Dump Shithole

[Mojo]

Holy motherfuckin' NRA talking points, Batman. Does Ollie North have his hand up your ass like Charlie McCarthy? What I don't understand is how people read the bullshit you write and not shove your clown shoes up your ass sideways like they do TenLenny.

Your not knowing history doesn’t make it any less true, whether you like it pointed out to you or not.

https://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A1Sec8.html

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Dude...
The Powers of Congress details what Congress is able to do. Of course congress can call up a militia. Who said they can’t? That has nothing to do with why the 2nd amendment was written. Do you really want to keep going with this?

[Danzig in the Dark]

Your not knowing history doesn’t make it any less true, whether you like it pointed out to you or not.

https://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A1Sec8.html

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Dude...
The Powers of Congress details what Congress is able to do. Of course congress can call up a militia. Who said they can’t? That has nothing to do with why the 2nd amendment was written. Do you really want to keep going with this?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/mad ... -founders/

By the logic of the 18th century, any society with a professional army could never be truly free. The men in charge of that army could order it to attack the citizens themselves, who, unarmed and unorganized, would be unable to fight back. This was why a well-regulated militia was necessary to the security of a free state: To be secure, a society needed to be able to defend itself; to be free, it could not exist merely at the whim of a standing army and its generals.

The only way to be both free and secure was for citizens to be armed, organized and ready to defend their society. The choice was a stark one: a standing army or a free nation.

[Luminiferous]

Wouldn't it make more sense if God protected them? I mean they are in his house.

God is too busy hating fags and watching wards of innocent children die of cancer. He can't be expected to hang around and protect people. Especially the Jews.

[Mojo]

By the logic of the 18th century, any society with a professional army could never be truly free. The men in charge of that army could order it to attack the citizens themselves, who, unarmed and unorganized, would be unable to fight back. This was why a well-regulated militia was necessary to the security of a free state: To be secure, a society needed to be able to defend itself; to be free, it could not exist merely at the whim of a standing army and its generals.

Yes.

As I’ve said, multiple times now, 2A grants the right to form a militia against one’s own government’s standing army. You’ve just posted exactly what I’ve been saying this entire time.

Jesus Christ.

[MickeyG]

https://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A1Sec8.html

Dude...
The Powers of Congress details what Congress is able to do. Of course congress can call up a militia. Who said they can’t? That has nothing to do with why the 2nd amendment was written. Do you really want to keep going with this?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/mad ... -founders/

By the logic of the 18th century, any society with a professional army could never be truly free. The men in charge of that army could order it to attack the citizens themselves, who, unarmed and unorganized, would be unable to fight back. This was why a well-regulated militia was necessary to the security of a free state: To be secure, a society needed to be able to defend itself; to be free, it could not exist merely at the whim of a standing army and its generals.

The only way to be both free and secure was for citizens to be armed, organized and ready to defend their society. The choice was a stark one: a standing army or a free nation.

Either way, my original comment was a sarcastic one. I don't seriously think locals with guns should protect places of worship.

[Danzig in the Dark]

By the logic of the 18th century, any society with a professional army could never be truly free. The men in charge of that army could order it to attack the citizens themselves, who, unarmed and unorganized, would be unable to fight back. This was why a well-regulated militia was necessary to the security of a free state: To be secure, a society needed to be able to defend itself; to be free, it could not exist merely at the whim of a standing army and its generals.

Yes.

As I’ve said, multiple times now, 2A grants the right to form a militia against one’s own government’s standing army. You’ve just posted exactly what I’ve been saying this entire time.

Jesus Christ.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Firstly, the Constitution does not grant rights. Secondly, please point out the part of the 2nd Amendment which supports your premise. I'll wait.

[Mojo]

Firstly, the Constitution does not grant rights. Secondly, please point out the part of the 2nd Amendment which supports your premise. I'll wait.

Well, there's the Libertarian argument that the Constitution doesn't grant rights, it recognizes them. You're arguing semantics, now. You know very well that the actual amendment doesn't state why it was written, so wait all you want. I don't need to support my premise as you've done it for me, posting almost verbatim what I've said from the start. Either you've chosen a really weird way to admit that you were wrong, or you were just fucking with me the whole time and I'm too dumb to know it. I'm done with it either way. You're tedious as fuck an I've no doubt you'll carry on just as voraciously without me.

[Danzig in the Dark]

Firstly, the Constitution does not grant rights. Secondly, please point out the part of the 2nd Amendment which supports your premise. I'll wait.

Well, there's the Libertarian argument that the Constitution doesn't grant rights, it recognizes them. You're arguing semantics, now. You know very well that the actual amendment doesn't state why it was written, so wait all you want. I don't need to support my premise as you've done it for me, posting almost verbatim what I've said from the start. Either you've chosen a really weird way to admit that you were wrong, or you were just fucking with me the whole time and I'm too dumb to know it. I'm done with it either way. You're tedious as fuck an I've no doubt you'll carry on just as voraciously without me.

Thanks, radiosped.

