Page 1 of 1

Even Maureen Dowd Begins To Turn...

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 12:30 pm
by brotherplanet
This woman is like a goddamn cheerleader for the left. She's one of the top writers for the New York Times. I mean honestly... I'm almost waiting for someone to post a graph in a desperate attempt to show that somehow the New York Times is not a legitimate news source.


Dreaming of a Superhero
By MAUREEN DOWD


ON Friday night, the nation’s capital was under a tornado watch. And that was the best thing that happened to the White House all week.

As the president was being slapped by Mitt Romney for being too weak on national security, he was being rapped by a Times editorial for being too aggressive on national security.

A Times article by Jo Becker and Scott Shane revealed that the liberal law professor who campaigned against torture and the Iraq war now personally makes the final decisions on the “kill list,” targets for drone strikes. “A unilateral campaign of death is untenable,” the editorial asserted.

On Thursday, Bill Clinton once more telegraphed that he considers Obama a lightweight who should not have bested his wife. Bluntly contradicting the Obama campaign theme that Romney is a heartless corporate raider, Clinton told CNN that the Republican’s record at Bain was “sterling.” Ohhhhh, SNAP!

Covering a humorous W. at the unveiling of his portrait, the White House press actually seemed nostalgic for the president who bollixed up Afghanistan, Iraq, Katrina and the economy — a sure sign that the Obama magic is flagging.

On Friday, an ugly job market report led to the stock market’s worst day of the year. As the recovery flat-lined, the president conceded to a crowd at a Honeywell factory in Golden Valley, Minn., that “our economy is still facing some serious headwinds” and getting sucked further into Europe’s sinkhole. In depressing imagery for the start of the summer campaign, cable channels carried the red Dow arrow pointing down while Obama spoke; the Dow wiped out all of its 2012 gains.

The president who started off with such dazzle now seems incapable of stimulating either the economy or the voters. His campaign is offering Obama 2012 car magnets for a donation of $10; cat collars reading “I Meow for Michelle” for $12; an Obama grill spatula for $40, and discounted hoodies and T-shirts. How the mighty have fallen.

Once glowing, his press is now burning. “To a very real degree, 2008’s candidate of hope stands poised to become 2012’s candidate of fear,” John Heilemann wrote in New York magazine, noting that because Obama feels he can’t run on his record, his campaign will resort to nuking Romney.

In his new book, “A Nation of Wusses,” the Democrat Ed Rendell, the former governor of Pennsylvania, wonders how “the best communicator in campaign history” lost his touch.

The legendary speaker who drew campaign crowds in the tens of thousands and inspired a dispirited nation ended up nonchalantly delegating to a pork-happy Congress, disdaining the bully pulpit, neglecting to do any L.B.J.-style grunt work with Congress and the American public, and ceding control of his narrative.

As president, Obama has never felt the need to explain or sell his signature pieces of legislation — the stimulus and health care bills — or stanch the flow of false information from the other side.

“The administration lost the communications war with disastrous consequences that played out on Election Day 2010,” Rendell writes, and Obama never got credit for the two pieces of legislation where he reached for greatness.

The president had lofty dreams of playing the great convener and conciliator. But at a fund-raiser in Minneapolis, he admitted he’s just another combatant in a capital full of Hatfields and McCoys. No compromises, just nihilism.

If he wins the election, “the fever may break,” he said. “My hope, my expectation, is that after the election, now that it turns out that the goal of beating Obama doesn’t make much sense because I’m not running again, that we can start getting some cooperation again.”

In his new biography, “Barack Obama: The Story,” David Maraniss writes that a roommate of the young Obama compared him to Walker Percy’s protagonist in “The Moviegoer”: an observer of his life, one step removed.

Obama’s boss at his community organizing job in Chicago, Jerry Kellman, observed: “He was not unwilling to take risks, but was just this strange combination of someone who would have to weigh everything to death, and then take a dramatic risk at the end. He was reluctant to do confrontation, to push the other side because it might blow up — and it might. But one thing Alinsky did understand was that within reason, once something blows up, to a certain degree it doesn’t hurt, it helps.”

