Ron Paul In 1998 John Birch Documentary

[Turner Coates]

http://www.osborneink.com/2011/12/morni ... er-bs.html

[DEATH ROW JOE]

Good find. Ron Paul gets his "end the fed" crap from the anti-Semitic John Birch society. It's a conspiracy of Jew bankers.

The John Birch Society advocates abolishing the Federal Reserve.
http://www.jbs.org/issues-pages/federal-reserve

[Moggio]

That doesn't mean that Ron Paul got his idea to "End The Fed" from The John Birch Society. And good luck PROVING they're "anti-Semitic", racist or whatever other completely false accusations your throw at them...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Birch_Society

You two are such dumb-shits.

[Turner Coates]

That doesn't mean that Ron Paul got his idea to "End The Fed" from The John Birch Society. And good luck PROVING they're "anti-Semitic", racist or whatever other completely false accusations your throw at them...

Yikes!
Whoo boy.

[DEATH ROW JOE]

That doesn't mean that Ron Paul got his idea to "End The Fed" from The John Birch Society.

LMFAO @ Moggio. Explain how Ron Paul's argument for ending the Fed is different than the John Birch society's argument for ending the Fed. The arguments are the same and John Birch made them first. Ron Paul copied them.

"Ron Paul may not be a member of the John Birch Society, but you need a micrometer to tell them apart," says Chip Berlet, a senior analyst at Political Research Associates who's been tracking the JBS and other right wing groups for years.

And good luck PROVING they're "anti-Semitic", racist or whatever other completely false accusations your throw at them...

Easy.

"The Birch Society promoted the book None Dare Call It Conspiracy by Gary Allen who included a dubious discussion of the Rothschilds and other Jewish banking interests as part of a sketch of a much larger conspiracy involving financial and political elites and the Council on Foreign Relations. "

Gary Allen:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Allen
He was a prominent member of the John Birch Society, of which he was a spokesman. He also was the speech writer for George Wallace during the Alabama Governor Presidential campaigns

George Wallace
"In the name of the greatest people that have ever trod this earth, I draw the line in the dust and toss the gauntlet before the feet of tyranny, and I say segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever"

==========
Product Review of None Dare Call It Conspiracy by Gary Allen:
http://www.amazon.com/None-Dare-Call-It ... eNumber=10
Gary Allen's book, None Dare Call It Conspiracy, utilizes anti-Semitic themes and sources. Some details follow.

In Chapter 3 "The Money Manipulators", Jewish bankers are given substantial attention. The Rothschilds, Schiffs, and Warburgs plus the firm of Kuhn, Loeb and Co. are depicted as part of the powerful and prominent evil-doers who are part of the conspiracy to create wars, depressions, and other sinister manipulations.

Among Allen's lies--which can only be found in anti-Semitic literature.

1. "The Warburgs, part of the Rothschild empire, helped finance Adolph Hitler."

[In Chapter 5, Allen says that the financing of Hitler "was handled through the Warburg-controlled Mendelsohn Bank of Amsterdam..." He cites 2 sources on page 85 for this assertion. However, neither source says anything about the Warburgs having helped finance Hitler and neither source mentions any role played by the Mendelsohn Bank of Amsterdam.]

2. In Chapter 3, Allen exhumes the charges made by Father Charles
Coughlin, Eustace Mullins, and Dearborn Independent articles, that the Federal Reserve System was a scheme by international bankers, led by Paul Warburg of Kuhn, Loeb and Co. to gain control of the nation's economy. This theme has always been pre-eminent in anti-Semitic diatribes about the "Jewish plan for world control"

3. In Chapter 4, "Bankrolling the Bolshevik Revolution" Allen revives a lie originated by Czarist propagandists at the end of World War I - that Jewish bankers, especially Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb and Co., financed the Bolshevik takeover in Russia. This lie was first published in the Dearborn Independent in their series of articles entitled The International Jew. For more on the articles

HISTORICAL NOTE: After the Bolshevik ascension to power in 1917, emigre Czarists and White Russians disseminated the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion in Germany, France, Great Britain and the United States. These folks sought to restore the Romanovs by "proving" that the Bolshevik Revolution was a Jewish plot for world domination as described in The Protocols.

