Meta-irony alert- RPaul sues fans for rights to RonPaul.com

[Turner Coates]

What you clearly don't understand is that Ron Paul went to the WIPO because he HAD to in order to file the complaint, since it's the only significant form of recourse for a matter as unique as this...

LOL!
Wrong....but thanks for playing.

He could have settled the matter without depending on a venue that he himself condemned. He was offered the site for a buyout. Also, as pointed out in a cite I provided, he could have appealed to the National Arbitration Forum.

You lose.

[Stoner]

@ "He HAD to!"

[Turner Coates]

@ "He HAD to!"

Really. What's a hypocrite supposed to do? Stand by his principles?
No way! "Do as I say...not as I do. I'm not gonna PAY for that website. I'm gonna appeal to the folks at that fine, useful institution, the UNITED NATIONS!"
..............................................

"Those bureaucrats are not satisfied by meddling only in international disputes, however. The UN increasingly wants to influence our domestic environmental, trade, labor, tax, and gun laws. Its global planners fully intend to expand the UN into a true world government, complete with taxes, courts, and a standing army. This is not an alarmist statement; these facts are readily promoted on the UN's own website. UN planners do not care about national sovereignty; in fact they are actively hostile to it. They correctly view it as an obstacle to their plans. They simply aren't interested in our Constitution and republican form of government.

The choice is very clear: we either follow the Constitution or submit to UN global governance. American national sovereignty cannot survive if we allow our domestic laws to be crafted by an international body. This needs to be stated publicly more often. If we continue down the UN path, America as we know it will cease to exist." - Ron Paul

[Luminiferous]

Just think... If Paul were president and got rid of the UN, he couldn't have gone to WIPO, so he'd really have to rely on like an executive order....

[Turner Coates]

Just think... If Paul were president and got rid of the UN, he couldn't have gone to WIPO, so he'd really have to rely on like an executive order....

Yes...he'd HAVE to.......just because he HAD to.
Yeah, that's it.
He could accept the offer to buy the website, but that would cost him money better spent on stuff like dry cleaning and big shoes.

[Moggio]

The National Arbitration Forum wouldn't have done SHIT...


ONE. MORE. TIME. FOR. THE. WORLD.:

Wrong....yet AGAIN.

What you clearly don't understand is that Ron Paul went to the WIPO because he HAD to in order to file the complaint, since it's the only significant form of recourse for a matter as unique as this...

There is NOTHING wrong with what Ron Paul did.


Keep tryin' and you'll keep failin'...

[Turner Coates]

The National Arbitration Forum wouldn't have done SHIT...

Really?
And you know this HOW? You weren't even aware that the WIPO was part of the U.N. until we had you cornered.
(This ought to be good, folks!)

PLASTIC. PEOPLE. OH. BABY. NOW. YOU'RE. SUCH. A. DRAG.

As always, you don't know SHIT, Moggio.

[KneelandBobDylan]

Still LOLing @ "He had to."

[Turner Coates]

What you clearly don't understand is that Ron Paul went to the WIPO because he HAD to

It was the only place with a drive thru window.

[Turner Coates]

BUMP
(for reasons obvious to any sane person)

[Moggio]

The National Arbitration Forum wouldn't have done SHIT...

Really?
And you know this HOW?

Yes, really. Did you even read the articles you posted?!

You weren't even aware that the WIPO was part of the U.N. until we had you cornered.
(This ought to be good, folks!)

NO ONE here was aware of the WIPO, moron. And THAT'S my point.

PLASTIC. PEOPLE. OH. BABY. NOW. YOU'RE. SUCH. A. DRAG.

As always, you don't know SHIT, Moggio.

That denial is really workin' for ya, isn't it, dipshit?


Keep tryin' and you'll keep failin'...

[Turner Coates]

Oh, Moggio, you stupid fool.
I was first made aware of the WIPO when David Letterman moved from NBC to CBS in 1993. There were mentions of it on TV news broadcasts, when there was a dispute over what NBC claimed was their intellectual property. The disagreement was settled by arbitration between lawyers.

