Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post your thoughts and comments on terrorism, war, and political shit like that.

Moderator: Metal Sludge

User avatar
Drunk Kennedy
MSX Tour Support Act
Posts: 4191
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:11 am

Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by Drunk Kennedy »

Image

A presidential election prediction model developed by two University of Colorado professors points to a big win for GOP presidential contender Mitt Romney in November.

The model, the only of its kind to use more than one state-level economic indicator, has correctly predicted the winner of every presidential election since 1980.

It predicts Romney winning the electoral college by a 320-218 margin and winning 52.9 percent of the popular vote when only the two major parties’ candidates are considered, the Associated Press reported Thursday.

Romney, it concluded, will win every state currently considered by pollsters to be a swing state, including Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Florida, Virginia, Colorado, New Hampshire and North Carolina.

The model even predicts Romney will win Minnesota and Maine’s Second Congressional District, the electoral votes of which most pollsters consider to be “safe” for President Obama. Nevada and Iowa are the only swing states it assigns to Obama.

“Based on our forecasting model, it becomes clear that the president is in electoral trouble,” explained Kenneth Bickers, a political science professor at the University of Colorado-Boulder who developed the prediction model with Michael Berry of University of Colorado-Denver.

“The apparent advantage of being a Democratic candidate and holding the White House disappears,” Berry noted, ”when the national unemployment rate hits 5.6 percent. The incumbency advantage enjoyed by President Obama, though statistically significant, is not great enough to offset high rates of unemployment currently experienced in many of the states.”

Bickers said large issues like the economy and the country’s overall direction tend to determine presidential elections. Computerized prediction models “suggest that presidential elections are about big things and the stewardship of the national economy,” he said. “It’s not about gaffes, political commercials or day-to-day campaign tactics. I find that heartening for our democracy.”

Bickers and Berry cautioned, however, that their model used economic data from June, 2012. They intend to update their calculations when new data become available in September.

And many swing states showed close enough to a 50-50 split that factors other than the economy could tilt them in the opposite direction. Bicker and Berry also did not factor in third party candidates, such as Libertarian presidential nominee Gary Johnson, who Public Policy Polling, a Democratic-affiliated polling firm, has noted could significantly diminish Obama’s chances of winning New Mexico.

http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/23/unive ... romney-win
User avatar
Drunk Kennedy
MSX Tour Support Act
Posts: 4191
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:11 am

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by Drunk Kennedy »

romney pulls ahead of obama....47 - 46

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ ... _page.html
User avatar
DEATH ROW JOE
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 20480
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 11:51 pm

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by DEATH ROW JOE »

Drunk Kennedy wrote:The model, the only of its kind to use more than one state-level economic indicator, has correctly predicted the winner of every presidential election since 1980.
Their model is useless since no president since 1980 inherited an economy that looked like this:

Image
Image

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... cking_poll

Monday, August 27, 2012

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Monday shows President Obama attracting support from 47% of voters nationwide, while Mitt Romney earns 44% of the vote. Four percent (4%) prefer some other candidate, and five percent (5%) are undecided.

This is the president’s biggest lead since May.
Last edited by DEATH ROW JOE on Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Drunk Kennedy
MSX Tour Support Act
Posts: 4191
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:11 am

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by Drunk Kennedy »

not quite as pretty and fancy as all your charts 'n stuff...but far more accurate:


Image


:P
User avatar
DEATH ROW JOE
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 20480
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 11:51 pm

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by DEATH ROW JOE »

LMFAO, you're posting something that was posted last week dunce cap. Talk about having your head in the sand.

Image
User avatar
DEATH ROW JOE
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 20480
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 11:51 pm

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by DEATH ROW JOE »

Here you go stupid:

Posted Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:00 pm

Analysis That Has Predicted Every Pres. Winner Since 1980
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=275701
User avatar
Turner Coates
Playing First Stage at SludgeFest
Posts: 42881
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:09 am
Location: Is Everything

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by Turner Coates »

How's old Ron Paul doing? :wink:
Image

I reckon all songs are folk songs. I ain't never heard no horses singing any.
User avatar
Drunk Kennedy
MSX Tour Support Act
Posts: 4191
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:11 am

