Metal Sludge Gossip Board

poizond13 wrote:

Try again sporto..

*cough*
Rings
*cough*
and do we even need to show Peyton and the faces he made walking around like a kid who's mom wouldn't let him get a new toy each time he got destroyed by the Pats in the playoffs?
Didn't think so.

Luminiferous wrote:

poizond13 wrote:

Try again sporto..

Who says "sporto?" HAHA, what a weirdo.

Thanks for the laugh, "sporto."

Facedown wrote:*cough*
Rings
*cough*
and do we even need to show Peyton and the faces he made walking around like a kid who's mom wouldn't let him get a new toy each time he got destroyed by the Pats in the playoffs?
Didn't think so.

*cough*
spygate
*cough*

poizond13 wrote:

Facedown wrote:*cough*
Rings
*cough*
and do we even need to show Peyton and the faces he made walking around like a kid who's mom wouldn't let him get a new toy each time he got destroyed by the Pats in the playoffs?
Didn't think so.

*cough*
spygate
*cough*

Off course. Your proof?
Didn't think so.

Facedown wrote:

poizond13 wrote:

Facedown wrote:*cough*
Rings
*cough*
and do we even need to show Peyton and the faces he made walking around like a kid who's mom wouldn't let him get a new toy each time he got destroyed by the Pats in the playoffs?
Didn't think so.

*cough*
spygate
*cough*

Off course. Your proof?
Didn't think so.

HAHA, the proof that existed was used to fine Belichick and the Patriots and dock them a first round draft pick. The proof was then destroyed by the NFL, inexplicably.

poizond13 wrote:HAHA, the proof that existed was used to fine Belichick and the Patriots and dock them a first round draft pick. The proof was then destroyed by the NFL, inexplicably.

So no proof then?
Thought so.

Facedown wrote:

poizond13 wrote:HAHA, the proof that existed was used to fine Belichick and the Patriots and dock them a first round draft pick. The proof was then destroyed by the NFL, inexplicably.

So no proof then?
Thought so.

The proof is in the record fine and first round draft pick that was docked. DUH.

poizond13 wrote:The proof is in the record fine and first round draft pick that was docked. DUH.

So that proof that you don't have somehow proves that the Pats cheated to beat the Colts?
Didn't think so.

Facedown wrote:

poizond13 wrote:The proof is in the record fine and first round draft pick that was docked. DUH.

So that proof that you don't have somehow proves that the Pats cheated to beat the Colts?
Didn't think so.

No, sorry I didn't have a way of magically acquiring the tapes that the NFL inexplicably destroyed. Talk about a fan in denial.

poizond13 wrote:No, sorry I didn't have a way of magically acquiring the tapes that the NFL inexplicably destroyed. Talk about a fan in denial.

No denial. You brought up spygate as a response to the rings.
With no proof to back that one had to do with the other, you're wrong.

Facedown wrote:

poizond13 wrote:No, sorry I didn't have a way of magically acquiring the tapes that the NFL inexplicably destroyed. Talk about a fan in denial.

No denial. You brought up spygate as a response to the rings.
With no proof to back that one had to do with the other, you're wrong.

So the Patriots were never formally and sternly punished by the NFL for cheating? You sound like those people who say the holocaust never happened.

poizond13 wrote:

Luminiferous wrote:

poizond13 wrote:

Try again sporto..

Who says "sporto?" HAHA, what a weirdo.

Thanks for the laugh, "sporto."

Thanks for the failure in trying to post a picture and attempting humor fanboi..

Better?

Luminiferous wrote:
Thanks for the failure in trying to post a picture and attempting humor fanboi..

Better?

Just for the record, I'm real disappointed that you didn't find it funny.

"Sporto."

I hate the Patriots but the point is that even though, YES, they were proven to have cheated, there's nothing to prove that their cheating led to them winning 3 Super Bowls. There was no evidence (at least described by the NFL prior to erasing it) linking their Super Bowl wins to spy cams.

You can claim there was all day, but there's nothing definitive. Some people (myself included) think they probably were cheating back then, but to claim you've got concrete proof is stupid, because NONE exists.

