Re: Dump Shithole
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2018 6:00 pm
And, amidst this, Fox News is leading with “Illegal Mexican Suspected of Killing Mollie Tibbets.”
Where is the feigning disbelief emoticon?
Where is the feigning disbelief emoticon?
https://forums.metalsludge.tv/forums/
https://forums.metalsludge.tv/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=336454
SeminiferousButtNoid wrote: ↑Tue Aug 21, 2018 1:54 pmLOL @ "what's been widely presumed by people" If Lenny represents what and how the "The People" think, this country is in real trouble.TenBenny wrote: ↑Mon Aug 20, 2018 3:26 pmDanzig in the Dark wrote: ↑Mon Aug 20, 2018 3:06 pm
Do you actually believe Mueller is sitting on evidence the President of the United States of America has committed high crimes and misdemeanors, possibly even been compromised by a foreign power?
Are you asking that question with sincerity or is that sarcasm? A lot of smart, knowing minds with strong knowledge of how the intel community works have already expressed a belief that Mueller likely has information on crimes committed by the president and people who work for and with him. What's been widely presumed by many people is that Mueller has cast a wide net and that his investigation is attempting to pull in as many partners in crime across the board as possible. That's why something like this takes such a long time. People should not take the ongoing duration as an indication that Mueller and his team are frantically trying to dig up real evidence of criminality. It seems like the expert conclusion is that he already has some degree of evidence.
So in short, if you were being serious, yes, I do think Robert Mueller has evidence of criminality on Trump's part. The public has seen and heard some of it with its own eyes and ears.
The public has seen zero evidence of a criminal conspiracy between Donald Trump and the Russian government. None. Ex-CIA flunkies making assertions is not evidence. Twitter #resistance grifters weaving spy stories on twitter and MSNBC is not evidence. Mueller getting convictions of crimes unrelated to the impetus for the special counsel is not evidence. Intelligence reports by government agencies aren't evidence.
Insane Clown Potsie wrote: ↑Tue Aug 21, 2018 5:36 pm The more erratic tweets here lately can be attributed to Mueller's silence. Mueller is playing the perfect poker face as he goes through with the job he was hired to do.
Trump his whole life has always been the guy who he believes is the boss, closes the deals and bullied his way through business and always looks for online confrontation to make himself appear the better, but with Mueller, he's met an immovable object. He's never been in this situation and it's driving him nuts.
His lack of knowledge into the daily workings of the investigation, his not being able to get a response from Mueller despite his daily attacks on him and McGahn's lengthy interview, his tweets are showing a man slowly unraveling.
I can only imagine what the Manafort verdicts and Cohen's guilty pleas are going to unleash in the days to come, but it should be entertaining.
They have blind faith in Spanky.EddieVanHeineken wrote: ↑Tue Aug 21, 2018 6:16 pm
The issue for conservative Fox nuts is that they have been mislead and gaslighted for so long, no matter how strong the evidence is against Trump, they will not believe it.
The only relevant part of your response.EddieVanHeineken wrote: ↑Tue Aug 21, 2018 6:16 pmWhen his report finally comes out, it will all be clear.
I keep seeing Esquire, GQ, CNN, etc, posting stories on Facebook with stuff like "Manafort and Cohen could be the start of the end for the Trump presidency" and "Are we witnessing the death blow of the Trump dynasty?!?" That's what you all said about Comey. And Flynn. And Fire and Fury. And Stormy Daniels.Danzig in the Dark wrote: ↑Tue Aug 21, 2018 6:49 pmThe only relevant part of your response.EddieVanHeineken wrote: ↑Tue Aug 21, 2018 6:16 pmWhen his report finally comes out, it will all be clear.
There are going to be a lot of disappointed people. They'll know how all those delusional retards waiting for "Crooked Hillary™" to be locked up feel. if Trump is colluding with Russia, he's doing a shitty job of it, just like everything else.
I hear ya. My guilty pleasure is jamming a knitting needle into my eyeball.
Former Speaker Newt Gingrich emailed Axios' Mike Allen to make sure that we'd be covering this story, which Fox News led with on air and online Tuesday evening, ahead of the Cohen-Manafort news. His take: "If Mollie Tibbetts is a household name by October, Democrats will be in deep trouble. If we can be blocked by Manafort-Cohen, etc., then GOP could lose [the House] badly."exitflagger wrote: ↑Wed Aug 22, 2018 5:48 am Donnie and the Trumptards are dancing in the streets over the fact that the prime suspect in the Mollie Tibbetts murder is an illegal. I guess it would be too much to ask for the decency to maybe not politicize such a thing before the body even gets cold? Nah. Forget that shit.
