NFC North 2010 final standings.
Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 9:38 am
1)Vikings(13-3)
2)Bears(9-7)
3)Lions(6-10)
Packers(6-10)
2)Bears(9-7)
3)Lions(6-10)
Packers(6-10)
https://forums.metalsludge.tv/forums/
https://forums.metalsludge.tv/forums/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=226452
But...but we signed Brandon Manamanamanamanlu!thejuggernaut wrote:GB
Minny
And I won't be even close to surprised if Detroit finishes ahead of Chicago.
ac/dc sucks wrote:Green Bay is gonna have a rude awakening. I live in Wisconsin and all these moron Packer fans are really setting themselves up for failure. Aaron Rodgers is just a stat guy. When they really need him to do something, he fails. Apparently he's a "Fantasy Football hero". Unfortunately "Fantasy Football" isn't "Football". That team hasn't beaten anybody good for the past 2 seasons. They beat Dallas last year, but that was because of some really bad calls and Dallas did not show up. Cutler gave them 2 games. Detroit, St. Louis and Seattle had them on their heels until they proved why they've been so dreadful. The Ravens had them until Flacco and some more awful calls gave it away. They got down against Tampa and it was too much for Rodgers to handle.
Last seasons schedule was really weak. This years, not so much.
You can bank on a 6-10 mark again.
I don't think he has the passion or heart that Brett displayed there for 16 years. If he does, he hasn't showed it yet. Favre is a legend; Rodgers is just beginning. We will see how well he can do.thejuggernaut wrote:ac/dc sucks wrote:Green Bay is gonna have a rude awakening. I live in Wisconsin and all these moron Packer fans are really setting themselves up for failure. Aaron Rodgers is just a stat guy. When they really need him to do something, he fails. Apparently he's a "Fantasy Football hero". Unfortunately "Fantasy Football" isn't "Football". That team hasn't beaten anybody good for the past 2 seasons. They beat Dallas last year, but that was because of some really bad calls and Dallas did not show up. Cutler gave them 2 games. Detroit, St. Louis and Seattle had them on their heels until they proved why they've been so dreadful. The Ravens had them until Flacco and some more awful calls gave it away. They got down against Tampa and it was too much for Rodgers to handle.
Last seasons schedule was really weak. This years, not so much.
You can bank on a 6-10 mark again.
The guy before him was a stat guy who, in his first 4 years as a starter, choked when it mattered most as well. It ended up ok in 96.
Rodgers is much more intelligent than Bert as well.
I'd go with this, GB and MN could flip. I could also see MN having Bret issues, if he plays he will get hurt and when that happens MN is going to loose several more.SkyDog112046 wrote:GB: 12-4
MN: 11-5
Chi: 6-10
Det: 5-11
If the Chicago locker room comes apart I could see them falling to 3-13 and Det picking up another couple of wins.
You call it passion, I call it poise.bigbuttskinner wrote:I don't think he has the passion or heart that Brett displayed there for 16 years. If he does, he hasn't showed it yet. Favre is a legend; Rodgers is just beginning. We will see how well he can do.thejuggernaut wrote:ac/dc sucks wrote:Green Bay is gonna have a rude awakening. I live in Wisconsin and all these moron Packer fans are really setting themselves up for failure. Aaron Rodgers is just a stat guy. When they really need him to do something, he fails. Apparently he's a "Fantasy Football hero". Unfortunately "Fantasy Football" isn't "Football". That team hasn't beaten anybody good for the past 2 seasons. They beat Dallas last year, but that was because of some really bad calls and Dallas did not show up. Cutler gave them 2 games. Detroit, St. Louis and Seattle had them on their heels until they proved why they've been so dreadful. The Ravens had them until Flacco and some more awful calls gave it away. They got down against Tampa and it was too much for Rodgers to handle.
Last seasons schedule was really weak. This years, not so much.
You can bank on a 6-10 mark again.
The guy before him was a stat guy who, in his first 4 years as a starter, choked when it mattered most as well. It ended up ok in 96.
Rodgers is much more intelligent than Bert as well.
