Dave Navarro, Eric Avery, Stephen Perkins sues Perry Farrel

The one that started it all. Spreading gossip and insults since 1998.

Moderator: Metal Sludge

Velvis
Playing Shitty Clubs in a Van
Posts: 1221
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 8:54 pm

Re: Dave Navarro, Eric Avery, Stephen Perkins sues Perry Farrel

Post by Velvis »

MetalSludgeCEO wrote: Thu Jul 17, 2025 11:06 am
Lobo wrote: Thu Jul 17, 2025 4:48 am The guys in the band have hated Farrell for a long time. I'm assuming the reason they kept going back was because they would make more playing in Jane's than in any other band they could form.

From Wikipedia regarding their first studio album, 1988's Nothing's Shocking:

During the recording sessions, Farrell stated he wanted 50% of the band's publishing royalties for writing the lyrics, plus a quarter of the remaining half for writing music, adding up to 62.5%. Bassist Eric Avery said he and the other members – guitarist Dave Navarro and drummer Stephen Perkins – were stunned by these demands. Farrell refused to compromise. One day Jerden drove to the studio to find Farrell, Navarro and Perkins leaving. Farrell told him the band had broken up and there would be no record. Warner Bros. called an emergency meeting to resolve the situation. Farrell received the royalty percentages he sought, with the other members receiving 12.5 percent each. Avery said the incident had a profound effect on the band, creating an internal fracture.

Not long after the royalties dispute, Farrell and Avery – who had co-founded the band – had a falling-out. This was the result of Avery's newfound sobriety as well as an incident in which Farrell believed Avery had drunkenly tried to pick up his girlfriend. "Unfortunately," Farrell recalled, "the tensions between Eric and I affected the whole family". Some people were asked to take sides, and others just moped about because they didn't know what was going on. Perkins, however, is reported to have got along with Navarro, Avery and Farrell.

"""""""""""""""""The guys in the band have hated Farrell for a long time.""""""""""""""""""""""

This!

And people wonder why Skid Row won't take Sebastian Bach back into their band.

The truth is, they don't really like the guy... they didn't like how he was 30 years ago, and they've watched him act the fool for 25+ years since booting him!

So, to save themselves from what would likely be a 'walking on egg-shells' world and tour with him back... they have simply said; "No thank you."

But... the diehard delusional fanboys won't let it go.

$tEvil
This seems like a stretch. Bach is behaves like a toddler for sure and would be super annoying to be around and that doesn't seem to have changed much in old age, but I never got the vibe any of them despised each other and is there any financial dealings like Jane's Addiction that soured the relationship?

And isn't Perry a drug addict with a nutty wife who wants them to record in Doubly?

Point is Sebastian is likely insufferable to be around and his presence isn't worth the $ to deal with it. I don't think it's much deeper than that. The Jane's thing seems to have much deeper issues than our singer is an obnoxious tool.

If more money was on the table I have no doubt Rachel and Scotti would change their minds.
Velvis
Playing Shitty Clubs in a Van
Posts: 1221
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 8:54 pm

Re: Dave Navarro, Eric Avery, Stephen Perkins sues Perry Farrel

Post by Velvis »

MetalSludgeCEO wrote: Thu Jul 17, 2025 11:06 am
Lobo wrote: Thu Jul 17, 2025 4:48 am The guys in the band have hated Farrell for a long time. I'm assuming the reason they kept going back was because they would make more playing in Jane's than in any other band they could form.

From Wikipedia regarding their first studio album, 1988's Nothing's Shocking:

During the recording sessions, Farrell stated he wanted 50% of the band's publishing royalties for writing the lyrics, plus a quarter of the remaining half for writing music, adding up to 62.5%. Bassist Eric Avery said he and the other members – guitarist Dave Navarro and drummer Stephen Perkins – were stunned by these demands. Farrell refused to compromise. One day Jerden drove to the studio to find Farrell, Navarro and Perkins leaving. Farrell told him the band had broken up and there would be no record. Warner Bros. called an emergency meeting to resolve the situation. Farrell received the royalty percentages he sought, with the other members receiving 12.5 percent each. Avery said the incident had a profound effect on the band, creating an internal fracture.

