Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Danzig in the Dark · Post by **Danzig in the Dark** » Fri Aug 17, 2012 4:31 pm

brotherplanet wrote:
Danzig in the Dark wrote:Ron Paul supporters believe that Romney and Obama are corporate whores and tools of Wall Street because they are major financial backers of both parties, yet Paul is somehow not corrupted by his White Power backers.

You don't even have to know who Ron Paul is to know that Romney and Obama are corporate whores and tools of Wall Street.

I rank Nazis and Klansmen as worse than bankers and businessmen. That you don't says much about you.

Turner Coates · Post by **Turner Coates** » Fri Aug 17, 2012 5:11 pm

Ron Paul Endorsed By Former KKK Grand Wizard

http://www.bilerico.com/2012/01/ron_pau ... leader.php

Moggio · Post by **Moggio** » Sat Aug 18, 2012 4:07 pm

Wheresthestagemanager? wrote:
Moggio wrote: Provide actual links to where these supposed "quotes" came from or SHUT THE FUCK UP.
Request denied, you blowhard.

Thanks for showing us you're clearly FULL OF SHIT.

ralphwiggumsdealer wrote:
Moggio wrote: Provide actual links to where these supposed "quotes" came from or SHUT THE FUCK UP.

Moggio wrote: There's PLENTY of compelling evidence and proof. But do you really expect me to hold your hand and help you through the overwhelming amount of it? Google.com is your friend. Look into it...

Nice OUT OF CONTEXT quote post, shithead. The second quote had strictly to do with voter fraud and the abundance of evidence of it easily found online. I'VE PROVEN ALL MY POINTS. You're almost as manipulative as DEATH ROW JOE.

Wheresthestagemanager? wrote:John Birch Society Aug 21, 2009 Ron Paul Speech
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_S9Ogyu5DDY
"Delighted to be here."

And this proves what?

Danzig in the Dark wrote:
brotherplanet wrote:
Danzig in the Dark wrote:Ron Paul supporters believe that Romney and Obama are corporate whores and tools of Wall Street because they are major financial backers of both parties, yet Paul is somehow not corrupted by his White Power backers.

You don't even have to know who Ron Paul is to know that Romney and Obama are corporate whores and tools of Wall Street.
I rank Nazis and Klansmen as worse than bankers and businessmen. That you don't says much about you.

Where did I say I ranked racists above bankers and businessmen, COCKSMOKER?

Wheresthestagemanager? wrote:Ron Paul Endorsed By Former KKK Grand Wizard

http://www.bilerico.com/2012/01/ron_pau ... leader.php

And this proves what?

Grendel wrote:

Are the US troops and Stephen Colbert registered to vote? Because many of the US troops and Colbert are Ron Paul supporters...

Keep tryin' and you'll keep failin', morons...

Danzig in the Dark · Post by **Danzig in the Dark** » Sat Aug 18, 2012 4:50 pm

Danzig in the Dark wrote:
brotherplanet wrote:
Danzig in the Dark wrote:Ron Paul supporters believe that Romney and Obama are corporate whores and tools of Wall Street because they are major financial backers of both parties, yet Paul is somehow not corrupted by his White Power backers.

You don't even have to know who Ron Paul is to know that Romney and Obama are corporate whores and tools of Wall Street.
I rank Nazis and Klansmen as worse than bankers and businessmen. That you don't says much about you.

Moggio wrote:Where did I say I ranked racists above bankers and businessmen, COCKSMOKER?

Moggio, are you behind the brotherplanet nym? Did someone just out himself?

Moggio · Post by **Moggio** » Sat Aug 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Danzig in the Dark wrote:Moggio, are you behind the brotherplanet nym? Did someone just out himself?

No. And No.

Grendel wrote:

Danzig in the Dark · Post by **Danzig in the Dark** » Sat Aug 18, 2012 8:44 pm

Moggio wrote:
Danzig in the Dark wrote:Moggio, are you behind the brotherplanet nym? Did someone just out himself?
No. And No.

Why freak out then? You took a comment I made to another poster way too personally. Guilty conscience?

Moggio · Post by **Moggio** » Sun Aug 19, 2012 3:21 pm

Danzig in the Dark wrote:
Moggio wrote:
Danzig in the Dark wrote:Moggio, are you behind the brotherplanet nym? Did someone just out himself?
No. And No.
Why freak out then? You took a comment I made to another poster way too personally. Guilty conscience?

I didn't freak out.

brotherplanet and I share similar views. So, since you stated something INCREDIBLY STUPID like that to him, you might as well have to me.

Danzig in the Dark · Post by **Danzig in the Dark** » Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:59 pm

Moggio wrote:
brotherplanet and I share similar views.

I doubt it. Even brotherpanet knows that sex after a Rush concert starts with hand lotion and ends with tissue paper.

