The NFL Thread
Moderator: Metal Sludge
Re: The NFL Thread
Can't believe the spread opened with at 6.5 with New England / Denver.
I see Patriots winning that game -- they have become a very tough, physical and balanced team.
What a difference between a Belichick coached team and an Andy Reid team (and I really like Andy Reid).
I see Patriots winning that game -- they have become a very tough, physical and balanced team.
What a difference between a Belichick coached team and an Andy Reid team (and I really like Andy Reid).
Re: The NFL Thread
It's a fair spread.veritas wrote:Can't believe the spread opened with at 6.5 with New England / Denver.
I see Patriots winning that game -- they have become a very tough, physical and balanced team.
What a difference between a Belichick coached team and an Andy Reid team (and I really like Andy Reid).
Brady - is there any pro bowlers on his offense?
Peyton - loaded with weapons and at home.
I can see the Pat's winning because it's Belichick and Brady and I can see them winning because it's Peyton.
This is old Brady with no scary toys against Peyton's loaded team and possibly his last year going out in style.
It would be great to watch the Donkey's lose to the Pat's. Just don't see it happening. But if the Donkey lose I'm gonna start going to church and devote my life to Jesus.
poizond13 wrote:I have been very bummed out, sad and shocked for most of the night
Artemis2085 wrote:so I blurt out "I love you Paul!
Atomicpunk18 wrote:You see Black Crowes music has gotten me laid multiple times.
Re: The NFL Thread
One reason New England wont win.
No Tuck Rule to save them.
No Tuck Rule to save them.
poizond13 wrote:I have been very bummed out, sad and shocked for most of the night
Artemis2085 wrote:so I blurt out "I love you Paul!
Atomicpunk18 wrote:You see Black Crowes music has gotten me laid multiple times.
- bane
- Threesome with Pam and Donna
- Posts: 6977
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 6:12 pm
- Location: Texas
- Contact:
Re: The NFL Thread
They went 2-14. By contrast , New England went 9-7 when they lost Brady.UtahRatt wrote:
The verdict.
What did Indy do when they lost Peyton? 11-5 and in the playoffs two years in a row so far?
Re: The NFL Thread
Yeah I fucked the pony and hit enter before finishing that post. What I get for having ten things going on with a brain that can hardly handle one.bane wrote:They went 2-14. By contrast , New England went 9-7 when they lost Brady.UtahRatt wrote:
The verdict.
What did Indy do when they lost Peyton? 11-5 and in the playoffs two years in a row so far?
poizond13 wrote:I have been very bummed out, sad and shocked for most of the night
Artemis2085 wrote:so I blurt out "I love you Paul!
Atomicpunk18 wrote:You see Black Crowes music has gotten me laid multiple times.
Re: The NFL Thread
You won't include Bradshaw in the discussion?bane wrote:From that list I'd say Montana, Brady and Elway are in the conversation. By your logic Dilfer is as good as Manning.
4 SB titles. Don't tell me he didn't have a hand in winning those 4 games?

- HeavyMetalZombie666
- Angry Wyoming Rain Man
- Posts: 34410
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 1:55 pm
- Location: Casper, Wyoming, USA
- Contact:
Re: The NFL Thread
I wondering if that will be the superbowl myself.Horse Called War wrote:DENVER VS. SF IN THE SUPERBOWL. Great game on Sunday, voice is shot, hungover like a motherfucker.
If Manning wins, i think he will hang it up for good.
- Ham Stroker's Ejacula
- Transylvanian Wang
- Posts: 3458
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 12:44 pm
Re: The NFL Thread
Pats went 11-5 with Cassel at the helm in 2008.bane wrote:New England went 9-7 when they lost Brady.
I dip my forefinger in the watery blood
of your impotent redeemer
and write over his thorn torn brow
the true Prince of Evil



of your impotent redeemer
and write over his thorn torn brow
the true Prince of Evil



