Bands who's zenith was not within their first 6 albums

The one that started it all. Spreading gossip and insults since 1998.

Moderator: Metal Sludge

Post Reply
User avatar
HueyRamone
Playing First Stage at SludgeFest
Posts: 34227
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 9:07 pm

Bands who's zenith was not within their first 6 albums

Post by HueyRamone »

List bands where their best stuff was not their first 6 (or more likely first 4) albums.

Only rule is that conventional wisdom has to pretty much agree with you. If you personally like Crazy Nights and Hot in the Shade best, it doesnt really jibe with what Kiss' zenith was.


Judas Priest - SFV/DOTF
Behemoth - The Apostasy and beyond
LAglamrocker wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2024 8:07 pm You can tell Sleek had nothing to do with this…thats why it’s so entertaining
User avatar
LurkingAtWork
Opening for Slaughter
Posts: 458
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 7:50 pm

Re: Bands who's zenith was not within their first 6 albums

Post by LurkingAtWork »

Scorpions? They were around a long time before Love at First Sting
User avatar
DonJuanDeMarco
MSX Tour Support Act
Posts: 4280
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 8:50 pm

Re: Bands who's zenith was not within their first 6 albums

Post by DonJuanDeMarco »

Bob Seger for the win!
"You want Don Juan DeMarco, the world's greatest lover, to talk to you? What do you know of great love?"
CrankerBait
Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
Posts: 1565
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2019 9:20 am

Re: Bands who's zenith was not within their first 6 albums

Post by CrankerBait »

You could make a strong argument for the following:

Pink Floyd
The Rolling Stones
The Beatles
Rush
Fleetwood Mac
Judas Priest
Elton John
R.E.M
Bob Dylan
ZZ Top
Genesis

I might disagree with a few of those, but I could understand why one might make the argument for them.
CrankerBait
Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
Posts: 1565
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2019 9:20 am

Re: Bands who's zenith was not within their first 6 albums

Post by CrankerBait »

DonJuanDeMarco wrote: Fri Aug 29, 2025 7:23 am Bob Seger for the win!
Great pick!
User avatar
RaceFan3
Debut Album Goes Gold
Posts: 4055
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:10 am
Location: Chicago area

Re: Bands who's zenith was not within their first 6 albums

Post by RaceFan3 »

DonJuanDeMarco wrote: Fri Aug 29, 2025 7:23 am Bob Seger for the win!
Came here to say this! He had a lot of stuff out before Live Bullet exploded. Kinda like KISS with Alive, ironically the same year.
*I kinda want a new screenname. Seriously. I barely watch racing anymore. :x
User avatar
Anthrax442
Cockblocked by Poison
Posts: 7926
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 5:12 am
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

Re: Bands who's zenith was not within their first 6 albums

Post by Anthrax442 »

CrankerBait wrote: Fri Aug 29, 2025 7:26 am You could make a strong argument for the following:

Pink Floyd
The Rolling Stones
The Beatles
Rush
Fleetwood Mac
Judas Priest
Elton John
R.E.M
Bob Dylan
ZZ Top
Genesis

I might disagree with a few of those, but I could understand why one might make the argument for them.
Yeah, this list is pretty accurate. I think the only bones I'd pick would be

Judas Priest - I have British Steel over Screaming For Vengeance, but that is CLOSE
Pink Floyd - It's technically right, but there's two soundtracks and only half of an album with Ummagumma in there. Feels wrong.
ZZ Top - Commercial Zenith, yes, but Tres Hombres is better than anything they did in the 80s.
Image
MurrayFiend wrote:Shit, deathcurse, you sure know how to make an exit.
Hair I Go Again
Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
Posts: 1332
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: Bands who's zenith was not within their first 6 albums

Post by Hair I Go Again »

Four albums is definitely easier than six.

Savatage - if you count Dungeons as an album, conventional wisdom is that #5 (Hall of the Mountain King) is the pinnacle (or at least the kickoff of their golden era)

Hardcore Superstar - the self-titled (album #5) is the one they usually play the most songs from (and lately, they've only been playing one song from the records released prior)

Journey - their fourth was their first with Perry, but it wasn't until #7 that they became massive

Sammy Hagar - I admit I'm not that familiar with his solo stuff, but it seems like #6 was when he started to get big

Tom Petty - might be a controversial pick since he did some great stuff prior, but I think conventional wisdom (at least in terms of pop culture/zeitgeist impact) would be that his late '80s/early '90s stuff is peak Petty, which would be his 8th album with the Heartbreakers and his first solo album (and maybe some Wilburys carry-over)
User avatar
Demon Kogure
Playing Frat Parties
Posts: 270
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2021 6:22 pm

Re: Bands who's zenith was not within their first 6 albums

Post by Demon Kogure »

April Wine put out 6 albums before anybody in the US even heard of them
Whitesnake 1987 was their 7th album
Golden Earring's best-selling album was their 9th
Bee Gees had at least a dozen albums out before they peaked
User avatar
GoodJudge
Headlining Clubs
Posts: 2408
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 11:49 am
Location: UK

