Page 1 of 1
The Hair Metal Litmus Test
Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2025 1:22 pm
by PhrozenInferno
This is it. If you crack open ‘Hair Metal’, the genre we all love so much, this is what you find - this is the pure essence and nucleus of what it REALLY is. Not Van Halen, not Hanoi Rocks. Like it or not, it’s the truth. There is no through line from David Johannsen to Bret Michaels.
If you don’t like this. You’ll never ‘get’ hair metal.
https://youtu.be/czWvnYIot6k?si=iwhLFOpYcPdIVLL3
Re: The Hair Metal Litmus Test
Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2025 1:36 pm
by Rocker4Real
A D-level band?
Re: The Hair Metal Litmus Test
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2025 11:02 am
by PhrozenInferno
Rocker4Real wrote: ↑Fri Aug 01, 2025 1:36 pm
A D-level band?
D for ‘Defining’
This is what it is. Like it or not. Accept it.
It’s ok.
Re: The Hair Metal Litmus Test
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2025 12:27 pm
by Fat_Elvis
"D" for Death knell.
Re: The Hair Metal Litmus Test
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2025 12:35 pm
by dmbrocker
Rocker4Real wrote: ↑Fri Aug 01, 2025 1:36 pm
A D-level band?
More like a DD-level band, amirite? As in "DD" for Danger Danger!
All jokes aside, this isn't terrible. It's just what hair metal had become by that point, and they were just pandering to the MTV Unplugged era for at least a song.
Re: The Hair Metal Litmus Test
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2025 1:02 pm
by Rocker4Real
Trixter sold more than Danger Danger.
Re: The Hair Metal Litmus Test
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2025 2:57 pm
by DangerZone
so then ‘hair metal’ was just a small slice of relatively unknown bands at the tail end of 80s hard rock?
Re: The Hair Metal Litmus Test
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2025 3:51 pm
by Chip Z'Hoy
Re: The Hair Metal Litmus Test
Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2025 11:20 am
by PhrozenInferno
DangerZone wrote: ↑Sat Aug 02, 2025 2:57 pm
so then ‘hair metal’ was just a small slice of relatively unknown bands at the tail end of 80s hard rock?
If you can’t defend this in a pub to your mate who despises the genre, which we’ve all done, then you don’t deserve the title of ‘fan’.
Re: The Hair Metal Litmus Test
Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2025 4:25 pm
by Van Ailin'
PhrozenInferno wrote: ↑Sat Aug 02, 2025 11:02 am
This is what it is. Like it or not. Accept it.
Accept was most decidedly NOT hair metal.
Re: The Hair Metal Litmus Test
Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2025 8:02 pm
by DangerZone
PhrozenInferno wrote: ↑Sun Aug 03, 2025 11:20 am
DangerZone wrote: ↑Sat Aug 02, 2025 2:57 pm
so then ‘hair metal’ was just a small slice of relatively unknown bands at the tail end of 80s hard rock?
If you can’t defend this in a pub to your mate who despises the genre, which we’ve all done, then you don’t deserve the title of ‘fan’.
da fuq ?
Re: The Hair Metal Litmus Test
Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2025 8:37 pm
by FreddyFender
You're confused - this is a band that fits all of the worst clichés about hair metal, but none of the good stuff to go along with it.
That doesn't make them *more* hairmetal - that just means they sucked.
Re: The Hair Metal Litmus Test
Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2025 9:07 pm
by Tommy2Tone84
PhrozenInferno wrote: ↑Fri Aug 01, 2025 1:22 pm
This is it. If you crack open ‘Hair Metal’, the genre we all love so much, this is what you find - this is the pure essence and nucleus of what it REALLY is. Not Van Halen, not Hanoi Rocks. Like it or not, it’s the truth. There is no through line from David Johannsen to Bret Michaels.
If you don’t like this. You’ll never ‘get’ hair metal.
https://youtu.be/czWvnYIot6k?si=iwhLFOpYcPdIVLL3
There is no through line from David Johannsen to Bret Michaels? You’ve got to be kidding me. There is a direct line from Johannsen to Michaels. If you don’t see or hear it, then that’s your problem.
Hair metal was a lot of different bands and a lot of things. It wasn’t just one type or style of rock or metal music.
Twisted Sister, Quiet Riot, Scorpions, KISS, WASP, Motley Crue, Ratt, Dokken. Queensryche, Yngwie, Stryper, Cinderella, LA Guns, were all hair metal or hair bands, I don’t care what you call it. Glam metal or glam rock. Butt rock, cock rock, shock rock, arena rock. All those bands were hair bands or hair metal.
Twisted Sister, Queensryche, Yngwie and Stryper were way more metal than Danger Danger, Poison. Warrant and Trixter ever were. I can’t call bands like Poison and Danger Danger “metal” in good conscience. But I can and do call the first four I mentioned initially here metal.
Call it what you want. They’re all hair bands to me.