Ya know, you are probably the most closed minded person I've ever run across.
I don't understand how you can be a Zappa fan, as you have no sense of humor or irony, not to mention your lack of comprehension when it comes to idioms and cultural references. It must be odd time signatures that interest you, because you are the lame brained type of person that Zappa often rallied against in his lyrics.

[Moggio]

Oh, Moggio, you stupid fool.
I was first made aware of the WIPO when David Letterman moved from NBC to CBS in 1993. There were mentions of it on TV news broadcasts, when there was a dispute over what NBC claimed was their intellectual property. The disagreement was settled by arbitration between lawyers.

Riiiiiiiiiiiight. You looked up who the WIPO were the other day. Just like everybody else.

Ya know, you are probably the most closed minded person I've ever run across.

POT. KETTLE. BLACK.

I don't understand how you can be a Zappa fan, as you have no sense of humor or irony, not to mention your lack of comprehension when it comes to idioms and cultural references. It must be odd time signatures that interest you, because you are the lame brained type of person that Zappa often rallied against in his lyrics.

I don't understand how you could continue to be constantly OWNED this much by me yet come back for even more OWNAGE. Nor do I understand why you follow me from thread to thread EVERY single day. But then again, it's obvious you don't have a life. So I'm not surprised.

You do know that pic was taken BEFORE Regan was President, which was when Ron Paul endorsed him? And you do know that Ron Paul had NO time for Regan after he became President because of how he fucked up the US even more with Star Wars, Reganomics, etc., which was the reason why RP left and joined the Libertarian Party in the mid-80s?

Yeah...that's what I thought. You are one stupid fuck.


Keep tryin' and you'll keep failin'...

[Turner Coates]

You do know that pic was taken BEFORE Regan was President, which was when Ron Paul endorsed him, right? And you do know that Ron Paul had NO time for Regan after he became President since he fucked up the US even more with Star Wars, Reganomics, etc., which was the reason he left and joined the Libertarian Party in the mid-80s, right?

Did I make any comment on the pic?
And before you pull your usual routine....no, I didn't say you said I did.
I posted the pic to make you dance...which you did.

Will Rogers never met you, Moggio.
(Yet another cultural reference which more than likely will baffle you.)
It's no wonder you've been stomped into the dirt by every single Sludger you've argued with.



And..........I've yet to find a cite about the Letterman / NBC / Late Show dispute I spoke of, but here is a similar example of NBC appealing to the WIPO, over a dispute about intellectual property involving The Tonight Show:
http://domainnamewire.com/2009/05/27/nb ... ain-names/

"Just a few weeks after Jay Leno filed for arbitration to get several domain names related to his TV show, NBC has filed for arbitration on two domain names related to The Tonight Show. Leno is stepping aside from his role on The Tonight Show for his new show, and Conan O’Brien is taking over as host.

NBC has filed two separate arbitration cases with World Intellectual Property Organization for TonightShow.com and TheTonightShow.com. It’s no wonder the company wants these domain names; its current domain for the show is tonightshowwithconanobrien.com."
.........................................................
The dispute I spoke of, which I saw discussed on a TV news report, was about NBC not wanting Letterman to use "The Late Show" and "The World's Most Dangerous Band" names. As I said, it was settled through private arbitration, and Letterman came up with a new name for his program, as well as a name for the show's band.
.........................................................
CLASS DISMISSED....except for Moggio....who needs to study more.

[Moggio]

You do know that pic was taken BEFORE Regan was President, which was when Ron Paul endorsed him, right? And you do know that Ron Paul had NO time for Regan after he became President since he fucked up the US even more with Star Wars, Reganomics, etc., which was the reason he left and joined the Libertarian Party in the mid-80s, right?

Did I make any comment on the pic?
And before you pull your usual routine....no, I didn't say you said I did.
I posted the pic to make you dance...which you did.

Will Rogers never met you, Moggio.
(Yet another cultural reference which more than likely will baffle you.)
It's no wonder you've been stomped into the dirt by every single Sludger you've argued with.

ROTF! You were just OWNED and now you claim you were just trying to make me dance?! And now you're about to be OWNED once again...