Moggio · Post by **Moggio** » Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:00 pm

Danzig in the Dark wrote:
Moggio wrote:
brotherplanet and I share similar views.
I doubt it. Even brotherpanet knows that sex after a Rush concert starts with hand lotion and ends with tissue paper.

I know you keep denying it but 25% of Rush's fanbase is now female. Watch and realize the reality...

Danzig in the Dark · Post by **Danzig in the Dark** » Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:03 pm

Moggio wrote:
Danzig in the Dark wrote:
Moggio wrote:
brotherplanet and I share similar views.
I doubt it. Even brotherpanet knows that sex after a Rush concert starts with hand lotion and ends with tissue paper.
I know you keep denying it but 25% of Rush's fanbase is now female. Watch and realize the reality...

Lets see some stats.

KneelandBobDylan · Post by **KneelandBobDylan** » Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:13 pm

Can you imagine the hot chicks that would go to a Rush show? Neither can I.

Moggio · Post by **Moggio** » Mon Aug 20, 2012 2:45 pm

Danzig in the Dark wrote:
Moggio wrote:
Lets see some stats.

KneelandBobDylan wrote:Can you imagine the hot chicks that would go to a Rush show? Neither can I.

Hmmmm....maybe you two can't read properly? I guess I'll bold my previous post for you:

I know you keep denying it but 25% of Rush's fanbase is now female. Watch and realize the reality...

KneelandBobDylan · Post by **KneelandBobDylan** » Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:03 pm

I saw the time machine tour in Nashville. I can assure I'm being generous when I say maybe 10% of the crowd were women.

Turner Coates · Post by **Turner Coates** » Mon Aug 20, 2012 4:21 pm

Grendel wrote:Prepare to be proven wrong about the Nashville show.

That's right. If you're called a curse word, followed by "OWNED", that means you've been proven wrong.

Danzig in the Dark · Post by **Danzig in the Dark** » Mon Aug 20, 2012 4:22 pm

Bashed and owned.

Moggio · Post by **Moggio** » Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:28 pm

KneelandBobDylan wrote:I saw the time machine tour in Nashville. I can assure I'm being generous when I say maybe 10% of the crowd were women.

Wheresthestagemanager? wrote:
Grendel wrote:Prepare to be proven wrong about the Nashville show.
That's right. If you're called a curse word, followed by "OWNED", that means you've been proven wrong.

Danzig in the Dark wrote:Bashed and owned.

LOL are you morons claiming/implying that I haven't backed my shit up with evidence/proof. What sore losers.

Anyways, let me know when you actually PROVE SOMETHING.

Turner Coates · Post by **Turner Coates** » Tue Aug 21, 2012 6:17 pm

Moggio wrote: LOL are you morons claiming/implying that I haven't backed my shit up with evidence/proof. What sore losers.

Anyways, let me know when you actually PROVE SOMETHING.

You haven't proven a damn thing except that you're fighting for an obvious losing cause.
YOU BE OWNED, SUCKER!

Moggio · Post by **Moggio** » Wed Aug 22, 2012 2:20 pm

Wheresthestagemanager? wrote:
Moggio wrote: LOL are you morons claiming/implying that I haven't backed my shit up with evidence/proof. What sore losers.

Anyways, let me know when you actually PROVE SOMETHING.
You haven't proven a damn thing except that you're fighting for an obvious losing cause.
YOU BE OWNED, SUCKER!

ROTFLMFAO!

I've PROVEN all of my points with compelling evidence and logic. You know what that IS, right? But of course, you and your moronic team of supporters can't do SHIT to detract from that. And you certainly won't ever admit you're wrong.

If you want to perpetually be OWNED INTO OBLIVION, keep it up. And if you do, you know what will happen...

Turner Coates · Post by **Turner Coates** » Wed Aug 22, 2012 2:27 pm

Moggio wrote: If you want to perpetually be OWNED INTO OBLIVION, keep it up. And if you do, you know what will happen...

Well, you're OWNED INTO INFINITY.
So, whatta ya gonna do about it, huh?
Are you gonna increase the font size in your posts?
Are you supposed to be a tough guy?
Bring it on, Popeye.
Ha ha!

Moggio · Post by **Moggio** » Wed Aug 22, 2012 10:55 pm

Wheresthestagemanager? wrote:
Moggio wrote: If you want to perpetually be OWNED INTO OBLIVION, keep it up. And if you do, you know what will happen...
Well, you're OWNED INTO INFINITY.
So, whatta ya gonna do about it, huh?
Are you gonna increase the font size in your posts?
Are you supposed to be a tough guy?
Bring it on, Popeye.
Ha ha!

Riiiiiiiiiiiiight.

Anyway, let me know when you've got SOMETHING, Mr. Gadget...

Turner Coates · Post by **Turner Coates** » Wed Aug 22, 2012 11:10 pm

Boy, you sure showed me!....Not.

Moggio · Post by **Moggio** » Wed Aug 22, 2012 11:24 pm

Wheresthestagemanager? wrote:Boy, you sure showed me!....Not.

