Page 7 of 7

Re: The Old Itwalksamongus vs. The New ItwalksAmongus

Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:05 am
by mullet_head
Well, DC, I'm sure the mummy will be here soon to tell me that that never happened and to come back when I'm done lying, as he's too fucking stupid to grasp the concept of metaphor.

Even if he wasn't so dumb, he lacks the imagination to say something else.
Fuck, the monophonic bass lines of my old Casio MT-40 are less repetitive than he is.

Do you ever wonder if he has ocasional moments of clarity where he realises how much pathetic he is and how the whole board laughs at his expense?

Re: The Old Itwalksamongus vs. The New ItwalksAmongus

Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:30 am
by CrouchingStonerHiddenBong
No, because that would require an actual moment of lucidity, which we all know he hasn't had since Horus Aha busted him lying about the price of papyrus.

Re: The Old Itwalksamongus vs. The New ItwalksAmongus

Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:21 am
by mullet_head
CrouchingStonerHiddenBong wrote:he hasn't had since Horus Aha busted him lying about the price of papyrus.
:lol:


I think deep down inside he knows he's being used as the board toilet, and his retarded comebacks and lies are just a way for him to overcome that fact and to give others and himself the illusion of somehow walking on a higher ground.

He ain't fooling anyone, but he sure as hell tries. Also he goes out of his way to tell us on a daily basis how happy he is up there in the hill with his slant eyed "better half"...

Yeah, he's the "happy person" prototype. Bullshit.

How long till MI Japan rips him a new one again?


Itwalksamongus wrote:when I was a kid I couldn't WAIT to grow up
:lol:

I guess the guy in the read beard never came down the chimney to deliver his adulthood.

Re: The Old Itwalksamongus vs. The New ItwalksAmongus

Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:02 pm
by cormerdamus
I don't have a problem with him, but I do think it's stupid when people attack spelling or poor grammar. It's a last resort to make others look stupid and have less credit in an argument when they know they're actual argument is poor. I over use commas, so what?,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Re: The Old Itwalksamongus vs. The New ItwalksAmongus

Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 2:09 am
by Itwalksamongus
cormerdamus wrote: It's a last resort to make others look stupid and have less credit in an argument when they know they're actual argument is poor.
That would be their, dipshit.

:lol:

Re: The Old Itwalksamongus vs. The New ItwalksAmongus

Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 6:24 am
by cormerdamus
Itwalksamongus wrote:
cormerdamus wrote: It's a last resort to make others look stupid and have less credit in an argument when they know they're actual argument is poor.
That would be their, dipshit.

:lol:
Exactly lol

Re: The Old Itwalksamongus vs. The New ItwalksAmongus

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:11 am
by Itwalksamongus
cormerdamus wrote:
Itwalksamongus wrote:
cormerdamus wrote: It's a last resort to make others look stupid and have less credit in an argument when they know they're actual argument is poor.
That would be their, dipshit.

:lol:
Exactly lol
The fact the you can't navigate 3rd grade English grammar, and the fact that I'm illuminating that point, has nothing to do with the quality of my argument, Chode-boy.

Re: The Old Itwalksamongus vs. The New ItwalksAmongus

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 3:46 am
by cormerdamus
Itwalksamongus wrote:
The fact the you can't navigate 3rd grade English grammar, and the fact that I'm illuminating that point, has nothing to do with the quality of my argument, Chode-boy.

Sure it does. If you had a half decent argument to begin with you wouldn't be picking out things that having nothing to do with the argument at hand. Take a debate class, thats one of the first things you learn. People who try to dis credit you by pointing out flaws like that do it for the same reason people try personal attacks. It's because your actual argument is weak and doing that makes it seem as though your argument is stronger because you're trying to discredit the person. Thats why politicians do it, thats why you do it. If you were arguing with some one and your argument totally trumped anything they had to say and showed beyond doubt that you were right and they were just stupid for thinking otherwise, you wouldn't bother pointing out the fact that they spelled a word wrong because it's got nothing to do with the argument.
Anyone who uses a spell check on a forum, or even double checks the spelling themselves has got way too much time on their hands and takes this shit way too seriously.