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by Drunk Kennedy »

i dont give a fuck when, or how many times it was posted ya knucklehead....the point remains the same.

obama is in a world of hurt. romney has closed a 6 pt gap in less than a month.

with ++ $4 gas and ++ 8% unemployment, and close to 40% of eligible voters saying they are just gonna sit this one out (vast majority are dems), you have to be delusional (as you clearly are) to think the results are gonna favor obama.

but you keep on keepin on with your pretty little graphs.

its gonna be awful quiet around here after november.
User avatar
MotleyMaiden
Doing 20 Questions with Metal Sludge
Posts: 5073
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 5:37 pm
Location: on the run

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by MotleyMaiden »

Does that take into account that the latest polls are saying Romney will be getting 0% of the Black vote?

I would also be curious to see numbers on the Latino vote and the women's vote. I don't think he is polling very well with either group.
http://avatars.jurko.net/
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")

Love dogs. Hate Trump supporters
User avatar
Luminiferous
Playing First Stage at SludgeFest
Posts: 29049
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 3:47 pm
Location: OI! Down here mate!

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by Luminiferous »

Fortunately many voters aren't swayed by political crystal balls and predictions machines and also know that a US president has no control over gas prices.
Bush didn't. Obama doesn't.

Gas prices do not effect my voting for a candidate.

Many with eyes and ears also have watched the Republican party do nothing to try and help the situation by meeting in the middle for over 3-1/2 years with a goal of helping America get back on it's feet and have instead made it their main mission to see that Obama doesn't get a second term.
(Taking into account the Obama administration has failed to move more towards the middle that might sway more from the GOP to do so also..)

Republicans, along with Democrats have held the American people hostage for almost 4 years while they have bickered and kicked like a spoiled 2 year olds who didn't get their way and are more worried about who's name is on the amendment for bragging rights, another term and trying to gain majority control over the brain dead minions in the name of helping America...
Image
User avatar
MotleyMaiden
Doing 20 Questions with Metal Sludge
Posts: 5073
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 5:37 pm
Location: on the run

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by MotleyMaiden »

Obama spent the first 2 years bending over for the Republicans and giving them everything they wanted. He was trying so hard to make them like him he practically alienated his own party. I have not figured out why they didn't like him, he did what ever they wanted.

Like I said in that other thread though, they have ALL gotten out of control. The whole damn system is broken. The fact that a senator or congressman can go to Washington upper middle class and come out wealthy is ridiculous. It is also ridiculous that they get a full pension after only one term WITH healthcare. I believe that if they all want to run around and talk about how fantastic the Founding Fathers were and how much we need to be like them then we should go back to how it REALLY was then and make Congress their part time job.
http://avatars.jurko.net/
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")

Love dogs. Hate Trump supporters
User avatar
Luminiferous
Playing First Stage at SludgeFest
Posts: 29049
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 3:47 pm
Location: OI! Down here mate!

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by Luminiferous »

I've never understood why the longest a president may serve is 8 years, but congress and senate have no term limits..
Image
User avatar
MotleyMaiden
Doing 20 Questions with Metal Sludge
Posts: 5073
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 5:37 pm
Location: on the run

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by MotleyMaiden »

Because they are the ones who would have to GIVE themselves term limits and lets face it, none of those fuckers are going to vote themselves out of a job. Hell, the only reason the president has a term limit is because FDR was so popular he got voted in 4 times and that scared them after that and the imposed the 2 term limit. They SHOULD have done the same for themselves. Crooked bastards- all of them.
http://avatars.jurko.net/
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")

Love dogs. Hate Trump supporters
User avatar
SeminiferousButtNoid
Certified Asshole
Posts: 17738
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 6:58 pm
Location: Balls Deep In The Hoopla

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by SeminiferousButtNoid »

I support term limits as well, but the political class is staunchly opposed to it. I mean, can you imagine Maxine Waters campaigning on term limits?