I'm getting impatient, Gadget. Get to work...

Turner Coates · Post by **Turner Coates** » Thu Aug 23, 2012 12:12 am

Moggio wrote:
Wheresthestagemanager? wrote:Boy, you sure showed me!....Not.
I'm getting impatient, Gadget. Get to work...

Oh, yes....my "work".
In case you haven't noticed, I got you to stop raving like a lunatic.
You can thank me later, when you get a bit more of a grip on reality.

Moggio · Post by **Moggio** » Thu Aug 23, 2012 8:37 pm

Wheresthestagemanager? wrote:
Moggio wrote:
Wheresthestagemanager? wrote:Boy, you sure showed me!....Not.
I'm getting impatient, Gadget. Get to work...
Oh, yes....my "work".
In case you haven't noticed, I got you to stop raving like a lunatic.
You can thank me later, when you get a bit more of a grip on reality.

Earth to moron:

I'll already more than backed up my case with evidence, proof and logic, for why Ron Paul would be the best choice for President. If you can't see that, then you're the one who needs to get a grip on reality. But then again, if you'd rather vote/support someone who is anti-constitution, anti-freedom, pro-war, doesn't have the financial expertise, qualifications, experience or integrity to run the US, or not to mention, is owned and operated by the US Military Industrial Complex, then by all means, vote for Obama or Romney (Obamney) ~ there's virtually NO difference between the two.

Turner Coates · Post by **Turner Coates** » Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:23 pm

Moggio wrote: Earth to moron:

I'll already more than backed up my case with evidence, proof and logic, for why Ron Paul would be the best choice for President. If you can't see that, then you're the one who needs to get a grip on reality. But then again, if you'd rather vote/support someone who is anti-constitution, anti-freedom, pro-war, doesn't have the financial expertise, qualifications, experience or integrity to run the US, or not to mention, is owned and operated by the US Military Industrial Complex, then by all means, vote for Obama or Romney (Obamney) ~ there's virtually NO difference between the two.

Much better, stylistically, except for the "Earth to moron" part. A little tempering goes a long way in having your argument taken seriously.

That said, you have no way of knowing who or what I support unless I tell you.
For all you know, I could support a poodle...or Ron Paul, but you DON'T know.
You can only speculate.
I'll tell you this much; I support those with a sense of humor.

Moggio · Post by **Moggio** » Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:59 pm

Wheresthestagemanager? wrote:
Moggio wrote: Earth to moron:

I'll already more than backed up my case with evidence, proof and logic, for why Ron Paul would be the best choice for President. If you can't see that, then you're the one who needs to get a grip on reality. But then again, if you'd rather vote/support someone who is anti-constitution, anti-freedom, pro-war, doesn't have the financial expertise, qualifications, experience or integrity to run the US, or not to mention, is owned and operated by the US Military Industrial Complex, then by all means, vote for Obama or Romney (Obamney) ~ there's virtually NO difference between the two.
Much better, stylistically, except for the "Earth to moron" part. A little tempering goes a long way in having your argument taken seriously.

That said, you have no way of knowing who or what I support unless I tell you.
For all you know, I could support a poodle...or Ron Paul, but you DON'T know.
You can only speculate.
I'll tell you this much; I support those with a sense of humor.

Where did I say who you do or don't support?

Turner Coates · Post by **Turner Coates** » Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:17 pm

Moggio wrote:
Where did I say who you do or don't support?

Where did I say you did?

Moggio · Post by **Moggio** » Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:40 pm

Wheresthestagemanager? wrote:
Moggio wrote:
Where did I say who you do or don't support?
Where did I say you did?

Right here:

"That said, you have no way of knowing who or what I support unless I tell you.
For all you know, I could support a poodle...or Ron Paul, but you DON'T know.
You can only speculate."

Turner Coates · Post by **Turner Coates** » Sat Aug 25, 2012 1:54 am

Moggio wrote:
Wheresthestagemanager? wrote:
Moggio wrote:
Where did I say who you do or don't support?
Where did I say you did?
Right here:

"That said, you have no way of knowing who or what I support unless I tell you.
For all you know, I could support a poodle...or Ron Paul, but you DON'T know.
You can only speculate."

WRONG. I stated that you do NOT know .
Show me where I said you DO know.

Moggio · Post by **Moggio** » Sat Aug 25, 2012 2:41 am

Wheresthestagemanager? wrote:
Moggio wrote:
Wheresthestagemanager? wrote:Where did I say you did?
Right here:

"That said, you have no way of knowing who or what I support unless I tell you.
For all you know, I could support a poodle...or Ron Paul, but you DON'T know.
You can only speculate."
WRONG. I stated that you do NOT know .
Show me where I said you DO know.

Stop splitting hairs. That's your quote BOLDED for you to read, in response to my, "Where did I say who you do or don't support?", quote.

Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention

Re: Ron Paul Not Given Role at GOP Convention