Page 1 of 2

NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 9:38 am
by ac/dc sucks
1)Vikings(13-3)
2)Bears(9-7)
3)Lions(6-10)
Packers(6-10)

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 9:56 am
by jahlive 420
1. Vikings 11-5
2. Packers 9-7
3. Bears 6-10
4. Lions 4-12

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 12:35 pm
by bigbuttskinner
1) Vikings 14-2
2) Packers 11-5
3) Bears 7-9
4) Lions 6-10

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 10:25 pm
by SpecialSauce
1.Green Bay 11-5
2.Minnesota 10-6
3.Chicago 8-8
4.Detroit 6-10

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 1:49 am
by demolition23
1.Green Bay - Won't win the Superbowl.
2.Minnesota - Won't win the Superbowl.
3.Chicago - Won't make the playoffs.
4.Detroit - Haha.

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 8:29 am
by thejuggernaut
GB
Minny

And I won't be even close to surprised if Detroit finishes ahead of Chicago.

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 10:47 am
by SkyDog112046
GB: 12-4
MN: 11-5
Chi: 6-10
Det: 5-11

If the Chicago locker room comes apart I could see them falling to 3-13 and Det picking up another couple of wins.

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 12:50 pm
by Kamikaze_Russo
GB--- 11-5 (5-1)
MIN-- 11-5 (4-2)
CHI-- 7-9 (3-3)
DET-- 4-12 (0-6)

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 5:26 am
by Redman77
Detroit 16-0
Minny, Chic, GB 0-16

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Wed May 26, 2010 7:18 am
by johnk5150
thejuggernaut wrote:GB
Minny

And I won't be even close to surprised if Detroit finishes ahead of Chicago.
But...but we signed Brandon Manamanamanamanlu!

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 6:01 am
by ac/dc sucks
Green Bay is gonna have a rude awakening. I live in Wisconsin and all these moron Packer fans are really setting themselves up for failure. Aaron Rodgers is just a stat guy. When they really need him to do something, he fails. Apparently he's a "Fantasy Football hero". Unfortunately "Fantasy Football" isn't "Football". That team hasn't beaten anybody good for the past 2 seasons. They beat Dallas last year, but that was because of some really bad calls and Dallas did not show up. Cutler gave them 2 games. Detroit, St. Louis and Seattle had them on their heels until they proved why they've been so dreadful. The Ravens had them until Flacco and some more awful calls gave it away. They got down against Tampa and it was too much for Rodgers to handle.
Last seasons schedule was really weak. This years, not so much.
You can bank on a 6-10 mark again.

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 6:51 am
by thejuggernaut
ac/dc sucks wrote:Green Bay is gonna have a rude awakening. I live in Wisconsin and all these moron Packer fans are really setting themselves up for failure. Aaron Rodgers is just a stat guy. When they really need him to do something, he fails. Apparently he's a "Fantasy Football hero". Unfortunately "Fantasy Football" isn't "Football". That team hasn't beaten anybody good for the past 2 seasons. They beat Dallas last year, but that was because of some really bad calls and Dallas did not show up. Cutler gave them 2 games. Detroit, St. Louis and Seattle had them on their heels until they proved why they've been so dreadful. The Ravens had them until Flacco and some more awful calls gave it away. They got down against Tampa and it was too much for Rodgers to handle.
Last seasons schedule was really weak. This years, not so much.
You can bank on a 6-10 mark again.

The guy before him was a stat guy who, in his first 4 years as a starter, choked when it mattered most as well. It ended up ok in 96.

Rodgers is much more intelligent than Bert as well.

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 7:30 am
by bigbuttskinner
thejuggernaut wrote:
ac/dc sucks wrote:Green Bay is gonna have a rude awakening. I live in Wisconsin and all these moron Packer fans are really setting themselves up for failure. Aaron Rodgers is just a stat guy. When they really need him to do something, he fails. Apparently he's a "Fantasy Football hero". Unfortunately "Fantasy Football" isn't "Football". That team hasn't beaten anybody good for the past 2 seasons. They beat Dallas last year, but that was because of some really bad calls and Dallas did not show up. Cutler gave them 2 games. Detroit, St. Louis and Seattle had them on their heels until they proved why they've been so dreadful. The Ravens had them until Flacco and some more awful calls gave it away. They got down against Tampa and it was too much for Rodgers to handle.
Last seasons schedule was really weak. This years, not so much.
You can bank on a 6-10 mark again.

The guy before him was a stat guy who, in his first 4 years as a starter, choked when it mattered most as well. It ended up ok in 96.

Rodgers is much more intelligent than Bert as well.
I don't think he has the passion or heart that Brett displayed there for 16 years. If he does, he hasn't showed it yet. Favre is a legend; Rodgers is just beginning. We will see how well he can do.

