You've been FUCKING OWNED. You just got FUCKING ROCKED, just like what's happened to your team since it's inception. You know nothing about football, thanks for playing.
DISCLAIMER: The below images were forced upon me against my will by the moderator and are NOT of my choosing.
poizond13 wrote:You do that. Lot of people here gonna be eating a LOT of crow next Sunday night. Can't wait.
The line moved to -3 & 1/2 and +105. I like that even better. $262.50 buys a dinner a heck of a lot better than crow. I'm going to say they win outright.
Great. I'll enjoy this victory even more, knowing you just lost your entire week's salary.
DISCLAIMER: The below images were forced upon me against my will by the moderator and are NOT of my choosing.
poizond13 wrote:You do that. Lot of people here gonna be eating a LOT of crow next Sunday night. Can't wait.
The line moved to -3 & 1/2 and +105. I like that even better. $262.50 buys a dinner a heck of a lot better than crow. I'm going to say they win outright.
HOW'S THAT CROW TASTE BITCH?
DISCLAIMER: The below images were forced upon me against my will by the moderator and are NOT of my choosing.
Crazy Levi wrote:We13's bitch ass will be humming a different tune (with my balls securely in his mouth) when the Washington Redskins fuck up "his" shit next week. It's gonna be a HMZ-style ass pounding.
And don't even try to talk shit you 15-year old Bret Micheals cocksucking bitch - cause I'll just challWenge you to some kind of bet and we all know you are far too chickenshit to play that game so suck my dick, bitch.
The "Colts Road Back to 9-7" will hit a huge We13-sized pothole next week.
Douchebag.
What a punk ass bitch. You're in for a rude awakening next week, boy. Peyton and co. are coming into town and it aint gonna be pretty.
Bitch - you haven't watched any NFL football except for about half a season's worth of Colts games. You don't know shit.
I watched the Colts today. It's a soft team.
I watched the Redskins game - they are knocking motherfuckers out. They have been the hardest hitting team in the NFL this season, and that's the best kept secret in the league. Win or lose, people are getting their shit rearranged.
They knocked out the Rams starting RB. They knocked out the dog killer and some other starting asshole last week. And today, they sent about half the Packers to the ICU, including Clay Mathews (which made the difference in the game) and they gave Aaron Rodgers a concussion. They've been handing out concussions like Halloween candy this year.
That's 2 QBs knocked out in two weeks, and guess who's next. Peyton's bitch ass and "your" team. "You" are in for a world of hurt asshole, and then you can tell us all how 3-3 is exactly where "you" want to be.
Run and tell that, homeboy. We13 is the biggest bitch ever on Sludge and everyone knows it. The passage of time can't hide the stench of his pussy ass bet welching last year.
WOOOOOO. HOW DO YOU LIKE US NOW BOY? YOU JUST GOT FUCKING OWNED.
DISCLAIMER: The below images were forced upon me against my will by the moderator and are NOT of my choosing.
Nobody owned anybody assfuck. It was a good game that the lowly Skins were in till the last play.
And of course, just like I said, a key Colt got knocked the fuck out, Adai. Wonder if he's back next week.
We13 has forfieted his right to ever talk shit, and no abuse of the caps lock can change it.
His sorry ass was owned - FOREVER - last year when he took the field in Miami and got his ass kicked by the Saints after all his shit talk and bet welching.
A 3 point win over the Skins in week 6 doesn't do shit to change that. It's a long season bitch and this "road to the superbowl" bullshit thread will be here all year. You'll end up owned again, just like last year, and that's all anyone will remember.
poizond13 wrote:You do that. Lot of people here gonna be eating a LOT of crow next Sunday night. Can't wait.
The line moved to -3 & 1/2 and +105. I like that even better. $262.50 buys a dinner a heck of a lot better than crow. I'm going to say they win outright.
HOW'S THAT CROW TASTE BITCH?
Hey shit for brains. Not only do you not know a fucking thing about football, apparently you can't add either. The score was 27-24. I took Washington and got 3 & 1/2 points. 24 + 3.5 = 27.5, and 27.5 > 27 It means I won and with the odds at +105 my $250 hypothetical wager paid me $262.50, which I would collect in theory on Tuesday.
I wouldn't be bragging about that win. Indy looked like shit. If McNabb didn't throw a couple of interceptions the Skins would have won that game. Washington should have had a couple of picks of Manning but that secondary has stone hands. If they keep playing the way they are going to be 5-5 by the time they get their sorry asses on the plane to come back from Foxboro.
