Page 1 of 1
Can anyone say Islam is not a threat.. without lying??
Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 9:19 pm
by SmokingGun
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-inob20I ... re=related
http://www.news.com.au/national/push-to ... 5872274181
(push-to-let-australian-doctors-mutilate-genitals-of-baby-girls)
No matter where in the world you go, these people who insist on living in the dark ages spread their disease. The world is becoming increasingly Islamized, and that is a sad, sad thing.
Re: Muslims are fucking cunts, Mohammed is a cocksucker
Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 12:30 am
by MA551V3_700L
lol dude
Re: Muslims are fucking cunts, Mohammed is a cocksucker
Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 5:08 am
by tin00can
Wow. You're edgy.
Re: Muslims are fucking cunts, Mohammed is a cocksucker
Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 5:32 am
by SmokingGun
tin00can wrote:Wow. You're edgy.
Not really. Just worried about the future. Do you really think they will suddenly stop and become reasonable people? Or do you think their demands and actions will just get worse over time, the way it has in the past decade?
Re: Muslims are fucking cunts, Mohammed is a cocksucker
Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 5:37 am
by tin00can
SmokingGun wrote:tin00can wrote:Wow. You're edgy.
Not really. Just worried about the future. Do you really think they will suddenly stop and become reasonable people? Or do you think their demands and actions will just get worse over time, the way it has in the past decade?
Where did I say that? I was just complimenting you on being such a rebel.
Re: Muslims are fucking cunts, Mohammed is a cocksucker
Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 5:43 am
by SmokingGun
tin00can wrote:SmokingGun wrote:tin00can wrote:Wow. You're edgy.
Not really. Just worried about the future. Do you really think they will suddenly stop and become reasonable people? Or do you think their demands and actions will just get worse over time, the way it has in the past decade?
Where did I say that? I was just complimenting you on being such a rebel.
OK, I admit I was really pissed off after reading the article about female genital mutilation, on girls who will have no say in the matter. Simply the fact that a country isn't rejecting such a notion outright is puzzling to say the least. Changed the title, it was just reflecting my mood at the time.. sorry if I offended anyone.
Re: Can anyone say Islam is not a threat.. without lying??
Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 8:30 am
by vlad
First off, if this is part and parcel with other discussions by medical associations, including those in the United States, where the idea of a ritual nick instead of FGM, then the Australian newspaper is not telling the whole story. It is part of the discussion. Just that.
I think that FGM is appalling, and as the paper pointed out, the rise in Sudanese and Somali immigrants has brought this to the fore. It is a regional thing, in NE Africa. Practiced before there was an Islam.
And if, if they were to do such a thing as a ritual nick...all you boys, especially in the US, look down in your pants and ask yourself if that little procedure done when you were a tiny baby was just a "ritual nick". All those fun nerve endings that got removed. You should read why circumcision was pushed in the US....now they say it's hygiene (hello, it isn't hard to teach you little boy to wash his foreskin), but it was to impede masturbation. Check out Kellogg (yeah, the corn flakes guy)....you who are cut have freaks like that to thank for it.
It was a couple or three weeks ago that this was brought up in the U.S., the "ritual nick".
I would hope that FGM stops, just as I hope that circumcision stops as well.
Re: Can anyone say Islam is not a threat.. without lying??
Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 8:36 am
by upinsmoke
vlad wrote:
And if, if they were to do such a thing as a ritual nick...all you boys, especially in the US, look down in your pants and ask yourself if that little procedure done when you were a tiny baby was just a "ritual nick". All those fun nerve endings that got removed. You should read why circumcision was pushed in the US....now they say it's hygiene (hello, it isn't hard to teach you little boy to wash his foreskin), but it was to impede masturbation.
Hah! Bullshit! It never stopped me one iota!
Re: Can anyone say Islam is not a threat.. without lying??
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 1:32 am
by SmokingGun
vlad wrote:First off, if this is part and parcel with other discussions by medical associations, including those in the United States, where the idea of a ritual nick instead of FGM, then the Australian newspaper is not telling the whole story. It is part of the discussion. Just that.
I think that FGM is appalling, and as the paper pointed out, the rise in Sudanese and Somali immigrants has brought this to the fore. It is a regional thing, in NE Africa. Practiced before there was an Islam.
And if, if they were to do such a thing as a ritual nick...all you boys, especially in the US, look down in your pants and ask yourself if that little procedure done when you were a tiny baby was just a "ritual nick". All those fun nerve endings that got removed. You should read why circumcision was pushed in the US....now they say it's hygiene (hello, it isn't hard to teach you little boy to wash his foreskin), but it was to impede masturbation. Check out Kellogg (yeah, the corn flakes guy)....you who are cut have freaks like that to thank for it.