Her family has asked that people don't politicize her murder. Going so far as to say that it is wrong to use the color of the skin of the suspect and shouldn't be extrapolated to a whole group/race. I'm paraphrasing that last bit, because I'm too lazy to go find the quotes right now. Sadly I don't think it will happen. Seth Rich's family asked the same thing. Hell Vince Foster's family still asks that. Someone elsewhere said they gave it a week before the family gets attacked online, etc.Luminiferous wrote: ↑Wed Aug 22, 2018 9:33 amFormer Speaker Newt Gingrich emailed Axios' Mike Allen to make sure that we'd be covering this story, which Fox News led with on air and online Tuesday evening, ahead of the Cohen-Manafort news. His take: "If Mollie Tibbetts is a household name by October, Democrats will be in deep trouble. If we can be blocked by Manafort-Cohen, etc., then GOP could lose [the House] badly."exitflagger wrote: ↑Wed Aug 22, 2018 5:48 am Donnie and the Trumptards are dancing in the streets over the fact that the prime suspect in the Mollie Tibbetts murder is an illegal. I guess it would be too much to ask for the decency to maybe not politicize such a thing before the body even gets cold? Nah. Forget that shit.
https://www.axios.com/2018-midterm-elec ... 1237c.html
exitflagger wrote: ↑Wed Aug 22, 2018 7:24 pmBon voyage. That ship has sailed. Donnie don't give a fuck what her family wants, I guarantee you that.
Thank you.EddieVanHeineken wrote: ↑Tue Aug 21, 2018 6:16 pmSeminiferousButtNoid wrote: ↑Tue Aug 21, 2018 1:54 pmLOL @ "what's been widely presumed by people" If Lenny represents what and how the "The People" think, this country is in real trouble.TenBenny wrote: ↑Mon Aug 20, 2018 3:26 pm
Are you asking that question with sincerity or is that sarcasm? A lot of smart, knowing minds with strong knowledge of how the intel community works have already expressed a belief that Mueller likely has information on crimes committed by the president and people who work for and with him. What's been widely presumed by many people is that Mueller has cast a wide net and that his investigation is attempting to pull in as many partners in crime across the board as possible. That's why something like this takes such a long time. People should not take the ongoing duration as an indication that Mueller and his team are frantically trying to dig up real evidence of criminality. It seems like the expert conclusion is that he already has some degree of evidence.
So in short, if you were being serious, yes, I do think Robert Mueller has evidence of criminality on Trump's part. The public has seen and heard some of it with its own eyes and ears.
The public has seen zero evidence of a criminal conspiracy between Donald Trump and the Russian government. None. Ex-CIA flunkies making assertions is not evidence. Twitter #resistance grifters weaving spy stories on twitter and MSNBC is not evidence. Mueller getting convictions of crimes unrelated to the impetus for the special counsel is not evidence. Intelligence reports by government agencies aren't evidence.
"The public has seen zero evidence..."
Like your Resistance grifter hero Seth Abramson, you're just babbling at this point. This is narrative, not argument. You're divining what you hope happens from actions rather than what there is evidence for. But just like the "conservative Fox nuts" who you claim will deny Russia collusion even if evidence is presented, you belong to the group of Russia truthers who will insist that there is a conspiracy even with no evidence presented.This is because Mueller's investigative team is not leaking what they have. There have been absolutely no leaks out of his investigative unit. "Reported" leaks of questions they wanted to ask Trump were actually leaked by Trump's team. They came up with Q's they thought Mueller MIGHT ask and were trying to prepare Trump for them. Trump and his team have done everything they can to get a response from Mueller and it just isn't happening. Trotting Rudy out stating completely asinine hogwash each week isn't working.
Maybe turn off Hannity, Fox and Friends, Tucker, etc. You will learn what is actually going on in the investigation. This isn't tic tac toe or checkers. Mueller's team is playing 3D chess here.
Many of Trump's inner circle have now been either indicted, convicted, and/or are cooperating with Mueller due to "unrelated crimes". They don't want to spend the rest of their lives in jail. They have now come to the realization that standing by Trump is not worth it as he is a crook, will turn on them in a second, and is only out for himself. With life in prison as a real consequence, they will be cooperating with Mueller and sharing what they know about cooperation because of these so-called "unrelated crimes". When his report finally comes out, it will all be clear.
The issue for conservative Fox nuts is that they have been mislead and gaslighted for so long, no matter how strong the evidence is against Trump, they will not believe it. It will be viewed as some deep state conspiracy run out of a pizza joint in DC with Bill, Hillary, and Obama at the helm.
Yeah but how do we know it’s true? They can say anything but until they show a picture of Trump without a pecker it’s just a bunch of unsubstantiated wishing on females part.Turner Coates wrote: ↑Thu Aug 23, 2018 9:36 am Huffpost just ran a piece with the banner:
"Report: Trump Loses His Pecker!"
Turner Coates wrote: ↑Thu Aug 23, 2018 9:36 am Huffpost just ran a piece with the banner:
"Report: Trump Loses His Pecker!"
milk-milk-lemonade wrote: ↑Thu Aug 23, 2018 11:51 am If Trump is impeached. It will crash the market!! Or, so he says.
I fully expect Alex Jones to claim the Mexican and the victim are crisis actors and she's not really dead...Chip Z'Hoy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 22, 2018 8:07 pm Yeah, let's ask Seth Rich's family or the Sandy Hook parents how much these ghouls respect wishes.
“I don’t know how you can impeach somebody who’s done a great job. I tell you what, if I ever got impeached, I think the market would crash, I think everybody would be very poor, because without this thinking, you would see, you would see numbers that you wouldn’t believe in reverse.”milk-milk-lemonade wrote: ↑Thu Aug 23, 2018 11:51 am If Trump is impeached. It will crash the market!! Or, so he says.