Here's Frank Zappa virtually endorsing the Libertarian Party in 1988 (he only disagreed with two parts of their platform):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flsh-vcWqf4

And..........I've yet to find a cite about the Letterman / NBC / Late Show dispute I spoke of, but here is a similar example of NBC appealing to the WIPO, over a dispute about intellectual property involving The Tonight Show:
http://domainnamewire.com/2009/05/27/nb ... ain-names/

"Just a few weeks after Jay Leno filed for arbitration to get several domain names related to his TV show, NBC has filed for arbitration on two domain names related to The Tonight Show. Leno is stepping aside from his role on The Tonight Show for his new show, and Conan O’Brien is taking over as host.

NBC has filed two separate arbitration cases with World Intellectual Property Organization for TonightShow.com and TheTonightShow.com. It’s no wonder the company wants these domain names; its current domain for the show is tonightshowwithconanobrien.com."
.........................................................
The dispute I spoke of, which I saw discussed on a TV news report, was about NBC not wanting Letterman to use "The Late Show" and "The World's Most Dangerous Band" names. As I said, it was settled through private arbitration, and Letterman came up with a new name for his program, as well as a name for the show's band.
.........................................................
CLASS DISMISSED....except for Moggio....who needs to study more.

This only proves that the WIPO exists, moron. It certainly doesn't back up ANY of your points here.


Keep tryin' and you'll keep failin'...

[Turner Coates]

WHOOSH!
(Since you don't understand most references, I'll dumb it down for you....It's the sound of wind blowing between your ears.)

[DEATH ROW JOE]

You do know that pic was taken BEFORE Regan was President, which was when Ron Paul endorsed him? And you do know that Ron Paul had NO time for Regan after he became President because of how he fucked up the US even more with Star Wars, Reganomics, etc., which was the reason why RP left and joined the Libertarian Party in the mid-80s?

Yeah...that's what I thought. You are one stupid fuck.


Keep tryin' and you'll keep failin'...

LMFAO, Moggio, you keep proving how little you know about the United States.

Reagan's defense policies came as no surprise to anyone. Here's a song dedicated to Ronald Reagan at Woodstock.

JOAN BAEZ & JEFFREY SHURTLEFF - He`s A Drug Store Truck Drivin` Man
http://youtu.be/_dBkAvxPsJ8

Pay attention to these lyrics, right up Ron Paul's alley:
He's a drug store truck drivin man
He's a head of the Ku Klux Klan

Reaganomics damaged the country because the executive branch refused to regulate the S&Ls and pursued a libertarian economic agenda. Tax cuts, strong dollar policy, deregulation. Sound familiar? It created the rust belt, tripled the national debt and tanked the economy for 4 years under Bush Sr. Austrian economics would be Reaganomics on steroids. Go ahead and tell us how Ron Paul would reduce the deficit by getting rid of the IRS and cutting spending a trillion dollar spending. Anyone who knows how to subtract sees the deficit explode from 1.2 trillion to 2.5 trillion.

So far as Ron Paul's lawsuit, why does he even need the govt to get involved? Why not let the market sort it out?

Bottom line is that anyway you slice it, he's a fraud and a hypocrite.

[Heenan Snuka]

[Moggio]

WHOOSH!
(Since you don't understand most references, I'll dumb it down for you....It's the sound of wind blowing between your ears.)

No, I have to dumb it down for YOU.

You've been OWNED...

...again.

You do know that pic was taken BEFORE Regan was President, which was when Ron Paul endorsed him? And you do know that Ron Paul had NO time for Regan after he became President because of how he fucked up the US even more with Star Wars, Reganomics, etc., which was the reason why RP left and joined the Libertarian Party in the mid-80s?

Yeah...that's what I thought. You are one stupid fuck.


Keep tryin' and you'll keep failin'...

LMFAO, Moggio, you keep proving how little you know about the United States.

Reagan's defense policies came as no surprise to anyone. Here's a song dedicated to Ronald Reagan at Woodstock.

