Luminiferous wrote:I remember an even funnier look on someone's face in the Super Bowl.. PRICELESS!
![]()
![]()
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Moderator: Metal Sludge
Luminiferous wrote:I remember an even funnier look on someone's face in the Super Bowl.. PRICELESS!
![]()
![]()
Anybody see Steve Young's wierd meltdown on this topic after the game last night?johnk5150 wrote:This officiating is an abortion. The Packers held Julius Peppers on EVERY snap on Thursday. I don't blame the Packers for that. If they aren't going to call it use it to your advantage, but FUCK.Machado wrote: “Officiating is never perfect,”
I did see that and assumed Young was suffering from concussion like symptoms.Crazy Levi wrote:Anybody see Steve Young's wierd meltdown on this topic after the game last night?johnk5150 wrote:This officiating is an abortion. The Packers held Julius Peppers on EVERY snap on Thursday. I don't blame the Packers for that. If they aren't going to call it use it to your advantage, but FUCK.Machado wrote: “Officiating is never perfect,”
"This will not affect the bottom line, so the NFL doesn't care, so we shouldn't talk about it!" repeated over and over, with Dilfer not really getting it and continuing to argue that the refs suck.
Steve's right, I guess. But is the NFL opening itself up to lawsuits from anybody who gets injured because of this horrific officiating?
Which part of the body is that?Machado wrote: Last night $74 on Denver threw a punch and that punch struck a ref on the field.
WTF!!!
Liar.poizond13 wrote:I grew up
bonedog wrote:I let Facedown get the better of me
bonedog wrote:My first kid will be born when I am 47.
bonedog wrote:I suck at sludging.
This is a fun story that's gonna have legs.Machado wrote: Being a Cowboy fan, I dislike the Giants, but even my eyes can clearly see the play by Tampa was cheap and should've never happened.
That's exactly what might happen.Crazy Levi wrote:This is a fun story that's gonna have legs.Machado wrote: Being a Cowboy fan, I dislike the Giants, but even my eyes can clearly see the play by Tampa was cheap and should've never happened.
We all know it was a ridiculous, bush league move - but where do we go from here?
The Rutger's coach has stated clearly that he plans on doing this, all the time from now on. But let's just say the element of surprise is gone.
Besides that, I see lots of running up the score on the Bucs from here on in. I mean, what choice do you have when you have this college lunatic coaching?
NeverSurrender wrote:Yeah, i guess you wouldn't think they sucked, since they let your o-linemen tackle the Vikes defenders all day Sunday.
poizond13 wrote:NeverSurrender wrote:Yeah, i guess you wouldn't think they sucked, since they let your o-linemen tackle the Vikes defenders all day Sunday.![]()
No excuses, no explanations.
poizond13 wrote:NeverSurrender wrote:Yeah, i guess you wouldn't think they sucked, since they let your o-linemen tackle the Vikes defenders all day Sunday.![]()
No excuses, no explanations.
No one's life is in danger, moron. And the NFL's credibility is not at stake. In one year, no one is going to remember or care about the replacement refs. Just like the league continued to grow exponentially in popularity after they used replacement PLAYERS in the late 80s. If the NFL got away with using replacement players, what makes you think replacement REFS are going to destroy the league's credibility? It won't. And the NFL's popularity, TV ratings, and revenue will continue to increase, no matter what happens with these refs.Crazy Levi wrote:Greeg-
I didn't SAY any team has an "unfair advantage."
I said the scab refs are destroying the credibility of the league, and worse, endangering the lives of the players.
And EVERYONE agrees with me.
It's so odd how you worship the word of NFL Insiders - except you know, when they disagree with you. And 100 percent of them disagree with you on this (and on RG3, for that matter.)
That's fine. Then stop mentioning the refs as a reason the Vikes lost.NeverSurrender wrote:poizond13 wrote:NeverSurrender wrote:Yeah, i guess you wouldn't think they sucked, since they let your o-linemen tackle the Vikes defenders all day Sunday.![]()
No excuses, no explanations.
Minnesota made a shitload of mistakes and deserved to lose. Therefore me saying the refs doing something they were doing is not an excuse. The Vies are a young rebuilding team. The refs still blow.
....and 99% wrong.poizond13 wrote:My opinions are 100% my own.
bonedog wrote:I let Facedown get the better of me
bonedog wrote:My first kid will be born when I am 47.
bonedog wrote:I suck at sludging.
poizond13 wrote:
Lastly, I couldn't care less what the pundits think.
Then why did you mention it in almost all of your posts regarding the game? Oh yeah, because you're trying to make excuses for your team.NeverSurrender wrote:Vagina13, i never said that's why they lost.
I know you're a troll, just try not to make it so obvious.
poizond13 wrote:Then why did you mention it in almost all of your posts regarding the game? Oh yeah, because you're trying to make excuses for your team.NeverSurrender wrote:Vagina13, i never said that's why they lost.
I know you're a troll, just try not to make it so obvious.
Who do I constantly quote? Last I remember I posted something from Hoge a few weeks ago. Can't remember when was the last time I did it before then. How is that "constantly?"Crazy Levi wrote:poizond13 wrote:
Lastly, I couldn't care less what the pundits think.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Then why do you constantly quote them to back up your retarded opinions? You are the ONLY one who does that here. Like any of us give a shit what Merril Hodge has to say.
I didn't see anything. I also couldn't care less. I did notice that they gave us an extra down after a penalty in the 2nd quarter. They also ruled Harvin down when he clearly fumbled on the last Viking drive. None of it matters. Colts won, Vikings lost. On to next weekend.NeverSurrender wrote:
No, see when you say the team deserved to lose for doing dumb shit, there are no excuses. The sky is still blue if the Vikes makes dumb plays or not. The refs still let your guys hold, whether the Viks did dumb shit or not.
I do notice you don't deny the refs let your lineman do what they wanted. Which is why, "they're not so bad."
True dat!poizond13 wrote:. None of it matters. Colts won, Vikings lost. On to next weekend.