Bill Clinton hospitalized with chest pains

[vlad]

Oh Vinnie, you have got to be trolling, seriously. Are you this stupid?

You throw one of several versions of a bunch of names (and NO evidence) and..what? It's kinda fun to see the old school paranoia...ah memories...but here's the snopes link.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/bodycount.asp

The really disgusting thing is that some dickhead gathered a bunch of people's names who had died and threw them together to make this (or the other versions) list, without even thinking how this kind of twaddle would impact their loved ones.

You really should be embarrassed if you believe this crap.

Oh feel free to debunk the snopes article, with, you know, actual facts.

[tin00can]

Oh Vinnie, you have got to be trolling, seriously. Are you this stupid?

You throw one of several versions of a bunch of names (and NO evidence) and..what? It's kinda fun to see the old school paranoia...ah memories...but here's the snopes link.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/bodycount.asp

The really disgusting thing is that some dickhead gathered a bunch of people's names who had died and threw them together to make this (or the other versions) list, without even thinking how this kind of twaddle would impact their loved ones.

You really should be embarrassed if you believe this crap.

Oh feel free to debunk the snopes article, with, you know, actual facts.

Since I got hired at my job last April, two co-workers have died from heart attacks and one has had a stroke. I guess that means I'm a serial killer with some bad luck on #3.

[Hames Jetfield]

Come on man, no matter what you're not going to "respect" him. Whenever he dies, or gets admitted to a hospital, you'll just start a thread saying "good riddance." You're a piece of shit. I got the whole Edward Kennedy thing because he did actually kill someone, but now you're just showing what a partisan hack you really are--and, for you, it seems to transcend a person's death.

I was referring to Obama. Not sure what you're talking about. Personally, Clinton is hard not to like.

I honestly confused you with Vinnie Kulick; sorry.

[VinnieKulick]

Oh Vinnie, you have got to be trolling, seriously. Are you this stupid?

You throw one of several versions of a bunch of names (and NO evidence) and..what? It's kinda fun to see the old school paranoia...ah memories...but here's the snopes link.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/bodycount.asp

The really disgusting thing is that some dickhead gathered a bunch of people's names who had died and threw them together to make this (or the other versions) list, without even thinking how this kind of twaddle would impact their loved ones.

You really should be embarrassed if you believe this crap.

Oh feel free to debunk the snopes article, with, you know, actual facts.

Ah yes, Snopes. Well, if Snopes said it, it MUST be true. I mean, it's on the internet and all. Plus, the article doesn't disprove anything. It simply says the 'death list' isn't a new things, and there are some tenuous inclusions on it.

But, if a dozen of your bodyguards die, and a lot of people with specific information about you die, it's got to be more than a simple coincidence.

You don't want to believe? Thats fine. I think there's at least enough anecdotal evidence to think it's simply a possibility.

[tin00can]

Oh Vinnie, you have got to be trolling, seriously. Are you this stupid?

You throw one of several versions of a bunch of names (and NO evidence) and..what? It's kinda fun to see the old school paranoia...ah memories...but here's the snopes link.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/bodycount.asp

The really disgusting thing is that some dickhead gathered a bunch of people's names who had died and threw them together to make this (or the other versions) list, without even thinking how this kind of twaddle would impact their loved ones.

You really should be embarrassed if you believe this crap.

Oh feel free to debunk the snopes article, with, you know, actual facts.

Ah yes, Snopes. Well, if Snopes said it, it MUST be true. I mean, it's on the internet and all. Plus, the article doesn't disprove anything. It simply says the 'death list' isn't a new things, and there are some tenuous inclusions on it.

But, if a dozen of your bodyguards die, and a lot of people with specific information about you die, it's got to be more than a simple coincidence.

You don't want to believe? Thats fine. I think there's at least enough anecdotal evidence to think it's simply a possibility.

And by "possibility" I get the feeling you mean "I completely believe it." And, "wanting" to believe something means you will believe it if given a chance.

Can you find any even reasonably credibly proof that snopes has a bias?