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 10:25 pm
by UtahRatt
SkyDog112046 wrote:GB: 12-4
MN: 11-5
Chi: 6-10
Det: 5-11

If the Chicago locker room comes apart I could see them falling to 3-13 and Det picking up another couple of wins.
I'd go with this, GB and MN could flip. I could also see MN having Bret issues, if he plays he will get hurt and when that happens MN is going to loose several more.

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 4:34 am
by thejuggernaut
bigbuttskinner wrote:
thejuggernaut wrote:
ac/dc sucks wrote:Green Bay is gonna have a rude awakening. I live in Wisconsin and all these moron Packer fans are really setting themselves up for failure. Aaron Rodgers is just a stat guy. When they really need him to do something, he fails. Apparently he's a "Fantasy Football hero". Unfortunately "Fantasy Football" isn't "Football". That team hasn't beaten anybody good for the past 2 seasons. They beat Dallas last year, but that was because of some really bad calls and Dallas did not show up. Cutler gave them 2 games. Detroit, St. Louis and Seattle had them on their heels until they proved why they've been so dreadful. The Ravens had them until Flacco and some more awful calls gave it away. They got down against Tampa and it was too much for Rodgers to handle.
Last seasons schedule was really weak. This years, not so much.
You can bank on a 6-10 mark again.

The guy before him was a stat guy who, in his first 4 years as a starter, choked when it mattered most as well. It ended up ok in 96.

Rodgers is much more intelligent than Bert as well.
I don't think he has the passion or heart that Brett displayed there for 16 years. If he does, he hasn't showed it yet. Favre is a legend; Rodgers is just beginning. We will see how well he can do.
You call it passion, I call it poise.

What did Brett's "passion" get him except a drug addiction, criminal behavior, the most interceptions in history and choke job after choke job ?

"Passion" or, as it's also known, "youthful exuberance" is great for linebackers, RBs, WRs, DBs, Dlinemen. Not so much for the guy who throws the ball.

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 6:33 pm
by bigbuttskinner

The guy before him was a stat guy who, in his first 4 years as a starter, choked when it mattered most as well. It ended up ok in 96.

Rodgers is much more intelligent than Bert as well.
[/quote]

I don't think he has the passion or heart that Brett displayed there for 16 years. If he does, he hasn't showed it yet. Favre is a legend; Rodgers is just beginning. We will see how well he can do.[/quote]

You call it passion, I call it poise.

What did Brett's "passion" get him except a drug addiction, criminal behavior, the most interceptions in history and choke job after choke job ?

"Passion" or, as it's also known, "youthful exuberance" is great for linebackers, RBs, WRs, DBs, Dlinemen. Not so much for the guy who throws the ball.
[/quote]

Brett's passion got him a legion of fans and the respect of the finest football players to ever play the game.

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 6:39 am
by johnk5150
bigbuttskinner wrote: Brett's passion got him a legion of fans and the respect of the finest football players to ever play the game.
John Daly has a legion of fans.

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 6:21 am
by Dana_Dubrow
Redman77 wrote:Detroit 19-0
Minny, Chic, GB 0-16
fixed

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 6:31 am
by Redman77
Dana_Dubrow wrote:
Redman77 wrote:Detroit 19-0
Minny, Chic, GB 0-16
fixed
I didn't want to go too overboard.

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:31 pm
by Garbageman
Unless Farve comes back, I don't see anyone in the division winning more than 10 games, and with Farve 11 will be lucky.

I actually give the Lions a chance to go 7-9 with their schedule. And that might put them second in the division. And they'll take that as a major victory! Of course, that will likely be a 3 way tie for second!

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:36 am
by NeverSurrender
No way the pack finishes in last with that qb.

Vikes - 12-4
Pack-10 -6
Lions 6-10
Bears 3-13

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:50 am
by johnk5150
Things Bears beat writers should never print, "Jay Cutler is going to try to cut back on his interceptions". No shit? He's going to try?

What a BRILLIANT thing for the coaches to focus on.

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 12:31 pm
by Crazy Levi
bigbuttskinner wrote:

What did Brett's "passion" get him except a drug addiction, criminal behavior, the most interceptions in history and choke job after choke job ?

"Passion" or, as it's also known, "youthful exuberance" is great for linebackers, RBs, WRs, DBs, Dlinemen. Not so much for the guy who throws the ball.
Brett's passion got him a legion of fans and the respect of the finest football players to ever play the game.[/quote]

I guess Super Bowl rings don't count for much up in Canada?

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 9:22 am
by thejuggernaut
Crazy Levi wrote:
bigbuttskinner wrote:

What did Brett's "passion" get him except a drug addiction, criminal behavior, the most interceptions in history and choke job after choke job ?

"Passion" or, as it's also known, "youthful exuberance" is great for linebackers, RBs, WRs, DBs, Dlinemen. Not so much for the guy who throws the ball.
Brett's passion got him a legion of fans and the respect of the finest football players to ever play the game.
I guess Super Bowl rings don't count for much up in Canada?[/quote]

Ooh, poor Levi doesn't like Brett Favre mocking.