Re: The Hair Metal Litmus Test
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2025 1:23 pm
by PhrozenInferno
Not to the layman on the street. They don’t know about all that above. Sure, we all do. But they hear the term ‘hair metal’ they aren’t thinking of how it began with Quiet Riots number one album or whatever the f*ck.
They imagine something like the video I posted. They know it to be lame. That’s why the video is the true essence. Me? I love it.
"Moisture is the essence of wetness, and wetness is the essence of beauty." - D. Zoolander
Re: The Hair Metal Litmus Test
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2025 5:08 pm
by Chip Z'Hoy
I like your passion, Phrozen; I've decided to give this a fair listen.
Full transparency: I'm not a Danger Danger fan. I get the impression that TED POLAAAAAAAY is a nice guy but "Monkey Business" is a bit much. You understand.
I'm familiar with this song, but I'm going to pretend I've never heard it. This acoustic version simplifies this trick of the mind for me--thank you.
Here goes:
If you told me this was Nelson, I'd say "Wow, this is pretty good for a Nelson song."
I don't dislike it. It's a catchy-enough bubblegum song. It's the DeFranco Family, basically. Who I like! Not an insult.
Is it GENRE-DEFINING? I don't know that I'm entirely sold but I think what we have here is an extremely good example of the Metal Edge music scene circa 1989-1991. Men who look like women (who are also cowboys) playing an acoustic version of a bubblegum metal song to prove that they can play their instruments--that is 1990 hard rock in a nutshell right there.
If we define "hair metal" as just Metal Edge music--which I'm fine with, not all that inaccurate--I think Phrozen's thesis holds water.
I co-sign.
Re: The Hair Metal Litmus Test
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2025 9:16 pm
by Mister Freeze
Not sure that song begs for an acoustic version, but that's a solid performance.
Re: The Hair Metal Litmus Test
Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2025 10:27 am
by PhrozenInferno
Chip Z'Hoy wrote: ↑Mon Aug 04, 2025 5:08 pmMen who look like women (who are also cowboys).
Also, thank you for wasting as much time on this debate as is required. Others could learn from you. Welcome to the correct side of history
Re: The Hair Metal Litmus Test
Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2025 10:33 am
by PhrozenInferno
Tommy2Tone84 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 03, 2025 9:07 pm
PhrozenInferno wrote: ↑Fri Aug 01, 2025 1:22 pm
This is it. If you crack open ‘Hair Metal’, the genre we all love so much, this is what you find - this is the pure essence and nucleus of what it REALLY is. Not Van Halen, not Hanoi Rocks. Like it or not, it’s the truth. There is no through line from David Johannsen to Bret Michaels.
If you don’t like this. You’ll never ‘get’ hair metal.
https://youtu.be/czWvnYIot6k?si=iwhLFOpYcPdIVLL3
There is no through line from David Johannsen to Bret Michaels? You’ve got to be kidding me. There is a direct line from Johannsen to Michaels. If you don’t see or hear it, then that’s your problem.
Hair metal was a lot of different bands and a lot of things. It wasn’t just one type or style of rock or metal music.
Twisted Sister, Quiet Riot, Scorpions, KISS, WASP, Motley Crue, Ratt, Dokken. Queensryche, Yngwie, Stryper, Cinderella, LA Guns, were all hair metal or hair bands, I don’t care what you call it. Glam metal or glam rock. Butt rock, cock rock, shock rock, arena rock. All those bands were hair bands or hair metal.
Twisted Sister, Queensryche, Yngwie and Stryper were way more metal than Danger Danger, Poison. Warrant and Trixter ever were. I can’t call bands like Poison and Danger Danger “metal” in good conscience. But I can and do call the first four I mentioned initially here metal.
Call it what you want. They’re all hair bands to me.
Much like bands like Backstreet Boys in the 90s claimed to be spiritual descendants of Motown aka The Temptations / The Four Tops (what with the acapella videos they would release etc) in order to shore up badly needed clout, when in actual fact they, and the rest of us knew that was a tenuous, albeit neat link. Cheesy shit.
The same goes for these goofs in the video I posted. Nobody hears the term hair metal and thinks ‘ah yes the natural progression from 70s era glam punks the NYDs, early Aerosmith and The Sweet.
They think of this cheesy tripe. Which, again , I am a massive fan of. It’s just the way it is. It ain’t cool. It doesn’t have to be.
Re: The Hair Metal Litmus Test
Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2025 6:29 pm
by Tommy2Tone84
PhrozenInferno wrote: ↑Mon Aug 04, 2025 1:23 pm
Not to the layman on the street. They don’t know about all that above. Sure, we all do. But they hear the term ‘hair metal’ they aren’t thinking of how it began with Quiet Riots number one album or whatever the f*ck.
They imagine something like the video I posted. They know it to be lame. That’s why the video is the true essence. Me? I love it.
"Moisture is the essence of wetness, and wetness is the essence of beauty." - D. Zoolander
The Dolls only had about 25 fans so the layman wouldn’t know or care about them anyway.