In the United States, the introduction of The Protocols came as a result of the endeavors of Boris Brasol, a Czarist agent who remained in the U.S. after the Revolution. [At one time, Brasol headed the Czarist Secret Police].

Brasol is responsible for providing an English language version of The Protocols to Henry Ford which led to the Dearborn Independent articles. In a 1921 letter to Maj. Gen. Count Sherep-Spiridovich, Brasol wrote:

"Within the last year I have written three books, two of which have done the Jews more injury than would have been done to them by ten progroms."

Brasol vouched for the authenticity of The Protocols to the American Defense Society and he induced them to distribute
copies.

A May 1941 FBI memo for U.S. Assistant Attorney General Wendell Berge described Brasol as: "extremely mercenary" and "responsible for many of the anti-Jewish protocols published in the U.S. and (he) is violently anti-Semitic."

Father Charles Coughlin serialized The Protocols in his weekly newspaper, Social Justice. Allen cites Social Justice on page 66 of NDCIC as a reliable source of info.

4. To support his lie about Jewish bankers financing Bolshevism, Allen relies heavily on a 1931 book authored by anti-Jewish White Russian, Arsene de Goulevitch. The book, Czarism and Revolution, was subsequently translated into English and published by Omni Publications of Hawthorne CA -- a one-man bookselling operation which catered to anyone seeking anti-Jewish publications.

In the preface to his book, De Goulevitch refers to the "Polish and Jewish problems" which existed in Czarist Russia and the amazing ability of the Jews for propaganda".

Gary Allen described this book "as one of the best sources of information on the financing of the Bolshevik Revolution."

DeGoulevitch cites as one of his authorities, none other than the aforementioned Boris Brasol!

Another authority cited by DeGoulevitch was General Alexander Nechvolodov, who in 1924 published, in France, a book which included the full text of The Protocols with approving commentaries.

5. Anti-semites use any scrap of evidence to associate Jews with
prominent Bolsheviks and they don't especially care if the evidence is accurate so long as it conveys adverse innuendos or statements.

For example, DeGoulevitch quotes General Nechvolodov's statement that Leon Trotsky was married to a Jewish woman whose father (Jivotovsky) was among those (along with Schiff, Warburg et al) who were responsible for financing Leon Trotsky. In reality, Trotsky married twice but he never married any woman whose name was Jivotovsky.

6. Allen again cites DeGoulevitch as the source for a statement that another "important financier" of the Bolshevik Revolution was "an extremely wealthy Englishman named Lord Alfred Milner...".

According to Allen, DeGoulevitch discovered that Milner spent over 21 million rubles to finance the Russian Revolution. Historian, Dr. Carroll Quigley, responded to Allen's assertion as follows:

"Allen's statements about Milner are almost all wrong. He was not a rich man at all...He was never a millionaire...It is nonsense to say, as Allen does, that he wanted a revolution in Russia in 1917 and gave 21 million rubles to finance it...I have been through the greater part of Milner's private papers and have found no evidence to support Allen's statements about his connection with the revolution in Russia...He was not linked in any way with the Rothschilds, as Allen says..."

7. On page 69, Allen writes: "According to the New York Journal-American of February 3, 1949: 'Today, it is estimated by Jacob's grandson, John Schiff, that the old man sank about 20,000,000 dollars for the final triumph of Bolshevism in Russia.'"

The quotation is actually from a society gossip column by
pseudonym "Cholly Knickerbocker" !!

8. Allen cites Dr. Carroll Quigley's 1966 book, Tragedy and Hope as a source for his comments about the role of "international bankers" in working toward a socialist superstate under the auspices of the UN.

When advised that Allen used him as a source, Quigley observed:

"Allen's book is full of factual errors...and is flatly wrong in his statements that my book supports his version of history...I may be correct or I may be mistaken but I certainly did not say what Allen pretends that I said...Allen not only selects evidence to prove a case, but also concocts evidence if necessary" ...

Here is another Quigley comment on Gary Allen and W. Cleon Skousen -- both of whom cite Quigley's book as "evidence" for their right-wing conspiratorial arguments. This Quigley comment came in response to assertions made by Gary Allen during a debate in which Quigley and Allen participated together. A question was asked concerning Gary Allen and W. Cleon Skousen's interpretation of Quigley's research:

"For example, they constantly misquote me to this effect: that Lord Milner (the dominant trustee of the Cecil Rhodes Trust and a heavy in the Round Table Group) helped finance the Bolsheviks. I have been through the greater part of Milner's private papers and have found no evidence to support that. Further, None Dare Call It Conspiracy insists that international bankers were a single bloc, were all-powerful and remain so today. I, on the contrary, stated in my book that they were much divided, often fought among themselves, had great influence but not control of political life and were sharply reduced in power about 1931-1940, when they became less influential than monopolized industry."