John Daly has a legion of fans.bigbuttskinner wrote: Brett's passion got him a legion of fans and the respect of the finest football players to ever play the game.
fixedRedman77 wrote:Detroit 19-0
Minny, Chic, GB 0-16
I didn't want to go too overboard.Dana_Dubrow wrote:fixedRedman77 wrote:Detroit 19-0
Minny, Chic, GB 0-16
Brett's passion got him a legion of fans and the respect of the finest football players to ever play the game.[/quote]bigbuttskinner wrote:
What did Brett's "passion" get him except a drug addiction, criminal behavior, the most interceptions in history and choke job after choke job ?
"Passion" or, as it's also known, "youthful exuberance" is great for linebackers, RBs, WRs, DBs, Dlinemen. Not so much for the guy who throws the ball.
I guess Super Bowl rings don't count for much up in Canada?[/quote]Crazy Levi wrote:Brett's passion got him a legion of fans and the respect of the finest football players to ever play the game.bigbuttskinner wrote:
What did Brett's "passion" get him except a drug addiction, criminal behavior, the most interceptions in history and choke job after choke job ?
"Passion" or, as it's also known, "youthful exuberance" is great for linebackers, RBs, WRs, DBs, Dlinemen. Not so much for the guy who throws the ball.
Ooh, poor Levi doesn't like Brett Favre mocking.[/quote]thejuggernaut wrote:I guess Super Bowl rings don't count for much up in Canada?Crazy Levi wrote:Brett's passion got him a legion of fans and the respect of the finest football players to ever play the game.bigbuttskinner wrote:
What did Brett's "passion" get him except a drug addiction, criminal behavior, the most interceptions in history and choke job after choke job ?
"Passion" or, as it's also known, "youthful exuberance" is great for linebackers, RBs, WRs, DBs, Dlinemen. Not so much for the guy who throws the ball.
Relax, Indy.Crazy Levi wrote:?????thejuggernaut wrote:Ooh, poor Levi doesn't like Brett Favre mocking.Crazy Levi wrote:
Brett's passion got him a legion of fans and the respect of the finest football players to ever play the game.
I guess Super Bowl rings don't count for much up in Canada?
What's the "poor Levi" mocking?!
I don't LIKE Bret Farve. I was on board through your entire Brett-bashing fiesta during the playoffs.
But I don't understand how you can ignore two trips to the super bowl and a super bowl ring. You see, in the USA, we have this thing called the "Super Bowl." It's kind of like your "Grey Cup," except it matters.
It's the most important thing in football. Once a QB has won himself a "Super Bowl Ring," it's kinda silly to ask what his "passion" has "gotten him." Your retarded laundry list of the things his "passion" has gotten him conveniently left out "Super Bowl ring+ - you know, the thing that represents the pinnacle of American football?
Get over it dude.
That shit just sounds funny.Brett's passion got him a legion of fans and the respect of the finest football players to ever play the game.
Levi's kind of simple. He doesn't realize that "respect between players" is merely union blather.NeverSurrender wrote:Is Crazy Levi MOR's baby brother?
That shit just sounds funny.Brett's passion got him a legion of fans and the respect of the finest football players to ever play the game.
I never said anything about "respect between players" idiot. I don't know why anybody would attribute that to me, unless you are too stupid to notice a quote function error.thejuggernaut wrote:Levi's kind of simple. He doesn't realize that "respect between players" is merely union blather.NeverSurrender wrote:Is Crazy Levi MOR's baby brother?
That shit just sounds funny.Brett's passion got him a legion of fans and the respect of the finest football players to ever play the game.
I know, right ?Crazy Levi wrote:I never said anything about "respect between players" idiot. I don't know why anybody would attribute that to me, unless you are too stupid to notice a quote function error.
Holy shit Indy, I guess you forget that it was defense, a returner and an opposing QB dumber than Favre that resulted in his title.Crazy Levi wrote:Juggs is kind of simple. He doesn't understand that once a football player has led his team to two Super Bowls and won one of them, and led his team within a cunt hair of the Super Bowl at age 40, he's immune to the criticism that he has never amounted to anything beyond a laundry list of petty insults.