SkyDog112046 wrote:
Hey shit for brains. Not only do you not know a fucking thing about football, apparently you can't add either. The score was 27-24. I took Washington and got 3 & 1/2 points. 24 + 3.5 = 27.5, and 27.5 > 27 It means I won and with the odds at +105 my $250 hypothetical wager paid me $262.50, which I would collect in theory on Tuesday.
I'm going to say they win outright.
DISCLAIMER: The below images were forced upon me against my will by the moderator and are NOT of my choosing.
SkyDog112046 wrote:
Hey shit for brains. Not only do you not know a fucking thing about football, apparently you can't add either. The score was 27-24. I took Washington and got 3 & 1/2 points. 24 + 3.5 = 27.5, and 27.5 > 27 It means I won and with the odds at +105 my $250 hypothetical wager paid me $262.50, which I would collect in theory on Tuesday.
I'm going to say they win outright.
Yeah, I thought Washington had a shot to win. If I didn't think they had the possibility of winning then I wouldn't have taken a 3.5 line. When the line is that small then you don't bet on a team that you think has no chance. I certainly wouldn't have bet that game if it was a Pick'em. The Skins won as far as Vegas is concerned, and that's all I really care about as I won too. No crow for me - $262.50 buys a pretty nice dinner.
If I had lost, do you think I could have pulled a P13 and weaseled out of my bet? I wonder what my associates would have done if I pussed out after the fact like you did? Real men honor their bets. Pussies welch on them.
SkyDog112046 wrote:
Hey shit for brains. Not only do you not know a fucking thing about football, apparently you can't add either. The score was 27-24. I took Washington and got 3 & 1/2 points. 24 + 3.5 = 27.5, and 27.5 > 27 It means I won and with the odds at +105 my $250 hypothetical wager paid me $262.50, which I would collect in theory on Tuesday.
I'm going to say they win outright.
Yeah, I thought Washington had a shot to win. If I didn't think they had the possibility of winning then I wouldn't have taken a 3.5 line. When the line is that small then you don't bet on a team that you think has no chance. I certainly wouldn't have bet that game if it was a Pick'em. The Skins won as far as Vegas is concerned, and that's all I really care about as I won too. No crow for me - $262.50 buys a pretty nice dinner.
If I had lost, do you think I could have pulled a P13 and weaseled out of my bet? I wonder what my associates would have done if I pussed out after the fact like you did? Real men honor their bets. Pussies welch on them.
I would be willing to wager $250 on the Redskins to beat Indy
Stop lying, boy. You've been saying all week that you will take the Redskins to win straight up, no spread. You lost your money by betting against the best player in the game, plain and simple.
DISCLAIMER: The below images were forced upon me against my will by the moderator and are NOT of my choosing.
poizond13 wrote:Stop lying, boy. You've been saying all week that you will take the Redskins to win straight up, no spread. You lost your money by betting against the best player in the game, plain and simple.
My original quote made the middle of last week:
"The line moved to -3 & 1/2 and +105. I like that even better. $262.50 buys a dinner a heck of a lot better than crow. I'm going to say they win outright."
I took the Skins with 3.5 points and +105 for $250. Two days before it was 3 points and even money. That extra 1/2 point and better odds made all the difference. $262.50 payout. And I never bet against the best QB in the game, it would be dumb to bet against the guy with 3 SB rings and the TD record.
poizond13 wrote:You lost your money by betting against the best player in the game, plain and simple.
Someone should probably inform the NFL about their incorrect stats on whom is the "best" player in the game..
Don't confuse the kid with facts. Right now he thinks Indy is 6-0 and is winning by an average margin of 42-3, and that Manning has thrown for over 5000 yards & 40 TD's with a QB rating of 155.
WhiteHouseSubsAC wrote:Is We13 really giving someone else shit about a bet?
Yeah, pretty funny coming from Pissant13. And even funnier that he's so stupid he doesn't understand how a bet works. He thinks that by my taking Washington with 3 & 1/2 points because I had the confidence they could win outright that I waived the points and bet a pick 'em.
I would love to see him try to explain to the nice guys that run the "for entertainment purposes only" betting establishment that he really didn't mean to say that he was going to honor his bet if his team lost. Be fun to be a fly on the wall when they came to explain to him that it is polite to honor your bets.
Facedown wrote:Uh oh. Dallas Clark is out indefinitely and Austin Collie is out a few weeks.