Incidentally, Gary Allen is quoted a Washington Post interview as confirming that he never contacted Quigley to discuss his book or to ask Quigley questions.

This is indicative of the quality of mind and "research" employed by conspiracy theorists.

Gary Allen (who had a degree in history from Stanford University!) never did any seminal research of his own.

For example: he never investigated Milner's private papers, nor anyone elses! He also didn't even think it necessary to make inquiries of Quigley---his MAJOR information source!

William Loeb, the ultra-conservative publisher of the
Manchester NH Union-Leader, ran an editorial in his paper wherein he described Gary Allen's book as "anti-Semitic nonsense".

The conservative newspaper, Human Events, refused to accept advertising for Allen's book as did the ultraconservative Church League of America.

Perhaps the most enthusiastic endorsements and promotion of all of Allen's books came from the John Birch Society (JBS).

In view of Gary Allen's close association with the JBS (he was their most prolific author and contributor to JBS publications), readers might like to review what J. Edgar Hoover and the FBI thought about the JBS and its conspiracy arguments.

[EvilRockPosh]

And good luck PROVING they're "anti-Semitic", racist or whatever other completely false accusations your throw at them...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Birch_Society

You two are such dumb-shits.

Are you fucking kidding me?

Are you completely unaware of these people (besides wikipedia ) and defending them for no reason other than the Ron Paul connection? Or are you actually a racist?

[Turner Coates]

And good luck PROVING they're "anti-Semitic", racist or whatever other completely false accusations your throw at them...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Birch_Society

You two are such dumb-shits.

Are you fucking kidding me?

Are you completely unaware of these people (besides wikipedia ) and defending them for no reason other than the Ron Paul connection? Or are you actually a racist?

He's unaware. He's not hip to popular culture....at ALL.
But he'll argue counterpoint till his brain gets sore.
Even if evidence is provided, he can't back down or admit a mistake.
That's his Achilles' heel.

[Moggio]

ONE. MORE. TIME. FOR. THE WORLD.:

That doesn't mean that Ron Paul got his idea to "End The Fed" from The John Birch Society. And good luck PROVING they're "anti-Semitic", racist or whatever other completely false accusations your throw at them...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Birch_Society

You two are such dumb-shits.

Also, Gary Allen WAS a member of the John Birch Society...DECADES ago. Secondly, you need to do research on George Wallace, especially about his life in the late '70s:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Wallace


Btw, once you morons figure out the difference between tolerance and endorsement, let me know...

[Turner Coates]

ONE. MORE. TIME. FOR. THE WORLD.:

That doesn't mean that Ron Paul got his idea to "End The Fed" from The John Birch Society. And good luck PROVING they're "anti-Semitic", racist or whatever other completely false accusations your throw at them...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Birch_Society


Also, Gary Allen WAS a member of the John Birch Society...DECADES ago. Secondly, you need to do research on George Wallace, especially about his life in the late '70s:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Wallace

Btw, once you morons figure out the difference between tolerance and endorsement, let me know...

George Wallace quotes:

"I draw the line in the dust and toss the gauntlet before the feet of tyranny, and I say segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever."

"If any demonstrator ever lays down in front of my car, it'll be the last car he'll ever lay down in front of."

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/autho ... llace.html

"A racist is one who despises someone because of his color, and an Alabama segregationist is one who conscientiously believes that it is in the best interest of Negro and white to have a separate education and social order."

"I don't expect people to forget my brash words or deeds. But I ask that they try to remember the actions that I took that were designed to help them."

http://www.learningfromlyrics.org/wallace.html

[Turner Coates]

http://redroom.com/member/steven-robert ... -wallace-0

Alabama Governor, George Wallace standing, defiantly, at the door of the University of Alabama, challenging the Feds to allow African Americans to enter the building to register for classes.