Maraniss’s book depicts Obama on an intense odyssey of self-discovery, moving toward defining himself less as a half-white man with white girlfriends than as a black man who wanted to be part of a black community.

His New York girlfriend, Genevieve Cook, told Maraniss that Obama confessed to her that “he felt like an impostor. Because he was so white. There was hardly a black bone in his body.” When she predicted that his future might be with a black woman — “That lithe, bubbly, strong black lady is waiting somewhere!” she wrote in her journal — he told her “he doubted there were any black women he would feel truly comfortable with. I would tell him, ‘No, she is out there.’ ”

He wanted to get out of the corporate world he found so distasteful — he described himself as “a spy behind enemy lines” — and reimagine himself as a politician.

On CNBC on Friday, Romney complained that Obama has “been more focused on his perspective of his historic legislative achievements than he has been focused on getting people back to work.”

A president focused on historic achievements? Imagine that. But in his lame way, Romney got at Obama’s problem: The Moviegoer prefers to float above, at a reserve, in grandiose mists.

As Maraniss recounts, Obama said he liked reading Hemingway because of Papa’s “integrity of grasping for those times, those visions, that are ones of true magnificence and profundity.”

Cook told Maraniss that she thought Obama’s desire to “play out a superhero life” was “a very strong archetype in his personality.”

But superheroes and mythic figures must boldly lead. Obama’s caution — ingrained from a life of being deserted by his father and sometimes his mother, and of being, as he wrote to another girlfriend, “caught without a class, a structure, or tradition to support me” — has restrained him at times.

In some ways, he’s still finding himself, too absorbed to see what’s not working. But the White House is a very hard place to go on a vision quest, especially with a storm brewing.



http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/03/opini ... ef=opinion

Re: Even Maureen Dowd Begins To Turn...

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 3:14 pm
by brotherplanet
Obama Gets 'Left' Behind...


Come on now. Is Obama really a “psychopathic megalomaniac”?

I learned of Obama’s problems today. Not from Ron Paul supporters. Not from Glenn Beck‘s Drudge wanna-be news site The Blaze. I read about Obama’s psychosis from left wing Democrats.

Everyday I get emails from former members of Move On, a pro-Democratic Party group that was famously active during the build-up to the Iraq War in 2003. They’re complaining about one man: President Obama.

In these emails, one thing is apparent. When it comes to the left wing liberals, Obama is being left behind.

The left was mostly raptured into political heaven four years ago when they elected Obama on bended knee. He spoke about things dear to their hearts: closing Guantanamo Bay. Ending the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Getting tough on bankers.

Guantanamo is still open. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are winding down, but the military presence remains. (Smacks of imperialism. That’s something the left hates as much as libertarians do.) Then there’s the president’s bit about getting tough on bankers. Where has the White House come down hard on Wall Street? Fuhgeddaboudit. This is New York!

One anti-Obama Saturday in my inbox:

Re: Write-in Kermit the Frog!

If being a ‘pragmatist’ or a ‘realist’ means choosing only amongst evils, count us OUT. Obama betrayed the American voters who expected he would not gut the US Constitution. Both parties are the same. And, in a world of infinite possibilities we choose not between the lesser of two evils. In fact, those of us who are not into denial and work at the human rights front lines prefer to face the Republican snake head-on then the confused and gutless Democrat chameleon whining about being a progressive when they are NOT.” — Ezili Danto, human rights lawyer at the Haitian Lawyers Leadership Network

