Page 1 of 1

WH had Clinton try to ease Sestak out of Pa. race

Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 1:34 pm
by MasterOfMeatPuppets
"Yes, we can"?- the Democrat's answer to "Can we self-destruct?" I've gone beyond "What was he thinking?" to ask "What was I thinking?". It's one thing promising change and falling short when Republicans won't play ball but this was his game alone.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100528/ap_ ... nia_senate
By PHILIP ELLIOTT, Associated Press Writer Philip Elliott, Associated Press Writer – Fri May 28, 2:03 pm ET

WASHINGTON – Forced to disclose backstage political bargaining, President Barack Obama's embarrassed White House acknowledged on Friday that it enlisted Bill Clinton to try to ease Rep. Joe Sestak out of Pennsylvania's Senate primary with a job offer.

The admission left many questions unanswered, however, and Republicans aren't likely to let the issue rest. For Obama, the revelations called into question his repeated promises to run an open government that was above back room deals.

Seeking to quiet the clamor from Republicans and some Democrats over a possible political trade, the White House released a report describing the offer that was intended to clear a path for Sen. Arlen Specter to win the Democratic nomination.

Presidential Counsel Robert Bauer rendered his own verdict in a two-page report that said there was no improper conduct. No one in the administration discussed the offer with Sestak, Bauer said. The report did not say what, if any, contacts or promises the White House had with Specter on the matter. It also did not reveal whether Obama was aware of the former president's role.

The report didn't impress Republicans.

"Regardless of what President Clinton or Congressman Sestak now say, it is abundantly clear that this kind of conduct is contrary to President Obama's pledge to change 'business as usual' and that his administration has engaged in the kind of political shenanigans he once campaigned to end," said Rep. Darrell Issa, the top Republican on the House oversight committee who unsuccessfully had sought a Department of Justice investigation.

Specter declined to comment.

The report said White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel enlisted Clinton's help as a go-between with Sestak. Clinton agreed to raise the offer of a seat on a presidential advisory board or another executive board if Sestak dropped his bid, "which would avoid a divisive Senate primary," the report said.

Under the proposed arrangement, Sestak would have been able to remain in the House while serving on a board. It was not clear why the White House — which has the power to offer Cabinet posts and sought-after embassy jobs — believed Sestak would be interested in just an advisory position.

Sestak declined the offer. He defeated the five-term Specter, who had switched from Republican to Democrat last year at the White House's urging, in the May 18 Democratic primary.

Sestak, who had said a job was offered but had provided no details, acknowledged Friday that he had had the conversation with Clinton. He said the former president told him he should stay in the U.S. House and perhaps join a presidential board.

In a statement released by his campaign, Sestak said, "I said no. I told President Clinton that my only consideration in getting into the Senate race or not was whether it was the right thing to do for Pennsylvania working families and not any offer."

Emanuel and Sestak both worked in the White House when Clinton was president in the 1990s, and both remain close with their former boss. Sestak was a supporter of Clinton's wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton, in her 2008 presidential bid.

Bauer, in the White House report, argued that previous Democratic and Republican administrations, "motivated by the same goals, discussed alternative paths to service for qualified individuals also considering campaigns for public office." The report said such actions aren't illegal nor unethical.

For weeks, the White House had insisted officials did not behave inappropriately but had declined to elaborate. But after Sestak won the nomination, Republicans renewed their questions of the administration and White House lawyers prepared to release a report they had been compiling for months.

At a White House news conference on Thursday, Obama told reporters a full accounting would be forthcoming.

"I can assure the public that nothing improper took place," he said.

Two top Democrats — party chief Tim Kaine and Dick Durbin of Illinois, the party's second-ranking leader in the Senate — said during the week that the White House and Sestak needed to address the questions. So, too, did Sestak's Republican challenger in Pennsylvania, former Rep. Pat Toomey.

Re: WH had Clinton try to ease Sestak out of Pa. race

Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 2:47 pm
by Nevermind
Sorry to tell you, but according to Crazy Levi in a post below, this is spam. :lol:
Redgardless, yesterday, Clinton was at the White House.
I assume this is when and where Obama, Emanuel, Sestak, and Clinton concocted the BS that was spewed from the presidents mouth today.