JOAN BAEZ & JEFFREY SHURTLEFF - He`s A Drug Store Truck Drivin` Man
http://youtu.be/_dBkAvxPsJ8

Pay attention to these lyrics, right up Ron Paul's alley:
He's a drug store truck drivin man
He's a head of the Ku Klux Klan

Reaganomics damaged the country because the executive branch refused to regulate the S&Ls and pursued a libertarian economic agenda. Tax cuts, strong dollar policy, deregulation. Sound familiar? It created the rust belt, tripled the national debt and tanked the economy for 4 years under Bush Sr. Austrian economics would be Reaganomics on steroids. Go ahead and tell us how Ron Paul would reduce the deficit by getting rid of the IRS and cutting spending a trillion dollar spending. Anyone who knows how to subtract sees the deficit explode from 1.2 trillion to 2.5 trillion.

If Reganomics was supported by Ron Paul or Libertarians, then RP would've still supported Regan in the '80s and would NOT have left the Republican Party for the Libertarian Party at that point in time, dipshit.

So far as Ron Paul's lawsuit, why does he even need the govt to get involved? Why not let the market sort it out?

Bottom line is that anyway you slice it, he's a fraud and a hypocrite.

The fuck? The market doesn't settle disputes like this.

Bottom line is that you don't have a fucking CLUE what you're talking about.


Talk about grasping at straws. You just keep getting stupider by the day, don't you?


Once a moron, always a moron...

[Danzig in the Dark]

So far as Ron Paul's lawsuit, why does he even need the govt to get involved? Why not let the market sort it out?

Bottom line is that anyway you slice it, he's a fraud and a hypocrite.

The fuck? The market doesn't settle disputes like this.

One party has something another party wants. The other party offers something of value to the one party in exchange. That is the free market.

Once a moron, always a moron...

So true.

[Moggio]

So far as Ron Paul's lawsuit, why does he even need the govt to get involved? Why not let the market sort it out?

Bottom line is that anyway you slice it, he's a fraud and a hypocrite.

The fuck? The market doesn't settle disputes like this.

One party has something another party wants. The other party offers something of value to the one party in exchange. That is the free market.

No. That's a Socialist's definition of what a free market is.

Once a moron, always a moron...

So true.

Congrats. You're actually growing a brain!

[Turner Coates]

WHOOSH!
(Since you don't understand most references, I'll dumb it down for you....It's the sound of wind blowing between your ears.)

No, I have to dumb it down for YOU.

You've been OWNED...

Since you just parroted what I said, that means you owned yourself.



Man, you make it too easy.
Why don't you try thinking for yourself, Mr. cut & paste.

[Danzig in the Dark]

The fuck? The market doesn't settle disputes like this.

One party has something another party wants. The other party offers something of value to the one party in exchange. That is the free market.

No. That's a Socialist's definition of what a free market is.

Explain the non-Socialist definition of the free market or dodge the question as usual. Your choice.

[KneelandBobDylan]

[Turner Coates]

[Moggio]

No, I have to dumb it down for YOU.

You've been OWNED...

Since you just parroted what I said, that means you owned yourself.

How so?

Man, you make it too easy.
Why don't you try thinking for yourself, Mr. cut & paste.

YOU actually make it easier.

No. That's a Socialist's definition of what a free market is.

Explain the non-Socialist definition of the free market or dodge the question as usual. Your choice.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_market

A free market is a market structure in which the distribution and costs of goods and services, along with the structure and hierarchy between capital and consumer goods, are coordinated by supply and demand unhindered by external regulation or control by government or monopolies. A free market contrasts with a controlled market or regulated market, in which government policy intervenes in the setting of prices. An economy composed entirely of free markets is referred to as a free-market economy.


Btw, I NEVER dodge questions.

For the most part, I agree. And that's why...

















...Ron Paul is technically a Libertarian, dipshit.



Keep tryin' and you'll keep failin'...

[KneelandBobDylan]

No, I have to dumb it down for YOU.

You've been OWNED...

Since you just parroted what I said, that means you owned yourself.

How so?

Man, you make it too easy.
Why don't you try thinking for yourself, Mr. cut & paste.

YOU actually make it easier.

No. That's a Socialist's definition of what a free market is.

Explain the non-Socialist definition of the free market or dodge the question as usual. Your choice.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_market

A free market is a market structure in which the distribution and costs of goods and services, along with the structure and hierarchy between capital and consumer goods, are coordinated by supply and demand unhindered by external regulation or control by government or monopolies. A free market contrasts with a controlled market or regulated market, in which government policy intervenes in the setting of prices. An economy composed entirely of free markets is referred to as a free-market economy.