Re: Obama is a psychopath; reminds me of Stalin

There’s a cancer in the presidency called Barack Obama. We have a psychopathic megalomaniac occupying the White house who could be compared to Nero, Caligula, Stalin, or Pol Pot in his disdain for human life. He and his coven of other like minded DC psychopaths and sociopaths are on a murdering spree and like a third world dictator Obama can have someone and their family (including you) executed or blasted to smithereens with a thumbs up or down. This is sickening to me. They are so blase about murdering that they refer to the hit list photos as “baseball cards”. Killing is a game or a sport to them. There is a “cancer on the Presidency” and that cancer has metastasized throughout Washington DC. It was there before Obama arrived but he brought a whole new and virulent strain with him. Every time there is a shameful incident or embarrassing event perpetrated by “a few bad apples” we hear from the DC psychopaths that “That is not who we are”. They are incorrect. It is who they are in DC. It is not who we the real everyday thinking feeling Americans are. I certainly am not one of the people to be included in their cumulative we.” — Alexander Cockburn, writing for his online publication Counterpunch. Alexander is also a columnist at The Nation, though I have a hard time believing this missive will make it passed Katrina Vanden Heuvel. Alex is a firebrand. I’ve written for him once or twice, and he was kind enough to comment on my reporting about the Iraq War for The Boston Globe in 2003 in his Beat the Devil column. This sounds like Alex being Alex, alright. Gotta love his fire.

Re: Bush mighta been better.

Hello!

“Why should the public believe what the Obama administration says about the people being assassinated by drones? Especially since, as we learn in the New York Times, the administration came up with a semantic solution to keep the civilian death toll to a minimum: simply count all military-age males in a strike zone as combatants. The rationale, reminiscent of George Zimmerman’s justification for shooting Trayvon Martin, is that “people in an area of known terrorist activity, or found with a top Qaeda operative, are probably up to no good.” Talk about profiling! At least when George Bush threw suspected militants into Guantanamo their lives were spared.” — Medea Benjamin, CodePINK

Obama’s dealings with the working stiff, or the perceived lack thereof, plus his foreign policy has caused much of the anger against him among the left wing of the party.

I’m not a blue dog democrat. I’m a hard hat Democrat from Massachusetts; like the guys who climb telephone poles after hurricanes that vote for Kennedy. That’s where I cast my lot.

I voted for Obama through the U.S. Consulate in São Paulo. Obama was different. He was inspiring. I watched the votes unfold on two laptops — one on CNN, one on MSNBC with emails from my American friends flooding in every minute. My Blackberry was on my lap, blowing up with texts – can you believe North Carolina? It never happens!

Obama’s winning was like a moon landing. You noticed it more when you’re overseas. America did it again, Brazilians told me. The world can elect women presidents. It’s happened before. But what advanced economy has ever elected a black man? None. Not Europe. Not Latin America. Not Australia. Not even close. They’re not even on the ballot. Only in America. What a country.


http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2 ... ft-behind/

Re: Even Maureen Dowd Begins To Turn...

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:55 pm
by DEATH ROW JOE
brotherplanet wrote:This woman is like a goddamn cheerleader for the left. She's one of the top writers for the New York Times. I mean honestly... I'm almost waiting for someone to post a graph in a desperate attempt to show that somehow the New York Times is not a legitimate news source.

=======ImageImage
=========================================================================
This has been pointed out to you before but since you are very, very slow, it has to be pointed out again and again. Look at the URL you posted:

/2012/06/03/opinion/sunday/dowd-dreaming-of-a-superhero.html?pagewanted=2&ref=opinion

You are not posting a news article from the NY Times. You are posting an opinion piece from Maureen Dowd who has been critical of Obama for over 4 years.

For example, here is a quote from 2010 in which she calls Obama a cry baby who blames others for his failures:

"It hurts Obama to be a crybaby about it, and to blame the press and the “old Washington game” for his own communication failures."

Since you obviously are not familiar with her columns, you can't possibly know whether or not she is a "goddamn cheerleader for the left." That's merely something you heard somewhere and are parroting. She is a liberal but she's critical of everyone which is why she was a favorite of Don Imus.

Since you wanted some graphs, even though they have nothing to do with this story, here are some graphs.