:lol:
GreatWhiteSnake wrote:I'm 46 and my dad's 67 and we kiss each other on the mouth and my 9 yo old son and I do too. It's because we love each other. A lot. And could give a shit what anyone else thinks about us kissing on the mouth.
User avatar
FullMetalWhackit
Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
Posts: 1549
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 7:41 pm

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by FullMetalWhackit »

MotleyMaiden wrote:Does that take into account that the latest polls are saying Romney will be getting 0% of the Black vote?
That was funny. I liked that.
MotleyMaiden wrote:I would also be curious to see numbers on the Latino vote and the women's vote. I don't think he is polling very well with either group.
No he is not. Republicans never do. The woman vote is keeping Obama afloat. Men prefer Romney.
Image

Image
User avatar
DEATH ROW JOE
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 20480
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 11:51 pm

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by DEATH ROW JOE »

FullMetalWhackit wrote:
MotleyMaiden wrote:I would also be curious to see numbers on the Latino vote and the women's vote. I don't think he is polling very well with either group.
No he is not. Republicans never do. The woman vote is keeping Obama afloat. Men prefer Romney.
LMFAO, more like the white male vote is keeping Romney afloat. If Obama had two white parents, Romney would be down about 10 points right now. The racists are keeping Romney in the race at this stage. That's why he keeps lying about Obama getting rid of the welfare work requirement and cracking "birther" jokes. Most of the ads on his website deal with his lie about welfare's work requirement.

Scarborough: Romney welfare ads are "completely false"

Joe Scarborough on Morning Joe today, responding to Mitt Romney's series of TV ads claiming that Barack Obama has gutted welfare reform.

"I've been looking for a week-and-a-half to try to figure out the basis of this welfare reform ad, I've scoured the Wall Street Journal editorial pages, I've scoured.... the ad's completely false. It's just completely false. And I'm pretty stunned."


http://gop12.thehill.com/2012/08/scarbo ... s-are.html


Numbers on Latino votes:

Romney Combined………………..26
Obama Combined………………...65

http://www.latinodecisions.com/files/56 ... week_1.pdf

From that same poll:

Thinking about the last two administrations, which would you say is MOST responsible for the economic downturn these last few years? Would you say the economic policies of President George W. Bush or President Barack Obama are more to blame?
Bush is to blame ...................................................................... 68
Obama is to blame .................................................................. 14
Both are to blame (VOL) ...................................................... 10
Neither / something else ......................................................... 3
Don’t know ................................................................................ 4


Numbers on Women:
Obama 51%
Romney 41%

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/MSNBC/Secti ... _Sched.pdf
User avatar
FullMetalWhackit
Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
Posts: 1549
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 7:41 pm

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by FullMetalWhackit »

Women: Obama +10
Men: Romney +9
Image

Image
User avatar
DEATH ROW JOE
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 20480
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 11:51 pm

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by DEATH ROW JOE »

FullMetalWhackit wrote:Women: Obama +10
Men: Romney +9
What's your point? Romney gets little to no support from black men and only 26% of Latinos support him. Put those numbers together with your number and you see that white males are keeping Romney afloat.

With white males, though, Obama trails Romney by 26 points, 60 to 34 percent, in Pew’s survey. In a Quinnipiac poll released Thursday, the spread is 21, 55 to 34 percent.

Pew poll white males:
Romney 60
Obama 34

Quinnipiac poll white males
Romney 55
Obama 34

Want to know why Santorum is speaking at the convention tonight?

Santorum: "I don't want to make black people's lives better by giving them somebody else's money."

Santorum: I'll Protect Your Tax Dollars From Black People
http://youtu.be/JgLMghcPDVs

Image
User avatar
David_Lee_Halen
Raw Dogged by Hagar
Posts: 10010
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 4:19 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by David_Lee_Halen »

DEATH ROW JOE wrote:
FullMetalWhackit wrote:Women: Obama +10
Men: Romney +9
What's your point? Romney gets little to no support from black men and only 26% of Latinos support him. Put those numbers together with your number and you see that white males are keeping Romney afloat.

With white males, though, Obama trails Romney by 26 points, 60 to 34 percent, in Pew’s survey. In a Quinnipiac poll released Thursday, the spread is 21, 55 to 34 percent.

Pew poll white males:
Romney 60
Obama 34

Quinnipiac poll white males
Romney 55
Obama 34

Want to know why Santorum is speaking at the convention tonight?

Santorum: "I don't want to make black people's lives better by giving them somebody else's money."