Not long after the royalties dispute, Farrell and Avery – who had co-founded the band – had a falling-out. This was the result of Avery's newfound sobriety as well as an incident in which Farrell believed Avery had drunkenly tried to pick up his girlfriend. "Unfortunately," Farrell recalled, "the tensions between Eric and I affected the whole family". Some people were asked to take sides, and others just moped about because they didn't know what was going on. Perkins, however, is reported to have got along with Navarro, Avery and Farrell.

"""""""""""""""""The guys in the band have hated Farrell for a long time.""""""""""""""""""""""

This!

And people wonder why Skid Row won't take Sebastian Bach back into their band.

The truth is, they don't really like the guy... they didn't like how he was 30 years ago, and they've watched him act the fool for 25+ years since booting him!

So, to save themselves from what would likely be a 'walking on egg-shells' world and tour with him back... they have simply said; "No thank you."

But... the diehard delusional fanboys won't let it go.

$tEvil
This seems like a stretch. Bach is behaves like a toddler for sure and would be super annoying to be around and that doesn't seem to have changed much in old age, but I never got the vibe any of them despised each other and is there any financial dealings like Jane's Addiction that soured the relationship?

And isn't Perry a drug addict with a nutty wife who wants them to record in Doubly?

Point is Sebastian is likely insufferable to be around and his presence isn't worth the $ to deal with it. I don't think it's much deeper than that. The Jane's thing seems to have much deeper issues than our singer is an obnoxious tool.

If more money was on the table I have no doubt Rachel and Scotti would change their minds.
User avatar
RaceFan3
Debut Album Goes Gold
Posts: 4037
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:10 am
Location: Chicago area

Re: Dave Navarro, Eric Avery, Stephen Perkins sues Perry Farrel

Post by RaceFan3 »

Off-topic but didn't someone post a video here of Navarro playing a song or two with Marilyn Manson? At least I think it was Navarro...can't recall and it's driving me nuts. Wasn't pro shot, but was a cool tune, slow & heavy. It was Manson and someone, thought it was Dave. I know that's vague as fuck but I do remember seeing it here a couple years ago.

Might not even have been Dave, and it might have been Manson guesting with someone else, not the other way around. My memory is dull as fuck on this one.

Carry on.
*I kinda want a new screenname. Seriously. I barely watch racing anymore. :x
User avatar
TheCULTofMANSON
MSX Tour Support Act
Posts: 4514
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 2:05 pm
Location: Chapel Hill, NC

Re: Dave Navarro, Eric Avery, Stephen Perkins sues Perry Farrel

Post by TheCULTofMANSON »

DangerZone wrote: Wed Jul 16, 2025 9:00 pm Sounds like Perry’s right.
He shouldn’t have got in Dave’s personal space, but they shouldn’t have canceled the tour.

Yup
RockSkar wrote:
Patton could sing anything that those other singers have ever sang. But none of them could sing Patton's catalog.
Itwalksamongus wrote:
Dude - did you, like, just get ass-fucked by Patton or something? You're really off the hook here.
User avatar
HottKarl777
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2221
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 3:38 pm

Re: Dave Navarro, Eric Avery, Stephen Perkins sues Perry Farrel

Post by HottKarl777 »

TheCULTofMANSON wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 1:49 am
DangerZone wrote: Wed Jul 16, 2025 9:00 pm Sounds like Perry’s right.
He shouldn’t have got in Dave’s personal space, but they shouldn’t have canceled the tour.