Re: WH had Clinton try to ease Sestak out of Pa. race

Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 3:01 pm
by Crazy Levi
Nevermind wrote:Sorry to tell you, but according to Crazy Levi in a post below, this is spam. :lol:
Redgardless, yesterday, Clinton was at the White House.
I assume this is when and where Obama, Emanuel, Sestak, and Clinton concocted the BS that was spewed from the presidents mouth today.
Actually no. He took a little effort to actually add some of his own thoughts to it.

:lol:

Re: WH had Clinton try to ease Sestak out of Pa. race

Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 12:09 pm
by VinnieKulick
GypsyDog5150 wrote:At least he didn't lie to start a war for personal gain! This doesn't bother me, Obama did the right thing to keep Specter in the Senate.
But he's continuing two wars, so is that the right thing?

Re: WH had Clinton try to ease Sestak out of Pa. race

Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:41 pm
by Nevermind
GypsyDog5150 wrote:
VinnieKulick wrote:
GypsyDog5150 wrote:At least he didn't lie to start a war for personal gain! This doesn't bother me, Obama did the right thing to keep Specter in the Senate.
But he's continuing two wars, so is that the right thing?
The Republicans caused such a mess he can't even pull out. The fact is he didn't send them there, nobody should have. If Obama was President in 2003 the Iraq war never would have happened.
I love how liberals just ignore all the elected democrats who voted for both of those wars, and continue to fund them to this day.

Just the senators including Reid, Clinton, Biden etc....

Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Biden (D-DE)
Breaux (D-LA)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carnahan (D-MO)
Carper (D-DE)
Cleland (D-GA)
Clinton (D-NY)
Daschle (D-SD)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Edwards (D-NC)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Harkin (D-IA)
Hollings (D-SC)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kerry (D-MA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Miller (D-GA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Schumer (D-NY)
Torricelli (D-NJ)

Re: WH had Clinton try to ease Sestak out of Pa. race

Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 2:50 pm
by JakeYonkel
Baaaaah.

Re: WH had Clinton try to ease Sestak out of Pa. race

Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 3:06 pm
by MasterOfMeatPuppets
Nevermind wrote:
I love how liberals just ignore all the elected democrats who voted for both of those wars, and continue to fund them to this day.

Just the senators including Reid, Clinton, Biden etc....
I know why we went into Afghanistan but why don't you refresh everyone on why we went into Iraq?

Re: WH had Clinton try to ease Sestak out of Pa. race

Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 3:52 pm
by WhiteHouseSubsAC
GypsyDog5150 wrote:At least he didn't lie to start a war for personal gain!
Nice straw man. Try to stay on topic, please.

Re: WH had Clinton try to ease Sestak out of Pa. race

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 8:10 am
by vanitybinge
Another story to prove the guy I voted for is a lying politician no different from the rest.

I also didn't know going in that Biden was one of the main authors of the Patriot Act. How many people knew Cheney's history when they voted for Bush?
It seems to me like vice presidents can have a slimy fucking history and still get right into the cockpit of US government.

Maybe I just wont vote next time. I'm sick of this shit.

Re: WH had Clinton try to ease Sestak out of Pa. race

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:26 pm
by thejuggernaut
vanitybinge wrote:Another story to prove the guy I voted for is a lying politician no different from the rest.

I also didn't know going in that Biden was one of the main authors of the Patriot Act. How many people knew Cheney's history when they voted for Bush?
It seems to me like vice presidents can have a slimy fucking history and still get right into the cockpit of US government.

Maybe I just wont vote next time. I'm sick of this shit.
Joe Biden seems like an all around decent guy.

I can assure you he, Cheney and Bush don't give a goddamn about your backseat bong and cock hauling.

Re: WH had Clinton try to ease Sestak out of Pa. race

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 3:00 pm
by Ugmo
Politics is a dirty business. Sure, it looks kinda shady that they tried to keep Sestak out of the race, but my understanding is that the White House promised Specter when he made the switch that they would try to keep the primary field clear for him. Remember this is back when they were gunning for that all-important Supermajority, so at the time it seemed like a good idea. At least they kept their word to Specter.

If anything this is more evidence that Obama is not a populist, he's a Senate-bred dealmaker. That's how he (tries to) get stuff done, through negotiation in Congress rather than FDR-style pulpit bullying. I wish he were more the latter than the former, but alas a leopard can't change its spots.