Page 1 of 1

DEEMER...

Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 8:49 am
by Cliffenstein
House Democrats 'Deem' Faux $1.1 Trillion Budget 'as Passed'
Connie Hair / Human Events / July 2, 2010

Last night, as part of a procedural vote on the emergency war supplemental bill, House Democrats attached a document that "deemed as passed" a non-existent $1.12 trillion budget. The execution of the "deeming" document allows Democrats to start spending money for Fiscal Year 2011 without the pesky constraints of a budget.

The procedural vote passed 215-210 with no Republicans voting in favor and 38 Democrats crossing the aisle to vote against deeming the faux budget resolution passed.

Never before -- since the creation of the Congressional budget process -- has the House failed to pass a budget, failed to propose a budget then deemed the non-existent budget as passed as a means to avoid a direct, recorded vote on a budget, but still allow Congress to spend taxpayer money.

House Budget Committee Ranking Member Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) warned this was the green light for Democrats to continue their out-of-control spending virtually unchecked.

"Facing a record deficit and a tidal wave of debt, House Democrats decided it was politically inconvenient to put forward a budget and account for their fiscal recklessness. With no priorities and no restraints, the spending, taxing, and borrowing will continue unchecked for the coming fiscal year," Ryan said. "The so-called 'budget enforcement resolution' enforces no budget, but instead provides a green light for the Appropriators to continue spending, exacerbating our looming fiscal crisis."

As we reported on HUMAN EVENTS, CBO issued a dire warning about the long term outlook for the budget.

"Yesterday, the Congressional Budget Office rang the latest fiscal alarm with the release of The Long-Term Budget Outlook," Ryan said. "Today, Congress again hit snooze. To avert a fiscal and economic calamity, Washington needs to wake up."

Key points from the House Republican Budget staff on the House Democrats' deeming resolution:

1. This is not a budget. The measure fails to meet the most basic, commonly understood objectives of any budget. It does not set congressional priorities; it does not align overall spending, tax, deficit, and debt levels; and it does nothing to address the runaway spending of Federal entitlement programs.

2. It is not a 'congressional budget resolution'. The measure does not satisfy even the most basic criteria of a budget resolution as set forth in the Congressional Budget Act.

3. It creates a deception of spending 'restraint'. While claiming restraint in discretionary spending, the resolution increases non-emergency spending by $30 billion over 2010 and includes a number of gimmicks that give a green light to higher spending.

4. It continues relying on the flawed and over-sold pay-as-you-go [pay-go] procedure. Pay-go – which Democrats have used mainly to raise taxes, and have ignored when it was inconvenient – does nothing to reduce deficits or restrain spending growth in existing law.

5. Outsourcing fiscal responsibilities. The measure is another hand-off by the Democratic Majority of Congress's power of the purse – this time relying on the Fiscal Commission created by the President to do Congress's job.


A full Republican Budget Committee staff analysis of the Majority's Budget Deemer: "An Admission of Fiscal Failure".

-------

Connie Hair writes daily as HUMAN EVENTS' Congressional correspondent. She is a former speechwriter for Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ) and a former media and coalitions advisor to the Senate Republican Conference.

Re: DEEMER...

Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 9:14 am
by MasterOfMeatPuppets
The real story:
House Democrats pass 'budget enforcement resolution' by 215-210
By Walter Alarkon - 07/01/10 08:40 PM ET

House Democrats passed a budget document Thursday that sets discretionary spending at levels below those proposed by President Barack Obama but doesn’t address how Congress should cut deficits.

The “budget enforcement resolution” Democrats are substituting for a traditional budget resolution sets discretionary spending for 2011 at $1.12 trillion, about $7 billion less than Obama’s proposal and $3 billion less than a Senate Democratic plan. It also sets a goal of cutting deficits to the point where revenues equal all spending except for interest payments on the debt.

But unlike traditional budget resolutions, this year’s version doesn’t detail how Congress should reach that goal, leaving those tough decisions to Obama’s bipartisan fiscal commission.

“While this resolution does not project the budget out over five years, it does look to the future by assuring that the House will have an opportunity to vote this year on longer-term budget proposals made by the president’s Fiscal Commission and approved by the Senate,” said House Budget Committee Chairman John Spratt (D-S.C.).

The budget measure passed on a 215-210 vote as part of a rule setting debate on a supplemental spending bill for the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. All Republicans plus 38 Democrats from both ends of their caucus voted against the bill. Liberals had concerns about the war while centrist Democrats raised concerns about domestic and disaster aid spending that House leaders plan to attach to the bill.

The enforcement resolution is being used instead of a full-fledged budget resolution because rank-and-file Democrats did not want to vote for a budget resolution that would show large deficits, particularly in an election year marked by worries about the nation’s fiscal solvency.

The measure calls for a budget by 2015 that would be balanced except for debt interest payments. This mirrors a goal already set out by Obama.

The budget document, however, doesn’t say what policies Congress should enact to reach that out-year goal, something past budget resolutions have done. Instead, it relies on the White House fiscal commission, a bipartisan panel looking at tax, spending and entitlement policies, to come up with a plan to reach their target by 2015.

This year’s deficit is projected by the Congressional Budget Office to be $1.5 trillion, or 10 percent of gross domestic product. A budget balanced except for payments on the debt is about 3 percent of GDP.

The White House panel plans to report out its recommendations in December.

Republican leaders have slammed the Democrats’ decision not to do a traditional budget when deficits are soaring, seeing it as more evidence of their inability to govern. GOP members noted that Democrats’ spending levels for 2011 would raise non-emergency discretionary spending levels by $31 billion.

“Facing a record deficit and a tidal wave of debt, House Democrats decided it was politically inconvenient to put forward a budget and account for their fiscal recklessness,” said Rep. Paul Ryan (Wis.), the top Republican on the House Budget Committee. “With no priorities and no restraints, the spending, taxing, and borrowing will continue unchecked for the coming fiscal year.”

Congress has failed to adopt a full budget resolution four times when Republicans controlled the House, but on each of those occasions the House approved its version of the budget resolution.

Spratt’s measure would also increase funding for programs seeking to root out waste and sync the pay-as-you-go law enacted this year with a previous House pay-go rule, which was less stringent but still in effect.


Senate Democrats have yet to decide how they will set spending levels for next year, choosing to wait for the House to act first.
Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/10690 ... resolution
The contents of this site are © 2010 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.

Re: DEEMER...

Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 10:31 am
by WhiteHouseSubsAC
MasterOfMeatPuppets wrote:The real story:

The enforcement resolution is being used instead of a full-fledged budget resolution because rank-and-file Democrats did not want to vote for a budget resolution that would show large deficits, particularly in an election year marked by worries about the nation’s fiscal solvency.

Re: DEEMER...

Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 12:20 pm
by MasterOfMeatPuppets
WhiteHouseSubsAC wrote:
MasterOfMeatPuppets wrote:The real story:

The enforcement resolution is being used instead of a full-fledged budget resolution because rank-and-file Democrats did not want to vote for a budget resolution that would show large deficits, particularly in an election year marked by worries about the nation’s fiscal solvency.
Was that left out?