It was a couple or three weeks ago that this was brought up in the U.S., the "ritual nick".
I would hope that FGM stops, just as I hope that circumcision stops as well.
If you read the article, it says there is a push for doctors to perform it because it is being performed in backyard operations already. It also states that doctors increasingly have to fix up botched operations.
First of all, why aren't the parents of these children being put in prison for child abuse, and why aren't the children being taken away from such mentally handicapped idiots?
Perish the thought, we'd much rather tolerate yet another load of bullshit from the religion of piss than stand up for decency and (true) civilization.
And about circumcision being performed on boys.. totally different. Ask Crazy Levi if he feels mutilated and if his sexual gratification is almost non-existent. I know of someone who had to have it done at the ripe age of 18, so there are supporting medical reasons for doing it.
Muslims just want to control women as much as possible. Diminishing their sexual pleasure will make them much more subservient, and will do a lot to stop them going to the clubs to find sexual gratification from a well hung infidel.
Re: Muslims are fucking cunts, Mohammed is a cocksucker
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 10:48 am
by CliffByford
SmokingGun wrote:Or do you think their demands and actions will just get worse over time, the way it has in the past decade?
When I had a Palestinian girlfriend, sometimes she'd be saying "ah, Cliff, you never take me anywhere nice" and I was all "yeah, whatever" so I guess you're right.
Re: Can anyone say Islam is not a threat.. without lying??
Posted: Sun May 30, 2010 7:36 pm
by platoon2063
9/11, Fort Hood, bus bombings in London, Madrid bombings, Khobar Towers bombings in Saudi, Uss Cole, hell go ahead and trace it back to Marine barracks bombings in Beirut-in other words YES Islam is a threat.
Re: Can anyone say Islam is not a threat.. without lying??
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 7:38 pm
by MasterOfMeatPuppets
Calm down. The soldiers are protecting your clit from those nasty terrorists.
Re: Can anyone say Islam is not a threat.. without lying??
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 12:45 am
by SmokingGun
MasterOfMeatPuppets wrote:
Calm down. The soldiers are protecting your clit from those nasty terrorists.
Ahh.. as usual, when confronted with actual evidence that Muslims still live in the stone age and are doing their utmost to change our superior civilization, the idiots do what they always do and resort to an ad-hominem attack. Real smart, aren't you?
The links have nothing to do with terrorists, you brainless clod! They are about countries bowing down to the wishes of a cult that is mired in the past, that refuses to move with the times. One that says 'OK!' to mutilating girls, one that says 'OK!' to worshiping a leader who married a SIX YEAR OLD GIRL, and fucked her when she was NINE. One that still oppresses women.
If you want to stand up for that, go right ahead. Freak.
Re: Muslims are fucking cunts, Mohammed is a cocksucker
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 4:24 am
by SmokingGun
GypsyDog5150 wrote:I don't think they are at all. Now The Jews, they are a threat!!! Hell, Christians are worse than muslims. Our military are bigger terrorists than any muslim group could ever be.
Christians, who follow the New Testament, are commanded to love their enemies, not behead them.
And you deny the holocaust so fuck you.
Here is a small selection of Muslim scriptures. Not outdated like the Old Testament is to Christians, they believe this shit NOW.
Want more? There's ones on how to oppress women, some on rape, some on pedophilia, something for anyone who happens to be batshit crazy enough to buy into the religion of piss.
"5.18" : And the Jews and the Christians say: We are the sons of Allah and His beloved ones. Say: Why does He then chastise you for your faults? Nay, you are mortals from among those whom He has created, then take your sword and separate his head from him, for
the heads of the Jews and the Christians are to be praised only when they are removed from their bodies.
"5.73" : Certainly they disbelieve who say: Surely Allah is the third (person) of the three; and there is no god but the one God, and if they desist not from what they say,
a painful chastisement shall befall those among them who disbelieve. Remove from them their heads, therefore, and place thy excrement in its place.
"9.30" : And the Jews say: Uzair is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before;
may Allah destroy them; and castrate them, and placeth their testicles within their mouths, and remove their hands and get them into the place where they defecate.
"5.33" :
The punishment of those who depict Allah and His apostle in drawing or clay and strive to make mischief and mock them in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement,
"8.39" : And fight with them until there is no more persecution and religion should be only for Allah; but if they desist, then surely kill them.
"9.5" : Slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush,then if they repent kill them anyway.
