Liar of the year 2009

Bruce Chickenson · Post by **Bruce Chickenson** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 5:34 pm

Ive lurked on this board for a while and have seen 'The Mummy' owned over and over again.

I like him though, he seems quite resilient for somebody who is obviously a laughing stock.

Bourbon Cowboy · Post by **Bourbon Cowboy** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 6:13 pm

Bruce Chickenson wrote:Ive lurked on this board for a while and have seen 'The Mummy' owned over and over again.

I like him though, he seems quite resilient for somebody who is obviously a laughing stock.

You can only view the Sludge boards as a member, so how have you been able to lurk the boards for awhile having only signed up on Thursday??

Itwalksamongus · Post by **Itwalksamongus** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 6:32 pm

Bruce Chickenson wrote:Ive lurked on this board for a while and have seen 'The Mummy' owned over and over again.

Actually that's never happened.

Bruce Chickenson · Post by **Bruce Chickenson** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:21 pm

Itwalksamongus wrote:
Bruce Chickenson wrote:Ive lurked on this board for a while and have seen 'The Mummy' owned over and over again.
Actually that's never happened.

Add delusional to my list

Itwalksamongus · Post by **Itwalksamongus** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:28 pm

Bruce Chickenson wrote:
Itwalksamongus wrote:
Bruce Chickenson wrote:Ive lurked on this board for a while and have seen 'The Mummy' owned over and over again.
Actually that's never happened.
Add delusional to my list

Think what you want. I've never been "owned" here.

Take.Your.Own.Advice · Sat Jan 09, 2010 11:26 pm

Itwalksamongus wrote:Seriously, jackass - shut the fuck up.

Bruce Chickenson · Post by **Bruce Chickenson** » Sun Jan 10, 2010 12:01 pm

Itwalksamongus wrote:
Bruce Chickenson wrote:
Add delusional to my list
Think what you want. I've never been "owned" here.

How about 'pwned' then?

Itwalksamongus · Post by **Itwalksamongus** » Sun Jan 10, 2010 1:50 pm

Bruce Chickenson wrote:
Itwalksamongus wrote:
Bruce Chickenson wrote:
Add delusional to my list
Think what you want. I've never been "owned" here.
How about 'pwned' then?

Nope. What are you, 12?

Bruce Chickenson · Post by **Bruce Chickenson** » Sun Jan 10, 2010 9:02 pm

Itwalksamongus wrote:
Bruce Chickenson wrote:
How about 'pwned' then?
Nope. What are you, 12?

Ask a question that makes sense.

Itwalksamongus · Post by **Itwalksamongus** » Sun Jan 10, 2010 11:52 pm

Classy Fred Blassy wrote:It's your job to prove that you aren't lying.

Nope. It's your job to back up your original claim.

I'll wait.

Itwalksamongus · Post by **Itwalksamongus** » Sun Jan 10, 2010 11:52 pm

Bruce Chickenson wrote:
Itwalksamongus wrote:
Bruce Chickenson wrote:
How about 'pwned' then?
Nope. What are you, 12?
Ask a question that makes sense.

I just did.

Itwalksamongus · Post by **Itwalksamongus** » Mon Jan 11, 2010 12:35 am

Classy Fred Blassy wrote:
Itwalksamongus wrote:
Classy Fred Blassy wrote:It's your job to prove that you aren't lying.
Nope. It's your job to back up your original claim.

I'll wait.
Nope, it's your job to prove your innocence.

Translation: I made up my original claim.

No surprise there.

Itwalksamongus · Post by **Itwalksamongus** » Mon Jan 11, 2010 12:39 am

Classy Fred Blassy wrote:Still waiting for you to prove that you haven't been lying.

I'll wait.

Don't have to. You can't back up your original claim. Why?

Because you made it up.

Itwalksamongus · Post by **Itwalksamongus** » Mon Jan 11, 2010 1:02 am

Your orignal claim has nothing to do with YouTube.

Still waiting for you to back it up.

Itwalksamongus · Post by **Itwalksamongus** » Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:15 am

Classy Fred Blassy wrote:Still denying everything?

Nope. Tell you what - I'll make you a deal. You either prove your original claim OR admit you made it up and I'll address your YouTube question.

Go ahead.

SoulsOfBlack · Post by **SoulsOfBlack** » Mon Jan 11, 2010 5:34 am

It's not "Go ahead". It's either "I'll wait" or "Take your time". Come on, don't you know how to REALLY pwn someone?

Itwalksamongus · Post by **Itwalksamongus** » Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:29 pm

SoulsOfBlack wrote:It's not "Go ahead".

It is now.

Bruce Chickenson · Post by **Bruce Chickenson** » Mon Jan 11, 2010 9:50 pm

Itwalksamongus wrote: Nope. What are you, 12?

Ask a question that makes sense.[/quote]

I just did.[/quote]

A question that makes sense would be along the lines of:

"How old are you, 12?"

Ask again, maybe i will give you an answer.

Itwalksamongus · Post by **Itwalksamongus** » Mon Jan 11, 2010 10:00 pm

Nope.

SeminiferousButtNoid · Mon Jan 11, 2010 10:04 pm

Itwalksamongus wrote:Nope.

Yep.

Bruce Chickenson · Post by **Bruce Chickenson** » Mon Jan 11, 2010 10:36 pm

Itwalksamongus wrote:Nope.

Excellent, that takes care of that then. Next.

Bourbon Cowboy · Post by **Bourbon Cowboy** » Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:33 am

Quantavius could hand out ninja advice using these sort of invisible tactics.

SoulsOfBlack · Post by **SoulsOfBlack** » Tue Jan 12, 2010 6:22 am

What happened to him anyway.... I mean, TimBerrington?

Itwalksamongus · Post by **Itwalksamongus** » Tue Jan 12, 2010 2:24 pm

Classy Fred Blassy wrote:
Here's how it works. I accuse you of something, you provide proof to show you're innocent.

Nope. You made the claim - you back it up. You back it up. Or admit you made it up.

Your choice.

Go ahead.

Itwalksamongus · Post by **Itwalksamongus** » Wed Jan 13, 2010 12:35 am

Classy Fred Blassy wrote:Still no sign of that proof then?

Didn't think so.

I'll wait.

So you admit you made up your original claim.

Itwalksamongus · Post by **Itwalksamongus** » Wed Jan 13, 2010 3:08 am

Classy Fred Blassy wrote:Nope, if that were the case then I would have a reputation for being a liar. .

Actually, you do. And you just extended it by making this claim that you now can't prove.

And why can't you prove it?

Because it never happened.

SoulsOfBlack · Post by **SoulsOfBlack** » Wed Jan 13, 2010 4:41 am

Grendel wrote:Advantage - Classy Fred

No, it's more like:

Advantage - anyone that doesn't bother with this thread!

Itwalksamongus · Post by **Itwalksamongus** » Wed Jan 13, 2010 4:46 am

Classy Fred Blassy wrote:Prove it never happened.

Don't have to. You're the one who made the claim.

Why haven't you backed it up yet?

Itwalksamongus · Post by **Itwalksamongus** » Wed Jan 13, 2010 4:57 am

Classy Fred Blassy wrote: I accuse you of something, you then provide proof that you aren't a liar.

Sorry, dipshit. That's not how it works. You made the claim. You back it up.

If what you claimed happened actually happened that should be easy for you.

Itwalksamongus · Post by **Itwalksamongus** » Wed Jan 13, 2010 5:02 am

Classy Fred Blassy wrote:Prove it never happened.

Don't have to. You claimed it happened.

Prove your claim.

Should be easy.

Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009

Re: Liar of the year 2009