- AliceManson
- Headlining Clubs
- Posts: 2968
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 8:12 pm
Re: The NFL Thread
They did? They went 11-5 but missed the playoffs, because Miami won the division.bane wrote:New England went 9-7 when they lost Brady.
Re: The NFL Thread
No way the spread stays that way -- I bet money flew into Vegas on 6.5.UtahRatt wrote:It's a fair spread.veritas wrote:Can't believe the spread opened with at 6.5 with New England / Denver.
I see Patriots winning that game -- they have become a very tough, physical and balanced team.
What a difference between a Belichick coached team and an Andy Reid team (and I really like Andy Reid).
Brady - is there any pro bowlers on his offense?
Peyton - loaded with weapons and at home.
I can see the Pat's winning because it's Belichick and Brady and I can see them winning because it's Peyton.
This is old Brady with no scary toys against Peyton's loaded team and possibly his last year going out in style.
It would be great to watch the Donkey's lose to the Pat's. Just don't see it happening. But if the Donkey lose I'm gonna start going to church and devote my life to Jesus.
I hear what you are saying about the Patriots being decimated and not having the same class of talent on offense or defense, but I am looking at how the teams are actually playing versus who is on their roster. Pats look like the more physical team and it looks like they are peaking at the right time.
I can see them being able to both run the ball on the Denver and pass the ball, particularly with Denver's best corner being out. I can also see the Pats defense matching up pretty well on the Denver's passing game -- the Pats secondary is the only unit not destroyed by injuries. Now, the run defense might be another story . . .. . From a coaching / preparation standpoint, i will always take Belichick.
I think it's a big spread. I made a pretty big bet on it (and i never bet on football). Now, watch the patriots get blown out . . . .
-
- Playing Decent Clubs in a Bus
- Posts: 1916
- Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 6:39 pm
- Location: Boulder,CO
Re: The NFL Thread
Denver will cover by a touchdown, the fuckers in Vegas know what they are doing. Plus the refs will make it happen too.
- bane
- Threesome with Pam and Donna
- Posts: 6977
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 6:12 pm
- Location: Texas
- Contact:
Re: The NFL Thread
Sure he had a hand in it. He also played on teams with tremendous defenses. He's a very good QB but I don't consider him to be on the same level as the other guys listed . Look at his stats.Machado wrote:You won't include Bradshaw in the discussion?bane wrote:From that list I'd say Montana, Brady and Elway are in the conversation. By your logic Dilfer is as good as Manning.
4 SB titles. Don't tell me he didn't have a hand in winning those 4 games?
- bane
- Threesome with Pam and Donna
- Posts: 6977
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 6:12 pm
- Location: Texas
- Contact:
Re: The NFL Thread
You're right. I stand corrected.AliceManson wrote:They did? They went 11-5 but missed the playoffs, because Miami won the division.bane wrote:New England went 9-7 when they lost Brady.
- LillianRoxyFA
- Headlining Clubs
- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 6:29 am
- Location: Hell MN, Population 1
Re: The NFL Thread
I'll be rooting for the Pats, but I have a hard time seeing how Denver loses this game. Feels like New England is playing a bit above their station, and the losses on D and of Gronk have to play in somewhere.
I see San Fran going in a beating Seattle, but they will have to endure an early onslaught to do so. The Sea Birds and their fans will be crazy.
Looking ahead then, 2 west coast team in the elements for the Super Bowl. Edge has to go to the team with the better D, which is SF.
I see San Fran going in a beating Seattle, but they will have to endure an early onslaught to do so. The Sea Birds and their fans will be crazy.
Looking ahead then, 2 west coast team in the elements for the Super Bowl. Edge has to go to the team with the better D, which is SF.
It's hard for me to get used to these changing times. I can remember when the air was clean and sex was dirty.
-- George Burns
-- George Burns
Re: The NFL Thread
It's already come down 2 points from the opening spread . . .Horse Called War wrote:Denver will cover by a touchdown, the fuckers in Vegas know what they are doing. Plus the refs will make it happen too.
We shall see . . . .The Patriots are currently a 4.5-point underdog on the road after being quickly bet down from an open of -6.5 Sunday night.
Re: The NFL Thread
I am torn with the Broncos/Pats game.
Both QB's are the top in the NFL.. I like both teams. And both QB's..
Still, I am going with the Pats.
And, GO SEATTLE.
Both QB's are the top in the NFL.. I like both teams. And both QB's..
Still, I am going with the Pats.
And, GO SEATTLE.
Re: The NFL Thread
Straight up or vs the spread?Bludegeon wrote:I am torn with the Broncos/Pats game.
Both QB's are the top in the NFL.. I like both teams. And both QB's..
Still, I am going with the Pats.
And, GO SEATTLE.
I'll take the point and the Pats
The money is going on Denver whether you believe it or not.

Re: The NFL Thread
If the money was going on Denver the spread wouldn't have come down 2 points.Machado wrote: Straight up or vs the spread?
I'll take the point and the Pats
The money is going on Denver whether you believe it or not.

Re: The NFL Thread
Is the game today or Sunday? Patience.WTF wrote:If the money was going on Denver the spread wouldn't have come down 2 points.Machado wrote: Straight up or vs the spread?
I'll take the point and the Pats
The money is going on Denver whether you believe it or not.

Re: The NFL Thread
I tell you what. If the spread comes down any more, this game is gonna be a blowout for Denver (for all who think the games are fixed.)Machado wrote:Is the game today or Sunday? Patience.WTF wrote:If the money was going on Denver the spread wouldn't have come down 2 points.Machado wrote: Straight up or vs the spread?
I'll take the point and the Pats
The money is going on Denver whether you believe it or not.

