
Craig Biggio just missed the amount needed to enter the hall.
Moderator: Metal Sludge
Not as retarded as Pete Rose not even being eligible.Crazy Levi wrote: It's still retarded that guys like Bonds and Clemens are getting long-dicked by self-righteous baseball writers.
Pete Rose's omission is the biggest crime.WTF wrote:Not as retarded as Pete Rose not even being eligible.Crazy Levi wrote: It's still retarded that guys like Bonds and Clemens are getting long-dicked by self-righteous baseball writers.
Are you fucking insane?Machado wrote:Pete Rose's omission is the biggest crime.WTF wrote:Not as retarded as Pete Rose not even being eligible.Crazy Levi wrote: It's still retarded that guys like Bonds and Clemens are getting long-dicked by self-righteous baseball writers.
Eventually Pete will get in long after his death. The commissioner of that era will issue an apology and admit
MLB made a mistake and should have inducted Pete many years earlier.
Is your glass every half full? WOW! You are one depressing Sludger.Crazy Levi wrote:Machado wrote:Are you fucking insane?WTF wrote:
Pete Rose's omission is the biggest crime.
Eventually Pete will get in long after his death. The commissioner of that era will issue an apology and admit
MLB made a mistake and should have inducted Pete many years earlier.
Rose may or may not get in (I'm betting NEVER) but the commissioner of MLB - now and forever - will NEVER, EVER, EVER apologize to that piece of shit Pete Rose, and rightfully so.
He'll never get in and he's a piece of shit, but there's quite a list of slime balls already enshrined.Crazy Levi wrote: Are you fucking insane?
Rose may or may not get in (I'm betting NEVER) but the commissioner of MLB - now and forever - will NEVER, EVER, EVER apologize to that piece of shit Pete Rose, and rightfully so.
He was the manager of the Reds when he was betting on them. Gambling is THE cardinal sin in baseball and Rose while as a player was beyond deserving,has no business in the Hall because of his actions.Rainbow Bright wrote:Why? Because he bet on the Reds after his playing career? While a different sport, Jordan bet on the Bulls while playing. Why do you think his dad got whacked and had to spend a season with the White Sox?
C'mon Kill, exceptions can be made.killeverything wrote:He was the manager of the Reds when he was betting on them. Gambling is THE cardinal sin in baseball and Rose while as a player was beyond deserving,has no business in the Hall because of his actions.Rainbow Bright wrote:Why? Because he bet on the Reds after his playing career? While a different sport, Jordan bet on the Bulls while playing. Why do you think his dad got whacked and had to spend a season with the White Sox?
Dude, after 1919 that is the biggest rule. Like my stance on the PED players an admission would've exonerated him IMO. Unfortunately Charlie Hustle procrastinated ( see what I did there? ) for over a decade on his confession. He doesn't get in.Machado wrote:C'mon Kill, exceptions can be made.killeverything wrote:He was the manager of the Reds when he was betting on them. Gambling is THE cardinal sin in baseball and Rose while as a player was beyond deserving,has no business in the Hall because of his actions.Rainbow Bright wrote:Why? Because he bet on the Reds after his playing career? While a different sport, Jordan bet on the Bulls while playing. Why do you think his dad got whacked and had to spend a season with the White Sox?
There is plenty of room on a plaque to state the positives and the negatives in his career.
Why can't those words be communicated? Everybody would win.
Pete gets elected. His fans can visit his plaque and MLB gets a victory by mentioning that Pete bet on baseball
as a manager.
I'm not going to pretend that the players already in the HOF were model citizens on and off the field.
The amount of covering up the press did between 50-100 years ago would be national news/front page news today.
Integrity of the game? Get out of here. You did not write about integrity.Crazy Levi wrote:If "exceptions can be made" why have the rule in the first place?
"Rule 21 MISCONDUCT, (d) BETTING ON BALL GAMES, Any player, umpire, or club or league official or employee, who shall bet any sum whatsoever upon any baseball game in connection with which the bettor has a duty to perform shall be declared permanently ineligible."
