Page 1 of 2

Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:03 am
by thejuggernaut
Without shaking hands.

Where are the "Belicheats" who complained about him doing it ?


Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:04 am
by Crazy Levi
thejuggernaut wrote:Without shaking hands.

Where are the "Belicheats" who complained about him doing it ?

irrelevant. It's not Manning's responsibility to shake anybody's hand after losing the fucking Super Bowl, this isn't pop warner.

Only the coaches are obligated to do that.

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:10 am
by Machado
Crazy Levi wrote:
thejuggernaut wrote:Without shaking hands.

Where are the "Belicheats" who complained about him doing it ?

irrelevant. It's not Manning's responsibility to shake anybody's hand after losing the fucking Super Bowl, this isn't pop warner.

Only the coaches are obligated to do that.
BULLSHIT!!!
Manning is the leader of his team and should lead by example.
If a team wants to claim "they" win with class, the team should also
show class when they lose.
End of story!

I have not seen the footage, but if what was written is true, Manning showed very poor sportsmanship.

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:11 am
by SkyDog112046
Crazy Levi wrote:
thejuggernaut wrote:Without shaking hands.

Where are the "Belicheats" who complained about him doing it ?

irrelevant. It's not Manning's responsibility to shake anybody's hand after losing the fucking Super Bowl, this isn't pop warner.

Only the coaches are obligated to do that.
The 2 QBs usually meet for a handshake. Brees is friends with Manning's family. Peyton should have sought him out and congratulated him.

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:22 am
by alecjonsludge
He was too preoccupied trying to think who he could blame the loss on,Stover or Baskett. Because,despite the pick 6, it certainly wasn't his fault,ya know. :D

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:48 am
by thejuggernaut
Crazy Levi wrote:
thejuggernaut wrote:Without shaking hands.

Where are the "Belicheats" who complained about him doing it ?

irrelevant. It's not Manning's responsibility to shake anybody's hand after losing the fucking Super Bowl, this isn't pop warner.

Only the coaches are obligated to do that.
Cool.

What section of the rulebook is that in ?

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:54 am
by PussinBoots36
Is there footage of that? We were watching and the camera cut away from the quarterbacks. We even re-wound it and checked twice. They focused on confetti or some shit. I wondered if something had happened. If Peyton did do that I will be very disappointed. He should be a bigger person than that.

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:03 am
by JakeYonkel
thejuggernaut wrote:
Crazy Levi wrote:
thejuggernaut wrote:Without shaking hands.

Where are the "Belicheats" who complained about him doing it ?

irrelevant. It's not Manning's responsibility to shake anybody's hand after losing the fucking Super Bowl, this isn't pop warner.

Only the coaches are obligated to do that.
Cool.

What section of the rulebook is that in ?
Does the rulebook say that the coaches have to shake hands, like it's a kids' game? I never got that about football. Every other sport, the game's over, your team congratulates eachother, and you're out of there. In football both team's pour into the center of the field and everybody's gotta say "hey what's up" to one another.

Manning may be a sore loser, who cares. He's not a jackass like Belicheat is, though, so he won't be vilified.

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:10 am
by Machado
JakeYonkel wrote:
Manning may be a sore loser, who cares. He's not a jackass like Belicheat is, though, so he won't be vilified.
He might not be a jackass like the pats coach, but if the alleged is true, he is working his way up to where the pats coach stands-as a #1 rated jackass.
There is no excuse why the colts qb could not shake hands like a gracious loser.

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:18 am
by Luminiferous
Crazy Levi wrote:irrelevant. It's not Manning's responsibility to shake anybody's hand after losing the fucking Super Bowl, this isn't pop warner.

Only the coaches are obligated to do that.
So that includes offensive and defensive coordinators?

They're coaches too ya know... :D

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:20 am
by thejuggernaut
Machado wrote:
JakeYonkel wrote:
Manning may be a sore loser, who cares. He's not a jackass like Belicheat is, though, so he won't be vilified.
He might not be a jackass like the pats coach, but if the alleged is true, he is working his way up to where the pats coach stands-as a #1 rated jackass.
There is no excuse why the colts qb could not shake hands like a gracious loser.
I don't care if he shook hands or not.

I don't care if the losing team pisses on the winning team's logo.

I just get a kick out of the fact that a lot of the people who claim Manning is a classy sportsman, are usually some of the most vocal whiners about Belichick not shaking hands.

They're right up there with those who say Brett "I'm too important to bother with training camp" Favre is down to earth.