In 1954 the U.S. Supreme Court called for an end to segregation in public schools in their ruling via Brown vs. The Board of Education. A year later Rosa Parks was arrested in Montgomery. Alabama's reaction was to outlaw the NAACP. When the Supreme Court ruled that buses must be integrated, Wallace found his moderate views to be out of step with the electorate. In 1958, incumbent John Patterson defeated him in Alabama's Democrat gubernatorial primary. Republicans were virtually non-existent in the Jim Crow South, a fact not unnoticed by two young citizens of the region at that time, Condoleeza Rice and Clarence Thomas.

The Klan backed Patterson while Wallace spoke out against the KKK, even after they offered its support. The "outlawed" NAACP endorsed Wallace. He lost by more than 64,000 votes. His infamous post-mortem was, "I'll never be out-niggered again."

In 1959 Wallace re-invented himself as a hardcore segregationist, refused to cooperate with the Civil Rights Commission designed to investigate voting rights abuses, and opposed Eisenhower's Federal attempts at reform. He surrendered local voting records to avoid jail time, but only after making his point.

In 1961, Janie Lee, the Wallace's fourth child, was born. She was named after Confederate General Robert E. Lee. A year later, running as a pro-segregation, pro-states' rights candidate, Wallace was elected Governor of Alabama by a landslide. His inaugural speech vaulted him into the national spotlight and infamy. Asa Carter, the founder of a KKK terrorist organization, wrote his "segregation now, segregation forever" speech.

[Moggio]

ONE. MORE. TIME. FOR. THE. WORLD.:

You need to do research on George Wallace, especially about his life in the late '70s:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Wallace

In the late 1970s, Wallace announced that he was a born-again Christian and apologized to black civil rights leaders for his earlier segregationist positions. He said that while he had once sought power and glory, he realized he needed to seek love and forgiveness.[note 3] In 1979, Wallace said of his stand in the schoolhouse door: "I was wrong. Those days are over, and they ought to be over."

[Turner Coates]

ONE. MORE. TIME. FOR. THE. WORLD.:

You need to do research on George Wallace, especially about his life in the late '70s:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Wallace

In the late 1970s, Wallace announced that he was a born-again Christian and apologized to black civil rights leaders for his earlier segregationist positions. He said that while he had once sought power and glory, he realized he needed to seek love and forgiveness.[note 3] In 1979, Wallace said of his stand in the schoolhouse door: "I was wrong. Those days are over, and they ought to be over."

His apology does not correct the wrongs he committed, just as the apologies given by various politicians and evangelists such as Jerry Fallwell do not correct their wrongdoings. It's just not that simple. Claiming to be "born again" doesn't change what he did. Wallace's actions resulted in the beatings (and worse) of many Black citizens.
Wallace apologized when he decided he wanted to run for President.
Nice try, but Wallace was a racist. He was not forgiven by the American public at large. He remains one of the most hated politicians in my country's history.
Ask any Black American who lived through those times what they think of the man you are lamely attempting to defend.
David Duke, of the KKK also attempted to reinvent himself when he decided to run for president.
You'll never replicate the experience of living through those times by cutting and pasting from wikipedia.
If someone beat the shit out of you, denied you the right to enter schools and businesses for many years, then said "I found Jesus and I'm sorry", I seriously doubt that you would consider their crimes totally forgiven.
As I said, it's just not that simple.

[Moggio]

ONE. MORE. TIME. FOR. THE. WORLD.:

You need to do research on George Wallace, especially about his life in the late '70s:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Wallace

In the late 1970s, Wallace announced that he was a born-again Christian and apologized to black civil rights leaders for his earlier segregationist positions. He said that while he had once sought power and glory, he realized he needed to seek love and forgiveness.[note 3] In 1979, Wallace said of his stand in the schoolhouse door: "I was wrong. Those days are over, and they ought to be over."

His apology does not correct the wrongs he committed, just as the apologies given by various politicians and evangelists such as Jerry Fallwell do not correct their wrongdoings. It's just not that simple. Claiming to be "born again" doesn't change what he did. Wallace's actions resulted in the beatings (and worse) of many Black citizens.
Wallace apologized when he decided he wanted to run for President.
Nice try, but Wallace was a racist. He was not forgiven by the American public at large. He remains one of the most hated politicians in my country's history.
Ask any Black American who lived through those times what they think of the man you are lamely attempting to defend.
David Duke, of the KKK also attempted to reinvent himself when he decided to run for president.
You'll never replicate the experience of living through those times by cutting and pasting from wikipedia.
If someone beat the shit out of you, denied you the right to enter schools and businesses for many years, then said "I found Jesus and I'm sorry", I seriously doubt that you would consider their crimes totally forgiven.
As I said, it's just not that simple.