- dtmfs
- MSX Tour Support Act
- Posts: 4647
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 3:31 pm
- Location: Mother fuckin' Earth
- Contact:
Re: The NFL Thread
Machado wrote:Marino was a great quarterback. He put up terrific numbers with Miami.
Is he among the greatest of all time? I don't think so. I think there are many ahead of him and they are ahead of him for good reasons:
Winning the Super Bowl at least once.
Oh for fuck sakes most experts have him well above many QB's with multiple SB wins, guys like Simms, Aikman and Bradshaw were no where near the level of Marino. Can't blame Marino for not getting a ring, Shula takes the blame and has admitted it over and over, they thought they could win on the strength of Marino's arm alone and his defenses were always mediocre or flat out sucked. Look at 99% of "top 10 QB's" ever be it on ESPN, FOX sports or even the NFL network and Marino is always above the 3 I mentioned. Saying He's not among the greatest of all time is because He didn't win a SB is flat out retarded, This basically means that Jim McMahon, Jeff Hostetler, Mark Rypian and Joe Theisman are all higher on the all time list than Dan Marino, Yeah makes a lot of fucking sense. I guess Charles Haley is the greatest player to ever lace em' up.
Re: The NFL Thread
I don't give a shit what the spread is or whatever all the betting shit is..Machado wrote:Straight up or vs the spread?Bludegeon wrote:I am torn with the Broncos/Pats game.
Both QB's are the top in the NFL.. I like both teams. And both QB's..
Still, I am going with the Pats.
And, GO SEATTLE.
I'll take the point and the Pats
The money is going on Denver whether you believe it or not.
Pats/Broncos and Seattle Super Bowl is what needs to be done.
- AliceManson
- Headlining Clubs
- Posts: 2968
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 8:12 pm
Re: The NFL Thread
Why?Bludegeon wrote: Pats/Broncos and Seattle Super Bowl is what needs to be done.
Re: The NFL Thread
AliceManson wrote:Why?Bludegeon wrote: Pats/Broncos and Seattle Super Bowl is what needs to be done.
Ummm.. Because I don't want Frisco to even get close to winning a #6 Lombardi?
- LillianRoxyFA
- Headlining Clubs
- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 6:29 am
- Location: Hell MN, Population 1
Re: The NFL Thread
Vikings hire Mike Zimmer. Reaction from locals and pundits is positive. Seems like the right guy to give this team a kick in the ass. Let the dynasty begin.
It's hard for me to get used to these changing times. I can remember when the air was clean and sex was dirty.
-- George Burns
-- George Burns
- AliceManson
- Headlining Clubs
- Posts: 2968
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 8:12 pm
Re: The NFL Thread
Steelers fan or Cowboys fan?Bludegeon wrote:
Ummm.. Because I don't want Frisco to even get close to winning a #6 Lombardi?
- eddie lee roth
- Signed to a Major Label Multi-Album Deal
- Posts: 15163
- Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:14 am
- Location: In front of a computer screen
Re: The NFL Thread
Are you kidding me FFS his pillowcase is made out of Tony Romo's underwear.AliceManson wrote:Steelers fan or Cowboys fan?Bludegeon wrote:
Ummm.. Because I don't want Frisco to even get close to winning a #6 Lombardi?


Re: The NFL Thread
[quote="dtmfs"
his defenses were always mediocre or flat out sucked. [/quote]
Blasphemy!
I know you're talking about the Marino era, but what about the killer B's?
his defenses were always mediocre or flat out sucked. [/quote]
Blasphemy!
I know you're talking about the Marino era, but what about the killer B's?
-
- MSX Tour Support Act
- Posts: 4786
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 12:52 am
- Location: Ancho-RAGE, Alaska
Re: The NFL Thread
Bengaldom is bummed at the loss of Zimmer but happy for him as he finally gets a shot. One hell of a coordinator, that's for sure.LillianRoxyFA wrote:Vikings hire Mike Zimmer. Reaction from locals and pundits is positive. Seems like the right guy to give this team a kick in the ass. Let the dynasty begin.
Only users lose drugs.
:-)-~~~
:-)-~~~
- dtmfs
- MSX Tour Support Act
- Posts: 4647
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 3:31 pm
- Location: Mother fuckin' Earth
- Contact:
Re: The NFL Thread
I was talking strictly of The Defenses Marino played with, in his 2nd season they had the 17th ranked Defense and the #1 offense But they were favored to beat SF for some reason who had the 2nd ranked offense and a top 5 maybe even 3 defense can't remember exactly but overall I don't get how Miami was favored in that SB. I'm guessing it was because Marino had a 2013 type of season that year, If any of the killer B's were there when Marino took charge they clearly werent what they once were.MickeyG wrote:
Blasphemy!
I know you're talking about the Marino era, but what about the killer B's?