Metal Sludge Gossip Board

Just look at what the U.S. Government and its friends are willing to do and capable of doing to someone who challenges or defies them -- all without any charges being filed or a shred of legal authority. They've blocked access to their assets, tried to remove them from the Internet, bullied most everyone out of doing any business with them, froze the funds marked for Assange's legal defense at exactly the time that they prepare a strange international arrest warrant to be executed, repeatedly threatened him with murder, had their Australian vassals openly threaten to revoke his passport, and declared them "Terrorists" even though -- unlike the authorities who are doing all of these things -- neither Assange nor WikiLeaks ever engaged in violence, advocated violence, or caused the slaughter of civilians.

SeminiferousButtNoid wrote:And that doesn't even mention the bogus rape charges in Sweden.

cantstopthemusic wrote:

SeminiferousButtNoid wrote:And that doesn't even mention the bogus rape charges in Sweden.

You have no clue one way or the other as to whether the Swedish rape charges are "bogus."

cantstopthemusic wrote:

SeminiferousButtNoid wrote:And that doesn't even mention the bogus rape charges in Sweden.

You have no clue one way or the other as to whether the Swedish rape charges are "bogus."

wylde342 wrote:That dude doesn't look like he could even rape a squirrel.

absolutely fabulous wrote:

wylde342 wrote:That dude doesn't look like he could even rape a squirrel.

i don't think i'd want to be in a room alone with his drab demeanor.

SeminiferousButtNoid wrote:

cantstopthemusic wrote:

SeminiferousButtNoid wrote:And that doesn't even mention the bogus rape charges in Sweden.

You have no clue one way or the other as to whether the Swedish rape charges are "bogus."

The Swedish rape charges have already been dropped once, on Aug 20th. Since the women never filed an official report in the first place, that means that the prosecution has 0 physical evidence to support their claim. In the US, that would mean that the case was dead in the water, especially in a rape case. This information, barring all the conspiracy talk, is the elephant in the room.

These are now part of a distasteful and unsettling story, many details of which, thanks to a Swedish police leak and an interview given by Miss A to a Swedish paper, are in the public domain.

The story appears to proceed as follows: Miss A, having invited Assange to speak to a leftwing campaign group in the town of Enkoping, suggested he stay in her flat, although the two had not met. Both agree that they slept together on the night before the event, during which the condom split.

The following day, the woman attended and helped facilitate the event, at which Miss W was also present. According to her police interview, Miss W accompanied the Australian and some male guests to lunch at which he flirted with her; afterwards the pair went to the cinema, where she told police she had performed oral sex on him. They slept together that night, using a condom, and again the following morning, when both parties appear to agree that a condom was not used, after which Assange left.

What happened next will be the subject of any legal process, but according to her testimony Miss W, for some reason, got in touch with Miss A (they did not previously know each other); some days later the two went to a Stockholm police station where they said they were "seeking advice" on making a complaint against Assange. Miss A is understood to have told police that he had ripped the condom on purpose, while Miss W said the unprotected sex act had been without her consent. They were reportedly advised by the police officer that these allegations amounted to rape against Miss W and sexual molestation against Miss A.

The accusations leaked to the press two days later, shortly after which Miss A gave an interview to the Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet. She said: "The responsibility for what happened to me and the other girl lies with a man who had attitude problems with women."

Ok, I take it back. Broken condoms and "attitude problems with women"? He definitely raped them.

cantstopthemusic wrote:

SeminiferousButtNoid wrote:And that doesn't even mention the bogus rape charges in Sweden.

You have no clue one way or the other as to whether the Swedish rape charges are "bogus."

SmokingGun wrote:
Do the words 'sex by surprise' mean anything to you?

MasterOfMeatPuppets wrote:

SmokingGun wrote:
Do the words 'sex by surprise' mean anything to you?

Rape is usually 'sex by surprise'. This does not help your argument.

CrouchingStonerHiddenBong wrote:I want to believe.

Aliens, not butt secks.