlin
Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
Posts: 1835
Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 7:16 pm

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by Ozzy Stradlin »

They were fairly successful, and they made a few solid albums that have their moments.

But, the notion that Josh Todd is anywhere near Steven Tyler (in his prime) is absurd.
User avatar
superglide88
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 3101
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 2:33 am

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by superglide88 »

Wrong timing, average songs
Vandermint wrote:At best, KISS is Alice Cooper for dumb people
eddie lee roth wrote:myself and members of my family could use some help but I'm supposed to help some fucker in a banana suit first.
Get the fuck out of here with this bullshit :!:
HORRORHOLIC1979
Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
Posts: 1394
Joined: Sun May 10, 2015 10:03 am

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by HORRORHOLIC1979 »

joey78 wrote: Fri Apr 11, 2025 5:39 am They always seemed like a blend of Aerosmith and Guns n Roses.

Consistent records with catchy songs .

Josh Todd is right up there with Steven Tyler as a front man .Keith Nelson is a great songwriter

They should have been way bigger
Because their singer sounds like absolute shit and comes across as a complete tool!!! I don't get the Aerosmith/Guns N Roses comparison at all. I'm shocked some people expected them to be bigger back in the day.
Image
"They're never gonna find your face, it's hidden away
I found a very special place where you used to play"
- Alice Cooper
User avatar
SterileEyes1
Doing Package Tours in Theaters
Posts: 5184
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 2:53 pm

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by SterileEyes1 »

Always wondered why they ever got big in the first place and how they’ve managed to still be out there now. They always struck me as one of those bands who proudly wear their influences on their sleeve but don’t come close to being as good or better or making anything new with it.
My Video Covers: https://www.youtube.com/@therealjeffstein/

"Diary Of A Madman"
"Aja"
"I’m Bad, I’m Nationwide”
“Sludge Factory”
"Locomotive"

My Original Music: https://jeffstein.bandcamp.com
joey78
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2231
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 2:21 am
Location: Mumbai, India

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by joey78 »

Josh and Keith were in an early version of Velvet Revolver.

If they were good enough for Slash to consider …..

Here is that lineup doing a tribute to Randy Castillo

https://youtu.be/nhmMETa_i9U?si=bDg7JjKvY2bb3_LJ
aznsquirt
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2444
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:16 pm

Re: Why weren’t Buckcherry bigger ?

Post by aznsquirt »

HORRORHOLIC1979 wrote: Sat Apr 12, 2025 11:21 am
joey78 wrote: Fri Apr 11, 2025 5:39 am They always seemed like a blend of Aerosmith and Guns n Roses.

Consistent records with catchy songs .

Josh Todd is right up there with Steven Tyler as a front man .Keith Nelson is a great songwriter

They should have been way bigger
Because their singer sounds like absolute shit and comes across as a complete tool!!! I don't get the Aerosmith/Guns N Roses comparison at all. I'm shocked some people expected them to be bigger back in the day.
The timing was right for people in their mid 30s+ who were over the 90s to get excited about a band bringing their youth back. I remember the pseudo-hype when they first broke, and then they just sort of flash in the panned, and I remember thinking "of course they did, that was never really going to work".

And then they reformed and came out of nowhere with Crazy Bitch, which crossed over to a larger audience. It was a perfect song to pull it off with (it just crushed it among 30-something-ish women who are in their barfly phase). But they were never going to have major staying power without some kind of major pivot towards pop, e.g. some huge ballad which I don't think they even tried.

Like I said before, rather than "why weren't they bigger" I think it's easy to argue that they got most of what they could've gotten out of what they were at the time.
Post Reply