Page 3 of 8
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 5:34 pm
by Bruce Chickenson
Ive lurked on this board for a while and have seen 'The Mummy' owned over and over again.
I like him though, he seems quite resilient for somebody who is obviously a laughing stock.
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 6:13 pm
by Bourbon Cowboy
Bruce Chickenson wrote:Ive lurked on this board for a while and have seen 'The Mummy' owned over and over again.
I like him though, he seems quite resilient for somebody who is obviously a laughing stock.
You can only view the Sludge boards as a member, so how have you been able to lurk the boards for awhile having only signed up on Thursday??
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 6:32 pm
by Itwalksamongus
Bruce Chickenson wrote:Ive lurked on this board for a while and have seen 'The Mummy' owned over and over again.
Actually that's never happened.
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:21 pm
by Bruce Chickenson
Itwalksamongus wrote:Bruce Chickenson wrote:Ive lurked on this board for a while and have seen 'The Mummy' owned over and over again.
Actually that's never happened.
Add delusional to my list
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:28 pm
by Itwalksamongus
Bruce Chickenson wrote:Itwalksamongus wrote:Bruce Chickenson wrote:Ive lurked on this board for a while and have seen 'The Mummy' owned over and over again.
Actually that's never happened.
Add delusional to my list
Think what you want. I've never been "owned" here.
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 11:26 pm
by Take.Your.Own.Advice
Itwalksamongus wrote:Seriously, jackass - shut the fuck up.
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 12:01 pm
by Bruce Chickenson
Itwalksamongus wrote:Bruce Chickenson wrote:
Add delusional to my list
Think what you want. I've never been "owned" here.
How about 'pwned' then?
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 1:50 pm
by Itwalksamongus
Bruce Chickenson wrote:Itwalksamongus wrote:Bruce Chickenson wrote:
Add delusional to my list
Think what you want. I've never been "owned" here.
How about 'pwned' then?
Nope. What are you, 12?
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 9:02 pm
by Bruce Chickenson
Itwalksamongus wrote:Bruce Chickenson wrote:
How about 'pwned' then?
Nope. What are you, 12?
Ask a question that makes sense.
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 11:52 pm
by Itwalksamongus
Classy Fred Blassy wrote:It's your job to prove that you aren't lying.
Nope. It's your job to back up your original claim.
I'll wait.
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 11:52 pm
by Itwalksamongus
Bruce Chickenson wrote:Itwalksamongus wrote:Bruce Chickenson wrote:
How about 'pwned' then?
Nope. What are you, 12?
Ask a question that makes sense.
I just did.
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 12:35 am
by Itwalksamongus
Classy Fred Blassy wrote:Itwalksamongus wrote:Classy Fred Blassy wrote:It's your job to prove that you aren't lying.
Nope. It's your job to back up your original claim.
I'll wait.
Nope, it's your job to prove your innocence.
Translation: I made up my original claim.
No surprise there.
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 12:39 am
by Itwalksamongus
Classy Fred Blassy wrote:Still waiting for you to prove that you haven't been lying.
I'll wait.
Don't have to. You can't back up your original claim. Why?
Because you made it up.
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 1:02 am
by Itwalksamongus
Your orignal claim has nothing to do with YouTube.
Still waiting for you to back it up.
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:15 am
by Itwalksamongus
Classy Fred Blassy wrote:Still denying everything?
Nope. Tell you what - I'll make you a deal. You either prove your original claim OR admit you made it up and I'll address your YouTube question.
Go ahead.
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 5:34 am
by SoulsOfBlack
It's not "Go ahead". It's either "I'll wait" or "Take your time". Come on, don't you know how to REALLY pwn someone?
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:29 pm
by Itwalksamongus
SoulsOfBlack wrote:It's not "Go ahead".
It is now.
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 9:50 pm
by Bruce Chickenson
Itwalksamongus wrote:
Nope. What are you, 12?
Ask a question that makes sense.[/quote]
I just did.[/quote]
A question that makes sense would be along the lines of:
"How old are you, 12?"
Ask again, maybe i will give you an answer.
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 10:00 pm
by Itwalksamongus
Nope.
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 10:04 pm
by SeminiferousButtNoid
Itwalksamongus wrote:Nope.
Yep.
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 10:36 pm
by Bruce Chickenson
Itwalksamongus wrote:Nope.
Excellent, that takes care of that then. Next.
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:33 am
by Bourbon Cowboy
Quantavius could hand out ninja advice using these sort of invisible tactics.
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 6:22 am
by SoulsOfBlack
What happened to him anyway.... I mean, TimBerrington?
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 2:24 pm
by Itwalksamongus
Classy Fred Blassy wrote:
Here's how it works. I accuse you of something, you provide proof to show you're innocent.
Nope. You made the claim - you back it up. You back it up. Or admit you made it up.
Your choice.
Go ahead.
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 12:35 am
by Itwalksamongus
Classy Fred Blassy wrote:Still no sign of that proof then?
Didn't think so.
I'll wait.
So you admit you made up your original claim.
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 3:08 am
by Itwalksamongus
Classy Fred Blassy wrote:Nope, if that were the case then I would have a reputation for being a liar. .
Actually, you do. And you just extended it by making this claim that you now can't prove.
And why can't you prove it?
Because it never happened.
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 4:41 am
by SoulsOfBlack
Grendel wrote:Advantage - Classy Fred
No, it's more like:
Advantage - anyone that doesn't bother with this thread!
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 4:46 am
by Itwalksamongus
Classy Fred Blassy wrote:Prove it never happened.
Don't have to. You're the one who made the claim.
Why haven't you backed it up yet?
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 4:57 am
by Itwalksamongus
Classy Fred Blassy wrote:
I accuse you of something, you then provide proof that you aren't a liar.
Sorry, dipshit. That's not how it works. You made the claim. You back it up.
If what you claimed happened actually happened that should be easy for you.
Re: Liar of the year 2009
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 5:02 am
by Itwalksamongus
Classy Fred Blassy wrote:Prove it never happened.
Don't have to. You claimed it happened.
Prove your claim.
Should be easy.