[milk-milk-lemonade]

Trump falsely says NYSE opened day after Sept. 11 attacks to justify holding rally after Pittsburgh shooting


Washington (CNN) — President Donald Trump falsely claimed Saturday that the New York Stock Exchange re-opened the day after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in an effort to justify holding a rally on the same day that a mass shooting occurred at a synagogue in Pittsburgh.

Speaking at a planned campaign rally in Illinois, Trump said he had weighed whether to cancel his rally as well as a speech at an agricultural convention earlier in the day in Indianapolis, Indiana, but ultimately decided against it, saying such a move would amount to giving the killer an edge. He compared his decision to continue with the rally to reopening the NYSE after the September 11 attacks, something that did not happen.

"And with what happened early today -- that horrible, horrible attack in Pittsburgh -- I was saying maybe I should cancel both this and that," Trump said, referring to the rally and his earlier appearance at the agricultural convention. "And then I said to myself, I remember Dick Grasso, a friend of mine, great guy. He headed up the New York Stock Exchange on September 11. And the New York Stock Exchange was open the following day. He said -- and what they had to do to open it you wouldn't believe. We won't even talk to you about it. But he got that exchange open."

"We can't make these sick, demented, evil people important. And when we start changing around our lives and changing around our schedules ... we can't allow people like this to become important," Trump said. "And when we change all of our lives in order to accommodate them, it's not acceptable."


There's the leadership we've been waiting for!

more..
https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/10/28/politi ... cnn.com%2F

[Kiss Crue]

Arguing about who is worse between the extreme left or right may be interesting as a philosophical exercise but in practicality means little since neither is right and true and both are massive problems. The only thing we should have consensus on is they're all a bunch of brainwashed shit heads.

[Kiss Crue]

Firstly, the Constitution does not grant rights. Secondly, please point out the part of the 2nd Amendment which supports your premise. I'll wait.

Well, there's the Libertarian argument that the Constitution doesn't grant rights, it recognizes them. You're arguing semantics, now. You know very well that the actual amendment doesn't state why it was written, so wait all you want. I don't need to support my premise as you've done it for me, posting almost verbatim what I've said from the start. Either you've chosen a really weird way to admit that you were wrong, or you were just fucking with me the whole time and I'm too dumb to know it. I'm done with it either way. You're tedious as fuck an I've no doubt you'll carry on just as voraciously without me.

Thanks, radiosped.

Danzig is smarter than i thought because he's smart enough to know he really needs socialism bad.

Like how many lazy poor dumb idiots on welfare have you see going, "Rah Rah right wing." It always seems funny to me when the people who need government the most are voting against themselves.

So good on Danzig for realizing he has no chance to compete with better, smarter humans in a merit based economy and will continue to be a massive failure without large changes entailing the govt stealing money from the rest of us.

[Danzig in the Dark]

Well, there's the Libertarian argument that the Constitution doesn't grant rights, it recognizes them. You're arguing semantics, now. You know very well that the actual amendment doesn't state why it was written, so wait all you want. I don't need to support my premise as you've done it for me, posting almost verbatim what I've said from the start. Either you've chosen a really weird way to admit that you were wrong, or you were just fucking with me the whole time and I'm too dumb to know it. I'm done with it either way. You're tedious as fuck an I've no doubt you'll carry on just as voraciously without me.

Thanks, radiosped.

Danzig is smarter than i thought because he's smart enough to know he really needs socialism bad.

Like how many lazy poor dumb idiots on welfare have you see going, "Rah Rah right wing." It always seems funny to me when the people who need government the most are voting against themselves.

So good on Danzig for realizing he has no chance to compete with better, smarter humans in a merit based economy and will continue to be a massive failure without large changes entailing the govt stealing money from the rest of us.

This has fuck all to do with socialism, Piss Crue. You give drugs a bad name.

[exitflagger]

Spanky has got his dueling harpies, Huckafrump and Conjob, running interference for him again.

The former claims "The first thing Trump did was condemn the bombing attempts" which is false. The first thing he did was lay the inflammatory groundwork for the bombing attempts to happen in the first place.

The latter is pandering to the evangelicals again, claiming that late night TV comedy is the work UB DA DEBBIL! Because they make fun of an idiotic douchebag. Christian-republicans should be offended to their core that people like her and Trump have the nerve to claim they represent their values. What a fucking crock. There's never been a president who was more morally bereft in the history of this country. Every quasi-pious gesture he makes absolutely drips with insincerity. It's all totally absurd.

[aerozeppelin]

Well, there's the Libertarian argument that the Constitution doesn't grant rights, it recognizes them. You're arguing semantics, now. You know very well that the actual amendment doesn't state why it was written, so wait all you want. I don't need to support my premise as you've done it for me, posting almost verbatim what I've said from the start. Either you've chosen a really weird way to admit that you were wrong, or you were just fucking with me the whole time and I'm too dumb to know it. I'm done with it either way. You're tedious as fuck an I've no doubt you'll carry on just as voraciously without me.

