RockNRev wrote:2Tempting wrote:RockNRev wrote:And you're a pussy for trying to be creative with your editing.
Yet before and after saying that, in a few separate posts RockNRev creatively wrote:bunch of stuff
So which is it, Reverend Good Friday Steak Eater? Does it make you a pussy to creatively edit posts or is it only acceptable when you think it works in your favor?
It's simple. On one hand, we have a loser trying to tell people I used the fire to promote my band and then making an edited quote to back up his bullshit. He deleted important words that actually proved I did not even have a band. It changed the whole statement and made it say something it did not say.-
You most certainly did use The Fire to promote your band and get your name in the paper. That has already been established by the simple fact that you took your drummer's tape to the press before you brought it to the AG, and they had to come get it from you. No one is buying the lame story that you didn't want to take it to them because the police were in on it. You're an idiot if it is. You simply tell them you have a copy and you will be giving it to the press if it dissappears. Not the other way around.
The original quote said I was still in the formative stages (yes, even by the time the trial happened, nevermind the time the fire happened, dumbass) but the loser edited to say I had a band. His editing made a lie.
My editing did no such thing.
If one of you idiots wants to add your own opinions and descriptions to a statement, that's on you, but it doesn't change the facts when I edit out your jealous banter.
For example, when someone tells me you at least TWICE saw my suck ass fucking chunk of shit band that everyone laughed at and you hated, and I trim your opinionated, jealous bullshit off and show you saying "I at least TWICE saw your band" I did not make the statement a lie. You still saw my band whether you say you liked it (during a flame war) or not.
That is the difference, idiot and you're welcome for the schooling on the subject.
When you edit you change the intent of the entire statement. Like if I say : "I love the way you band sound like shit when you play". and you edit it down to" "I love the way your band sounds when you play". Yeah- that is creative editing. You do it all the time. Re: the quote of mine you used I think the original says: "Big deal, somone on the board actually saw your band". Your edit changes the tone and meaning of my post. That is creative editing to serve your purpose.
DejaPussy LIED flat out and tried to trick you with his lies and you jerked him off for it before learning that he was full of shit and was trying to make it look like I had a band when the FACT is, I did not.
The Drummer said otherwise.
Son_of_Sam_I_Am wrote:Yeah, but did you bask in the glory of the resurrection of Jesus Christ your Lord?
Nope! Sure didn't.
Apparently you feel your religion and its practices are or should be followed by everyone. I don't feel the same way.
As a matter of fact, when we had our meal on Friday night, those who were observing Good Friday were absolutely miserable watching everyone else eat the good stuff. One guy was swearing more than normal and drank too much because of it. Why? Does Jesus dig it more when you don't eat meat for a day but instead you spend the day all angry and drunk?
What exactly is "The Good Stuff?" If you are Catholic, in the true sense, your aren't miserable to give up meat for one day. If you are- you shouldn't be Catholic or if a person is miserable they need to go back and learn why they give it up.
Did that whole Good Friday thing come about because Jesus was trying to help out the fishing industry?
For someone that claims to be an Ordained Minister, you have no religious class.
If you fools feel the need to make yourselves miserable (as most Catholics prefer), feel free. I do not subscribe to any religious ideas that tell me I have to be miserable, or whip myself with a cat of nine tails, or climb a million stair on my knees, or hate myself for having sex, or feel the fire of hell for whacking off, or feel evil for being human. Y'all can have that stupid shit.
Again, or someone tha claims to be an Ordained Minister, you still have no religious class.
Aquanet wrote:You been busted a a liar
Back it it up, sucka.
It's been backed up countless times in this thread. You are just can't come to terms with it. That would be you owning yourself.
Aquanet wrote:By the way- How many 40+ people use the word "owned and "schooled"?
I dunno. I'll let you know when I either become 40, or 40+, or start hanging out with that crowd. But maybe you can answer that question for me? How many?
Really thought you and Jack were buds? He's way past that crowd. I wouldn't know yet. But, come to think of it, I don't know a single person in their 30's that uses it either. If you are in still in your 30's you look rough.
Aquanet wrote:I still doubt you even "own" a car.
Of course you do, even with those pictures popping out right in your face. You will deny, deny, deny like that and make a jackass out of yourself the whole time. Why? Because you know damn well that is a 1988 Lincoln Mark VII LSC I'm showing you and you know it's not photoshopped and you know you are owned.
But maybe, JUST MAYBE if you keep saying you doubt it, you can pretend you haven't been owned and stretch that "I haven't been owned" feeling out a little longer.
You showed everyone a tarp with a grill. Probablyy still has no engine. Ok its a car under a trap. Looks nothing like the one you compared it to. Haven't even seen tires on it.
Hey, I let you stretch it out. I could have whipped the cover off and quickly owned you, but slowly putting splinters under your fingernails seemed like more fun to me and it still does.
And Aqua, on a side note, with all sincerity... I DID flat out call you a liar about your car and about you sending in an affidavit. I apologize for that. I shouldn't have said that when I don't know one way or the other.
Instead I just should have said that for as long as you are just a nameless, faceless username, you really have no credibility with me and you can't prove a single thing. Anyone can post a picture without themselves in it and say it's a picture of something of theirs. Anyone can say they sent in an affidavit when there's no way for anyone to check that.
Hey buddy- see there is the difference. I don't need people to check up on what I say to prove anything. There are plenty of people that know who I am, and what I've done in and around the music business. If you or someone else doesn't know me (which I don't expect you too) I don't fell like I need to prove myself or validate my life's history like you do. The only reason I posted the picture of my car is because it was right there, out the window and I didn't have to get up from my desk. That was the most effort I pu tinto this thread and that was more than you deserve. I don't feel the need to plaster my name and photo all over the world wide web for attention. You= Proven Attention Whore. Me= Not at all. The Attorney General and the Court read my affidavit-that's who is suppose to read it. That's who I gave it to. Not you.
So, sorry for going that extra step and actually calling you a liar. My bad.
This entire thread has been "your bad".