I’ve never understood why Quiet Riot gets so much credit. Def Leppard had already gone platinum in 1981 with HND and released Pyromania a month before Metal Health and sold double the amount. It was pure luck and a fluke DL had a #2 record while QR had a #1 record that year.
Pyromania > Metal Health
Re: The Hair Metal Litmus Test
Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2025 6:53 pm
by Tommy2Tone84
PhrozenInferno wrote: ↑Tue Aug 05, 2025 10:33 am
Tommy2Tone84 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 03, 2025 9:07 pm
PhrozenInferno wrote: ↑Fri Aug 01, 2025 1:22 pm
This is it. If you crack open ‘Hair Metal’, the genre we all love so much, this is what you find - this is the pure essence and nucleus of what it REALLY is. Not Van Halen, not Hanoi Rocks. Like it or not, it’s the truth. There is no through line from David Johannsen to Bret Michaels.
If you don’t like this. You’ll never ‘get’ hair metal.
https://youtu.be/czWvnYIot6k?si=iwhLFOpYcPdIVLL3
There is no through line from David Johannsen to Bret Michaels? You’ve got to be kidding me. There is a direct line from Johannsen to Michaels. If you don’t see or hear it, then that’s your problem.
Hair metal was a lot of different bands and a lot of things. It wasn’t just one type or style of rock or metal music.
Twisted Sister, Quiet Riot, Scorpions, KISS, WASP, Motley Crue, Ratt, Dokken. Queensryche, Yngwie, Stryper, Cinderella, LA Guns, were all hair metal or hair bands, I don’t care what you call it. Glam metal or glam rock. Butt rock, cock rock, shock rock, arena rock. All those bands were hair bands or hair metal.
Twisted Sister, Queensryche, Yngwie and Stryper were way more metal than Danger Danger, Poison. Warrant and Trixter ever were. I can’t call bands like Poison and Danger Danger “metal” in good conscience. But I can and do call the first four I mentioned initially here metal.
Call it what you want. They’re all hair bands to me.
Much like bands like Backstreet Boys in the 90s claimed to be spiritual descendants of Motown aka The Temptations / The Four Tops (what with the acapella videos they would release etc) in order to shore up badly needed clout, when in actual fact they, and the rest of us knew that was a tenuous, albeit neat link. Cheesy shit.
The same goes for these goofs in the video I posted. Nobody hears the term hair metal and thinks ‘ah yes the natural progression from 70s era glam punks the NYDs, early Aerosmith and The Sweet.
They think of this cheesy tripe. Which, again , I am a massive fan of. It’s just the way it is. It ain’t cool. It doesn’t have to be.
I think you’re giving Danger Danger entirely too much credit. They were good players and had a very solid if not, fantastic debut record. They weren’t much of anything as far as impact on the scene goes.
When someone says hair metal or hair band most think of bands like Ratt, Motley Crue, Quiet Riot, Twisted Sister, Def Leppard, Bon Jovi, Dokken, Queensryche, Stryper, Poison, Cinderella, Tesla, Whitesnake, White Lion, Great White, GNR (although that topic is hotly contested), Bulletboys, Skid Row, Warrant, Winger. Hell even Slaughter.
Danger Danger was a rung or two down from those bands,
Some of those bands had a direct lineage from the Dolls, Sweet, Slade and Hanoi Rocks like Twisted Sister, Quiet Riot, Motley Crue, Poison and GNR while other bands like Dokken, Bon Jovi, Whitesnake, and Winger did not.
I find it very likely boy bands from the 90s grew up on Motown. The influence, regardless of your personal feelings towards them, is obvious. Just as obvious as Motley, Poison and GNR being heavily influenced by the Dolls, KISS, Alice Cooper, Aerosmith, Slade and Sweet
Re: The Hair Metal Litmus Test
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2025 9:51 am
by SchenkerFan
PhrozenInferno wrote: ↑Fri Aug 01, 2025 1:22 pm
This is it. If you crack open ‘Hair Metal’, the genre we all love so much, this is what you find - this is the pure essence and nucleus of what it REALLY is. Not Van Halen, not Hanoi Rocks. Like it or not, it’s the truth. There is no through line from David Johannsen to Bret Michaels.
If you don’t like this. You’ll never ‘get’ hair metal.
https://youtu.be/czWvnYIot6k?si=iwhLFOpYcPdIVLL3
Nah, this is too poppy. The essence of hair metal is Beau Nasty's Shake It.
Re: The Hair Metal Litmus Test
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2025 11:05 am
by Tyketto Meniketti
That was pretty darn good. I don't think I'd want to see DD do acoustic, but they did it well there.
Their issue was cheesy name with the two cheesy, repetitive song titles. But talent-wise, they produced good pop-metal/hard rock music.
Who doesn't love "Turn It On"? That song rules. They've got plenty of other catchy tunes, as well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOt_oe79XxY