Re: The Old Itwalksamongus vs. The New ItwalksAmongus

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 4:19 am
by Itwalksamongus
cormerdamus wrote:
Itwalksamongus wrote:
The fact the you can't navigate 3rd grade English grammar, and the fact that I'm illuminating that point, has nothing to do with the quality of my argument, Chode-boy.

Sure it does.

Nope.

Owned.

:lol:

Re: The Old Itwalksamongus vs. The New ItwalksAmongus

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 10:17 am
by mullet_head
cormerdamus wrote:
Itwalksamongus wrote:
The fact the you can't navigate 3rd grade English grammar, and the fact that I'm illuminating that point, has nothing to do with the quality of my argument, Chode-boy.

Sure it does. If you had a half decent argument to begin with you wouldn't be picking out things that having nothing to do with the argument at hand. Take a debate class, thats one of the first things you learn. People who try to dis credit you by pointing out flaws like that do it for the same reason people try personal attacks. It's because your actual argument is weak and doing that makes it seem as though your argument is stronger because you're trying to discredit the person. Thats why politicians do it, thats why you do it. If you were arguing with some one and your argument totally trumped anything they had to say and showed beyond doubt that you were right and they were just stupid for thinking otherwise, you wouldn't bother pointing out the fact that they spelled a word wrong because it's got nothing to do with the argument.
Anyone who uses a spell check on a forum, or even double checks the spelling themselves has got way too much time on their hands and takes this shit way too seriously.
Advantage - cormerdamus

Itwalks - owned (again)

Re: The Old Itwalksamongus vs. The New ItwalksAmongus

Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:29 pm
by Stoner
Bump for great justice.


Re: The Old Itwalksamongus vs. The New ItwalksAmongus

Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 8:20 pm
by BlackCrypt
Stoner wrote:Bump for great justice.

:mrgreen:

Re: The Old Itwalksamongus vs. The New ItwalksAmongus

Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 3:03 pm
by MurrayFiend
Stoner wrote:Bump for great justice.

8)

Re: The Old Itwalksamongus vs. The New ItwalksAmongus

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 10:28 pm
by TawnyVonJagger
CrouchingStonerHiddenBong wrote:No, because that would require an actual moment of lucidity, which we all know he hasn't had since Horus Aha busted him lying about the price of papyrus.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Fuck. How did I miss this?!

Re: The Old Itwalksamongus vs. The New ItwalksAmongus

Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 12:08 pm
by Craig1168
Oh how I miss pwning Timbo and watching in glee as Stoner and Deathcurse hand Mummy his proverbial depends. I love how Mummy always tries to flip or spin shit and tries to direct the fire off himself and towards Stoner, yet Stoner is smart and witty and she beats Mummies ass down like Rodney King. You're just a liar Mr Mirror and myself as well as Deathcurse have exposed your embalmed ass in multiple lies such as the epic beatles story or your three day herion habit, or maybe the Foghat story. What's sad is you lie about stupid shit, Deathcurse lies in a joking manner. Lastly you know you suck at Sludge Tim, when even I school and own you.

:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :roll: :roll: :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol: :roll: :roll: :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

TFE

OWNED AND REOWNED WHEN YOU HIT ENTER!

Re: The Old Itwalksamongus vs. The New ItwalksAmongus

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2018 7:21 pm
by BlackCrypt
Image

Re: The Old Itwalksamongus vs. The New ItwalksAmongus

Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 12:44 pm
by Stoner
mullet_head wrote::lol:

For the love of Anubis, for centuries to come, bards shall sing about this monumental ownage, along with the Panama bass line.

Owned
:lol:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Shit made me wheeze.

This thread is so fucking good and I miss mullet_head.