Of course it doesn't "change" what he did, moron. But he DID apparently amend his ways. Which was the point of my post. Not defending him. Just sayin'...

[Turner Coates]

Gee, thanks, Capt. Obvious. My original links to Wallace quotes contain the same information you think you just discovered.
Since you're "just sayin'", I guess your trying to explain away Ron Paul's connection to racist individuals and organizations is null and void.
.................................
ONCE. MORE. FOR. THE. WORLD.
Ron Paul is a racist, and thankfully he'll never be the leader of the U.S.
You should choose your heroes more carefully. You should also study the history of this country more carefully before you try to pontificate on a subject you know very little about.

[Moggio]

Gee, thanks, Capt. Obvious. My original links to Wallace quotes contain the same information you think you just discovered.
Since you're "just sayin'", I guess your trying to explain away Ron Paul's connection to racist individuals and organizations is null and void.
.................................
ONCE. MORE. FOR. THE. WORLD.
Ron Paul is a racist, and thankfully he'll never be the leader of the U.S.
You should choose your heroes more carefully. You should also study the history of this country more carefully before you try to pontificate on a subject you know very little about.

So, first of all you call me Capt. Obvious for HAVING to point out the OBVIOUS to YOU. Then, you try and make it seem like you're the one who pointed out that Wallace amended his ways, despite the FACT I was the one who did that. Then, you state Ron Paul is connected to racist individuals and organizations, despite the FACT he isn't. Then you accuse me of pontificating the history of the US, despite FACT that I wasn't and I really was only stating an opinion that I believe Ron Paul has PROBABLY championed the US constitution more than almost ANYONE. Then, you claim I know very little about the subject, yet you STILL haven't provided a convincing argument to the contrary.

ONE. MORE. TIME. FOR. THE. WORLD.:

You cannot PROVE Ron Paul is a racist.

[Turner Coates]

Gee, thanks, Capt. Obvious. My original links to Wallace quotes contain the same information you think you just discovered.
Since you're "just sayin'", I guess your trying to explain away Ron Paul's connection to racist individuals and organizations is null and void.
.................................
ONCE. MORE. FOR. THE. WORLD.
Ron Paul is a racist, and thankfully he'll never be the leader of the U.S.
You should choose your heroes more carefully. You should also study the history of this country more carefully before you try to pontificate on a subject you know very little about.

So, first of all you call me Capt. Obvious for HAVING to point out the OBVIOUS to YOU. Then, you try and make it seem like you're the one who pointed out that Wallace amended his ways, despite the FACT I was the one who did that. Then, you state Ron Paul is connected to racist individuals and organizations, despite the FACT he isn't. Then you accuse me of pontificating the history of the US, despite FACT that I wasn't and I really was only stating an opinion that I believe Ron Paul has PROBABLY championed the US constitution more than almost ANYONE. Then, you claim I know very little about the subject, yet you STILL haven't provided a convincing argument to the contrary.

ONE. MORE. TIME. FOR. THE. WORLD.:

You cannot PROVE Ron Paul is a racist.

Wow. You sure are wound up when you get home from your shift at Burger Doodle.
Take a chill pill.

[EvilRockPosh]

Fucking idiot

[Turner Coates]

[Moggio]

Wow. You sure are wound up when you get home from your shift at Burger Doodle.
Take a chill pill.

I'm not wound up, nor do I work in fast food restaurants, jerk-off. But I see you response time is usually only MINUTES after most of my posts, no-lifer. And I'm relaxed most of the time, especially when I'm OWNING you.

Provide a link to this supposed Ron Paul "quote" that supposedly states, "There clearly is no right to privacy nor sodomy found anywhere in the Constitution..." and place it in the RIGHT context, asshole.

Btw, at least 50% of RP supporters are Democrats and Independents, genius.

Fucking idiot

Just STFU already.

[Turner Coates]

Wow. You sure are wound up when you get home from your shift at Burger Doodle.
Take a chill pill.