Yup


Bull fucking shit. That behavior was beyond the pale. Navarro was completely in the right to never go onstage with that abusive psycho. Are you guys on crack? He punched Dave in the face backstage. At what point is it too much for you guys?? Or does anything go? Seriously.... :shock:
User avatar
HueyRamone
Playing First Stage at SludgeFest
Posts: 34103
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 9:07 pm

Re: Dave Navarro, Eric Avery, Stephen Perkins sues Perry Farrel

Post by HueyRamone »

Heres Perry's isolated vocals before the fight. If you can make asstons of $ to sing that shittily, maybe dont be angry and fuck it up?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McPjstN ... ElrodSucks
LAglamrocker wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2024 8:07 pm You can tell Sleek had nothing to do with this…thats why it’s so entertaining
DangerZone
MSX Tour Support Act
Posts: 4818
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2017 10:39 am

Re: Dave Navarro, Eric Avery, Stephen Perkins sues Perry Farrel

Post by DangerZone »

HottKarl777 wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 1:59 am
TheCULTofMANSON wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 1:49 am
DangerZone wrote: Wed Jul 16, 2025 9:00 pm Sounds like Perry’s right.
He shouldn’t have got in Dave’s personal space, but they shouldn’t have canceled the tour.

Yup


Bull fucking shit. That behavior was beyond the pale. Navarro was completely in the right to never go onstage with that abusive psycho. Are you guys on crack? He punched Dave in the face backstage. At what point is it too much for you guys?? Or does anything go? Seriously.... :shock:
They may have a case for assault. But they just preemptively canceled the tour - so they may be holding the bag for the money lost. It’s not a matter of feelings
jens
Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
Posts: 1720
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 11:42 am

Re: Dave Navarro, Eric Avery, Stephen Perkins sues Perry Farrel

Post by jens »

FreddyFender wrote: Wed Jul 16, 2025 8:24 pm This all blew up because the band wouldn't let his wife onstage. And then the final straw was when they wouldn't let him play videos of her dancing on the screens during the performance.
Hilarious! It must suck bad to be dependant on that dude to make money.
User avatar
TheCULTofMANSON
MSX Tour Support Act
Posts: 4514
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 2:05 pm
Location: Chapel Hill, NC

Re: Dave Navarro, Eric Avery, Stephen Perkins sues Perry Farrel

Post by TheCULTofMANSON »

jens wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 7:08 am
FreddyFender wrote: Wed Jul 16, 2025 8:24 pm This all blew up because the band wouldn't let his wife onstage. And then the final straw was when they wouldn't let him play videos of her dancing on the screens during the performance.
Hilarious! It must suck bad to be dependant on that dude to make money.
Both Perry and the other 3 have tried to do other bands and they never went anywhere, they need eachother. If GNR and The Cult can do it then Janes certainly can
RockSkar wrote:
Patton could sing anything that those other singers have ever sang. But none of them could sing Patton's catalog.
Itwalksamongus wrote:
Dude - did you, like, just get ass-fucked by Patton or something? You're really off the hook here.
User avatar
FreddyFender
Debut Album Goes Gold
Posts: 4076
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2018 12:36 am

Re: Dave Navarro, Eric Avery, Stephen Perkins sues Perry Farrel

Post by FreddyFender »

TheCULTofMANSON wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 8:12 am
jens wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 7:08 am
FreddyFender wrote: Wed Jul 16, 2025 8:24 pm This all blew up because the band wouldn't let his wife onstage. And then the final straw was when they wouldn't let him play videos of her dancing on the screens during the performance.
Hilarious! It must suck bad to be dependant on that dude to make money.
Both Perry and the other 3 have tried to do other bands and they never went anywhere, they need eachother. If GNR and The Cult can do it then Janes certainly can
It took Slash getting a divorce from his wife/manager to get him back in GNR.

Same probably applies to Perry. Time will tell.
fromanotherplace82
Saving Up For a Guitar
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2025 10:44 am

Re: Dave Navarro, Eric Avery, Stephen Perkins sues Perry Farrel

Post by fromanotherplace82 »

DangerZone wrote: Wed Jul 16, 2025 9:00 pm Sounds like Perry’s right.
He shouldn’t have got in Dave’s personal space, but they shouldn’t have canceled the tour.
From what i heard they had no choice. Plus his wife pretty much tried to sabotage the whole tour from the beginning when she found out she wasn't going to be allowed to dance. I've met both Perry and his wife and he's pretty much a vegetable from years of drug use and she's very nagging and controlling and insists in inserting herself into everything he does.