Re: Bands who's zenith was not within their first 6 albums

Post by GoodJudge »

Anthrax442 wrote: Fri Aug 29, 2025 7:41 am
CrankerBait wrote: Fri Aug 29, 2025 7:26 am You could make a strong argument for the following:

Pink Floyd
The Rolling Stones
The Beatles
Rush
Fleetwood Mac
Judas Priest
Elton John
R.E.M
Bob Dylan
ZZ Top
Genesis

I might disagree with a few of those, but I could understand why one might make the argument for them.
Yeah, this list is pretty accurate. I think the only bones I'd pick would be

Judas Priest - I have British Steel over Screaming For Vengeance, but that is CLOSE
Pink Floyd - It's technically right, but there's two soundtracks and only half of an album with Ummagumma in there. Feels wrong.
ZZ Top - Commercial Zenith, yes, but Tres Hombres is better than anything they did in the 80s.
As with ZZ, so for REM. Their commercial peak was albums 7 and 8 but Reckoning then Green (5 and 6) were better musically.
Sleek wrote: It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a shredder to write a great song.
CrankerBait
Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
Posts: 1565
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2019 9:20 am

Re: Bands who's zenith was not within their first 6 albums

Post by CrankerBait »

Anthrax442 wrote: Fri Aug 29, 2025 7:41 am
CrankerBait wrote: Fri Aug 29, 2025 7:26 am You could make a strong argument for the following:

Pink Floyd
The Rolling Stones
The Beatles
Rush
Fleetwood Mac
Judas Priest
Elton John
R.E.M
Bob Dylan
ZZ Top
Genesis

I might disagree with a few of those, but I could understand why one might make the argument for them.
Yeah, this list is pretty accurate. I think the only bones I'd pick would be

Judas Priest - I have British Steel over Screaming For Vengeance, but that is CLOSE
Pink Floyd - It's technically right, but there's two soundtracks and only half of an album with Ummagumma in there. Feels wrong.
ZZ Top - Commercial Zenith, yes, but Tres Hombres is better than anything they did in the 80s.
All good points. I prefer looking at runs of three, four or five albums in a row as being an artist's overall peak period, instead of one album being the zenith, which is more challenging, especially when a you could be basing a list on commercial zenith, artistic zenith or a mix of the two. I feel a lot more comfortable saying that Meddle to The Wall, Rubber Soul to the White Album or Permanent Waves to Grace Under Pressure are works of bands in their prime/at the top of their game, instead of having to pick one album as the definitive career apex.
User avatar
Sleek
Playing a Package Tour in Arenas
Posts: 14707
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:52 pm
Contact:

Re: Bands who's zenith was not within their first 6 albums

Post by Sleek »

DonJuanDeMarco wrote: Fri Aug 29, 2025 7:23 am Bob Seger for the win!
Came here to post this. He actually had an album called Seven, which was his seventh album. He did not hit with that one.

...or his next, Beautiful Loser.

Live Bullet, which broke him nationally was his 9th album.

There are some really good records in his "unknown" material.
ROADHEAD wrote:I've never tasted coffee
HueyRamone wrote:I like Radio Gaga
HueyRamone wrote:QUIT FUCKING WITH MY SETLIST, ASSWIPE!


Image
User avatar
Spongie
Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
Posts: 1463
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2021 1:41 pm

Re: Bands who's zenith was not within their first 6 albums

Post by Spongie »

HueyRamone wrote: Fri Aug 29, 2025 6:55 am
Behemoth - The Apostasy and beyond
Just popping into in to shout out your Behemoth shout out. Don’t see too much of that around here.

The Satanist is their masterpiece.
User avatar
HueyRamone
Playing First Stage at SludgeFest
Posts: 34227
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 9:07 pm

Re: Bands who's zenith was not within their first 6 albums

Post by HueyRamone »

Spongie wrote: Fri Aug 29, 2025 10:32 am
HueyRamone wrote: Fri Aug 29, 2025 6:55 am
Behemoth - The Apostasy and beyond
Just popping into in to shout out your Behemoth shout out. Don’t see too much of that around here.

The Satanist is their masterpiece.
Im getting heavily into them lately. I think their new one is one of their best.
LAglamrocker wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2024 8:07 pm You can tell Sleek had nothing to do with this…thats why it’s so entertaining
User avatar
Gibsonite
Cockblocked by Poison
Posts: 8241
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 5:03 pm
Location: Hiding in Honduras

Re: Bands who's zenith was not within their first 6 albums

Post by Gibsonite »

Hi Infidelity was REO Speedwagon's 9th studio album
Image
TYTAN3K
Taking Music Lessons
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Salinas, CA.

Re: Bands who's zenith was not within their first 6 albums

Post by TYTAN3K »

PRETTY MAIDS
User avatar
Hellsinkey
Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
Posts: 18442
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 12:15 pm
Location: Finland

Re: Bands who's zenith was not within their first 6 albums

Post by Hellsinkey »

Julian Cope
Image
Post Reply