It's plain as fucking day mr. medio vaso. As has been stated it's the cardinal sin, it's the one rule with the most importance to the integrity of the game.
Why such a soft spot for Rose, vato?
I don't and he's really not too well liked. How about this ask his bullpen how they feel about him. The guys he kept out there or put in specifically to win his bets.Machado wrote:Integrity of the game? Get out of here. You did not write about integrity.Crazy Levi wrote:If "exceptions can be made" why have the rule in the first place?
"Rule 21 MISCONDUCT, (d) BETTING ON BALL GAMES, Any player, umpire, or club or league official or employee, who shall bet any sum whatsoever upon any baseball game in connection with which the bettor has a duty to perform shall be declared permanently ineligible."
It's plain as fucking day mr. medio vaso. As has been stated it's the cardinal sin, it's the one rule with the most importance to the integrity of the game.
Why such a soft spot for Rose, vato?
Where is Bud Selig's integrity? C'mon, I know you will come up with an answer for him. Go ahead I dare you to defend
his tenure as Commish!!!
Any casual baseball fan has a soft spot for Rose.
Charlie Hustle
The Hit King
DUH!!!
Let's agree to disagree.killeverything wrote:I don't and he's really not too well liked. How about this ask his bullpen how they feel about him. The guys he kept out there or put in specifically to win his bets.Machado wrote:Integrity of the game? Get out of here. You did not write about integrity.Crazy Levi wrote:If "exceptions can be made" why have the rule in the first place?
"Rule 21 MISCONDUCT, (d) BETTING ON BALL GAMES, Any player, umpire, or club or league official or employee, who shall bet any sum whatsoever upon any baseball game in connection with which the bettor has a duty to perform shall be declared permanently ineligible."
It's plain as fucking day mr. medio vaso. As has been stated it's the cardinal sin, it's the one rule with the most importance to the integrity of the game.
Why such a soft spot for Rose, vato?
Where is Bud Selig's integrity? C'mon, I know you will come up with an answer for him. Go ahead I dare you to defend
his tenure as Commish!!!
Any casual baseball fan has a soft spot for Rose.
Charlie Hustle
The Hit King
DUH!!!
Rose played hard and hit well no one is arguing his greatness as a player. His HOF credentials were erased when he bet on the games.
Bobby Cox going in as well, as voted by the veterans' committee. Nice the three can go in together.Crazy Levi wrote:Maddux and Glavine going in at the same time is pretty fitting.
Maddux and Glavine are the first two teammates to go in together since Mantle and Ford.WOLF wrote:Bobby Cox going in as well, as voted by the veterans' committee. Nice the three can go in together.Crazy Levi wrote:Maddux and Glavine going in at the same time is pretty fitting.
Don't you think that is hyper critical? Baseball would have been reduced to a worse popularity than the NHL if it wasn't for the PED guys hitting home runs and putting up numbers night in and night out after the strike. Only when it became a nuance is when the League acted on what they already knew.killeverything wrote:
And as for the comment about Clemens and Bonds being kept out because of writers' morality. The veterans committee also feel they should he out too because they cheated. So basically actual HOF inducted players also think they shouldn't be allowed. I'm inclined to agree.
Baseball was in pretty rough shape in the years following the work stoppage and these freak show juicers helped bring it back. And EVERYONE - from owners, management, broadcasters, even the majority of the sanctimonious sportswriters who won't shut the fuck up about this stuff - turned a blind eye when it was ridiculously obvious these guys were pumped up on something. It wasn't even against the rules at the time.Rainbow Bright wrote:Don't you think that is hyper critical? Baseball would have been reduced to a worse popularity than the NHL if it wasn't for the PED guys hitting home runs and putting up numbers night in and night out after the strike. Only when it became a nuance is when the League acted on what they already knew.killeverything wrote:
And as for the comment about Clemens and Bonds being kept out because of writers' morality. The veterans committee also feel they should he out too because they cheated. So basically actual HOF inducted players also think they shouldn't be allowed. I'm inclined to agree.