Cleary says that before the initial European leg of the tour — which found the original four members coming together for the first time in 14 years — they had agreed to proceed as a democracy. And one of those democratic decisions at the time was that “we just want to be four guys on stage —no backup singers, no dancers, none of that. Old school music speaks for itself. … And I do know that there was immediate pushback from Perry on that issue.” Some previous tours under the band’s name that had not included all the original players had utilized Etty Lau Farrell and other dancers on stage, but the singer went along with the other musicians’ wishes to not include that element.

But before the U.S. leg of the tour, the subject came up again, now with the possibility of having the dancers on video, which the rest of the band nixed. The other members commissioned some non-dancing video content, which Farrell turned down. In this account, Farrell, who had allegedly not attended rehearsals, showed up a few hours before the start of the Las Vegas opener with video content he had filmed “of Etty and I think some other women in the desert dancing. No dancers on the stage, but now uyou want to put ‘em behind us dancing — it’s kind of the same thing… It’s 2024, it’s a bit of a different time. You know, having scantily clad chicks on stage or on video, I don’t think it’s as empowering as maybe the Farrells might think it is… The Farrells sort of couldn’t let go of this thing, to the point that before the first show, Perry quit the band.”
Newman, who had come out for the Vegas opener, further discusses with his host how Etty Lau Farrell was “out in this public area yelling about how Perry is going home and the tour is over, and this is in front of our Live Nation reps, who are the people that basically promote the tour and front the bill for the tour. And when they start hearing that people are going home before the first show, obviously they get very squirrelly and very concerned.”
More details about what happened here.
https://variety.com/2024/music/news/jan ... 236157389/
OKWhiteFalcon
Playing at a Friend's Party
Posts: 198
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 12:59 pm

Re: Dave Navarro, Eric Avery, Stephen Perkins sues Perry Farrel

Post by OKWhiteFalcon »

fromanotherplace82 wrote: Mon Jul 21, 2025 2:05 pm ...More details about what happened here.
https://variety.com/2024/music/news/jan ... 236157389/
Here's the entire interview with Jane's crew member Dan Cleary the Variety article references:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVvDL6v2K8E&t=4s
DangerZone
MSX Tour Support Act
Posts: 4818
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2017 10:39 am

Re: Dave Navarro, Eric Avery, Stephen Perkins sues Perry Farrel

Post by DangerZone »

fromanotherplace82 wrote: Mon Jul 21, 2025 2:05 pm
DangerZone wrote: Wed Jul 16, 2025 9:00 pm Sounds like Perry’s right.
He shouldn’t have got in Dave’s personal space, but they shouldn’t have canceled the tour.
From what i heard they had no choice. Plus his wife pretty much tried to sabotage the whole tour from the beginning when she found out she wasn't going to be allowed to dance. I've met both Perry and his wife and he's pretty much a vegetable from years of drug use and she's very nagging and controlling and insists in inserting herself into everything he does.

Cleary says that before the initial European leg of the tour — which found the original four members coming together for the first time in 14 years — they had agreed to proceed as a democracy. And one of those democratic decisions at the time was that “we just want to be four guys on stage —no backup singers, no dancers, none of that. Old school music speaks for itself. … And I do know that there was immediate pushback from Perry on that issue.” Some previous tours under the band’s name that had not included all the original players had utilized Etty Lau Farrell and other dancers on stage, but the singer went along with the other musicians’ wishes to not include that element.