Santorum: I'll Protect Your Tax Dollars From Black People
http://youtu.be/JgLMghcPDVs

Image
Fuck! Talk about singling out an entire race on welfare and depicts them as the only people collecting it. That was further proof that anybody can run for President. How fitting that he feels completely comfortable talking like that in a state that hardly has any black people, and how comfortable they are standing next to a candidate that is a walking talking example of ignorance that they applaud his words. That pic also further depicts how many stupid people we have here and how fucked we are compared to the other first world industrialized nations in the near future.
Image
User avatar
FullMetalWhackit
Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
Posts: 1549
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 7:41 pm

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by FullMetalWhackit »

Interestingly men make up the majority of the remaining undecided vote. No word yet on their skin color. 8)
Last edited by FullMetalWhackit on Tue Aug 28, 2012 5:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Image
User avatar
brotherplanet
Show Me Your Dick
Posts: 7556
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 5:31 pm

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by brotherplanet »

Drunk Kennedy wrote:not quite as pretty and fancy as all your charts 'n stuff...but far more accurate:


Image

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
Bourbon Cowboy
Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
Posts: 1825
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 9:50 pm
Location: Bottom of the bottle

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by Bourbon Cowboy »

Image
muppet butt wrote:You're an idiot if you think he has the ability to ban me.
User avatar
Moggio
MSX Tour Support Act
Posts: 4369
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 7:56 pm
Location: Where there are NO differences between ninth chords...

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by Moggio »

brotherplanet wrote:
Drunk Kennedy wrote:not quite as pretty and fancy as all your charts 'n stuff...but far more accurate:


Image

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!
Bourbon Cowboy wrote:Image
:lol: :lol: :lol:
ONE NATION UNDER SOCIALISM

Image

Because of Obamination's spending & socialist BS, America and much of the world will endure one of the worst depressions in history in 5...4...3...2...
User avatar
brotherplanet
Show Me Your Dick
Posts: 7556
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 5:31 pm

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by brotherplanet »

MotleyMaiden wrote:Obama spent the first 2 years bending over for the Republicans and giving them everything they wanted. He was trying so hard to make them like him he practically alienated his own party. I have not figured out why they didn't like him, he did what ever they wanted.
Clinton started doing the exact same thing after the Republican Revolution. In fact he actually worked really well with Congress when his own party wasn't in charge.

Yet, they still hated him. He had a great quote. "They will never forgive me for winning."
Dr J Jones
Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
Posts: 1751
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 5:46 pm

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by Dr J Jones »

Wheresthestagemanager? wrote:How's old Ron Paul doing? :wink:

Better question....
How's the economy doing?
User avatar
Danzig in the Dark
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 21595
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 4:39 pm

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by Danzig in the Dark »

Dr J Jones wrote:
Wheresthestagemanager? wrote:How's old Ron Paul doing? :wink:

Better question....
How's the economy doing?
It's slowly picking up. Thanks for asking.
ImageImage
Dr J Jones
Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
Posts: 1751
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 5:46 pm

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by Dr J Jones »

That's not good enough Sorry..

I have higher expectations than that.
User avatar
Danzig in the Dark
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 21595
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 4:39 pm

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by Danzig in the Dark »

Image
ImageImage
User avatar
Landshark2000
Headlining a Theater Tour
Posts: 6179
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 5:34 pm
Location: In A Glass Case Of Emotion ...

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by Landshark2000 »

SeminiferousButtNoid wrote:I support term limits as well, but the political class is staunchly opposed to it. I mean, can you imagine Maxine Waters campaigning on term limits?

:lol:
Can you imagine Maxine Waters having a real job, where civility, intelligence and professionalism is required? She's a fucking idiot, along with a large number of the Congress & Senate.
Image
IDIAMINDADA wrote:Take your child, and leave him in the woods....he has a better chance being raised by a pack of homosexual squirrels.
User avatar
Skate4RnR
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 16520
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 12:42 pm
Location: Kuruksetra

Re: Not Looking Good For Obama....

Post by Skate4RnR »

SeminiferousButtNoid wrote:I support term limits as well, but the political class is staunchly opposed to it. I mean, can you imagine Maxine Waters campaigning on term limits?

:lol:
Clarence Thomas and the other justices should adhere to term limits as well. So much pussay, so little time.
ImageImageImage
Post Reply