Graph 1: Household net worth has increased 8 trillion under Obama. Corporate profits after tax have increased 60%.

Graph 2: S&P 500 nearly up 100% under Obama

Graph 3: 4 million private sector jobs added to the economy including 600,000 manufacturing jobs

Graph 4: Manufacturing jobs were lost every year from 1997 until 2010.

Image

Re: Even Maureen Dowd Begins To Turn...

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 5:33 pm
by Luminiferous
brotherplanet wrote:Obama Gets 'Left' Behind...


Come on now. Is Obama really a “psychopathic megalomaniac”?

I learned of Obama’s problems today. Not from Ron Paul supporters. Not from Glenn Beck‘s Drudge wanna-be news site The Blaze. I read about Obama’s psychosis from left wing Democrats.

Everyday I get emails from former members of Move On, a pro-Democratic Party group that was famously active during the build-up to the Iraq War in 2003. They’re complaining about one man: President Obama.

In these emails, one thing is apparent. When it comes to the left wing liberals, Obama is being left behind.

The left was mostly raptured into political heaven four years ago when they elected Obama on bended knee. He spoke about things dear to their hearts: closing Guantanamo Bay. Ending the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Getting tough on bankers.

Guantanamo is still open. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are winding down, but the military presence remains. (Smacks of imperialism. That’s something the left hates as much as libertarians do.) Then there’s the president’s bit about getting tough on bankers. Where has the White House come down hard on Wall Street? Fuhgeddaboudit. This is New York!

One anti-Obama Saturday in my inbox:

Re: Write-in Kermit the Frog!

If being a ‘pragmatist’ or a ‘realist’ means choosing only amongst evils, count us OUT. Obama betrayed the American voters who expected he would not gut the US Constitution. Both parties are the same. And, in a world of infinite possibilities we choose not between the lesser of two evils. In fact, those of us who are not into denial and work at the human rights front lines prefer to face the Republican snake head-on then the confused and gutless Democrat chameleon whining about being a progressive when they are NOT.” — Ezili Danto, human rights lawyer at the Haitian Lawyers Leadership Network

Re: Obama is a psychopath; reminds me of Stalin

There’s a cancer in the presidency called Barack Obama. We have a psychopathic megalomaniac occupying the White house who could be compared to Nero, Caligula, Stalin, or Pol Pot in his disdain for human life. He and his coven of other like minded DC psychopaths and sociopaths are on a murdering spree and like a third world dictator Obama can have someone and their family (including you) executed or blasted to smithereens with a thumbs up or down. This is sickening to me. They are so blase about murdering that they refer to the hit list photos as “baseball cards”. Killing is a game or a sport to them. There is a “cancer on the Presidency” and that cancer has metastasized throughout Washington DC. It was there before Obama arrived but he brought a whole new and virulent strain with him. Every time there is a shameful incident or embarrassing event perpetrated by “a few bad apples” we hear from the DC psychopaths that “That is not who we are”. They are incorrect. It is who they are in DC. It is not who we the real everyday thinking feeling Americans are. I certainly am not one of the people to be included in their cumulative we.” — Alexander Cockburn, writing for his online publication Counterpunch. Alexander is also a columnist at The Nation, though I have a hard time believing this missive will make it passed Katrina Vanden Heuvel. Alex is a firebrand. I’ve written for him once or twice, and he was kind enough to comment on my reporting about the Iraq War for The Boston Globe in 2003 in his Beat the Devil column. This sounds like Alex being Alex, alright. Gotta love his fire.

Re: Bush mighta been better.

Hello!

“Why should the public believe what the Obama administration says about the people being assassinated by drones? Especially since, as we learn in the New York Times, the administration came up with a semantic solution to keep the civilian death toll to a minimum: simply count all military-age males in a strike zone as combatants. The rationale, reminiscent of George Zimmerman’s justification for shooting Trayvon Martin, is that “people in an area of known terrorist activity, or found with a top Qaeda operative, are probably up to no good.” Talk about profiling! At least when George Bush threw suspected militants into Guantanamo their lives were spared.” — Medea Benjamin, CodePINK

Obama’s dealings with the working stiff, or the perceived lack thereof, plus his foreign policy has caused much of the anger against him among the left wing of the party.