But before the U.S. leg of the tour, the subject came up again, now with the possibility of having the dancers on video, which the rest of the band nixed. The other members commissioned some non-dancing video content, which Farrell turned down. In this account, Farrell, who had allegedly not attended rehearsals, showed up a few hours before the start of the Las Vegas opener with video content he had filmed “of Etty and I think some other women in the desert dancing. No dancers on the stage, but now uyou want to put ‘em behind us dancing — it’s kind of the same thing… It’s 2024, it’s a bit of a different time. You know, having scantily clad chicks on stage or on video, I don’t think it’s as empowering as maybe the Farrells might think it is… The Farrells sort of couldn’t let go of this thing, to the point that before the first show, Perry quit the band.”
Newman, who had come out for the Vegas opener, further discusses with his host how Etty Lau Farrell was “out in this public area yelling about how Perry is going home and the tour is over, and this is in front of our Live Nation reps, who are the people that basically promote the tour and front the bill for the tour. And when they start hearing that people are going home before the first show, obviously they get very squirrelly and very concerned.”
More details about what happened here.
https://variety.com/2024/music/news/jan ... 236157389/
I’m not a lawyer but it seems whoever canceled will be liable for the money lost.
He may be a vegetable but he seems conniving & smart enough to hire the right legal team
User avatar
Michael Hotts Ghost
Playing Shitty Clubs in a Van
Posts: 929
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2018 3:59 pm

Re: Dave Navarro, Eric Avery, Stephen Perkins sues Perry Farrel

Post by Michael Hotts Ghost »

The dude sings like a wounded mule. How can people sit there and watch that crap? I understand years ago when he could still sing, but now it’s just stupid. You would think a band that big would have a band contract and there would be certain things spelled out.

Navarro could do a Slash Snakepit type of band, find some good singer, put out an album, and go out and play 2 or 3 tracks from the album and then fill the rest of the night with Jane‘s Addiction songs, and maybe a few covers. The other guys are screwed since they don’t have any name recognition..
User avatar
GoodJudge
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2357
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 11:49 am
Location: UK

Re: Dave Navarro, Eric Avery, Stephen Perkins sues Perry Farrel

Post by GoodJudge »

Michael Hotts Ghost wrote: Tue Jul 22, 2025 1:05 am The dude sings like a wounded mule. How can people sit there and watch that crap? I understand years ago when he could still sing, but now it’s just stupid.
Let me tell you about a band called Kiss...
Sleek wrote: It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a shredder to write a great song.
User avatar
Wiseacre
Platinum Artist
Posts: 10647
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 8:46 am
Location: STL
Contact:

Re: Dave Navarro, Eric Avery, Stephen Perkins sues Perry Farrel

Post by Wiseacre »

Can we all sue every guy who had his amp so loud we couldn’t hear ourselves singing onstage?
Last edited by Wiseacre on Wed Jul 23, 2025 1:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
grishnak boss
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 20608
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 8:55 pm

Re: Dave Navarro, Eric Avery, Stephen Perkins sues Perry Farrel

Post by grishnak boss »

GoodJudge wrote: Wed Jul 16, 2025 12:30 pm Dave wants $10m for 1 punch, the other 2 want money for "emotional distress". This is a bunch of grown men, hard-touring ex-alkies, ex-junkies. WTF have they got '"emotional distress" about? "Oh noes, the nasty man with the silly hair was mean to me and I need therapy". Bunch of fucking pussies. Maybe they'll read this and sue me for emotional distress as well.

ETA I've just read Sleek's post above. Of course it's about the touring money but why not say so instead of this wussy, playground "waah! He hurt my feelings and I can't cope!" BS.
Sit down, fucking boomer. We get it, you're traumatized by daddy's beatings & mommy's neglect - that doesn't mean the rest of the world has to handle things the way you have.

Fuck off.
SatanOscillateMyMetallicSonatas

Dogma: I am God.
grishnak boss
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 20608
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 8:55 pm

Re: Dave Navarro, Eric Avery, Stephen Perkins sues Perry Farrel

Post by grishnak boss »

FreddyFender wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 2:11 pm
TheCULTofMANSON wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 8:12 am
jens wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 7:08 am

Hilarious! It must suck bad to be dependant on that dude to make money.
Both Perry and the other 3 have tried to do other bands and they never went anywhere, they need eachother. If GNR and The Cult can do it then Janes certainly can
It took Slash getting a divorce from his wife/manager to get him back in GNR.

