[quote="amouthfulofsin220"]When I first became a fan, I was told to "not mention loving 'The Fragile' to his face" if I ever met him in a M&G, etc. Does that record really leave such a bitter taste in his mouth?
He must've expected people to be a bit perplexed by it, since it was so very different from everything he'd done before - it calls into question whether he wanted to confuse or piss off his fans, change fanbases...or maybe even self-destruct. Why else take such a huge risk?
He was so glossy and self-aware during the height of his fame in the mid-90's, but after 98 he started to look cowed. Was it just another facet of his carefully engineered persona, or was he really overwhelmed?
Did it take him that long because he was insecure artistically, or because he was fucking around too much? If so, I hope his long, lazy days cycling around NOLA and picking up swamprats and 'models' were worth it.[/quote]
He was giving interviews at the time announcing that people expected him to "save music". He set himself up for the fall he took. Arrogance comes with it's own rewards. He more than had it coming.
Fragile should have been a streamlined single album. Way too much pretentious filler. On the other hand, without the second disc, it probably wouldn't have gone gold since each disc counts in terms of sales. If TR doesn't appreciate people mentioning his album to him, it's probably because it was & continues to be a major humiliation for him. His PR people spent years carefully putting together a phony persona for him of tortured musical genius. A persona he bought into 150%. The Fragile took a HUGE chink out of that persona. It's really hard to look like a genius when you spend over five years & millions (and I mean MILLIONS) of dollars putting together a double album that doesn't even begin to sell enough to pay it's excessive production costs. It simply was not commercial. At all. No singles. No "Closer" to thrill the middle school kids with "Fuck you like an animal" . So it sank like a stone. His image, his reputation never recovered from that. He knows it. For all of his (hilarious to me) posturing about the record companies & how he's above all of that, who needs them, blah blah blah he's simply not attractive to the large companies & the smaller, boutique companies who would love to have his name on their label, can't afford to take on his debts & his lavish spending on inferior product such as HTDA that don't sell. That's record business 101.
Bottom line is always money money money money.
{quote: vladtapes} He has always been a nasty humanbeing.... the Nola days, what he has down to many people he has worked with ( Vierna, Clouser etc)
Absolutely 100% correct.
{Anyone know the story with Richard Patrick?}
Yes. Rich had the nerve not to want to spend his life as "Nine Inch Nails IS Trent Reznor". Shame on him. After all, Trent is a musical genius. Something like that. Just ask him. He's fabulous. Really. And he owes nothing to anybody. He does it ALL himself.
Rich is a good guy.