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 10:18 am
by Crazy Levi
thejuggernaut wrote:
Crazy Levi wrote:
bigbuttskinner wrote:

What did Brett's "passion" get him except a drug addiction, criminal behavior, the most interceptions in history and choke job after choke job ?

"Passion" or, as it's also known, "youthful exuberance" is great for linebackers, RBs, WRs, DBs, Dlinemen. Not so much for the guy who throws the ball.
Brett's passion got him a legion of fans and the respect of the finest football players to ever play the game.
I guess Super Bowl rings don't count for much up in Canada?
Ooh, poor Levi doesn't like Brett Favre mocking.[/quote]

?????

What's the "poor Levi" mocking?!

I don't LIKE Bret Farve. I was on board through your entire Brett-bashing fiesta during the playoffs.

But I don't understand how you can ignore two trips to the super bowl and a super bowl ring. You see, in the USA, we have this thing called the "Super Bowl." It's kind of like your "Grey Cup," except it matters.

It's the most important thing in football. Once a QB has won himself a "Super Bowl Ring," it's kinda silly to ask what his "passion" has "gotten him." Your retarded laundry list of the things his "passion" has gotten him conveniently left out "Super Bowl ring+ - you know, the thing that represents the pinnacle of American football?

Get over it dude.

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:10 pm
by thejuggernaut
Crazy Levi wrote:
thejuggernaut wrote:
Crazy Levi wrote:

Brett's passion got him a legion of fans and the respect of the finest football players to ever play the game.

I guess Super Bowl rings don't count for much up in Canada?
Ooh, poor Levi doesn't like Brett Favre mocking.
?????

What's the "poor Levi" mocking?!

I don't LIKE Bret Farve. I was on board through your entire Brett-bashing fiesta during the playoffs.

But I don't understand how you can ignore two trips to the super bowl and a super bowl ring. You see, in the USA, we have this thing called the "Super Bowl." It's kind of like your "Grey Cup," except it matters.

It's the most important thing in football. Once a QB has won himself a "Super Bowl Ring," it's kinda silly to ask what his "passion" has "gotten him." Your retarded laundry list of the things his "passion" has gotten him conveniently left out "Super Bowl ring+ - you know, the thing that represents the pinnacle of American football?

Get over it dude.
Relax, Indy.

When we find out about stoic figures like Joe Montana (who wasn't a product of a scheme) having drug addictions, a problem with stupid decisions, and flip flopping on retirements, then we can revisit the importance of "passion" in a QB.

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 11:39 am
by NeverSurrender
Is Crazy Levi MOR's baby brother?
Brett's passion got him a legion of fans and the respect of the finest football players to ever play the game.
That shit just sounds funny.

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 2:15 pm
by thejuggernaut
NeverSurrender wrote:Is Crazy Levi MOR's baby brother?
Brett's passion got him a legion of fans and the respect of the finest football players to ever play the game.
That shit just sounds funny.
Levi's kind of simple. He doesn't realize that "respect between players" is merely union blather.

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 10:30 am
by Crazy Levi
thejuggernaut wrote:
NeverSurrender wrote:Is Crazy Levi MOR's baby brother?
Brett's passion got him a legion of fans and the respect of the finest football players to ever play the game.
That shit just sounds funny.
Levi's kind of simple. He doesn't realize that "respect between players" is merely union blather.
I never said anything about "respect between players" idiot. I don't know why anybody would attribute that to me, unless you are too stupid to notice a quote function error.

Juggs is kind of simple. He doesn't understand that once a football player has led his team to two Super Bowls and won one of them, and led his team within a cunt hair of the Super Bowl at age 40, he's immune to the criticism that he has never amounted to anything beyond a laundry list of petty insults.

Re: NFC North 2010 final standings.

Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 11:05 am
by thejuggernaut
Crazy Levi wrote:I never said anything about "respect between players" idiot. I don't know why anybody would attribute that to me, unless you are too stupid to notice a quote function error.
I know, right ?

Image

LOL @ "quote function error"

Yeah, moron, Sludge's quote fuction was acting up and had nothing to do with the idiot using it.

Crazy Levi wrote:Juggs is kind of simple. He doesn't understand that once a football player has led his team to two Super Bowls and won one of them, and led his team within a cunt hair of the Super Bowl at age 40, he's immune to the criticism that he has never amounted to anything beyond a laundry list of petty insults.
Holy shit Indy, I guess you forget that it was defense, a returner and an opposing QB dumber than Favre that resulted in his title.

I guess you also forget that Favre himself has cost his teams shots at titles due to his stupidity.

When a QB who is 40 years old and has almost 20 years experience throws off his back foot into a crowd in the final seconds, costing his team a shot at a SB, his "criticism immunity" is opened up again.

He's the ultimate example of squandered ability. He could have been the best ever, but his lack of intelligence rendered him merely one of the best of his era.