Page 1 of 1
74k people now employed!!!
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 12:23 pm
by brotherplanet
Re: 74k people now employed!!!
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 12:35 pm
by DEATH ROW JOE
Congratulations on continuing to confirm that you're a moron. Private payroll jobs grew 2% this past year. Since 2001, +2% growth in private payrolls from Dec to Dec has only happened 4 times, 3 of them under Obama.

Re: 74k people now employed!!!
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 12:39 pm
by KAOS
DEATH ROW JOE wrote:Congratulations on continuing to confirm that you're a moron. Private payroll jobs grew 2% this past year. Since 2001, +2% growth in private payrolls from Dec to Dec has only happened 4 times, 3 of them under Obama.

BOOM!
Re: 74k people now employed!!!
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 5:41 pm
by Danzig in the Dark
As DRJ already schooled you, I've nothing to add.
brotherplanet wrote:The foreign press is reporting that Michele is sick of him too. Not sure if that's true
Lookie... Michele now knows how Obama makes all those unemployed Americans feel....
Miserable.

By foreign press, you mean the 6th most visited newspaper website in Nigeria, the Osun Defender?
Their source? An exclusive from the hard hitting icon of journalistic integrity, the National Enquirer.
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/celebri ... e-explodes
Re: 74k people now employed!!!
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 7:25 am
by tin00can
"Some people say..."
Re: 74k people now employed!!!
Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2014 4:26 pm
by Rainbow Bright
Too bad it's mostly McJobs. Then again, par for the course for a country where most of its citizens are working...McJobs.
Re: 74k people now employed!!!
Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2014 1:54 am
by BlackCrypt
Rainbow Bright wrote:Too bad it's mostly McJobs. Then again, par for the course for a country where most of its citizens are working...McJobs.
Kinda sad isn't it? Those who had one full time job are now looking for at least 3 part time jobs to make the same wage.
Guess that is one way to get the employment numbers up!
Re: 74k people now employed!!!
Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2014 2:02 am
by BlackCrypt
Those people on the left never want to reference the Labor Participation Rate in the numbers either.
http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000
That shit is dropping faster than support of Chris Christie!
Re: 74k people now employed!!!
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 9:50 am
by Stoner
A lot of people don't have to stay in shitty jobs just for healthcare anymore, but nobody on the right wants to talk about that either.
Re: 74k people now employed!!!
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 10:19 am
by killeverything
Stoner wrote:A lot of people don't have to stay in shitty jobs just for healthcare anymore, but nobody on the right wants to talk about that either.
That's because Obama's still black.
Re: 74k people now employed!!!
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2014 8:04 am
by DEATH ROW JOE
BlackCrypt wrote:Those people on the left never want to reference the Labor Participation Rate in the numbers either.
http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000
That shit is dropping faster than support of Chris Christie!
It's been addressed a dozen times. The number of workers not in the labor force because they are discouraged has fallen 33% since Jan 2011. It rose 200% due to Bush's recession. The decline in the labor force this past year from 63.6% to 63% is entirely due to demographics.
participation rate is labor force/Civilian Noninstitutional Population
During the Bush presidency the ratio between private payroll jobs and population fell 10%. There were ZERO jobs added to the private sector under Bush. Workers became extremely discouraged and dropped out of the labor force The number of discouraged workers tripled due to the Bush recession. The number of discouraged workers has fallen by 1/3 since Jan 2011.
The labor force participation rate peaked in 2000. Since that time the % of the workforce at retirement age but
who are still part of the Civilian Noninstitutional Population has increased.
Labor force, population and payroll jobs
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/?g=s1c
Discouraged workers
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/?g=s1d
Demographics
http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/ ... force.html