Btw, I NEVER dodge questions.

For the most part, I agree. And that's why...

















...Ron Paul is technically a Libertarian, dipshit.



Keep tryin' and you'll keep failin'...

No dipshit, he's not.

He may espouse libertarian views, but he's a member of the Republican party.

And before you parse another god damn thing, what he was in 1988 is irrelevant. As I said, right now, he's a member of the Republican party.

You lose, fuckface.

Also, not that Danzig needs me saying anything, but you didn't answer his question, you cut and pasted an answer, therefore proving you can look shit up on the internet, but you KNOW next to nothing. A monkey could do what you do, and would be a hell of a lot more entertaining.


Keep trying, and you'll keep failing.

Owned.

[Danzig in the Dark]

No. That's a Socialist's definition of what a free market is.

Explain the non-Socialist definition of the free market or dodge the question as usual. Your choice.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_market

A free market is a market structure in which the distribution and costs of goods and services, along with the structure and hierarchy between capital and consumer goods, are coordinated by supply and demand unhindered by external regulation or control by government or monopolies. A free market contrasts with a controlled market or regulated market, in which government policy intervenes in the setting of prices. An economy composed entirely of free markets is referred to as a free-market economy.


Btw, I NEVER dodge questions.

In other words, someone has shit another person wants and that other person trades them their own shit to get it. Right?

You do understand what you copied and pasted, don't you?

[Turner Coates]

See, that's the thing with Moggio. He DOESN'T get it.
If someone else posts a cite, he'll say it doesn't prove a thing.
If HE posts a cite, he'll say he's won an imaginary contest.
He's totally hung up on the concept of winning and losing. That's really all that matters to him.
It's not about the facts, it's about ego gratification, thinking he's right and everybody else is wrong.
He's one fucked up jackass.

[Moggio]

...Ron Paul is technically a Libertarian, dipshit.



Keep tryin' and you'll keep failin'...

No dipshit, he's not.

He may espouse libertarian views, but he's a member of the Republican party.

And before you parse another god damn thing, what he was in 1988 is irrelevant. As I said, right now, he's a member of the Republican party.

You lose, fuckface.

Wrong...yet AGAIN.

The ONLY reason why Ron Paul was a member of the Republican Party for a part of his career was because in order to gain a substantial following and get his message across to the masses, one HAS to be part of the two party system. And that's what he did. He has very little in common with the Republican Party. He's primarily a Libertarian, moron.

Also, not that Danzig needs me saying anything, but you didn't answer his question, you cut and pasted an answer, therefore proving you can look shit up on the internet, but you KNOW next to nothing. A monkey could do what you do, and would be a hell of a lot more entertaining.

I certainly did answer his question, asshole. Now go and jerk-off to your Obama pics...

Keep trying, and you'll keep failing.

Owned.

Nope.

That will NEVER happen.

In other words, someone has shit another person wants and that other person trades them their own shit to get it. Right?

You do understand what you copied and pasted, don't you?

ONE. MORE. TIME. FOR. THE. WORLD.:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_market

A free market is a market structure in which the distribution and costs of goods and services, along with the structure and hierarchy between capital and consumer goods, are coordinated by supply and demand unhindered by external regulation or control by government or monopolies. A free market contrasts with a controlled market or regulated market, in which government policy intervenes in the setting of prices. An economy composed entirely of free markets is referred to as a free-market economy.

You do understand that you don't have a fucking CLUE what you're talking about, don't you?

See, that's the thing with Moggio. He DOESN'T get it.
If someone else posts a cite, he'll say it doesn't prove a thing.
If HE posts a cite, he'll say he's won an imaginary contest.
He's totally hung up on the concept of winning and losing. That's really all that matters to him.
It's not about the facts, it's about ego gratification, thinking he's right and everybody else is wrong.
He's one fucked up jackass.

You couldn't be more wrong if you tried. Once you jack-asses actually get SOMETHING right, I'll tell you when that happens. But until then, I'll keep OWNING you.


Keep tryin' and you'll keep failin'...