[VinnieKulick]

What did snopes say?
They point out the more extreme cases linked to Clinton, which were a stretch to begin with.
Snopes said 'death lists' go back to the JFK assassination days.
Snopes didn't pick any one death and prove it wasn't Clinton, or that he had no involvement. They just said that the making of a list with a lot of people who had very iffy ties to Clinton died, but because of their questionable links, it makes the links very questionable.

It doesn't prove anything that snopes said one thing or another about it.

[ijwthstd]

Oh Vinnie, you have got to be trolling, seriously. Are you this stupid?

Yes, it's starting to look that way isn't it?

[ijwthstd]

I am starting to think all presidents have their enemies killed.

http://www.rinf.com/news/oct05/bushdeathlist.html

[vlad]

Oh Vinnie, you have got to be trolling, seriously. Are you this stupid?

You throw one of several versions of a bunch of names (and NO evidence) and..what? It's kinda fun to see the old school paranoia...ah memories...but here's the snopes link.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/bodycount.asp

The really disgusting thing is that some dickhead gathered a bunch of people's names who had died and threw them together to make this (or the other versions) list, without even thinking how this kind of twaddle would impact their loved ones.

You really should be embarrassed if you believe this crap.

Oh feel free to debunk the snopes article, with, you know, actual facts.

Ah yes, Snopes. Well, if Snopes said it, it MUST be true. I mean, it's on the internet and all. Plus, the article doesn't disprove anything. It simply says the 'death list' isn't a new things, and there are some tenuous inclusions on it.

But, if a dozen of your bodyguards die, and a lot of people with specific information about you die, it's got to be more than a simple coincidence.

You don't want to believe? Thats fine. I think there's at least enough anecdotal evidence to think it's simply a possibility.

Oh this is such bullshit...Snopes gave a name by name rundown....like I siad, prove them wrong, rather than posting a decade plus old wingnut list that is just pure wingnuttery...

For example, there is the one guy, I can't be bothered to look now, the one who was "decapitated" but listed as "natural causes"...and the "suspicion" he was killed because he knew about the murders of two others on the list, EVEN THOUGH HE WAS ALREADY DEAD A COUPLE MONTHS BEFORE THEY WERE KILLED...and the coroner's idea that the dog ate his head does crack me up....

Really, you have jumped the shark, the cute little puppy and Jenna Jameson's latex sex toy ass...

How do you even know if a "dozen of Clinton's bodyguards died"...can you verify them outside of this old e-mail list? Do you also send money to that Nigerian princess, too?

The definition of a true wingnut/moonbat is that they will believe crap like this...rather than use their brains...even when it is shown that this kind of stuff is crap.

You may choose to not believe Snopes, but tthey sure did a lot more research on the list than you did....

[Woosh]

Hope he gets better soon. He needs to be laying back, taking things easy, enjoying life. .

[VinnieKulick]

After reading the snopes article in full, I was wrong, and I retract the notion that Clinton had somebody killed.

[Crazy Levi]

After reading the snopes article in full, I was wrong, and I retract the notion that Clinton had somebody killed.

Great. Now all you have to do is some actual research into all of your other moronic political ideologies. I can only assume you've put as much thought into all of them as you did into latching onto the idea that Bill Clinton had killed 40 people.

[lerxstcat]

Do you really believe Bill Clinton had people killed?

I'd say it's pretty obvious that he's making that assertion. I don't get the right's hatred towards the guy. He was the most conservative president we've had in ages. Weird. You think they'd build him a statue or something.

If he'd been a Republican he would have supplanted Reagan in the GOP pantheon. His great sin was being a charismatic Democrat.

[bane]

Do you really believe Bill Clinton had people killed?

I'd say it's pretty obvious that he's making that assertion. I don't get the right's hatred towards the guy. He was the most conservative president we've had in ages. Weird. You think they'd build him a statue or something.

If he'd been a Republican he would have supplanted Reagan in the GOP pantheon. His great sin was being a charismatic Democrat.

Probably. It's a sad state of affairs when a leader is judged more for the letter next to his name than for what he actually accomplished.

[vanitybinge]

blahblahblahblahblahblahblah *listens to Crashdiet*