JakeYonkel wrote:I know it's early for the annual prediction threads but my take on the two aforementioned teams...
As for Oakland, I agree that their pitching staff is a mess. Duchsherer threw a lot of innings last year after never being a starter before. After that, what do they have? A bunch of young, unproven guys. No shot that all of them pan out - it never happens. Their bullpen should be OK, OAK usually puts together a good 'pen. They are 100x better offensively than last year, now with a middle of the order including Holliday, Giambi, O-Cab, maybe a healthy Eric Chavez (but probably not). Hard not to like the improvements they've made but they've made no effort to shore up the pitching staff. That could hurt.
On the LAA side... pitching is a wash from last year. Fuentes is an IMPROVEMENT over K-Rod, who really isn't that great anyway. Their setup men are top notch, and Lackey/Weaver/Santana/Saunders looks good to me. Offensively I don't really know what to make of them. Vlad seems to be sliding as his body breaks down. They've got like 12 outfielders. Abreu will have a nice year, Figgins is a nice player too. Morales is a question mark but doesn't seem to have as much power as you're projecting, Tin. I think 12-15 homers is more likely.
Seattle has made improvements. Really the only team in the division with pitching worth half a shit is LA, so I figure they'll be there at the end. But I could see Oakland pushing a bit if things fall right as far as their pitching goes.
Fair enough. I said he COULD hit over 20 HR and it wouldn't surprise me. I'm expecting about 17-20, but some people I know who are close to the team say he is really expected to break out this year. It's been a long time since the Angels have produced a power hitter, so I'm hopeful.