Same probably applies to Perry. Time will tell.
Not a lot of time left, thou'....we're talkin'bout a 66 yrs old senior
SatanOscillateMyMetallicSonatas

Dogma: I am God.
User avatar
eddie lee roth
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 15225
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:14 am
Location: In front of a computer screen

Re: Dave Navarro, Eric Avery, Stephen Perkins sues Perry Farrel

Post by eddie lee roth »

grishnak boss wrote: Tue Jul 22, 2025 5:09 am
GoodJudge wrote: Wed Jul 16, 2025 12:30 pm Dave wants $10m for 1 punch, the other 2 want money for "emotional distress". This is a bunch of grown men, hard-touring ex-alkies, ex-junkies. WTF have they got '"emotional distress" about? "Oh noes, the nasty man with the silly hair was mean to me and I need therapy". Bunch of fucking pussies. Maybe they'll read this and sue me for emotional distress as well.

ETA I've just read Sleek's post above. Of course it's about the touring money but why not say so instead of this wussy, playground "waah! He hurt my feelings and I can't cope!" BS.
Sit down, fucking boomer. We get it, you're traumatized by daddy's beatings & mommy's neglect - that doesn't mean the rest of the world has to handle things the way you have.

Fuck off.
Hey you old grumpy charm school dropout how’s life been treating you?
Image
grishnak boss
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 20608
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 8:55 pm

Re: Dave Navarro, Eric Avery, Stephen Perkins sues Perry Farrel

Post by grishnak boss »

eddie lee roth wrote: Tue Jul 22, 2025 12:48 pm
grishnak boss wrote: Tue Jul 22, 2025 5:09 am
GoodJudge wrote: Wed Jul 16, 2025 12:30 pm Dave wants $10m for 1 punch, the other 2 want money for "emotional distress". This is a bunch of grown men, hard-touring ex-alkies, ex-junkies. WTF have they got '"emotional distress" about? "Oh noes, the nasty man with the silly hair was mean to me and I need therapy". Bunch of fucking pussies. Maybe they'll read this and sue me for emotional distress as well.

ETA I've just read Sleek's post above. Of course it's about the touring money but why not say so instead of this wussy, playground "waah! He hurt my feelings and I can't cope!" BS.
Sit down, fucking boomer. We get it, you're traumatized by daddy's beatings & mommy's neglect - that doesn't mean the rest of the world has to handle things the way you have.

Fuck off.
Hey you old grumpy charm school dropout how’s life been treating you?
:lol:

Hey brother, I'm doin' good, thx! - living in the fuckin' land of the fascists, what a time to be alive, huh? :lol:

How are you? Send me a PM.
SatanOscillateMyMetallicSonatas

Dogma: I am God.
Tommy2Tone84
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 23093
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 6:04 am

Re: Dave Navarro, Eric Avery, Stephen Perkins sues Perry Farrel

Post by Tommy2Tone84 »

pieceofme wrote: Wed Jul 16, 2025 10:21 am Good. Farrel is really annoying. And he's got an awful voice.

This. Good riddance. The three of them are a good band and need to find a singer who isn’t tone deaf.
Tommy2Tone84
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 23093
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 6:04 am

Re: Dave Navarro, Eric Avery, Stephen Perkins sues Perry Farrel

Post by Tommy2Tone84 »

GoodJudge wrote: Tue Jul 22, 2025 1:27 am
Michael Hotts Ghost wrote: Tue Jul 22, 2025 1:05 am The dude sings like a wounded mule. How can people sit there and watch that crap? I understand years ago when he could still sing, but now it’s just stupid.
Let me tell you about a band called Kiss...
KISS are the Beatles compared to Jane’s Addiction

Jane’s clown singer always sang like a wounded mule
Post Reply