I'm not wound up, nor do I work in fast food restaurants, jerk-off. And I'm relaxed most of the time, especially when I'm OWNING you.

Nonsense. anyone can see that I get you wound up tighter than a cheap pocket watch.
Your many meltdowns attest to that.



http://www.loop21.com/top-5-racist-ron- ... newsletter

The Ron Paul Political Report newsletter stated the public should bear arms to protect themselves against carjackings by “urban youth who play whites like pianos.” Note that the terms “black” or “African American” aren’t used in this newsletter sample. However, the racially coded term “urban” and reference to “whites” makes it easy for the reader to ascertain what skin color the youth in question have. The newsletter, written in the first-person, continued on this topic with the following assertion: “I’ve urged everyone in my family to know how to use a gun in self-defense. For the animals are coming.” Now these animal wouldn’t be blacks, would they?

In another newsletter, Paul described most black men in Washington, D.C., as “semi-criminal or entirely criminal.”

Talking Points Memo reported that in December 1990, Paul suggested that the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. sexually molested girls and boys, remarking: “And we are supposed to honor this ‘Christian minister’ and lying socialist with a holiday that puts him on par with George Washington?”

In a 1993 Ron Paul Survival Report newsletter, alarm was raised about “The Disappearing White Majority.” The newsletter referenced the growing birth rate of people of color and expressed a pro-segregation stance with this comment: “It is human nature that like attracts likes. But whites are not allowed to express this same human impulse. Except in a de facto sense, there can be no white schools, white clubs, or white neighborhoods. The political system demands white integration, while allowing black segregation.”

In May 2011, Paul told MSNBC that he would have voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which ended Jim Crow. He questioned the act because it took authority away from property owners. Evidently, Paul values the rights of racist property owners over those of African Americans whose housing, employment, schooling and leisure activities were all dictated by Jim Crow.

[Moggio]

Wow. You sure are wound up when you get home from your shift at Burger Doodle.
Take a chill pill.

I'm not wound up, nor do I work in fast food restaurants, jerk-off. And I'm relaxed most of the time, especially when I'm OWNING you.

Nonsense. anyone can see that I get you wound up tighter than a cheap pocket watch.
Your many meltdowns attest to that.

Nope. I'm calm. But you STILL don't know what an OWN is. And if you seriously think you've OWNED anyone here, you need to be committed.

http://www.loop21.com/top-5-racist-ron- ... newsletter

The Ron Paul Political Report newsletter stated the public should bear arms to protect themselves against carjackings by “urban youth who play whites like pianos.” Note that the terms “black” or “African American” aren’t used in this newsletter sample. However, the racially coded term “urban” and reference to “whites” makes it easy for the reader to ascertain what skin color the youth in question have. The newsletter, written in the first-person, continued on this topic with the following assertion: “I’ve urged everyone in my family to know how to use a gun in self-defense. For the animals are coming.” Now these animal wouldn’t be blacks, would they?

In another newsletter, Paul described most black men in Washington, D.C., as “semi-criminal or entirely criminal.”

Talking Points Memo reported that in December 1990, Paul suggested that the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. sexually molested girls and boys, remarking: “And we are supposed to honor this ‘Christian minister’ and lying socialist with a holiday that puts him on par with George Washington?”

In a 1993 Ron Paul Survival Report newsletter, alarm was raised about “The Disappearing White Majority.” The newsletter referenced the growing birth rate of people of color and expressed a pro-segregation stance with this comment: “It is human nature that like attracts likes. But whites are not allowed to express this same human impulse. Except in a de facto sense, there can be no white schools, white clubs, or white neighborhoods. The political system demands white integration, while allowing black segregation.”

In May 2011, Paul told MSNBC that he would have voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which ended Jim Crow. He questioned the act because it took authority away from property owners. Evidently, Paul values the rights of racist property owners over those of African Americans whose housing, employment, schooling and leisure activities were all dictated by Jim Crow.

Accusations that Ron Paul wrote the racist parts in question in those newsletters have already been DISPROVEN. Also, the property rights issues RP had with the 40th Anniversary of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is regarding ALL property rights, not just white ones. Apparently, you haven't read this thread, moron:

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=274729

[Moggio]

So you admit that there was blatant racism in Ron Paul's newsletters?

You should try reading these boards. It helps...