Caustic Queen wrote:Mama - 4/10
I'm sick of the look of these flicks.
Get some decently lighting and come up with something a little more original than black smokey looking shit.
My buddy said this was pretty lame too.
I'll wait and rent it.
Moderator: Metal Sludge
Caustic Queen wrote:Mama - 4/10
I'm sick of the look of these flicks.
Get some decently lighting and come up with something a little more original than black smokey looking shit.
bonedog wrote:I let Facedown get the better of me
bonedog wrote:My first kid will be born when I am 47.
bonedog wrote:I suck at sludging.
theglammerthebetter wrote:The cabin in the woods(2011) Same old stuff 5/10
No shit. I don't think there's any other movie that's more self-referential, which obviously is the whole fucking point. Anybody who's remotely into horror flicks realizes it's the best thing that happened in the genre since god knows when. If there ever was an instant classic, it's this.John Simon Ritchie wrote:theglammerthebetter wrote:The cabin in the woods(2011) Same old stuff 5/10
![]()
Whether a person thinks it a lame movie or not, It hardly a rehash. I'll just chalk your rating up as another person that didn't get it.
word!SebastianLeeDanzig wrote:No shit. I don't think there's any other movie that's more self-referential, which obviously is the whole fucking point. Anybody who's remotely into horror flicks realizes it's the best thing that happened in the genre since god knows when. If there ever was an instant classic, it's this.John Simon Ritchie wrote:theglammerthebetter wrote:The cabin in the woods(2011) Same old stuff 5/10
![]()
Whether a person thinks it a lame movie or not, It hardly a rehash. I'll just chalk your rating up as another person that didn't get it.
LAglamrocker wrote: ↑Tue Oct 22, 2024 8:07 pm You can tell Sleek had nothing to do with this…thats why it’s so entertaining
Cabin in the Woods is like going to the movies expecting to see a Die Hard-ish action flick and you end up watching Last Action Hero.SebastianLeeDanzig wrote:No shit. I don't think there's any other movie that's more self-referential, which obviously is the whole fucking point. Anybody who's remotely into horror flicks realizes it's the best thing that happened in the genre since god knows when. If there ever was an instant classic, it's this.John Simon Ritchie wrote:theglammerthebetter wrote:The cabin in the woods(2011) Same old stuff 5/10
![]()
Whether a person thinks it a lame movie or not, It hardly a rehash. I'll just chalk your rating up as another person that didn't get it.
Still...it was not "ripping off" anything or a "rehash" as a couple of others had said. If people watch it and think that, it is very obvious they are not "getting" the movie. So again, good, bad or boring I can understand.Hurls34 wrote:Cabin in the Woods was lame, because it was advertised as a horror flick, but was a parody of a horror flick. And I hated it!!!!!
As I've said before, I can't stand any horror movie that tries to be funny.
LAglamrocker wrote: ↑Tue Oct 22, 2024 8:07 pm You can tell Sleek had nothing to do with this…thats why it’s so entertaining
First part as in the opening scene with guys destroying the house, or the hotel hookup gone bad?Fletch wrote:V/H/S (2012) - 8/10. Loved it, especially the first part.
The hotel hookup. Loved it. Second honeymoon was cool too. The last scnene in the house I thought had a good build up.Hurls34 wrote:First part as in the opening scene with guys destroying the house, or the hotel hookup gone bad?Fletch wrote:V/H/S (2012) - 8/10. Loved it, especially the first part.
I think I liked second honeymoon the best out of those.
Grendel wrote: Skip work tomorrow and smoke some meth...this thread is THAT epic.
Grendel wrote: Skip work tomorrow and smoke some meth...this thread is THAT epic.
bonedog wrote:I let Facedown get the better of me
bonedog wrote:My first kid will be born when I am 47.
bonedog wrote:I suck at sludging.
vodevillian wrote:but that could be because I have a thing for plowing girls from behind while they wear nothing but a t-shirt.
Stoner wrote:
...we stopped at a restaurant to eat and I was wearing a Sludge shirt. Someone came up and asked me if I read the messageboard - I touched cloth for a split second and then said the shirt was my husband's and just looked at them retardedly.
i saw this when it was in theaters last year and it was disappointing...boring....thought it would be some hot steamy sex storyvodevillian wrote:Blue Valentine. 7/10
Coming out of a hard break up, this movie was totally brutal for me to watch. I didn't really know what I was getting into. When it first came out, both my girlfriend and I thought it was just some uber-hipster love story...boy were we wrong.
Needless to say, It made me a fan of Ryan Gosling. Thought he was a pretty boy, but after this and "Drive", I've decided he's got more going on. I've never been attracted to Michelle Williams, but in this, I find her smokin' hot....but that could be because I have a thing for plowing girls from behind while they wear nothing but a t-shirt.
Stoner wrote:
...we stopped at a restaurant to eat and I was wearing a Sludge shirt. Someone came up and asked me if I read the messageboard - I touched cloth for a split second and then said the shirt was my husband's and just looked at them retardedly.
The baby scene is an all time classic.SebastianLeeDanzig wrote:Feast II - Sloppy Seconds - 9/10. I was skeptical about the praise it got here, because I didn't like the first one all that much, but this was fucking awesome. The luchador midgets, the alien autopsy, the football baby . . . pure class.
One of my favorite movies ever! Don't bother with part 3. It sucks.SebastianLeeDanzig wrote:Feast II - Sloppy Seconds - 9/10.