I’m not a blue dog democrat. I’m a hard hat Democrat from Massachusetts; like the guys who climb telephone poles after hurricanes that vote for Kennedy. That’s where I cast my lot.

I voted for Obama through the U.S. Consulate in São Paulo. Obama was different. He was inspiring. I watched the votes unfold on two laptops — one on CNN, one on MSNBC with emails from my American friends flooding in every minute. My Blackberry was on my lap, blowing up with texts – can you believe North Carolina? It never happens!

Obama’s winning was like a moon landing. You noticed it more when you’re overseas. America did it again, Brazilians told me. The world can elect women presidents. It’s happened before. But what advanced economy has ever elected a black man? None. Not Europe. Not Latin America. Not Australia. Not even close. They’re not even on the ballot. Only in America. What a country.


http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2 ... ft-behind/
Why didn't you go all out and post pages 2 and 3 too, birtherasteroid?

Yes, You Can!

It made so much sense.

My former Chicago-based editor from Dow Jones even mailed me a T-shirt with Obama’s slogan on it.

I wore it to bed.

Until I got sick of it.

The shirt. Not the slogan. Or Obama, necessarily.

Thought I have to say that I think the truth, once again, is not yes or no, it is more like maybe. Maybe, You Can. That doesn’t sound right. But it’s true. I understand that’s not very optimistic. Americans like to believe we can do anything we want, so long as we work really hard. Yes, we can! We tell ourselves that. Oh, no…some can. Most can’t. But hey, maybe you can.

That’s a different argument. I’m talking about equality. A fair shake. I’m talking about people working hard and having something to show for it, rather than a life of lowering expectations, of moving one step forward and one and half steps back. Medea and Alex are talking about drones. Most Americans probably don’t care about drones. But most care about equality and fairness.

I think Obama would win on fairness versus any Republican.

The left is a lot like the right. Bombastic. Deeply ideological. Never happy with their politics.

Know where I learned that?

Antioch College.

You don’t get any more left wing than Antioch College. When I entered the school in the 1990s, they required male students have a signed contract from female students before they had sex. The Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transgender students once hung a sign painted on a white sheet they hung one floor above the cafeteria door. It was for the hetero males. It read: “Don’t blame us if you can’t get laid.”

That was my liberal school. One adjunct professor with environmental activist blood in her veins, and whose name I cannot remember, explained to me how the left was like the right.

It was one afternoon after class, during the Newt Gingrich Contract With America years, when she drew a basic diagram to explain it all. When she drew it, she purposely didn’t connect the start of the circle to the end. There was a hairline fracture in this otherwise perfect basic shape . Where she started drawing the circle, she said, that was the right wing.

Where she ended, she pointed out, was the left wing. You see how close they are together? Incredibly close, of course. In their political angst, they are close neighbors.

The right left Bush behind, too.

They got their wars. They didn’t get the Second Coming.

They also didn’t get to end abortion, or a gay marriage amendment. When Bush left office, he had around a 33% popularity rating. He essentially left Washington with his puppy dog tail between his legs. My bet is he doesn’t miss Washington one bit.

The right doesn’t miss him either. They think Bush failed them. Just like the left thinks Obama has failed them.

Another email from Saturday. This one about George Carlin. Not from Carlin, of course. He is dead.

Re: Voting is meaningless!!!