Relish the fact they got blown out at home by Joe Flacco and the Ravens today and go the fuck back to the Gossip Board.

I can't stand Tom Brady but no, it's not funny.

As a matter of fact it looks like it was created by a 15 year old..

"Sucka??"

JakeYonkel wrote:I hate the Patriots but the point is that even though, YES, they were proven to have cheated, there's nothing to prove that their cheating led to them winning 3 Super Bowls. There was no evidence (at least described by the NFL prior to erasing it) linking their Super Bowl wins to spy cams.

You can claim there was all day, but there's nothing definitive. Some people (myself included) think they probably were cheating back then, but to claim you've got concrete proof is stupid, because NONE exists.

Relish the fact they got blown out at home by Joe Flacco and the Ravens today and go the fuck back to the Gossip Board.

I don't see why anyone would give proven cheaters the benefit of the doubt for not cheating. Doesn't make much sense to me.

And yeah, seeing the Pats' massive fall from grace is pretty sweet. Of course, they've been nothing special ever since the tapes were destroyed, but that's a whole other conversation.

Luminiferous wrote:

I can't stand Tom Brady but no, it's not funny.

As a matter of fact it looks like it was created by a 15 year old..

"Sucka??"

Only a Pats fan would not find that funny. Even though I did not create it, I think it's funny as hell.

I hate the Patriots, and no, it's not really funny.

I like Peyton Manning and the Colts, and I think the Manning Face is hysterical. Especially http://www.manningface.com

poizond13 wrote:So the Patriots were never formally and sternly punished by the NFL for cheating? You sound like those people who say the holocaust never happened.

Against the Colts or to win any Super Bowls?
Love to see that proof if you've got it.

poizond13 wrote:

Luminiferous wrote:

I can't stand Tom Brady but no, it's not funny.

As a matter of fact it looks like it was created by a 15 year old..

"Sucka??"

Only a Pats fan would not find that funny. Even though I did not create it, I think it's funny as hell.

Maybe you should pm it to LicketySplit...He's the resident Brady fan..
I've always found this one funny actually.

thejuggernaut wrote:Look at the muscle-less, unathletic, lazy eyed tranny lover, still trying to branch out.

Of course, you still can't seem to shake the fanboyism.

You ever going to explain you consider consider yourself as part of the "we" when referencing the Colts ?

I have a long standing policy on this site to not converse with trolls, except in certain circumstances. Plus, I already responded to it.

The only part of the "brady face" image that is meant to be funny, is Brady's actual face. That's the only part that's meant to be funny, which it is. The writing on the right is not really meant to be humorous, it's just true facts. The "sucka" part in the end is kinda dumb but whatever.

Facedown wrote:

poizond13 wrote:So the Patriots were never formally and sternly punished by the NFL for cheating? You sound like those people who say the holocaust never happened.

Against the Colts or to win any Super Bowls?
Love to see that proof if you've got it.

Once a cheater, always a cheater.

poizond13 wrote:Once a cheater, always a cheater.

Is that fact or just your opinion?

Facedown wrote:

poizond13 wrote:Once a cheater, always a cheater.

Is that fact or just your opinion?

It's a fact that they were caught cheating, plain and simple.

poizond13 wrote:

Facedown wrote:

poizond13 wrote:Once a cheater, always a cheater.

Is that fact or just your opinion?

It's a fact that they were caught cheating, plain and simple.

Against the Colts or to win Super Bowls?

poizond13 wrote:

thejuggernaut wrote:Look at the muscle-less, unathletic, lazy eyed tranny lover, still trying to branch out.

Of course, you still can't seem to shake the fanboyism.

You ever going to explain you consider consider yourself as part of the "we" when referencing the Colts ?

I have a long standing policy on this site to not converse with trolls, except in certain circumstances. Plus, I already responded to it.

You mean, when you (inevitably) say something retarded, and have it pointed out to you, so you cry "troll" ?

That's cute, being called a troll by a guy who, within the last month, FINALLY branched out and started trying to talk about sports. Of course, one look at you and we know you've never set foot on a field.

And no, you didn't answer the question, you talking pipe cleaner.

Hit the fucking gym, for christ's sake.