Metal Sludge Gossip Board

I'm back doing what I do best, simplifying the complicated after it's been complicated by the simple. So today I'm looking at Attorney General Eric Holder's decision to give the 9/11 conspirators a civilian trial in New York CITY.

This is



KHALID SHEIKH MOHAMMED

He orchestrated the
9/11 ATTACKS

The US Military had him held at



GITMO

But



ERIC HOLDER

The US Attorney General
is moving



KSM
to a civilian trial in



NEW YORK CITY

Even though



KSM

Already plead guilty and demanded execution while held at



GITMO



ERIC HOLDER
claims that the



CONSTITUTION
demands it

But the reality is that



KSM

As a terrorist is an



UNLAWFUL COMBATANT

And under the law as an



UNLAWFUL COMBATANT

He can be



SHOT
without trial (military or civilian)

Because they have no rights under the



CONSTITUTION
or the



GENEVA CONVENTION

So



ERIC HOLDER'S
decision has no basis in law or history and



DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE

Or does it?

Because...



HIS OLD LAW FIRM
is up to its neck in



GITMO CASES

And it also gives him a chance to put



THE CIA
on trial
for being mean to



KSM

And can then use it to slag the



BUSH ADMINISTRATION

AND ALL



And to neuter the War on Terror campaign

And hopefully distract everyone from the
fact that



THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION is
failing.

tylamonroe wrote:That was great. Did you do that or is that some blog?