I almost forgot:
OH, THE HUMANITY!!! THIS HAS TO BE THE SINGLE BIGGEST TRAGEDY IN THE HISTORY OF MANKIND!! THESE POOR GUYS MUST BE CURSED. WHAT IS POOR PEYTON TO DO? OH MY GOSH OH GOLLY.
Polian is going to have to get another rule change!! Stat!! If Peyton can't have his tight end and favorite receiver, then the opponent shouldn't be able to use theirs either.
Booohooohooo
WhiteHouseSubsAC wrote:Is We13 really giving someone else shit about a bet?
Yeah, pretty funny coming from Pissant13. And even funnier that he's so stupid he doesn't understand how a bet works. He thinks that by my taking Washington with 3 & 1/2 points because I had the confidence they could win outright that I waived the points and bet a pick 'em.
I would love to see him try to explain to the nice guys that run the "for entertainment purposes only" betting establishment that he really didn't mean to say that he was going to honor his bet if his team lost. Be fun to be a fly on the wall when they came to explain to him that it is polite to honor your bets.
Take it easy, it's nothing to lose your head over.
I'm working in Indy this week and absolutely LOVE this story.
“Colts president Bill Polian said the club will investigate and then discipline McAfee appropriately. We say to go easy on the kid. He wasn't driving, he wasn't fighting, he wasn't harassing; he had a few too many and decided to go for a late-night, mid-week autumn swim in a dirty, near-freezing canal. We've all been there before.”
Peyton overcame Harrison being out because they had Reggie Wayne, Dallas Clark and other receivers step up
not sure he can overcome this one though, unless they got a good backup TE...he relies on the TE a lot
Stoner wrote:
...we stopped at a restaurant to eat and I was wearing a Sludge shirt. Someone came up and asked me if I read the messageboard - I touched cloth for a split second and then said the shirt was my husband's and just looked at them retardedly.
Heenan Snuka wrote:Peyton overcame Harrison being out because they had Reggie Wayne, Dallas Clark and other receivers step up
not sure he can overcome this one though, unless they got a good backup TE...he relies on the TE a lot
Well, we have Jacob Tamme, who we are pretty high on. He'll step up and do a good job. Can't replace a Dallas Clark, but he will do his best. Honestly, as long as we have 18 under center, we will be OK on offense no matter who is catching the ball.
More important is the defense and making sure we avenge that terrible week 1 loss.
TIME FOR REVENGE!
DISCLAIMER: The below images were forced upon me against my will by the moderator and are NOT of my choosing.
This ought to make P13's head explode. Quote from Ron Jaworski:
Nobody studies more video or knows more football than ESPN football analyst Ron Jaworski. That's what made his comments on ESPN Radio earlier this month so startling. Speaking about Peyton Manning's play this season, Jaworski said he has noticed "little signs now that the deep sideline throws are not as accurate as they used to be, there's not the zip on the ball that there used to be. Maybe Father Time might be catching up with Peyton Manning a little bit … Maybe there does come a time when the skills start to diminish a little bit."
SkyDog112046 wrote:This ought to make P13's head explode. Quote from Ron Jaworski:
Nobody studies more video or knows more football than ESPN football analyst Ron Jaworski. That's what made his comments on ESPN Radio earlier this month so startling. Speaking about Peyton Manning's play this season, Jaworski said he has noticed "little signs now that the deep sideline throws are not as accurate as they used to be, there's not the zip on the ball that there used to be. Maybe Father Time might be catching up with Peyton Manning a little bit … Maybe there does come a time when the skills start to diminish a little bit."
I still don't be against him on national tv at night. Can someone please explain to me why Denver/SF started off with the 9ers favored in London tomorrow? SF SUCKS.
SkyDog112046 wrote:This ought to make P13's head explode. Quote from Ron Jaworski:
Nobody studies more video or knows more football than ESPN football analyst Ron Jaworski. That's what made his comments on ESPN Radio earlier this month so startling. Speaking about Peyton Manning's play this season, Jaworski said he has noticed "little signs now that the deep sideline throws are not as accurate as they used to be, there's not the zip on the ball that there used to be. Maybe Father Time might be catching up with Peyton Manning a little bit … Maybe there does come a time when the skills start to diminish a little bit."
I still don't be against him on national tv at night. Can someone please explain to me why Denver/SF started off with the 9ers favored in London tomorrow? SF SUCKS.
Casual bettors saw Denver get smoked by Oakland and bet SF so the line tried to get the money to even out. If the money spreads 50-50 then Vegas wins.