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:22 am
by Machado
thejuggernaut wrote:
Machado wrote:
JakeYonkel wrote:
Manning may be a sore loser, who cares. He's not a jackass like Belicheat is, though, so he won't be vilified.
He might not be a jackass like the pats coach, but if the alleged is true, he is working his way up to where the pats coach stands-as a #1 rated jackass.
There is no excuse why the colts qb could not shake hands like a gracious loser.
I don't care if he shook hands or not.

I don't care if the losing team pisses on the winning team's logo.

I just get a kick out of the fact that a lot of the people who claim Manning is a classy sportsman, are usually some of the most vocal whiners about Belichick not shaking hands.

They're right up there with those who say Brett "I'm too important to bother with training camp" Favre is down to earth.
I agree.
Those same people want it both ways.
Sorry! Does not work that way.

Manning once again proved that "he is not among the all time greatest qb's to play".

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:25 am
by SkyDog112046
Luminiferous wrote:
Crazy Levi wrote:irrelevant. It's not Manning's responsibility to shake anybody's hand after losing the fucking Super Bowl, this isn't pop warner.

Only the coaches are obligated to do that.
So that includes offensive and defensive coordinators?

They're coaches too ya know... :D
That reminds me. Using "Sludge Logic" there were 21 "Superbowl Winning Coaches" yesterday. If they all shook hands it would have made for a heck of a hand-shaking ceremony at the end of the game.

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:35 am
by WTF

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:39 am
by Crazy Levi
thejuggernaut wrote:
I don't care if the losing team pisses on the winning team's logo.

I just get a kick out of the fact that a lot of the people who claim Manning is a classy sportsman, are usually some of the most vocal whiners about Belichick not shaking hands.

Why do you always do this? You make these stupid posts trying to "trap" people you have disagreements with into contradicting themselves. It's like you are some kind of prosecutor who retired 20 years ago and is in the early stages of dementia.

If you don't give a shit that Manning didn't shake hands with Brees, why do you have to make post mocking him for it? So you can lure some guy who likes Brett Farve into some kind of trap that will show what a hypocrite he is - wow, great explanation.

Retarded...and you call *ME* a troll :roll:

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:41 am
by Crazy Levi
"The stage is being set up for the celebration and it was time for the Saints to celebrate at midfield," Manning said. "They deserved the moment.''


Well, that pretty much puts that one to bed...

Next!

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:00 am
by thejuggernaut
Crazy Levi wrote:
thejuggernaut wrote:
I don't care if the losing team pisses on the winning team's logo.

I just get a kick out of the fact that a lot of the people who claim Manning is a classy sportsman, are usually some of the most vocal whiners about Belichick not shaking hands.

Why do you always do this? You make these stupid posts trying to "trap" people you have disagreements with into contradicting themselves. It's like you are some kind of prosecutor who retired 20 years ago and is in the early stages of dementia.

If you don't give a shit that Manning didn't shake hands with Brees, why do you have to make post mocking him for it? So you can lure some guy who likes Brett Farve into some kind of trap that will show what a hypocrite he is - wow, great explanation.

Retarded...and you call *ME* a troll :roll:
Why do you read these "stupid posts" when they're amazingly easy to avoid ?

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:06 am
by Crazy Levi
thejuggernaut wrote:
Crazy Levi wrote:
thejuggernaut wrote:
I don't care if the losing team pisses on the winning team's logo.

I just get a kick out of the fact that a lot of the people who claim Manning is a classy sportsman, are usually some of the most vocal whiners about Belichick not shaking hands.

Why do you always do this? You make these stupid posts trying to "trap" people you have disagreements with into contradicting themselves. It's like you are some kind of prosecutor who retired 20 years ago and is in the early stages of dementia.

If you don't give a shit that Manning didn't shake hands with Brees, why do you have to make post mocking him for it? So you can lure some guy who likes Brett Farve into some kind of trap that will show what a hypocrite he is - wow, great explanation.

Retarded...and you call *ME* a troll :roll:
Why do you read these "stupid posts" when they're amazingly easy to avoid ?
Another one of your favorite gambits, "If it's so lame, why do you read it?"

Well if you think I'm a troll, why do you read MY posts!

Oooooooo! I bet you weren't expecting that.

