That is interesting discussion.Itjogsamongus wrote:I heard an interesting discussion on ESPN this morning.
Right now, the Red Sox are the team of the decade. But if the Yankees with the World Series, they would be. Both would have two championships, but the Yankees made it four World Series and were in the playoffs 9 out of 10 years.
They also brought the Cardinals into the discussion but even if they win this year, I would have to give it to Boston.
I wonder really though, do they even account for team's payrolls? The MFY spent half a billion of free-agents, their accomplishments this season really aren't that impressive to me. More of a "of course their good."
Now for the "Team Of The Decade". Let's not forget that the 2004 Red Sox were the most expensive team to ever win a WS.......until 2007 when the Red Sox were.
For the whole decade, do you consider how the team was built? Like was this just money to throw around ( the usual suspects ) or was it a team developed from draft picks completely ( Tampa ). Was it a team who had 86 wins on the season then went on to win the whole thing ( Cardinials )?
Certainly if St. Louis is being considered after a potential win this year, then what about Philly if they potentially won this year? They would be back to back. This is good stuff. Especially in this day and age where there is no salary-cap, and there is a Wild Card. What does everyone think so far?