“You’ll notice there’s one thing I don’t complain about. Politicians. Everyone loves to complain about politicians. They say politicians suck. But where do they think these politicians come from? They don’t fall out of the sky….they are elected by American citizens. This is the best we can do folks. This is what we have to offer. This is the best we can do: garbage in, garbage out. Maybe it’s not the politicians that suck. Maybe it’s the public. The public sucks. Now there’s a nice campaign slogan for someone. I solved this little problem for myself…on Election Day, I stay home. I don’t vote. It’s meaningless. This country was bought and sold and paid for a long time ago. People say if you don’t vote, you have no right to complain. But hey, I on the other hand, who did not vote…have every right to complain about the mess that you guys voted for and therefore created.” — George Carlin.

Re: Even Maureen Dowd Begins To Turn...

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 8:52 am
by MitziDupree
Ohhhhh, SNAP!

Re: Even Maureen Dowd Begins To Turn...

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 4:32 pm
by brotherplanet
I didn't post it because I gave you the link.

Nine times out of ten I'll just post the first page with the link.

And you followed it like you were supposed to.





Ohhhhh, SNAP!







Image

Re: Even Maureen Dowd Begins To Turn...

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:05 pm
by Luminiferous
brotherplanet wrote:I didn't post it because I gave you the link.

Nine times out of ten I'll just post the first page with the link.

And you followed it like you were supposed to.





Ohhhhh, SNAP!
I "followed" it because I know your usual "penchant" for leaving out certain parts of your little "unbiased" blurbs on here.. :wink:

Image

Re: Even Maureen Dowd Begins To Turn...

Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 3:03 pm
by brotherplanet
Luminiferous wrote:
brotherplanet wrote:I didn't post it because I gave you the link.

Nine times out of ten I'll just post the first page with the link.

And you followed it like you were supposed to.





Ohhhhh, SNAP!
I "followed" it because I know your usual "penchant" for leaving out certain parts of your little "unbiased" blurbs on here.. :wink:

Image
Really..? Show me ONE example where I didn't past the first page of an article with the link to the entire article.

Do it.

Re: Even Maureen Dowd Begins To Turn...

Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:28 pm
by Luminiferous
brotherplanet wrote:
Luminiferous wrote:
brotherplanet wrote:I didn't post it because I gave you the link.

Nine times out of ten I'll just post the first page with the link.

And you followed it like you were supposed to.





Ohhhhh, SNAP!
I "followed" it because I know your usual "penchant" for leaving out certain parts of your little "unbiased" blurbs on here.. :wink:

Image
Really..? Show me ONE example where I didn't past the first page of an article with the link to the entire article.

Do it.
Where did I say "page?" :lol:

I said you conveniently leave certain things out of your little unbiased blurbs on here quite often and you get called on it, Indy..

Re: Even Maureen Dowd Begins To Turn...

Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 6:14 pm
by brotherplanet
Yes, and I said I give a link in the event someone wants to read the rest of the story.

Which is true.


So you've pretty much got nothing.

Congrats!

Re: Even Maureen Dowd Begins To Turn...

Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 6:46 pm
by Luminiferous
I've got you to laugh at... That should count for something..

Re: Even Maureen Dowd Begins To Turn...

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 2:14 am
by absolutely fabulous
Luminiferous wrote: My former Chicago-based editor from Dow Jones even mailed me a T-shirt with Obama’s slogan on it.

I wore it to bed.
i hope your girlfriend didn't fuck you that night.
j/k

Re: Even Maureen Dowd Begins To Turn...

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 6:43 am
by Luminiferous
brotherplanet wrote:
Luminiferous wrote:I said you conveniently leave certain things out of your little unbiased blurbs on here quite often and you get called on it, Indy..
Yes
Thank you... :lol:
absolutely fabulous wrote:
Luminiferous wrote:My former Chicago-based editor from Dow Jones even mailed me a T-shirt with Obama’s slogan on it.

I wore it to bed.
i hope your girlfriend didn't fuck you that night.
j/k
Uhmm...I didn't say that..

It's by the author in the rest of the article birtherasteroid neglected to post.. :wink:

Re: Even Maureen Dowd Begins To Turn...

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 1:48 pm
by Skate4RnR
Man, there's a lotta fuckin' DERP! in this fucking thread.