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:10 am
by thejuggernaut
Crazy Levi wrote:
thejuggernaut wrote:
Crazy Levi wrote:
Why do you always do this? You make these stupid posts trying to "trap" people you have disagreements with into contradicting themselves. It's like you are some kind of prosecutor who retired 20 years ago and is in the early stages of dementia.

If you don't give a shit that Manning didn't shake hands with Brees, why do you have to make post mocking him for it? So you can lure some guy who likes Brett Farve into some kind of trap that will show what a hypocrite he is - wow, great explanation.

Retarded...and you call *ME* a troll :roll:
Why do you read these "stupid posts" when they're amazingly easy to avoid ?
Another one of your favorite gambits, "If it's so lame, why do you read it?"

Well if you think I'm a troll, why do you read MY posts!

Oooooooo! I bet you weren't expecting that.
So, should I expect the link of me saying you're a troll before or after you give us the link to the NFL rule book where it states that coaches are obligated to shake hands ?

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:13 am
by Crazy Levi
thejuggernaut wrote:
Why do you read these "stupid posts" when they're amazingly easy to avoid ?
Another one of your favorite gambits, "If it's so lame, why do you read it?"

Well if you think I'm a troll, why do you read MY posts!

Oooooooo! I bet you weren't expecting that.[/quote]

So, should I expect the link of me saying you're a troll before or after you give us the link to the NFL rule book where it states that coaches are obligated to shake hands ?[/quote]

Here you go champ....

Oh sorry..."sort of a troll..."

viewtopic.php?f=13&t=218606&p=4537403&h ... t#p4537403

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:16 am
by thejuggernaut
Crazy Levi wrote:
thejuggernaut wrote:
Crazy Levi wrote: Another one of your favorite gambits, "If it's so lame, why do you read it?"

Well if you think I'm a troll, why do you read MY posts!

Oooooooo! I bet you weren't expecting that.
So, should I expect the link of me saying you're a troll before or after you give us the link to the NFL rule book where it states that coaches are obligated to shake hands ?
Here you go champ....

Oh sorry..."sort of a troll..."

viewtopic.php?f=13&t=218606&p=4537403&h ... t#p4537403
Exactly.

And I personally don't really consider there to be such a thing.

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:35 am
by Crazy Levi
Ok, then you are sort of an asshole...though I don't really believe in such things.

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:36 am
by tripsgirl
alecjonsludge wrote:He was too preoccupied trying to think who he could blame the loss on,Stover or Baskett. Because,despite the pick 6, it certainly wasn't his fault,ya know. :D

Its not hanks fault damn it!!!
Image

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:38 am
by JakeYonkel
tripsgirl wrote:
alecjonsludge wrote:He was too preoccupied trying to think who he could blame the loss on,Stover or Baskett. Because,despite the pick 6, it certainly wasn't his fault,ya know. :D

Its not hanks fault damn it!!!
Image
Hahahahahahaha!!!!

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:01 pm
by thejuggernaut
Crazy Levi wrote:Ok, then you are sort of an asshole...though I don't really believe in such things.
Works for me.

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:02 pm
by DenimAndLeather
tripsgirl wrote:
alecjonsludge wrote:He was too preoccupied trying to think who he could blame the loss on,Stover or Baskett. Because,despite the pick 6, it certainly wasn't his fault,ya know. :D

Its not hanks fault damn it!!!
Image
LOL

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:41 pm
by Machado
Image
Just another female that is disappointed someone else could not
gain fame and $$$ for her to beg/borrow/steal.

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:39 pm
by Tenacious_Dio
I don't think this is much of an issue. As soon as the Super Bowl ends, the yellow tape goes up and the losers are kicked to the curb. Never noticed it until the Panthers lost. :|

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 2:49 pm
by cantstopthemusic
SkyDog112046 wrote:The 2 QBs usually meet for a handshake. Brees is friends with Manning's family. Peyton should have sought him out and congratulated him.
Machado wrote:There is no excuse why the colts qb could not shake hands like a gracious loser.

Just because you didn't see him do it on TV, doesn't mean it didn't happen (then, or later on).

Re: Manning sulks off the field

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 3:11 pm
by thejuggernaut
cantstopthemusic wrote:
SkyDog112046 wrote:The 2 QBs usually meet for a handshake. Brees is friends with Manning's family. Peyton should have sought him out and congratulated him.
Machado wrote:There is no excuse why the colts qb could not shake hands like a gracious loser.

Just because you didn't see him do it on TV, doesn't mean it didn't happen (then, or later on).
He didn't. He confirmed it with an incredibly lame PC story.