Deficit Is Shrinking Quickly

[Turner Coates]

The "employment rate" is the graph on the lower right, lamebrain.
Surely you're not so stupid that you missed that.
Oh wait.....yes you are.

[Moggio]

The "employment rate" is the graph on the lower right, lamebrain.
Surely you're not so stupid that you missed that.
Oh wait.....yes you are.

That's NOT the Employment Rate (as in a percentage of eligible labour participants that are currently working). And like I said, it hasn't been released in 2-3 years, you COLOSSAL MORON.

[Turner Coates]

Why did you just edit your post after saying the graph only covered 2011?
You must have looked a little closer.
Good boy.

[Turner Coates]

The "employment rate" is the graph on the lower right, lamebrain.
Surely you're not so stupid that you missed that.
Oh wait.....yes you are.

That's NOT the Employment Rate (as in a percentage of eligible labour participants that are currently working). And like I said, it hasn't been released in 2-3 years, you COLOSSAL MORON.

You're WRONG. Why can't you be a man for once and admit it?
See how you are? Semantics won't help you. You are just plain "WRONG".
The stats for Canadian employment ARE available online.
You just argue for argument's sake. I saw you edit a post where you suddenly realized you were wrong and you swapped for ANOTHER argument.
Grow a pair, and stop being such a jackass.

http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidie ... 5a-eng.htm

[Moggio]

The "employment rate" is the graph on the lower right, lamebrain.
Surely you're not so stupid that you missed that.
Oh wait.....yes you are.

That's NOT the Employment Rate (as in a percentage of eligible labour participants that are currently working). And like I said, it hasn't been released in 2-3 years, you COLOSSAL MORON.

You're WRONG. Why can't you be a man for once and admit it?
See how you are? Semantics won't help you. You are just plain "WRONG".
The stats for Canadian employment ARE available online.
You just argue for argument's sake. I saw you edit a post where you suddenly realized you were wrong and you swapped for ANOTHER argument.
Grow a pair, and stop being such a jackass.

http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidie ... 5a-eng.htm

Nope. That's a loose guestimate.

ONE. MORE. TIME. FOR. THE. WORLD.:

That's NOT the Employment Rate (as in a percentage of eligible labour participants that are currently working). And like I said, it hasn't been released in 2-3 years, you COLOSSAL MORON.