Thanks, radiosped.

Danzig is smarter than i thought because he's smart enough to know he really needs socialism bad.

Like how many lazy poor dumb idiots on welfare have you see going, "Rah Rah right wing." It always seems funny to me when the people who need government the most are voting against themselves.

So good on Danzig for realizing he has no chance to compete with better, smarter humans in a merit based economy and will continue to be a massive failure without large changes entailing the govt stealing money from the rest of us.

You're a fucking naive moron if you think what we've got now is anything close to a meritocracy.

[milk-milk-lemonade]

Trump calls media 'the true Enemy of the People' again in tweet



The President is not stepping back. He responded to growing debate about his contribution to the toxic political atmosphere Monday with one of his most inflammatory Twitter attacks yet on journalists.

"There is great anger in our Country caused in part by inaccurate, and even fraudulent, reporting of the news. The Fake News Media, the true Enemy of the People, must stop the open & obvious hostility & report the news accurately & fairly,"he wrote.

more..
https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/10/29/politi ... cnn.com%2F



Isn't this the same guy who said don't believe what you see?

[Turner Coates]

After seeing Sarah Sanders' press briefing today, I was inspired to vote early. The average age of the other voters was probably somewhere around 75. What the heck happened to the younger voters?

[Mojo]

The Proud Boys

So I’d never heard of these guys until you mentioned them. Just looked them up. I knew who Gavin McInnes is, but had no clue about the Proud Boys thing. Holy shit. Yeah, these dudes legitimately call for political violence. How is this even allowed in this country?

[milk-milk-lemonade]

The Proud Boys

So I’d never heard of these guys until you mentioned them. Just looked them up. I knew who Gavin McInnes is, but had no clue about the Proud Boys thing. Holy shit. Yeah, these dudes legitimately call for political violence. How is this even allowed in this country?

Oh shit, I'll have to research the Proud Boys thing.

[Danzig in the Dark]

The Proud Boys

So I’d never heard of these guys until you mentioned them. Just looked them up. I knew who Gavin McInnes is, but had no clue about the Proud Boys thing. Holy shit. Yeah, these dudes legitimately call for political violence. How is this even allowed in this country?

He was the featured speaker at NY's Metropolitan Republican Club. I don't recall Democrats inviting anyone equivalent to the Proud Boys, left wing or otherwise, to their meetings. Are both sides still the same?

Black and Yellow: The New Brown.

[vlad]

The Proud Boys

So I’d never heard of these guys until you mentioned them. Just looked them up. I knew who Gavin McInnes is, but had no clue about the Proud Boys thing. Holy shit. Yeah, these dudes legitimately call for political violence. How is this even allowed in this country?

He was the featured speaker at NY's Metropolitan Republican Club. I don't recall Democrats inviting anyone equivalent to the Proud Boys, left wing or otherwise, to their meetings. Are both sides still the same?

Black and Yellow: The New Brown.

Why he is allowed to stay in the US is beyond me. Well, it isn't really this last couple of years, but he's fronting a violent organization.

[Mojo]

Are both sides still the same?

Already said they weren’t.

[Danzig in the Dark]

So I’d never heard of these guys until you mentioned them. Just looked them up. I knew who Gavin McInnes is, but had no clue about the Proud Boys thing. Holy shit. Yeah, these dudes legitimately call for political violence. How is this even allowed in this country?

He was the featured speaker at NY's Metropolitan Republican Club. I don't recall Democrats inviting anyone equivalent to the Proud Boys, left wing or otherwise, to their meetings. Are both sides still the same?

Black and Yellow: The New Brown.

Why he is allowed to stay in the US is beyond me. Well, it isn't really this last couple of years, but he's fronting a violent organization.

He's got friends in high places.

[Danzig in the Dark]

Are both sides still the same?

Already said they weren’t.

Good. I'm still waiting for the rest of the fucktards to chime in.

[Luminiferous]

"Genetically superior"

[Mojo]

This one is funny in that McGinnis swears up and down that The Proud Boys isn’t a racist organization but a Fred Perry polo shirt is well-known skinhead apparel. Idiots.

[Danzig in the Dark]

"Genetically superior"

[Chip Z'Hoy]

I thought he drowned and they had to shut the camp down?

[David Lee Hasselhoff]

This one is funny in that McGinnis swears up and down that The Proud Boys isn’t a racist organization but a Fred Perry polo shirt is well-known skinhead apparel. Idiots.

Well, first and foremost, Fred Perry is a Jewish clothing company that spends part of its revenue to fight far-right morons like McGinnis. Doesn't make McGinnis any smarter though.

[LeeRatbag]

I thought he drowned and they had to shut the camp down?

[exitflagger]

Donnie better hope and pray that the "Caravan" people are not ready to martyr themselves for their cause. Can you imagine the fallout if his "15,000 troops" (guaranteed to be a grossly inflated number) lose their shit and go all Tiananmen Square '89 on them?

This is shaping up to be a serious recipe for disaster.