Ben Roethlisberger: "No" Means "Yes"?

A place to talk about sports, athletes and jock itch.

Moderator: Metal Sludge

User avatar
Tymaster
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 17466
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 3:03 pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Re: Ben Roethlisberger: "No" Means "Yes"?

Post by Tymaster »

As you know, dumbass got himself involved in another sexual assault/rape situation. We obviously don't have all the information yet, but I think one thing is crystal clear to all:

Big Ben must be neutered.

If he did rape/assault that women/those women, then I think a little testes-hacking is in order. I have two daughters. If some dumb hick that is enabled by a troglodyte fanbase felt he had the right to force himself on one of my girls, then I'd probably shoot the bastage, so a little nut-chopping would be merciful in comparison. Without his gonads, Mr. Burger might feel a tad less randy at 2 in the morning at college bars.

Even if he is innocent of this crime/these crimes, I believe he should still be made a eunuch, if only to prevent him from reproducing. Just by putting himself in these situations, it is obvious that Ben is a self-absorbed moron. Fat, ugly, and stupid is no way to go through life, but Ben's not only survived, he's thrived. He blows apart the idea that you need to be intelligent to play QB in the NFL. Apparently, you can be a drooling idiot, just so long as you have a great Defense, good size, and you can run around and make shit up as you go.

Nevertheless, no child should willingly be subjected to the torture of not only looking like Big B, but also being stuck with his IQ. If it CAN be prevented, it SHOULD be prevented.

Off with the balls. Give Ben a new definition of "pulling away from a sack".
LouDoo wrote:Neon has to be the most active poster who actually contributes the least, despite all the threads he starts. He has no redeeming value. He's completely useless.
Image
User avatar
Luminiferous
Playing First Stage at SludgeFest
Posts: 29049
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 3:47 pm
Location: OI! Down here mate!

Re: Ben Roethlisberger: "No" Means "Yes"?

Post by Luminiferous »

I'm not believing any of these accusations until we learn the whereabouts of Rikki Rockett that night..
Image
HAIRFORCEONE
Picking a Band Name
Posts: 147
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 6:20 pm

Re: Ben Roethlisberger: "No" Means "Yes"?

Post by HAIRFORCEONE »

GypsyDog5150 wrote:
Tymaster wrote:
As you know, dumbass got himself involved in another sexual assault/rape situation. We obviously don't have all the information yet, but I think one thing is crystal clear to all:

Big Ben must be neutered.

If he did rape/assault that women/those women, then I think a little testes-hacking is in order. I have two daughters. If some dumb hick that is enabled by a troglodyte fanbase felt he had the right to force himself on one of my girls, then I'd probably shoot the bastage, so a little nut-chopping would be merciful in comparison. Without his gonads, Mr. Burger might feel a tad less randy at 2 in the morning at college bars.

Even if he is innocent of this crime/these crimes, I believe he should still be made a eunuch, if only to prevent him from reproducing. Just by putting himself in these situations, it is obvious that Ben is a self-absorbed moron. Fat, ugly, and stupid is no way to go through life, but Ben's not only survived, he's thrived. He blows apart the idea that you need to be intelligent to play QB in the NFL. Apparently, you can be a drooling idiot, just so long as you have a great Defense, good size, and you can run around and make shit up as you go.

Nevertheless, no child should willingly be subjected to the torture of not only looking like Big B, but also being stuck with his IQ. If it CAN be prevented, it SHOULD be prevented.

Off with the balls. Give Ben a new definition of "pulling away from a sack".

That's beautiful.
hell I'm a Steelers fan and I found that quite amusing.
If Assholes could fly, this place would be an airport.
User avatar
Tymaster
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 17466
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 3:03 pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Re: Ben Roethlisberger: "No" Means "Yes"?

Post by Tymaster »

Luminiferous wrote:I'm not believing any of these accusations until we learn the whereabouts of Rikki Rockett that night..
He was in P13s mom's basement w/ P13.
LouDoo wrote:Neon has to be the most active poster who actually contributes the least, despite all the threads he starts. He has no redeeming value. He's completely useless.
Image
User avatar
MCSteeler
Blowing Advance from Record Label
Posts: 752
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 12:21 am

Re: Ben Roethlisberger: "No" Means "Yes"?

Post by MCSteeler »

GypsyDog5150 wrote:
Punk wrote:When talking about others that are retarded, you should probably refrain from shit such as "Steeler fans are all retarded, but the almost everyone on the team are actually dumber"

You and your obviously extremely intelligent followers are the asshats we make fun of the most, douche.

They are sheep. The Steelers have the stupidest fans out of any sports francise. If you can think of another pro team from any sport who outdo the, name them I'll keep an open mind.

Go crawl back into the asshole that crapped you out.

Seriously, may the cunt you call your mother be stricken with cancer for being too stupid to realize that abortion is legal and carrying a turd like yourself to full term and unleashing it on the rest of us.

Now, do the world a favor and kill yourself. Just consider it a late-term abortion.
User avatar
Tymaster
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 17466
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 3:03 pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Re: Ben Roethlisberger: "No" Means "Yes"?

Post by Tymaster »

GypsyDog5150 wrote:
MCSteeler wrote:
Go crawl back into the asshole that crapped you out.

Seriously, may the cunt you call your mother be stricken with cancer for being too stupid to realize that abortion is legal and carrying a turd like yourself to full term and unleashing it on the rest of us.

Now, do the world a favor and kill yourself. Just consider it a late-term abortion.
Looks like I pissed off a yinzer Pissburgh fan. Typical Pissburgh sheep.
Yinzers. LOL!
Steelers fans do seem to be some of the dumbest around.
LouDoo wrote:Neon has to be the most active poster who actually contributes the least, despite all the threads he starts. He has no redeeming value. He's completely useless.
Image
User avatar
Tymaster
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 17466
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 3:03 pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Re: Ben Roethlisberger: "No" Means "Yes"?

Post by Tymaster »

Well, Oakland has some real doozies. But, yeah, Pittsburgh, with that fanbase deeply rooted the sticks of Appalachia. Man, they are highly dumb.
LouDoo wrote:Neon has to be the most active poster who actually contributes the least, despite all the threads he starts. He has no redeeming value. He's completely useless.
Image
User avatar
Tymaster
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 17466
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 3:03 pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Re: Ben Roethlisberger: "No" Means "Yes"?

Post by Tymaster »

Goodell is gonna lay the hammer down!
Yes! Justice served! These kind of arrogant smugs (Kobe, I'm looking in your direction pal) make it bad for all of pro sports.
Do the right thing Goodell!
LouDoo wrote:Neon has to be the most active poster who actually contributes the least, despite all the threads he starts. He has no redeeming value. He's completely useless.
Image
User avatar
Tymaster
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 17466
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 3:03 pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Re: Ben Roethlisberger: "No" Means "Yes"?

Post by Tymaster »

GypsyDog5150 wrote:
Tymaster wrote:Goodell is gonna lay the hammer down!
Yes! Justice served! These kind of arrogant smugs (Kobe, I'm looking in your direction pal) make it bad for all of pro sports.
Do the right thing Goodell!
Hopefully he will be gone. And even if Ben gets another chance it's his last. He fucks up again he will be gone for sure. So he will be gone by training camp, he can't stop fucking up.

He is a dumb hick.
LouDoo wrote:Neon has to be the most active poster who actually contributes the least, despite all the threads he starts. He has no redeeming value. He's completely useless.
Image
Post Reply