Kill them, behead them, castrate them, cripple them, burn their buildings and rape their women.
Oh yeah, this is a religion for our day and age all right. Real nice.
Re: Can anyone say Islam is not a threat.. without lying??
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 8:19 am
by invaziondrummer
SmokingGun wrote:vlad wrote:First off, if this is part and parcel with other discussions by medical associations, including those in the United States, where the idea of a ritual nick instead of FGM, then the Australian newspaper is not telling the whole story. It is part of the discussion. Just that.
I think that FGM is appalling, and as the paper pointed out, the rise in Sudanese and Somali immigrants has brought this to the fore. It is a regional thing, in NE Africa. Practiced before there was an Islam.
And if, if they were to do such a thing as a ritual nick...all you boys, especially in the US, look down in your pants and ask yourself if that little procedure done when you were a tiny baby was just a "ritual nick". All those fun nerve endings that got removed. You should read why circumcision was pushed in the US....now they say it's hygiene (hello, it isn't hard to teach you little boy to wash his foreskin), but it was to impede masturbation. Check out Kellogg (yeah, the corn flakes guy)....you who are cut have freaks like that to thank for it.
It was a couple or three weeks ago that this was brought up in the U.S., the "ritual nick".
I would hope that FGM stops, just as I hope that circumcision stops as well.
If you read the article, it says there is a push for doctors to perform it because it is being performed in backyard operations already. It also states that doctors increasingly have to fix up botched operations.
First of all, why aren't the parents of these children being put in prison for child abuse, and why aren't the children being taken away from such mentally handicapped idiots?
Perish the thought, we'd much rather tolerate yet another load of bullshit from the religion of piss than stand up for decency and (true) civilization.
And about circumcision being performed on boys.. totally different. Ask Crazy Levi if he feels mutilated and if his sexual gratification is almost non-existent. I know of someone who had to have it done at the ripe age of 18, so there are supporting medical reasons for doing it.
Muslims just want to control women as much as possible. Diminishing their sexual pleasure will make them much more subservient, and will do a lot to stop them going to the clubs to find sexual gratification from a well hung infidel.
ALL religion is "piss", and should not be tolerated.
Re: Can anyone say Islam is not a threat.. without lying??
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 4:57 pm
by SeminiferousButtNoid
Not enough of a threat to fight two wars over.
Re: Can anyone say Islam is not a threat.. without lying??
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 2:06 pm
by thejuggernaut
MotleyScrew wrote:SmokingGun wrote:
No matter where in the world you go, these people who insist on living in the dark ages spread their disease. The world is becoming increasingly Islamized, and that is a sad, sad thing.
Did you learn that at your weekly Klan meeting?
Were you told something different at your weekly Lollipop Guild convention ?
Re: Can anyone say Islam is not a threat.. without lying??
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 2:11 pm
by thejuggernaut
MotleyScrew wrote:thejuggernaut wrote:MotleyScrew wrote:
Did you learn that at your weekly Klan meeting?
Were you told something different at your weekly Lollipop Guild convention ?
I have yet in my life to have a muslim push their beliefs down my throat. I respect their religion just like any person with tolerance should respect any others.
The way your friends in Iran treat homosexuals, women, harlots, jews etc ?
Re: Can anyone say Islam is not a threat.. without lying??
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 2:27 pm
by thejuggernaut
MotleyScrew wrote:thejuggernaut wrote:
The way your friends in Iran treat homosexuals, women, harlots, jews etc ?
That is a different country. I worry about America, my own backyard. I don't agree with North Korea, but I am not going to run around and preach hate against them.
I see.
So it's hate to call monsters what they are. I guess we should cut the Nazis some slack. After all, that was Germany, not north america, and we wouldn't want to "preach hate" since it wasn't in our "backyard".
I guess we'll just have to hope they keep their throwback beliefs and practices in their own regions and don't introduce things like honor killings and fatwas to the north american way of life and other westernized nations.
Thank god people aren't getting threatened and/or killed in westernized nations for writing cartoons or making films exposing the horrors of a throwback religion.
Re: Can anyone say Islam is not a threat.. without lying??
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:04 am
by thejuggernaut
MotleyScrew wrote:thejuggernaut wrote:
So it's hate to call monsters what they are. I guess we should cut the Nazis some slack. After all, that was Germany, not north america, and we wouldn't want to "preach hate" since it wasn't in our "backyard".
Perfect example you just gave me. Are/were all Germans Nazis? No, they aren't and weren't. Are all muslims violent? No. But sometimes the minority can make it look like they are.
Nobody is saying all Muslims are monsters.