The other part is you cannot pretend that the era didn't happen. It needs to be showcased. Yes, these guys juiced. But you still went to the games and cheered anyway as they recorded no hitters, home runs, RBI's and hits for the cycle. Baseball would be a shell of itself if it wasn't for those guys to put asses in the seats. Revisionist history, especially in the US, is a problem of mammoth proportions. Don't be a part of the problem.
How do you feel about Bagwell? Same situation as Piazza. I know Bagwell has always denied using, but I've worked at a gym. Bagwell most certainly used. Yeah, it's not proven.Crazy Levi wrote:
It's silly that guys like Clemens and Bonds - among the best to ever play the game - are being kept out by their onetime enablers, but it's outrageous that guys like Piazza are receiving the same treatment just because of mere suspicion without any proof.
yes.WTF wrote:
If Thomas is in, I think both Piazza and Bagwell should be in.
I agree.WTF wrote:How do you feel about Bagwell? Same situation as Piazza. I know Bagwell has always denied using, but I've worked at a gym. Bagwell most certainly used. Yeah, it's not proven.Crazy Levi wrote:
It's silly that guys like Clemens and Bonds - among the best to ever play the game - are being kept out by their onetime enablers, but it's outrageous that guys like Piazza are receiving the same treatment just because of mere suspicion without any proof.
If Thomas is in, I think both Piazza and Bagwell should be in.
I thought I explained this better earlier, my apologies for the confusion. If they came clean I would have no problem with their enshrinement. And for the record I was against them then too. Mcgwire I hated from the Oakland days because he and Canseco were juicing then. This was common knowledge in the late 80/90s. I rooted for Anaheim against the Giants because of Barry and Kent. I actually quit being an SF fan because of it. Unfortunately the Selig era is a part of baseball and this has nothing to do with revisionist history.Rainbow Bright wrote:Don't you think that is hyper critical? Baseball would have been reduced to a worse popularity than the NHL if it wasn't for the PED guys hitting home runs and putting up numbers night in and night out after the strike. Only when it became a nuance is when the League acted on what they already knew.killeverything wrote:
And as for the comment about Clemens and Bonds being kept out because of writers' morality. The veterans committee also feel they should he out too because they cheated. So basically actual HOF inducted players also think they shouldn't be allowed. I'm inclined to agree.
The other part is you cannot pretend that the era didn't happen. It needs to be showcased. Yes, these guys juiced. But you still went to the games and cheered anyway as they recorded no hitters, home runs, RBI's and hits for the cycle. Baseball would be a shell of itself if it wasn't for those guys to put asses in the seats. Revisionist history, especially in the US, is a problem of mammoth proportions. Don't be a part of the problem.
poizond13 wrote:I have been very bummed out, sad and shocked for most of the night
Artemis2085 wrote:so I blurt out "I love you Paul!
Atomicpunk18 wrote:You see Black Crowes music has gotten me laid multiple times.
Maddux and Glavine ( also added Jones, Smoltz and Justice ) made everyone root for the Braves....if they of course weren't playing your team. I also can't think of anyone that wasn't a Big Hurt fan either. His Topps Future Star card was THE card to have, almost on par with the Upperdeck Griffey Jr. rookie ( the fucking holy grail when you were like 10UtahRatt wrote:I'm glad I got to see Maddux, Glavine and Thomas play many times.
Watched Maddux and Glavine pitch back to back followed by a young Millwood rookie year if I remember right. Glavine dominated, Maddux lost a close game and Millwood got lit up in Coors Field.
Been a Thomas fan from day one, how could you not? I have a ton of his baseball cards laying around in a box somewhere.
Frank Thomas reminded me of Eddie Murray, one of my favorite players.